logo
Defensive back and Florida decommit Devin Jackson set for official visit to Nebraska

Defensive back and Florida decommit Devin Jackson set for official visit to Nebraska

USA Today22-05-2025
Defensive back and Florida decommit Devin Jackson set for official visit to Nebraska
The Nebraska Cornhuskers are scheduled to welcome in a four-star defensive back for an official visit in June. Safety Devin Jackson listed the Huskers on his official visits, alongside LSU, Miami and Oregon.
Jackson initially committed to Florida in July 2024 but decommitted in mid-April, becoming the second defensive back in the 2026 class to do so after position coach Will Harris left Florida to join Miami.
Jackson is listed as the No. 14-ranked safety and the No. 19-ranked prospect in the state of Florida according to the On3 recruiting ratings. He holds 45 offers with schools such as Miami, Auburn, Georgia, Florida State and LSU.
The 6-foot-2, 195-pound junior visited Nebraska back in February after putting together a strong 2024 season with First Academy. Across 10 games, Jackson racked up 80 total tackles, seven pass break-ups, four interceptions, two fumble recoveries and one tackle-for-loss.
Jackson is scheduled to visit Lincoln on June 20.
Contact/Follow us @CornhuskersWire on X (formerly Twitter), and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Nebraska news, notes, and opinions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wisconsin football a finalist with notable SEC programs for 2026 safety
Wisconsin football a finalist with notable SEC programs for 2026 safety

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Wisconsin football a finalist with notable SEC programs for 2026 safety

Wisconsin football made the final five schools for class of 2026 cornerback Tony Forney Jr. on Thursday. The program was included alongside Missouri, Georgia, Auburn, and Pittsburgh. In the announcement, Forney also noted that he will announce his commitment on Friday, July 4, at 4:30 p.m. ET, 3:30 p.m. CT. Advertisement 247Sports lists the Marietta, Georgia, native as a three-star recruit. He's specifically ranked as the No. 746 player in the class of 2026, the No. 66 safety and the No. 85 player from his home state. The recruiting service notes official visits to Missouri on May 30 and to Wisconsin on June 13. Rivals/On3, meanwhile, gives the Badgers, Missouri Tigers and Georgia Bulldogs a near equal shot to land the safety's commitment. Wisconsin is looking to continue its momentum in the cycle after the recent additions of blue-chip offensive playmakers, wide receiver Jayden Petit and running back Amari Latimer. The Badgers' class currently ranks No. 39 in the nation with 15 players committed. Stay tuned on Friday afternoon as the Badgers look to edge several top SEC programs for Forney's commitment. Advertisement Contact/Follow @TheBadgersWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Wisconsin Badgers news, notes and opinion This article originally appeared on Badgers Wire: Wisconsin recruiting target Tony Forney finalists, commitment date

NFL contract updates: Latest news on Micah Parsons, Lamar Jackson, T.J. Watt extensions
NFL contract updates: Latest news on Micah Parsons, Lamar Jackson, T.J. Watt extensions

USA Today

time26 minutes ago

  • USA Today

NFL contract updates: Latest news on Micah Parsons, Lamar Jackson, T.J. Watt extensions

NFL teams have doled out hundreds of millions of dollars in free agency during the 2025 offseason, but they may not be done spending yet. Several prominent NFL stars are still negotiating contract extensions. This includes a handful of players who are set to become free agents in 2026, young talents nearing the end of their rookie contracts and MVP-level performers who are being paid at a below-market rate. Not all of these players will ink long-term extensions, and some could eventually be traded if they reach an impasse with their teams. Nonetheless, NFL fans will be closely watching players like Micah Parsons, Lamar Jackson and T.J. Watt as they look to lock in lucrative – and perhaps record-breaking – contracts ahead of the 2025 season. Here's what to know about negotiations between the teams and players seeking extensions. Micah Parsons Parsons reported to Dallas Cowboys minicamp in June despite not having a new contract in place. At the time, he expressed he was "pretty hopeful" the two parties would agree to a contract extension ahead of the 2025 NFL season. "I understand that it's up to [Jerry Jones]," Parsons told reporters in June. "He gives the green light on everything, so hopefully something is done by next month." Despite Parsons' optimism, his representation hadn't yet had any contract extension talks with Jones at the time of his comments, per USA TODAY's Tyler Dragon. Still, neither side was concerned with the pace of negotiations. Parsons even acknowledged he could potentially benefit from waiting until players like T.J. Watt or Trey Hendrickson eventually sign their big-money deals. "It's going to cost them more," Parsons told Clarence Hill of All City DLLS of the Cowboys waiting to sign his extension. COWBOYS NEWS: Dallas cheerleaders are getting a 400% pay raise Lamar Jackson Baltimore Ravens general manager Eric DeCosta acknowledged in a June appearance on the "BMore Baseball Podcast" the team was exploring a contract extension with Jackson. "We've had some conversations before the draft, after the draft, in person last week," DeCosta said. "I think we're in the introductory sort of stage of looking at what an extension might look like." DeCosta cautioned the Ravens had "a lot of business" to conduct with several players at the time of the interview. Jackson is under contract through the 2027 NFL season, so Baltimore has spent the 2025 offseason inking extensions with players under shorter-term contracts, including running back Derrick Henry and receiver Rashod Bateman. Still, the Ravens would likely prefer to extend Jackson before the 2026 NFL offseason, as his cap hit will rise to $74.5 million, per Over the Cap. And the Ravens appear to have every expectation they will eventually sign Jackson to another record-breaking extension. "The value is the top. When Lamar gets paid, he's going to be the highest paid player in football, just like he was last time," John Harbaugh told reporters in May. "I think every contract he signs probably until he decides to hang up his cleats, he's going to be that guy." T.J. Watt Watt did not participate in Steelers minicamp while seeking a new contract. The 30-year-old is currently set to play the 2025 season on the final year of a four-year, $112.01 million contract extension he signed during the 2021 offseason. At the time, Watt's contract made him the highest-paid defensive player in NFL history. Now, he ranks seventh among edge rushers in average annual value (AAV), and well behind Myles Garrett's $40 million AAV price tag. Watt's decision to skip minicamp has prompted trade rumors about the pass rusher. ESPN reported "multiple teams" reached out to the Steelers about the veteran pass rusher after the team traded Minkah Fitzpatrick to the Miami Dolphins as part of the Jalen Ramsey trade. However, ESPN's Adam Schefter reports the Steelers "are adamant they want Watt to finish his career in Pittsburgh," while NFL Network's Tom Pelissero reports they "have no interest" in trading the perennial All-Pro. Trey Hendrickson Hendrickson and the Bengals appeared to be heading toward a split earlier in the offseason. The 30-year-old received permission from the Bengals to seek a trade – marking the second consecutive year he had requested a trade away from the team – and criticized the team for consistently failing to communicate with him about a potential contract extension. However, Hendrickson and the Bengals resumed contract talks in mid-June, according to ESPN's Jeremy Fowler. The report came just over a month after Hendrickson released a statement saying there had been "no communication" between the two parties following the conclusion of the 2025 NFL Draft on April 26. "The offers prior to the draft did not reflect the vision we shared and were promised last offseason if I continued to play at a high level," the statement read. "Coaches are aware of these past conversations. Rather than using collaboration to get us to a point to bring me home to the team, THEY are no longer communicating. I have been eagerly awaiting a resolution of this situation, but that's hard to do when there is no discussion and an evident lack of interest in reaching mutual goals." It's worth noting the Bengals also remain embroiled in a contract dispute with rookie edge rusher Shemar Stewart. It isn't clear whether Cincinnati's inability to reach a deal with its first-round pick has impacted its approach to negotiations with Hendrickson. SHEMAR STEWART: Explaining rookie's contract dispute with Bengals Sauce Gardner The New York Jets had opened contract extension discussions with both Gardner and Garrett Wilson as of June, per ESPN's Jeremy Fowler. How have those talks gone? Gardner described his dealings with the Jets as "productive" in a July 2 appearance on "The Pat McAfee Show." "We have our goals, in terms of numbers and stuff like that, and the Jets are aware of that," Gardner said. "And I'm aware of the rest of my peers, like [Jaycee Horn], [Derek Stingley Jr.], even [Patrick Surtain II] got paid, obviously before me, but those are all guys that are well-deserving of the money that they got. It's definitely something that my team and the Jets are talking about." Gardner did not provide a timetable for reaching an extension. He is under contract with the Jets through the 2026 NFL season, as New York exercised his $20.2 million fifth-year option in April. Garrett Wilson As mentioned, the Jets didn't just open negotiations with Gardner; they also did with Wilson. He told reporters at OTAs there had been "a few discussions, here and there" about an extension. "I'm hopeful I'm a Jet for life and that we get this thing rolling and that all of our best days are ahead of us," he said at the time. The comments were a departure from his tone at the end of New York's disappointing 2024 season, when he was asked point-blank whether he wanted to stay with the Jets long-term. "I don't know, man," Wilson told reporters in December. "I just do whatever, go about my day, be where my feet at and if they do [offer an extension], that would be a blessing. That would be awesome. I love the Jets. At the end of the day, they were the ones that believed in me. I can't be worrying about all that. Just going to finish these three games the right way." Terry McLaurin McLaurin held out from Washington Commanders minicamp as he seeks a new contract. It stemmed from the receiver being "frustrated with the lack of progress on a long-term deal," per Fox Sports' Jordan Schultz. McLaurin, 29, is entering the final season of a three-year, $68.4 million deal in 2025 and is hoping to cash in after posting a fifth-consecutive 1,000-yard season and a career-high 13 touchdowns in his first season working with Jayden Daniels. Will that happen soon? Sports Illustrated's Albert Breer intimated extension talks were "not in a great place" in late June. However, he acknowledged "there's plenty of time to get something done" before the season. TERRY MCLAURIN: Projecting WR's contract as he holds out from Commanders James Cook Cook is hoping to get a new contract with the Buffalo Bills and is reportedly seeking a deal paying him $15 million in AAV. The two sides were far apart in their hopes for his next contract, as Bills general manager Brandon Beane expressed in March, and haven't yet bridged the gap. Despite this, Cook decided to attend Buffalo's mandatory minicamp and participated in all three sessions. "I like my money," Cook said when explaining his decision to participate, per ESPN. Cook expects to be in attendance at training camp as well. The bigger question is whether he will participate fully in workouts or "hold in" to gain leverage in contract negotiations. "I don't know, man," Cook said. "We will see when camp comes."

Supreme Court to review state bans on transgender athletes in girls' sports
Supreme Court to review state bans on transgender athletes in girls' sports

New York Post

time31 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Supreme Court to review state bans on transgender athletes in girls' sports

The Supreme Court agreed Thursday to hear a case that will determine whether transgender female student athletes can be prevented from joining girls and women's sports teams at public schools. The justices are set to hear challenges to laws in Idaho and West Virginia after lower court rulings in sided with transgender students who sued when they were blocked from competing. 'I am optimistic that after hearing the case, the Supreme Court will restore sanity to athletics and allow West Virginia to enforce its commonsense law that prevents boys from competing in girl's sports,' Mountain State Gov. Patrick Morrisey fired off in an X post. Advertisement The Supreme Court agreed Thursday to review whether transgender student athletes can be banned from joining female sports teams at public schools. AP Twenty-seven states have passed laws in recent years that restrict participation in female sports for male-to-female trans students. In Idaho and West Virginia specifically, state laws specify that sports teams at public schools are based on 'biological sex' and ban 'students of the male sex' from joining female athletic teams. Advertisement The challenge to the West Virginia law was brought by Becky Pepper-Jackson in 2021 after her middle school banned her from joining the girls' cross country and track teams. Pepper-Jackson has been taking puberty-blocking medication and has publicly identified as a girl since she was in the third grade. The justices are set to hear two cases out of Idaho and West Virginia after earlier lower court rulings in each state sided with transgender students who sued. Getty Images A federal judge initially ruled in the student's favor at an early stage of the case, but later reversed course and ended up siding with the state. Advertisement The 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Jackson's exclusion from girls' teams violated Title IX, which forbids sex discrimination in education. '[Pepper-Jackson] has been publicly living as a girl for more than five years. During that time, her elementary and middle schools created gender support plans to affirm her gender identity and ensure she is recognized as a girl at school,' the appeals court ruling read. 'To align with her gender identity, [Pepper-Jackson] has changed her name, and the State of West Virginia (whose Act is challenged here) has issued a birth certificate that recognizes her changed name and lists her sex as female. [Pepper-Jackson] also takes puberty blocking medication to prevent her body from experiencing male adolescent development and estrogen hormone therapy, which is leading her to develop the outward physical characteristics—including fat distribution, pelvic shape, and bone size—of an adolescent female. Her family, teachers, and classmates have all known [Pepper-Jackson] as a girl for several years, and—beginning in elementary school—she has participated only on girls athletic teams. 'Given these facts, offering [Pepper-Jackson] a 'choice' between not participating in sports and participating only on boys teams is no real choice at all.' Meanwhile, the Idaho challenge was brought by Lindsay Hecox — a trans Boise State University student who had tried to join the women's track and cross-country teams, but failed to qualify. Advertisement Instead, Hecox has participating in sports clubs, including soccer and running, at the public university. A federal judge blocked Idaho's law in 2020, ruling that it likely violated the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause and unlawfully discriminated based on sex and transgender status. The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld initial ruling in 2023 and again in an amended ruling last year. While the Supreme Court agreed to take up the cases from Idaho and West Virginia, the justices opted not to act on a third case from Arizona that raises the same issue. The cases will be heard sometime after the justices convene for the new court term Oct. 6. Last month, the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban on transgender puberty blockers and hormone therapy treatments for minors — a major win for states that have similar laws on the books. With Post wires

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store