Philadelphia Public Workers Reach Deal to End Strike
'The Strike is Over!' the union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees District Council 33, posted on its Facebook page around 4:30 a.m. Eastern. It represents roughly 9,000 municipal employees, including 1,000 sanitation workers.
'I have good news tonight for the hard-working men and women of AFSCME District Council 33, and for every taxpaying resident and business in Philadelphia,' the mayor, Cherelle Parker, said in a statement on social media.
The strike, which began July 1, forced municipal agencies to scale back some programs and suspend others. The city closed some of its public libraries and warned of longer repair times for issues like water main breaks or street cave-ins.
The most visible effect of the strike was the overflowing garbage that caused pungent odors across the city. To deal with the piles of trash growing on the streets, the city enlisted private contractors and nonunion municipal employees, a plan that encountered intense criticism over its effectiveness.
The union and the mayor agreed on a three-year contract that would mean a 14 percent pay increase for union members over the four years that Ms. Parker is in office, she said in her statement.
The deal still has to be ratified by the union's members.
The workers had been operating under a one-year contract extension that expired at the beginning of the month and were seeking a multiyear deal.
Union members had been split over wage increases offered by the city, which union officials said did not keep up with inflation.
The strike was the first extended work stoppage by the union in nearly 40 years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Senate confirms former Trump attorney Emil Bove as U.S. appeals court judge
Washington — The Senate on Tuesday approved the nomination of Emil Bove, President Trump's former defense lawyer, to serve on a U.S. appeals court, confirming the controversial nominee to a lifetime appointment on the federal bench. The upper chamber voted 50-49 to green-light Bove's nomination to the Philadelphia-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, which oversees cases from Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. "He has a strong legal background and has served his country honorably. I believe he will be diligent, capable and a fair jurist," Sen. Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, said of Bove on the Senate floor ahead of the vote. Bove emerged as Mr. Trump's most controversial judicial pick so far, and former judges, prosecutors and other Justice Department employees had urged senators to reject his nomination. A Justice Department whistleblower alleged that Bove had suggested government lawyers should ignore court orders, prompting Democrats to unsuccessfully push for the Senate Judiciary Committee to delay a vote on his nomination. When the panel voted earlier this month to advance his nomination, all of the panel's Democrats walked out of the meeting in protest. Two more whistleblowers have since turned over information about Bove to either the Justice Department's internal watchdog or lawmakers, according to the organization Whistleblower Aid, which represents one of the people, and the Washington Post, which reported on evidence given to Sen. Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat who sits on the Judiciary Committee. Booker and Sen. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, asked the Justice Department's acting inspector general on Monday whether he has launched any investigations related to Bove and said the allegations of misconduct are "troubling." Bove was one of the lawyers who represented the president in his criminal cases and he joined the Justice Department as principal associate deputy attorney general when Mr. Trump returned to the White House for a second term. Bove also served briefly as acting deputy attorney general in the opening weeks of the second Trump administration until the Senate confirmed Todd Blanche, also a former defense lawyer for the president, to the No. 2 spot. But former Justice Department prosecutors accused Bove of executing mass firings at the department of employees who were "perceived not to show sufficient loyalty" to Mr. Trump, including officials who worked on former special counsel Jack Smith's investigations into the president, which yielded two prosecutions that have since been dropped. Bove was also at the center of a controversy involving the Justice Department's decision to drop its prosecution of New York City Mayor Eric Adams in exchange for cooperation with immigration enforcement. Several prosecutors who worked on Adams' case resigned after Bove directed them to dismiss the charges against the mayor and said the move appeared to be a quid pro quo. But Bove brushed away the accusations, telling senators in a questionnaire to the Judiciary Committee that the decision to drop the five-count indictment against Adams was within the scope of prosecutorial discretion. He also said Adams' own submissions to the court refute the allegations of an "improper quid pro quo." Bove also faced allegations of unethical conduct from a fired Justice Department lawyer, who filed a whistleblower report with lawmakers last month. The attorney, Erez Reuveni, claimed Bove suggested that the administration should ignore court orders regarding the administration's efforts to remove migrants under the wartime Alien Enemies Act. Reuveni alleged that during a March meeting with senior department officials about removal flights, Bove suggested that the department would need to consider telling the courts to "f**k you" if a judge blocked deportations under the 1798 law. Emails and text messages that Reuveni provided to senators include exchanges with a Justice Department colleague in which they appear to be referring to Bove's alleged directive regarding judicial orders. A second Justice Department whistleblower submitted documents to the department's internal watchdog that supports Reuveni's claims, according to the organization Whistleblower Aid, which is representing the lawyer. Reuveni worked at the Justice Department for nearly 15 years and had been promoted to acting deputy director of its Office of Immigration Litigation in March. But he was fired in April after telling a federal judge that Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man who was deported to his home country in March, should not have been removed. An immigration official with the Trump administration had acknowledged in a March court filing that Abrego Garcia's removal was an "administrative error" and an "oversight." Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee attempted to push the panel to delay the vote to advance Bove's nomination and allow Reuveni to testify, but Grassley rejected the move. The White House and Justice Department have defended Bove and claimed that Reuveni was a "disgruntled former employee." Grassley lambasted Democrats for their handling of Bove's nomination and said they have tried to obstruct nearly all of Mr. Trump's nominees. "The vicious rhetoric, unfair accusations and abuse directed at Mr. Bove by some on this committee, it has crossed the line," he said. Blanche wrote in an op-ed for Fox News that Bove is "the most capable and principled lawyer I have ever known," and said his "legal acumen is extraordinary and his moral clarity is above reproach."
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Looking ahead to the race for Rhode Island attorney general
The campaign to replace term-limited Attorney General Peter Neronha will be one of the most-watched races in the state next year. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT How Trump's Tax Cuts Could Impact My Family Budget — Here's the Breakdown
President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which he signed on July 4, will impact millions of households, from their student loan repayments to their access to Medicaid and other social safety net programs. I, however, was most concerned with how the legislation's sweeping changes to U.S. tax law might impact my obligations to the IRS. Since my tax attorney charges by the quarter-hour for phone calls, I went with the next-best thing — ChatGPT. I asked the AI platform how Trump's tax cuts could impact my family budget. Here's what it told me. Find Out: Read Next: Many Households — Including Mine — Will Save Money The AI platform began with a bulleted list of benefits that will help many families lower their tax bill. It relied on sources such as the Bipartisan Policy Center and the Tax Policy Center to generate the section, which it titled, 'What You'll Likely Save.' This is its word-for-word synopsis of the potential savings for my family and others. Extended 2017 TCJA benefits — no major tax increases that were scheduled to take effect in 2026. Higher standard deduction — receives a $2,000 extra (married) or $1,000 (single) until 2028 on top of inflation adjustment. (CTC) — boosted to $2,500 per child through 2028, then reverts to $2,000. New tax benefits — exemption from federal tax on tips and overtime income (under $160K), a $40K state-and-local-tax (SALT) cap and a one-time $1K 'Trump account' per child. Learn More: Have a Little, Get a Little; Have a Lot, Get a Lot Next, my unofficial AI accountant used a Tax Policy Center analysis and a CBS News report to surmise that most families would see at least some benefit, with an average household tax bill reduction of $2,900 in 2026. However, it generated the following bulleted list, cited here verbatim, which showed that the 'haves' stand to gain more than the 'have-nots.' Bottom quintile households (≤ $35K income): ~$150 saved (~0.8% of income) Top quintile (≥ $217K income): ~$12,540 saved (~2.5%). Middle-income families fall in between, likely saving several hundred to a few thousand dollars annually. Taxes Aren't the Only Thing That Impact Family Budgets The platform then outlined how what it called the 'offsetting effects' of the tax cuts could shake up my family's — or anyone's — finances. This, too, is in ChatGPT's own words. Cuts to Medicaid, food stamps (SNAP) — billions in savings, but may reduce public benefits your family relies on. Reduced social safety nets — tougher work requirements; lower-income families could see net income decline despite tax cuts. Growing deficit — adds $3-$5 trillion to federal debt over 10 years, increasing future borrowing costs and potential for inflation/higher interest rates. Which Provisions Impact Which Families the Most? It included the following table to break down how different aspects of the legislation will impact different income groups. Income Level Estimated Annual Savings Key New Provisions Watch-Outs Low Income ~$150 Child Tax Credit, tip/overtime exemption Less SNAP/Medicaid Middle Income (~$50K-$100K) $500-$1,500 Standard SALT deduction bump, CTC, SALT cap Social cuts, inflation High Income (>$200K) $5K-$12K+ All above, plus SALT/ deduction benefits Future tax, interest pressure Make Your Situation as Big and Beautiful as Possible It concluded with a numbered list titled 'How To Maximize Benefits,' which outlined steps that my family and others can take to get the most out of the new changes. Use enhanced standard deduction — reduces taxable income directly. Claim full child tax credit if eligible — $2,500 per child. Take advantage of tip/overtime deductions — especially if you receive a lot of tips or extra hours. Monitor public benefits changes — if your household receives Medicaid or SNAP, check whether new work requirements or eligibility changes impact your budget. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 10 Genius Things Warren Buffett Says To Do With Your Money 6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT How Trump's Tax Cuts Could Impact My Family Budget — Here's the Breakdown
