Senate Bill Aims to Reduce Tax on Loan Interest for U.S.-Built Cars
The deduction would only apply to cars with final assembly in the United States and doesn't include fleet sales or commercial vehicles.
The bill also has provisions to reduce the deductible amount for taxpayers who have an adjusted gross income of more than $100,000.
The latest version of the One Big Beautiful Bill contains a provision that aims to reduce thousands of dollars in interest on new car loans for taxpayers. The United States Senate passed the tax and policy bill on Tuesday, sending it back to the House of Representatives for final approval, which President Donald Trump wants to happen before July 4. Along with accelerating the removal of federal EV tax credits, the act contains a section titled "No Tax on Car Loan Interest."
The proposed deduction isn't as straightforward as that title, however, with a number of caveats. The biggest qualifier is that the vehicle being purchased "shall not include any vehicle the final assembly of which did not occur within the United States," according to the currently available text of the bill. This requirement that the car be built in the U.S. ties in with President Trump's goal to increase domestic automotive manufacturing, which he has so far attempted to instigate through hefty tariffs on imported vehicles. While some automakers have since invested in increased U.S. production, many popular vehicles are still produced overseas and imported into the United States.
NurPhoto
|
Getty Images
The bill also states that applicable vehicles are those that are "manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways" and are "a car, minivan, van, sport utility vehicle, pickup truck, or motorcycle." The vehicle must have a gross vehicle weight rating of under 14,000 pounds, and the loan cannot be for fleet sales or "a commercial vehicle that is not used for personal purposes." The bill also excludes loans to finance vehicles with a salvage title or vehicles that are going to be used for parts.
There are also exceptions based on the income of the taxpayer who is leasing the vehicle. The deductible amount will be reduced by $200 for every $1000 that the adjusted gross income of the taxpayers exceeds $100,000. For jointly filed tax returns, the threshold is $200,000 of income.
The proposal also covers a maximum of $10,000 in interest for each taxable year. According to the , the only buyers who could receive the maximum deduction are those with new car loans of $110,000 or higher. The publication quoted Jonathan Smoke, an economist at market research firm Cox Automotive, who said that just one percent of loans in the U.S. are over that mark.
Instead, the average car loan is around $43,000, with Smoke telling the Times that average buyers will be see a $3000 reduction in the first year of a six-year loan, although most buyers would only receive a roughly $500 reduction in the first year, and that the amount would shrink with each subsequent year. The bill still needs to be approved by the House before it can be signed into law by the president, and President Trump has expressed a desire to pass the bill by July 4.
Caleb Miller
Associate News Editor
Caleb Miller began blogging about cars at 13 years old, and he realized his dream of writing for a car magazine after graduating from Carnegie Mellon University and joining the Car and Driver team. He loves quirky and obscure autos, aiming to one day own something bizarre like a Nissan S-Cargo, and is an avid motorsports fan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Send them home': To promote tougher policies, report claims Spokane's homeless aren't from here
Jul. 5—Half of the homeless people in Spokane aren't from here and should be given bus tickets home, more strictly enforced by police and cut off from long-term services, according to a recent report released by the Spokane Business Association, a prominent political advocacy group funded by businessman Larry Stone. A week after the report's release, the association proposed an amendment to the city's charter, which if approved by voters would reshape the city's homelessness laws and force Spokane to shift funding away from affordable housing, firefighting equipment and other priorities to fund emergency shelters, more visible police patrols and other policies recommended in the report. Critics in City Hall have dismissed the report as unscientific, unhelpful and politically motivated ahead of the November elections, when several seats currently or recently occupied by progressives are being challenged by candidates more in line with the Spokane Business Association's policy goals. But the report's author and the organization sponsoring the survey argue the data is concrete proof that Spokane's homelessness policies aren't only not helping people get off the streets, they're attracting people from elsewhere who are drawn to the city by lax law enforcement. Just over 50% of the roughly 230 homeless people surveyed for the association said they moved to the city after becoming homeless. This contradicts the federally mandated "point-in-time" counts, annual standardized surveys that try to reach every homeless person living on the streets or in a shelter. The point-in-time counts have their own flaws, as the authors of Spokane County's 2024 report readily acknowledged. But of the 2,021 people surveyed in last year's point-in-time count, roughly 80% said they lived in Spokane County before becoming homeless. Robert Marbut, President Donald Trump's "homeless czar" from 2019 to 2021 and the consultant contracted to conduct the survey, argues his data is more accurate because he also asked where people were born, went to high school and whether they have family in Spokane. It is not clear why these additional questions would sway the data by 30 points, but Marbut's recommendations for dealing with this influx are clearer, and consistent with the "Velvet Hammer" approach he has pitched cities across the country for at least a decade: Spokane has to get tougher with the homeless, pressuring them into treatment or departure. Gavin Cooley, an executive of the Spokane Business Association, argued Marbut's expertise lent the report more authority than it lost from a lack of cited sources, and dismissed as "deeply political" a recent article from Range Media that turned to an expert in homeless research to pick apart the report's methodology and conclusions. Cooley believes the media and politicians are overly focused on attacking the data and not paying enough attention to the conclusions Marbut reaches with that data. "You can certainly note the deficiencies as you see them ... but I think it'd be a pity to miss the higher level order of what's being recommended," Cooley said. Every effort should be made to send people back where they came from, particularly if they've been in Spokane for less than 90 days, according to the report. Those who stay should be cut off from long-term services, which should be reserved only for those with longstanding ties to Spokane. For those who are from Spokane, the report recommends mandatory treatment services in order to receive housing, which city officials claim would violate state and federal law. Marbut has spoken out for at least a decade against policies he believes are "enabling" the homeless with "goodies," including Housing First policies that have been the national standard since 2013, in which homeless people are given stable housing upfront to enable them to then address addiction, mental health and social reintegration. Attempts to relocate the homeless en masse are even older. The phrase "Greyhound therapy" has been used to describe the practice since the 1970s and has been criticized by researchers for just as long for redistributing the social costs of homelessness rather than improving them. Many of America's largest cities have, at one point or another, attempted similar policies; between 2011 and 2017, the Guardian tracked over 20,000 homeless people given bus tickets out of and sometimes between 16 U.S. cities. Proponents, including the Spokane Business Association, argue that such programs reconnect people to families and friends and can lead to a long-term improvement in their situation. Spokane's homeless service providers have engaged in the practice for years, however. If a homeless person requests a bus ticket, and a friend or family member declares they can take them in, they will be provided a ticket. Julie Garcia, who runs the homeless services organization Jewels Helping Hands, which manages several of the city's homeless shelters, estimated her organization hands out around 250 tickets a year. There appears to be little academic research into whether these programs lead to long-term reductions of homelessness or just move it elsewhere. The Guardian reported that, of the thousands being bused from San Francisco through the Homeward Bound program between 2010 and 2015, the city had records of following up with only three people after they reached their destinations. But the Spokane Business Association report goes further to suggest that the city should cut off people who decline these tickets from long-term homeless services and even emergency shelters after 21 days. While much of the study copies nearly verbatim a similar report on King County that Marbut was commissioned to write for the Discovery Institute, Marbut claims that Spokane is unusual in one regard: Homeless people aren't coming to Spokane for its quality services, but for its lax enforcement. "What we got on the street was generally, they treat me nice here, they don't hassle me," Marbut said. "It wasn't that they came here because of the services — many communities I go to, it's, 'Oh, they have great services' — but here it was, 'They sort of let me be.' " This picture notably doesn't match what many homeless people on Spokane's streets have told The Spokesman-Review in recent years, who described being pushed from place to place throughout the day by law enforcement, security guards and business owners. "We literally don't get to sit down like this," said Amber, a 32-year-old homeless woman interviewed under an overpass in August. "We are moving constantly. ... So many people have cracked feet and heels." Cooley dismissed this type of enforcement as an "occasional blow of the horn," and wants to see tougher laws and stricter enforcement — not because he wants them to go to jail, which he says would be ineffective and expensive — but to force people to change their lives. Cooley acknowledged that Washington's involuntary treatment laws are not extensive enough to force a homeless person into drug or mental health treatment. Instead, he argued, the city should use its tougher homelessness laws to offer them a choice: either go to jail, or enter "voluntary" treatment. Or they could leave, Cooley noted. "If you find that a great number of people have no connection to Spokane at all, and you suddenly begin to say you cannot use fentanyl in this community unfettered ... how many of those folks will stick around?" Cooley asked. In an interview, Mayor Lisa Brown dismissed the report as misinformed, arguing many of the report's claims about the city's policies were untrue and some of its recommendations were already standard practice. "I believe this is really about the political campaigns in November," Brown said, noting Stone's longstanding funding of candidates opposing progressive policies and production of high-dollar videos to encourage tougher homelessness policies. "I also believe that, with the resources they are apparently able to mobilize, it would be great if, as a show of good faith, they put them into an actual solution, rather than a propaganda campaign against the city and the majority on the city council," Brown added. But Cooley believes the evidence was clear, regardless of the survey's findings, that what the city is doing is failing to have a significant impact on the city's visible homeless population or its soaring overdose deaths. "I know Seattle really damn well, and I can't believe the rapid turnaround as it relates to enforcement," Cooley said. "And what I don't know is where those people are ... but I know they've made a visible turn in on-street homelessness." The report has started to leak into the broader public conversation on Spokane's homelessness policies. Wendy Fishburne, vice president of the East Spokane Business Association, appeared to quote parts of it verbatim Monday before the Spokane City Council voted to reform its homelessness laws. "Research shows that people do better recovering from addiction when they're surrounded by their families of origin," Fishburne said. "Find out where people actually come from and compassionately send them home ... so that our resources could be used for our folks."
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Shane van Gisbergen's Chicago Burnout and Near-Miss Sparks Debate Over Dangers in Victory Celebrations
Shane van Gisbergen's Chicago Burnout and Near-Miss Sparks Debate Over Dangers in Victory Celebrations originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Shane van Gisbergen and Chicago have become synonymous with one another. Since NASCAR started going to the Windy City in 2023, the New Zealand driver has made his way to Victory Lane each year on the 2.20-mile track. Advertisement The 36-year-old did it during his Cup Series debut two years ago, stunning the NASCAR world with multiple drivers, including Chase Elliott, admitting it was embarrassing to have someone come in and win during his first-ever race in the sport. The three-time Supercars champion took the checkered flag first again in 2024, not in Cup but in the Xfinity Series. It was one of three wins during his first full-time season with the Series. He also won at Portland and Sonoma. The Kiwi — in his rookie Cup season — recorded his second career win just a few weeks ago in Mexico City, which, much like Chicago, was the series making its inaugural visit to a circuit featuring right and left turns. Shane van Gisbergen celebrates with a burnout after winning the NASCAR Xfinity Series race on the Chicago Street coming into the weekend along the shores of Lake Michigan were that SVG could win one if not both races. Advertisement He accomplished the first step on Saturday, out dueling his JR Motorsports teammate and fellow Red Bull driver Connor Zilisch on a late restart, recording his third win in the nation's third-largest city. After making a cooldown lap around the track, the No. 9 car slowed down the frontstretch before the engine started revving and smoke started billowing out from behind the rear tires. The burnout continued in front of the fans gathered in the grandstands. The CW camera operator was providing the television-viewing audience a close perspective of the burnout, standing on the track-side of the concrete wall, which serves as the barrier between pit road. He almost got too close. Advertisement As the JRM car approached, SVG turned hard to the left and the right rear of the car whipped around. The screen immediately filled with smoke before the camera abruptly tilted to the side, the operator getting knocked off balance. It was a near-miss. It was a close call. It was a disaster narrowly averted. It was all of those things — and it wasn't the first time. It's happened in the past. The broadcast trying to get the best close-up shot of the victory celebration as possible. However, at some point, the question needs to be asked — at what costs? It feels like it's just a matter of time before the close call becomes an accident. It could result in a cameraperson losing their balance like today, a minor injury like a sprained ankle, or who knows, even much worse. Advertisement Related: Richard Petty Doesn't Sugarcoat Feelings on Playoff Format After Shane van Gisbergen Win in Mexico This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 6, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Seatless Poilievre rustles up leadership support among Stampede faithful
He may have been rejected by voters in his own Ottawa riding but a Saturday evening Stampede week audience seemed ready to put Pierre Poilievre back in the Conservative leadership saddle. The sold-out barbecue crowd courted by Poilievre at Heritage Park ended a day of political glad-handing among urban cowpokes by all the federal leaders and their provincial counterparts. In a campaign-style speech not unlike those he delivered last April ahead of the federal election lost by his Conservatives, Poilievre made his argument that he remains his party's best hope at the helm — and the 1,200 who gathered for beef and politics seemed receptive. 'We don't back down and we don't run away when things get hard — we dust ourselves and get back in the saddle,' he told his supporters who delivered two standing ovations. Poilievre wasted little time in taking shots at his nemesis, Prime Minister Mark Carney, by noting his shakiness earlier in the day flipping pancakes at a Stampede breakfast. 'He couldn't figure out whether his elbows were up or down,' said Poilievre, digging on accusations Carney's decision to honour a demand by U.S. President Donald Trump that Canada drop a digital service tax. 'With his great talks with Trump, he's had much experience flip-flopping.' Poilievre avoided any words directly sympathetic to a separatist movement in Alberta but did suggest Albertans disillusioned with Ottawa have reason to be. 'I'll use the platform of leader of the opposition to amplify the legitimate demands of western Canada to end the unfair treatment,' he said. 'The era of Ottawa telling Alberta to pay up and shut up must end once and for all.' Poilievre is bidding for a return to Parliament as he campaigns in a byelection in the solidly Tory seat of Battle River-Crowfoot, which will be held Aug. 18. While he's expected to easily prevail there, his standing in the rest of the country is far less certain. A Nanos Research poll conducted in late June suggests the ruling Liberals under new PM Carney lead the Conservatives by 14 percentage points. Carney's lead as a preferred leader is even more pronounced in the survey with respondents choosing him over Poilievre by 29 points. The knives among party operatives aren't yet out publicly for Poilievre but that could change if he continues to badly trail Carney in the fall, said Mount Royal University political scientist Duane Bratt. And the Alberta byelection widely considered a shoo-in to return Poilievre to the House of Commons promises to be a political minefield in a national context, he said. The one-time Tory leader will be walking a tightrope where the path he navigates could alienate party supporters with separatist leanings in Alberta and elsewhere, said Bratt. 'What matters is not so much the election result, it's going to be his campaign that's happening during a debate about Alberta's place in Canada,' he said. 'How does he not hurt himself in the rest of the country, what's his views on greater taxation powers for Alberta, on immigration in Alberta and on constitutional change?' In effect Poilievre, he said, will be spending much of his summer campaigning for both a seat in Parliament and his own job as Conservative leader. And his running in one of the safest Conservative seats in the country — won last April with 83 per cent of the vote by Tory Damien Kurek, who's since signed on with a government relations and lobbying firm — produce optics of weakness, said Bratt. But some of those who attended the Conservative party barbecue fundraiser said they don't foresee Poilievre being replaced by anyone else. 'I can't see the party dumping him — he's been successful in a strange political environment,' said former conservative radio talk-show host Dave Rutherford. He noted that despite the electoral loss the party under Poilievre increased its vote count by 2.5 million and added 25 seats to its caucus. But he agreed Poilievre will have to balance his required support for a united Canada with an often separatist-leaning Conservative base in Alberta. 'It's part of the whole UCP culture,' said Rutherford, referring to the provincial conservative party largely allied to their federal cousins. In introducing Poilievre at the barbecue, Kurek said he gladly relinquished his seat to advance the Conservative movement 'as quickly as possible.' On Saturday morning, Carney flipped flapjacks at a Stampede breakfast in the city's northeast and admitted his skills were rusty. 'I'm here all day until I get it right,' said Carney. Premier Danielle Smith also attended the breakfast and playfully chided Carney on his pancake-handling technique. She also told him she would soon be signing a memo of understanding with Ontario Premier Doug Ford on energy, priorities and trade. 'It'd be so great if we didn't have (carbon) net-zero rules,' she told the prime minister, who walked the Stampede grounds Friday evening. In an interview with Postmedia, Carney said he's confident in his government's ability to collaborate with Alberta and other provinces in ways that'll foster unity. 'I think, from a federal government perspective, from my responsibilities, we're going to make Canada work. We're going to build. We're going to build together,' he said. 'There's a big intangible and cultural and value-based element to being Canadian and I firmly believe in those.' Poilievre showed up at the same morning breakfast but waited until Carney had left to greet onlookers. Federal NDP leader Don Davies was also in Calgary Saturday attending Stampede-themed functions. — with files from Chris Varcoe BKaufmann@ X: @BillKaufmannjrn
