Jailed MP Engineer Rashid allowed to attend Parliament session in custody
While rejecting Sheikh's plea for interim bail to discharge his parliamentary duties, Additional Sessions Judge Chander Jit Singh of the Patiala House Court directed that the MP can attend the session between July 24 and August 4 with a police escort.
The Parliament session began on Monday and will conclude on August 21, with a break between August 12 and August 18.
The court, however, imposed conditions and costs on the custody parole, the newspaper reported.
Sheikh, who is popularly known as Engineer Rashid, has been in jail since August 2019 in connection with a terror-funding case filed by the National Investigation Agency. He has been held under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act.
The National Investigation Agency had opposed his interim bail plea, contending that if he is allowed to attend Parliament in custody, he should bear the cost of travel.
Sheikh's lawyers argued that he should be granted bail or alternatively not be made to bear the cost since he was seeking to fulfil a public duty.
In July 2024, Sheikh was granted custody parole for two hours to take oath in Parliament. He had contested and won the 2024 Lok Sabha election from Baramulla while in jail, defeating National Conference leader Omar Abdullah.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Ek Gora White House Mein...': Owaisi BLASTS Modi Govt Over Trump's 'Ceasefire' Claim
During the discussion on Operation Sindoor in Parliament, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi launched a sharp attack on the government, raising questions over national security, accountability, and cricket ties with Pakistan. Owaisi questioned whether the families of Baisaran terror victims would be asked to watch a cricket match against Pakistan. He criticised government's stance of stopping water to Pakistan while still agreeing to play cricket. He demanded accountability for the Pahalgam attack, asking how terrorists managed to infiltrate despite heavy troop presence. Owaisi also slammed India's ceasefire decision, questioning if such decisions would now be dictated by the White House.#asaduddinowaisi #opsindoor #pahalgamattack #indiapakistancricket #ceasefire #nationalsecurity #parliamentdebate #aimim #terrorism #indiapakistan #toi #toibharat
Mint
11 minutes ago
- Mint
EAM Jaishankar reiterates India's 'zero tolerance against terror' stance against cross-border terrorism in parliament
New Delhi: There was no communication between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump between the Pahalgam attack on 22 April and mid-June, external affairs minister S. Jaishankar told Parliament on Monday. The remarks follow repeated claims by Trump that he helped broker the ceasefire between India and Pakistan – a claim consistently denied by New Delhi. Following the 22 April terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir, India attacked Pakistani terror bases on 7 May under its Operation Sindoor. The hostilities continued until 10 May, when a ceasefire was called. Indian officials have consistently maintained that the ceasefire was brokered bilaterally. In a cemented statement on India's foreign policy actions in the ongoing Operation Sindoor, Jaishankar echoed Modi's new doctrine of zero tolerance against cross-border terrorism. Jaishankar, in his address to the Lok Sabha, said talks and terror cannot go hand-in-hand, and that India will not pay heed to threats of nuclear weapons. "Talks and terror cannot go together. Blood and water cannot flow together," said Jaishankar. Modi in his address to the nation on 12 May had announced India's new approach against terror. Jaishankar said the global fraternity had sided with India and its response to the terror attack in Pahalgam, where India attacked key terrorist bases in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. He said all but three nations along with Pakistan had not supported India. Prime minister Modi received about 20 phone calls from world leaders expressing solidarity, and supporting Operation Sindoor, the external affairs minister told Parliament. Seven Indian delegations of members of Parliament across political parties had helped convey India's view to foreign governments "against cross-border terrorism, Jaishankar said. The minister said Operation Sindoor is still ongoing, but did not provide further details. Jaishankar also said the United Nations Security Council had shown solidarity with India and condemned the Pahalgam attack which left 26 people dead. 'Our goals in the Security Council were two – one, to get an endorsement from the Security Council of the need for accountability, and two, to bring to justice, those who perpetrated these attacks.' The UNSC statement, dated 25 April, also stated that every nation has the right to defend itself against cross-border terrorism. 'And, most importantly, the council underlined the need to hold the perpetrators, organizers, financiers, and sponsors of this reprehensible act of terrorism accountable and bring them to justice,' said Jaishankar. 'This statement of the UNSC resonated throughout the international community," he added. Jaishankar's address came after remarks by defence minister Rajnath Singh earlier in the day, who said the Indian armed forces had managed to thwart all attacks by Pakistani forces, and managed to damage key terrorist bases as well as military infrastructure.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Operation Sindoor sparks firestorm in Parliament: Govt hails strike, opposition questions ceasefire and secrecy
NEW DELHI: A marathon debate on Operation Sindoor in Parliament turned into a political battlefield on Monday, as the government lauded India's cross-border military action following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, while the Opposition grilled the Centre over transparency, strategic choices, and Donald Trump's claims of mediating a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. The session saw pointed attacks, dramatic rhetoric, emotional appeals, and deep divisions over what India's strongest post-Sindoor operation truly achieved. Government: Military precision, diplomatic success External affairs minister S Jaishankar led the defence, asserting that the operation, launched on May 7 and concluded on May 10, was India's sovereign response to Pakistan-backed terror. He categorically denied that trade was used as leverage by the US. He said, 'At no stage was there any discussion about trade during this time. The request for halting military action came from the Pakistani side, through the DGMO channel.' He added that India's diplomatic outreach was successful, with only three countries (besides Pakistan) opposing India at the UN. 'There was overwhelming recognition that terror was unacceptable, and India had the right to respond.' Opposition: Questions on ceasefire, secrecy, and Trump Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi delivered a sharp attack, citing Donald Trump's 26 public claims that he brokered the ceasefire by threatening to withdraw trade privileges, 'If Pakistan was ready to kneel, why did we stop? Before whom did the Prime Minister surrender?' He also accused the government of dodging key questions about how many Rafale jets were lost, and why China, reportedly backing Pakistan during the operation, was never named. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Emergency Generators in Tbilisi: (Prices May Surprise You) Emergency Generator | Search Ads Search Now Undo by Taboola by Taboola Deepender Hooda: 'Historic strategic mistake' Congress MP Deepender Hooda accused the government of giving a 'clean chit' to Pakistan by choosing not to strike military targets. He said, 'The foreign minister said we weren't targeting military or civilian infrastructure. That was a historic mistake. The world knows there's no difference between Pakistan's army , government, and terrorists.' He also said, 'The biggest strategic mistake during Operation Sindoor was when the foreign minister said that we were not targeting military or civilian infrastructure. By making that statement, the government effectively gave a clean chit to the Pakistani army and government.' He further elaborated, 'You have repeatedly said, and even the world acknowledges, that there is no difference between Pakistan's government, its military, and the terrorists. They are one and the same. Yet, by declaring that only terror infrastructure was being targeted, you ended up sending a different message to the world. That was a historic mistake.' Anurag Thakur's barrage: 'Rahul occupied Congress' BJP MP Anurag Thakur launched a blistering personal attack on Congress and Rahul Gandhi. On Rahul Gandhi's political standing, Thakur said, 'Let me tell you, the leader you talk about, twice the people of the country did not even give him enough votes to become the leader of the opposition... He has become LoB from LoP. LoB stands for Leader Opposing Bharat. Opposing India and the Prime Minister is his agenda. I don't know whether he becomes the poster boy of Congress or not, but he has become the poster boy of Pakistan's propaganda. ..' On the 'half front' of internal opposition during the conflict, Thakur said, 'India fought on two and a half fronts, everyone knows about the two fronts, but in this half front, there is also a Rahul Occupied Congress. Look at the social media, in the last two months, Rahul Occupied Congress has made disgusting and insulting cartoons against the Prime Minister and the Indian Army... Rahul Occupied Congress called the Army chief a roadside goon. Rahul Gandhi should apologise to the entire country and the Indian Army...' On opposition silence over gruesome terrorist acts, Thakur further said, 'Of all the opposition MPs who have spoken here till now, not even one MP has stood up and said that in this terrorist attack, people were asked about their religion and asked to recite Kalma, their pants were removed, and then they were killed. Tell me what pain did the Opposition MPs have in saying this? When the defence minister was discussing the achievements of the Indian Army, there was no applause, no one was thumping the table. ..' Rajnath Singh: 'Army losses not for public debate' Defence minister Rajnath Singh maintained that the Opposition's repeated demand to know the number of jets lost or pilots killed was inappropriate and disconnected from the national mood. 'The country is proud of its soldiers. Not everything needs to be counted in public.' Outlining the operation's success and India's firm stance against terrorism, Rajnath asserted, 'At no stage in any conversation with US was there any linkage of trade with Operation Sindoor.' He emphasized the Indian Army's achievements, reinforcing the government's narrative of decisive action. C harged exchange between BJP MP Tejasvi Surya and NCP (SP) MP Supriya Sule Tejasvi Surya sparked controversy with his historical assertions. He said, 'At the very beginning of our Independence, at the dawn of this nation as an Independent country, Pandit Nehruji had a state policy that India did not require an army. Nehruji said this to General Lockhart that no plans for the modernisation of the army are required and that India's policy is ahimsa (non-violence)...we don't need the army, the police will do its job. ' Surya blamed Jawaharlal Nehru for neglecting defence. He said, 'Nehru had said India didn't need an army—only the police. He refused to modernise the armed forces.' Supriya Sule hit back at Tejasvi Surya's remarks, calling them an insult to the armed forces. 'I would like to tell Tejasvi Surya and put it on record, he said that Jawaharlal Nehruji, the first Prime Minister of India, never encouraged the defence forces and we have never done anything, this is the first time India has done exceptionally well in its armed forces. He has not only insulted thousands and lakhs of Indian force and armies and their families who have stood so that you and I can be safe.' She added, 'I object to the statement that he has Surya, if you haven't read history, then read it... When it comes to the country, the country comes first, then the state, then the party, then the family... When we got a call from Kiren Rijiju, he just told me on the phone that Supriya, you will have to give 10 days for the country... It was the greatness of the Prime Minister that he showed faith in the opposition leaders to lead the delegations. .. At the all-party meeting, the Congress party was the first to say that the Congress party and the entire opposition will stand with Narendra Modi's government with full strength.' Rajbhar: 'We wanted Operation Tandoor, not Sindoor' SP MP Ramashankar Rajbhar used vivid imagery to critique the government, he said, 'The country wanted Operation Tandoor, not Sindoor. We should've roasted the terrorists.' He also mocked Trump's alleged influence, saying, 'If Trump is telling the truth, then who's the real Vishwaguru—Modi or the man in the White House?' Premachandran, Chamala: Govt escaped early debate RSP MP N K Premachandran and Congress MP Kiran Kumar Chamala accused the government of avoiding early scrutiny. 'We had demanded a special session in April. They refused. Now they claim we're not being constructive.' Lalan Singh, TDP hail Op Sindoor as calculated response JD(U)'s Lalan Singh said the operation sent a strong message by neutralising 100 terrorists and disabling 11 airbases, without civilian casualties. He said, 'India showed it can act with strength and restraint.' TDP MP Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu added, 'The Pahalgam massacre was a slaughter. The response was not only justified, but essential.' Tharoor Silent, Chidambaram doubts foreign hand While Shashi Tharoor refused to comment, 'Maunvrat, Maunvrat,' he said when asked. Congress veteran P Chidambaram questioned whether the attackers were even foreign: 'What proof do we have? They could have been homegrown. Let's not make assumptions.' Ceasefire: India vs Trump's narrative While Trump has repeatedly claimed he stopped India using the threat of withdrawing trade benefits, India insists that the ceasefire understanding followed a Pakistani request through military channels. The Opposition demanded clarity. 'Why hasn't the PM publicly refuted Trump if he's lying?' asked Gogoi.
