'India is foreign word': Ambedkar University V-C on 'Bharatiya Knowledge System' in curriculum
The vice-chancellor of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University Delhi (AUD), Anu Singh Lather, has said the institution is deliberately avoiding the term Indian Knowledge System in favour of the 'Bharatiya Knowledge System' as "India is a foreign word".
Asserting its cultural identity and academic autonomy, the university's choice of terminology reflects a deeper philosophical and historical consciousness, according to Ms. Lather.
"The word India itself is foreign to all of us," she said during an interview with PTI.
Ms. Lather said the AUD has recently approved 54 compulsory BKS courses that will be integrated across programmes in various departments, including history, law, heritage management and political philosophy.
VIDEO | Vice Chancellor of Dr BR Ambedkar University Delhi (AUD), Anu Singh Lather, has said the institution is deliberately avoiding the term Indian Knowledge System (IKS) in favour of the 'Bharatiya Knowledge System' as "India is a foreign word".
She said, "We again boast of… pic.twitter.com/aVSUtuN8jM — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) June 30, 2025
These are not merely value-addition electives, but mandatory components intended to embed indigenous knowledge frameworks into formal higher education, she said.
"We took nearly two years to finalise these courses. Every reference cited includes the original source — the Upanishads, Mahabharata, or Arthashastra, down to the chapter, verse, and line. We've done serious academic groundwork," Ms. Lather said, adding that the initiative is perhaps the most rigorous BKS model in any Indian university.
India that is Bharat: The Hindu editorial on a name game
The curriculum includes themes such as Bharatiya foundational political philosophy, Yoga and the Self, Indian aesthetics, Bhakti as Gyaan, traditional law systems, and ancient Indian science and technology.
These courses, Ms. Lather explained, were developed by inviting national-level experts and underwent robust academic scrutiny before receiving approval in the university's Academic Council.
Positioning AUD as a thought leader under the National Education Policy (NEP) framework, Ms. Lather said, "We are not competing with other institutions. Our vision, rooted in Babasaheb Ambedkar's ideals, guides our distinct academic identity, including our approach to what knowledge deserves to be central."
This bold pivot, she suggested, is part of a wider vision of reclaiming indigenous intellectual traditions while reshaping postcolonial academic discourse.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
33 minutes ago
- Mint
Jaishankar refutes Trump's India-Pakistan ceasefire claims: ‘Was in the room when JD Vance spoke to PM Modi…'
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has refuted Donald Trump's claim that he secured a ceasefire between India and Pakistan using trade negotiations, and dismissed rumours that the conflict affected India-US trade relations, PTI reported. He was speaking to Newsweek in Manhattan on June 30. Jaishankar is on an official visit to the US and will travel to Washington DC to participate in the Quad Foreign Ministers' Meeting on July 1 (today). After the interview, answering a question about Donald Trump's ceasefire claim and whether there was any negative impact on India-US trade, Jaishankar said, 'No, I don't think so.' "I think the trade people are doing what the trade people should be doing, which is negotiate with numbers and lines and products and do their trade-offs. I think they are very professional and very, very focused about it,' he added. Jaishankar further said that there is a national consensus in India that 'our dealings with Pakistan are bilateral'. Recounting the event as he saw it unfold on then, Jaishakar shared, 'And in this particular case, I can tell you that I was in the room when Vice President (JD) Vance spoke to Prime Minister (Narendra) Modi on the night of May 9, saying that the Pakistanis would launch a very massive assault on India if we did not accept certain things.' '…the Prime Minister was impervious to what the Pakistanis were threatening to do. On the contrary, he indicated that there would be a response from us. This was the night before and the Pakistanis did attack us massively that night, we responded very quickly thereafter,' he said. 'And the next morning, Mr (Secretary of State Marco) Rubio called me up and said the Pakistanis were ready to talk. So I can only tell you from my personal experience what happened. The rest I leave to you,' he added. On the Pahalgam terror attack, Jaishankar asserted that it was an act of economic warfare meant to destroy tourism in Kashmir, and stressed that India will not allow nuclear blackmail to prevent it from responding to terror emanating from Pakistan. 'India has had a string of terrorist attacks over the years emanating from Pakistan and in the wake of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, there was a sentiment in the country that 'enough is enough',' Jaishankar said. He added, 'The Pahalgam attack was an act of economic warfare. It was meant to destroy tourism in Kashmir, which was the mainstay of the economy. It was also meant to provoke religious violence because people were asked to identify their faith before they were killed. So we decided that we cannot let terrorists function with impunity. The idea that they are on that side of the border, and that, therefore, sort of prevents retribution, I think, that's a proposition that needs to be challenged and that is what we did.'
Indian Express
34 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Super premium frequent flier PM' off on 5-nation jaunt?: Cong jabs Modi ahead of visit
Taking a swipe at Prime Minister Narendra Modi ahead of his visit abroad, the Congress on Tuesday said the 'frequent flier PM' is off on a 5-nation 'jaunt' and alleged that he is running away from four issues, including the Manipur situation and US President Donald Trump's claims about bringing about a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh also alleged that the prime minister is running away from the 'revelations by defence officials that India suffered reverses in the first two days of Operation Sindoor because of the PM's decisions'. Prime Minister Modi will embark on a five-nation tour beginning July 2 to participate in the BRICS Summit in Brazil and expand India's ties with several key nations of the Global South. 'When the going gets tough, the self-styled toughs get going. The Super Premium Frequent Flier PM is off on a 5-nation, 8-day jaunt,' Ramesh said in a post on X. When the going gets tough, the self-styled toughs get going. The Super Premium Frequent Flier PM is off on a 5-nation, 8-day jaunt. He is running away from at least 4 issues that are agitating the nation – 1. Manipur, which he has not visited ever since the double engine in… — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) July 1, 2025 He is running away from at least four issues that are agitating the nation, Ramesh said. Ramesh alleged that the PM is running away from Manipur, 'which he has not visited ever since the double engine in the state got derailed and ever since normal life in the state has got totally destroyed'. The Congress leader claimed that PM Modi is also running away from revelations by defence officials that India suffered reverses in the first two days of Operation Sindoor 'because of the PM's decisions'. His remarks were an apparent reference to the reported comments of India's defence attache to Indonesia. However, the Indian embassy in Indonesia, in a post on X on Sunday, had said that the defence attache's remarks have been 'quoted out of context and the media reports are a misrepresentation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker'. Ramesh also claimed that the PM is running away from the continued claims by President Trump that he effected a ceasefire between India and Pakistan using the trade deal as a carrot and stick. He further alleged that the PM is running away from 'the continued failure to bring the Pahalgam terrorists to justice even after 70 days'. 'The failure is all the more glaring given they may have been earlier involved in terror attacks in Poonch (Dec 2023) and Gagangir & Gulmarg (Oct 2024),' Ramesh said. Besides Brazil, Modi will visit Ghana, Trinidad and Tobago, Argentina, Brazil, and Namibia during the eight-day trip, according to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA). In the first leg of the visit, Modi will undertake a visit to Ghana from July 2 to 3. From Ghana, Modi will travel to Trinidad and Tobago on a two-day visit from July 3 to 4. In the third leg of his visit, Modi will visit Argentina from July 4 to 5. In the fourth leg of his visit, Modi will travel to Brazil at the invitation of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The prime minister will visit Brazil from July 5 to 8 to attend the 17th BRICS Summit followed by a state visit. In the final leg of his visit, Modi will travel to Namibia.
NDTV
39 minutes ago
- NDTV
"I Was In The Room": S Jaishankar Refutes Trump's India-Pak Ceasefire Claims
New York: Foreign Minister S Jaishankar on Monday called the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam an "act of economic warfare" meant to destroy tourism in Kashmir. He asserted India's stand of not allowing nuclear blackmail to prevent it from responding to terror emanating from Pakistan, as he shared his firsthand account of the talks between New Delhi and Washington before the ceasefire deal with Islamabad. In an exclusive chat with Newsweek in New York, the Minister dismissed US President Donald Trump's claim of using trade to force India and Pakistan to accept a ceasefire after the escalation of India's Operation Sindoor in May. He revealed he was with Prime Minister Narendra Modi when US Vice President JD Vance spoke to him by phone, and there was no linking of trade and ceasefire as far as India was concerned. "I can tell you that I was in the room when Vice President Vance spoke to Prime Minister Modi on the night of May 9, saying that the Pakistanis would launch a very massive assault on did not accept certain things, and the Prime Minister was impervious to what the Pakistanis were threatening to do," Mr Jaishankar said. "On the contrary, he (PM Modi) indicated that there would be a response from us," he added, giving the chronology of interactions. Mr Jaishankar noted that on the night of May 9, the Pakistanis did attack India "massively", but he added that Indian forces responded very quickly. The next contact with Washington was between the Foreign Minister and US Secretary of State the next morning, with Marco Rubio telling him that "Pakistanis were ready to talk." Later that afternoon, Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations, Major General Kashif Abdullah, directly called his Indian counterpart, Lieutenant General Rajiv Ghai, to ask for a ceasefire. "So, I can only tell you from my personal experience what happened," Mr Jaishankar said while speaking at a fireside chat with Newsweek's CEO Dev Pragad. The Minister noted that India has had a string of terrorist attacks over the years emanating from Pakistan, and in the wake of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, there was a sentiment in the country that "enough is enough." "It was an act of economic warfare. It was meant to destroy tourism in Kashmir, which was the mainstay of the economy. It was also meant to provoke religious violence because people were asked to identify their faith before they were killed," he said. "So we decided that we cannot let terrorists function with impunity. The idea that they are on that side of the border, and that, therefore, sort of prevents retribution, I think, that's a proposition that needs to be challenged, and that is what we did," the Minister added. India launched Operation Sindoor against terrorist bases in Pakistan in retaliation for the Pahalgam terrorist attack by the Resistance Front, an outfit linked to Pakistan-supported Lashkar-e-Taiba. Trump's Claim Despite India's repeated denials, Trump, last Wednesday during a press conference in The Hague, again said, "I ended that with a series of phone calls on trade." "I said, 'Look, if you're gonna go fighting each other ... we're not doing any trade deal,'" he said. They responded that "You have to do a trade deal," the US President asserted. Mr Jaishankar asserted that the conversation did not pan out as claimed by the US President, and diplomacy and trade were not interlinked and operated independently of each other. "I think the trade people are doing what the trade people should be doing, which is negotiate with numbers and lines and products and do their tradeoffs," he said. "I think they're very professional and very, very focused," he added.
