
Poona Parsee Panchayat seeks minority status for Parsi students in admission forms
The letter highlights that Zoroastrians, though one of the smallest religious communities in the country, continue to face exclusion in institutional minority listings. This oversight, the Panchayat argues, affects the community's representation and access to educational benefits and reserved quotas, especially in competitive institutions.
Chairman of Poona Parsee Panchayat, advocate Marazban Irani, said 'It has been observed that in several educational institutions and admission processes, the Zoroastrian community is not specifically included under the minority category for consideration in reserved seats or other minority-related benefits. This omission affects the educational opportunities and representation of the community.'
A Parsi doctor from Pune, requesting anonymity, said that though the Supreme Court recognises Parsis as a minority community alongside Buddhists, Jains, Muslims, Christians and Sikhs, they are often not included in the minority category in admission forms and portals. 'Our appeal is simply to ensure that Zoroastrians are explicitly listed, so that students from our small community can access the rightful benefits extended to minorities,' he said.
The Panchayat urged authorities to correct this exclusion by ensuring Zoroastrians are explicitly included in all relevant admission-related documentation and systems. This, they said, would enable members of the community to avail the rightful benefits entitled to minorities under constitutional provisions.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
26 minutes ago
- India Today
In Bihar's 'Phulera', panchayat secretary takes on MLA, files case after threat
An FIR has been filed against RJD MLA Bhai Virendra in Patna by a panchayat secretary, a day after an audio clip went viral in which the Bihar leader is allegedly heard threatening the his complaint at an SC/ST police station, Sandeep Kumar, the panchayat secretary of Baluwa in Maner, accused the MLA of hurling casteist abuse and issuing spat between the MLA and the panchayat secretary has drawn sharp parallels with scenes from the popular web series 'Panchayat', whose premise hinges on a recurring tussle between the MLA (vidhayak) of Phulera and the panchayat pradhan and the secretary. THE VIRAL AUDIO CLIPNow, coming back to the real said the incident occurred on July 26, when he received a call from Virendra to enquire about the status of a death certificate for one Rinki (the similarities are unmissable here).However, the panchayat secretary failed to recognise the RJD MLA initially during the call, which angered Virendra. The audio clip of the incident has gone viral."You don't know Bhai Virendra? You want me to introduce myself? The whole country knows me," the voice, purportedly of Bhai Virendra, can be heard the panchayat secretary remains unnerved. "If you speak respectfully, I will do the same. I am not scared of you," he says.'JOOTE SE MARUNGA'This left the MLA fuming, who threatened to "beat him with a shoe". The MLA further says, "Joote se maarunga (I will hit you with a shoe) and you can file a case if you want... Anything can happen".After the audio clip surfaced online, the Block Development Officer (BDO) served a showcause notice to the panchayat secretary. Despite the notice, Kumar filed a formal complaint against the RJD acknowledged receiving the complaint and said that appropriate legal action would be taken after an investigation.- EndsMust Watch


NDTV
40 minutes ago
- NDTV
Trump-Kim Jong Un Ties "Not Bad", US Must Accept New Nuke Reality: North Korea
Seoul: -North Korea said on Tuesday the United States must accept that reality has changed since the countries' summit meetings in the past, and no future dialogue would end its nuclear programme, state media KCNA reported. Kim Yo Jong, the powerful sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un who is believed to speak for his brother, said she conceded that the personal relationship between Kim and U.S. President Donald Trump "is not bad." But if Washington intended to use a personal relationship as a way to end the North's nuclear weapons programme, the effort would only be the subject of "mockery," Kim Yo Jong said in a statement carried by KCNA. "If the U.S. fails to accept the changed reality and persists in the failed past, the DPRK-U.S. meeting will remain as a 'hope' of the U.S. side," she said. DPRK is short for North Korea's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. North Korea's capabilities as a nuclear weapons state and the geopolitical environment have radically changed since Kim and Trump held talks three times during the U.S. president's first term, she said. "Any attempt to deny the position of the DPRK as a nuclear weapons state ... will be thoroughly rejected," she said. Asked about the North Korean statement, a White House official said Trump was still committed to the goal he had for the three summit meetings he held with Kim in his first term. "The President retains those objectives and remains open to engaging with Leader Kim to achieve a fully denuclearised North Korea," the White House official told Reuters. At their first meeting in Singapore in 2018, Trump and Kim signed an agreement in principle to make the Korean peninsula free of nuclear weapons. The subsequent summit in Hanoi next year broke down due to a disagreement over removing international sanctions that had been imposed against Pyongyang. Trump has said he has a "great relationship" with Kim, and the White House has said the president is receptive to the idea of communicating with the reclusive North Korean leader.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Trump gets tough on Russia: What's hope for Ukraine can cause economic turmoil elsewhere
As the shortened deadline approaches, the world watches to see whether Trump's high-stakes gamble will force a breakthrough in the Ukraine conflict or lead to unintended consequences on the global stage. read more US President Donald Trump sips Diet Coke from his wine glass after a toast, during a luncheon for world leaders at the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, US, September 25, 2018. File Image/Reuters In a bold move, US President Donald Trump has drastically shortened the timeline he initially set for Russian President Vladimir Putin to secure a ceasefire with Ukraine. Originally giving Russia 50 days, Trump now insists on a resolution in just '10 or 12 days,' signalling an aggressive push to alter the course of the ongoing war. The timing is critical. Ukraine is grappling with its toughest moment on the battlefield since the conflict began. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD By September 3, the original deadline, Russia is poised to solidify significant territorial gains. Over the past two weeks, Moscow's forces have made rapid and strategic advances, positioning them to potentially encircle key eastern Ukrainian cities like Pokrovsk, Kostiantynivka, and Kupiansk in the north. Such a development could shift the front lines dramatically, bringing Putin closer to his goal of seizing the Donetsk region. The next '10 or 12 days' will be pivotal. If Trump's ultimatum proves to be another hollow threat or if the deadline shifts again, it could fuel perceptions of weakness within his administration. Critics have already pointed to a pattern they dub ' TACO' (Trump Always Chickens Out), suggesting Trump may hesitate to follow through on tough measures. Trump's secondary tariff gamble Last week, Trump floated the idea of imposing tariffs as high as 100 per cent on Russia's trading partners if Putin fails to halt hostilities within six weeks. However, this threat is fraught with complications. Russia's closest trading partners, China and India, are deeply intertwined with the US in delicate trade and tariff negotiations. Imposing secondary sanctions or tariffs on these nations could have far-reaching consequences for the global economy. Tariffing China, India to carry serious implications India, a close US partner, relies heavily on Russian energy. Complex mechanisms allow it to purchase this energy without destabilising global oil markets, which could otherwise drive up prices and harm the US economy. China, a Russian ally, is even more dependent on Moscow's energy supplies and maintains a complicated, often tense economic relationship with the United States. Sanctions on either country could disrupt global energy markets and strain US relations with two critical trading partners. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If Trump follows through with these sanctions, his actions would mark a significant escalation compared to the policies of his predecessor, President Joe Biden. Yet, the risk of miscalculation looms large. Punishing Russia's trading partners could derail ongoing negotiations with China and India, potentially backfiring on US interests and destabilising the global economy. As the shortened deadline approaches, the world watches to see whether Trump's high-stakes gamble will force a breakthrough in the Ukraine conflict or lead to unintended consequences on the global stage.