
Emmerdale star ENGAGED to convicted drug lord she secretly visits in prison after he helped start giant meth factory
Lucy, 48, has been to see Elliott Walker, 54, who helped start one of the largest amphetamine factories ever busted in Britain.
5
5
5
She drove four hours from her Yorkshire home to HMP Hollesley Bay, Suffolk, and back — 500 miles in all — where Walker is doing six years.
Our picture shows her last weekend parking in the visitors' car park of the 460-capacity Category D nick.
Lucy, who split from her former partner in 2019, had stated in a podcast that she was in an 'exclusive new relationship '.
Last year, the mum of three, who has played Chas Dingle on ITV's Emmerdale for 23 years, revealed in a personal Instagram video post that she was wearing a diamond engagement ring.
A source said: 'Her relationship has been the talk of the prison because some other visitors obviously recognised Lucy the other day as she's been on Emmerdale for ages.
'And Elliott has made no secret of telling other inmates she's his fiancee.'
It is not known how and where Lucy met Walker, who is thought to be close to a release date.
Walker, from Kidbrooke, South East London, was locked up in 2021 after admitting conspiracy to supply amphetamine.
He bought equipment for the drugs lab in Henley-in-Arden, Warks, which was smashed by the National Crime Agency.
It was said to be capable of producing 400kg of amphetamine — with an estimated street value of £10millon — every month.
Emmerdale's Lucy Pargeter splits from long-term boyfriend Rudi Coleano
Gang members had chemistry training in order to run the operation and the drugs were distributed in London, Kent and the West Midlands.
Another gang member got 18 years after admitting drug and money laundering offences.
Others were found guilty at trial.
Lucy, who came third on I'm A Celebrity in 2013, has told previously that she had breast implants removed as they hampered her breathing.
The Sun on Sunday has approached her for comment.
5
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Gregg Wallace claims he has been cleared of misconduct allegations
TV presenter Gregg Wallace has claimed he has been cleared of the 'most serious and sensational accusations' against him ahead of a report examining the MasterChef host's alleged misconduct. The 60-year-old stepped away from hosting the BBC cooking competition, after a number of historical complaints came to light last year, which led to the external investigation by the show's production company, Banijay UK. Advertisement A BBC News investigation reported that 13 people alleged Wallace had made inappropriate sexual comments across a range of shows over a 17-year period. The production firm previously said Wallace is 'committed to fully co-operating' with the external review while his lawyers have previously strongly denied 'he engages in behaviour of a sexually harassing nature', according to BBC News. Gregg Wallace co-presented Master Chef UK until last year. Photo: Ian West/PA. In a statement posted on his Instagram account on Tuesday, he said: 'I have taken the decision to speak out ahead of the publication of the Silkins (sic) report – a decision I do not take lightly. 'After 21 years of loyal service to the BBC, I cannot sit in silence while my reputation is further damaged to protect others. Advertisement 'I have now been cleared by the Silkins (sic) report of the most serious and sensational accusations made against me. 'The most damaging claims (including allegations from public figures which have not been upheld) were found to be baseless after a full and forensic six-month investigation.' BBC spokesperson said: 'Banijay UK instructed the law firm Lewis Silkin to run an investigation into allegations against Gregg Wallace. We are not going to comment until the investigation is complete and the findings are published.' Banijay UK declined to comment on Wallace's comments. Advertisement


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Real reason X Factor star Yazmin is on Love Island's Casa Amor ‘given away' by her former girl group's instagram post
CASA Amor bombshell Yaz Broom's real reason for signing up for Love Island has been 'given away' after her former girl group made a telling move on social media. Yaz, 26, now works as a DJ but she enjoyed brief success with girl group Four Of Diamonds after making it to The X Factor live shows in 2016. 3 3 3 The group - also made up of Caroline Alvares, Lauren Rammell and Sophia Saffarian - went on hiatus in 2020 after being signed to EMI Records and releasing a string of singles. Despite this, the group's official Instagram was reactivated as Yaz made her Love Island debut last night - suggesting they're hoping to use her time on the show to make a comeback. Yaz is growing close to hunky Giorgio Russo and during one of their chats she opened up about her time as a pop star. Gio, 30, asked why the group went their separate ways, and Yaz said: 'Lockdown. We just couldn't perform anything.' And fans were quick to comment on the revelation, with one writing: 'At least we finally have the answer why you split lol.' The group responded: 'Woops. Look, we haven't split, we're on hiatus!!' Another fan begged for 'one more tour', to which the group teased: 'For old time's sake?' After successfully making it through to The X Factor live shows in 2016, Four Of Diamonds pushed on until week five of the competition before being eliminated. The girls were sent home following a sing off with Gifty Louise, when only their mentor Louis Walsh voted to save them. Italian stallion Gio is currently coupled up with bombshell Yasmin Pettet, who has undoubtedly made the biggest impact on the villa - shocking her co-stars with threesome offers and leaving the other girls fuming by kissing their men. Gio and Yasmin appeared to have hit it off before the Islanders were split into two for Casa Amor. So Yaz will have her work cut out if she wants to turn Gio's head to win a place in the main villa.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
There's more to the Bayeux Tapestry loan deal than meets the eye…
President Macron's loan of the Bayeux Tapestry to the British Museum is the perfect way to mark King Charles III's first state visit of his reign. It ticks all the boxes. It's the greatest relic of Anglo-Norman royal history, probably commissioned in the 1070s by Odo of Bayeux, William the Conqueror's half-brother, who became the Earl of Kent after the Conquest. And the tapestry's extreme beauty – strictly speaking, it's an embroidery – appeals to Charles's aesthetic side. It features the King's direct ancestor, William the Conqueror – the monarch who, more than any other, created England, with a Norman infusion of blood and mighty Romanesque churches, cathedrals and castles. What's more, the tapestry is coming home. The smart money suggests the tapestry was made in Kent – Odo's heartland – before finding its way to Bayeux. Macron has been pondering this perfect present since 2018, when he first said the tapestry would come here for a 2022 exhibition. Conservation worries put the present on hold. Strictly speaking, Macron's present is really a loan: it will be swapped temporarily, going on display between September 2026 and July 2027, with museums in Normandy receiving Anglo-Saxon treasures from the Sutton Hoo ship burial. The exhibition is expected to be a once-in-a-generation blockbuster, attracting millions to the British Museum, perhaps even eclipsing the popularity of the museum's most popular show, its 1972 Tutankhamun event. After a successful holiday here, the artefact will certainly return to Bayeux. In so many ways, the Bayeux Tapestry's return is like the mooted return of the Elgin Marbles to Athens, currently being brokered by George Osborne, the museum's chairman. Like the Elgin Marbles, the tapestry is of vital national importance to its original home, if indeed it was first stitched in England. Like the marbles, it has ended up in a different country. And now, just as is mooted with the marbles, the tapestry is being loaned back to that original home. George Osborne is a good historian. We sat in seminars together in the early 1990s at Magdalen College, Oxford, where he was a Demy – Magdalen's word for a scholar. He, more than anyone, will appreciate the delicious similarities between Macron's masterstroke and his own plan to see the Elgin Marbles back in Athens. Osborne is forbidden by statute from actually giving them to Greece; the British Museum Act of 1963 prevents the museum from disposing of its holdings. Parliament would have to make changes to the Act in order for that to happen – not something that's high on its priority list in these febrile terms. Could the tapestry loan be a precursor to a marbles deal – a way of showing the Greeks the rules of engagement, without contravening the Act? There is one big difference: once the Bayeux Tapestry arrives in London, neither the King nor Keir Starmer – nor anyone in England, for that matter – will fight to keep it here. It isn't just the Elgin Marbles that hold a place in Greek hearts, it is the raging desire to have them back. Any Greek prime minister who gets them back, even on loan, will be a national hero. Any Greek prime minister who then sends them back to the British Museum will become a national pariah. Any loan agreement with the Greeks will thus not be worth the paper it's written on. Paving the way with the Bayeux Tapestry loan – which offers a contemporary blueprint for how such things can be done – is a shrewd political move by those who want Greece to have the marbles back for good. It isn't beyond the wit of government lawyers to construct an arrangement that gives the appearance of being time-limited when it is essentially permanent. After its blockbuster exhibition, the Bayeux Tapestry will return to Bayeux, and it may well come back here one day. If the Elgin Marbles go to Athens, however, they will never return.