Curtain finally falls on USAID
The US foreign aid agency formally closed down on Tuesday, with President Donald Trump's administration trumpeting the end of the "charity-based model" despite predictions that millions of lives will be lost.
Founded in 1961 as John F Kennedy sought to leverage aid to win over the developing world in the Cold War, the US Agency for International Development (USAID) has now been incorporated into the State Department — after Secretary of State Marco Rubio slashed 85 per cent of its programming.
In a farewell to remaining staff on Monday, former presidents George W Bush and Barack Obama — as well as U2 frontman Bono — saluted their work and said it was still needed.
Bush pointed to PEPFAR, the massive US effort to fight HIV/AIDS that he considers one of the top achievements of his 2001-2009 Republican presidency.
"This program shows a fundamental question facing our country — is it in our nation's interest that 25 million people who would have died now live? I think it is," Bush said in a video message seen by AFP.
Obama, who like Bush has been sparing in openly criticizing Trump, said that ending USAID was "inexplicable" and "will go down as a colossal mistake."
"Gutting USAID is a travesty and it is a tragedy because it's some of the most important work happening anywhere in the world," the Democrat said.
Rubio painted a drastically different picture of USAID, which was an early target of a sweeping government cost-cutting drive led for Trump by billionaire Elon Musk.
Rubio said that USAID's "charity-based model" fueled "addiction" by developing nations' leaders and that trade was more effective.
"Beyond creating a globe-spanning NGO industrial complex at taxpayer expense, USAID has little to show since the end of the Cold War," Rubio wrote in an essay.
He also complained that many recipients of US aid do not vote with the United States at the United Nations and that rival China often enjoys higher favorability among the public.
A senior State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that The Lancet study relied on "incorrect assumptions" and said the United States will continue aid but in a "more efficient" way.
He said that PEPFAR will remain, with a priority on stopping HIV transmission from mothers to children.
But he acknowledged the United States was no longer funding PrEP medication, which significantly reduces the rate of HIV transmission and has been encouraged by high-risk communities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Trump tax-cut plan returns to US House, Republicans divided on bill
WASHINGTON: The debate within President Donald Trump's Republican Party over a massive tax-cut and spending bill returns to the House of Representatives on Wednesday, as party leaders try to overcome internal divisions and meet a self-imposed July 4 deadline. The Senate passed the legislation, which nonpartisan analysts say will add $3.4 trillion to the nation's debt over the next decade, by the narrowest possible margin on Tuesday after intense debate on the bill's hefty price tag and substantial cuts to the Medicaid healthcare program. Similar divides exist in the House, which Republicans control by a 220-212 margin and where a fractious caucus has regularly bucked its leadership in recent years - though members have so far not rejected major Trump priorities. 'The House will work quickly to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill that enacts President Trump's full America First agenda by the Fourth of July,' House Speaker Mike Johnson said in a statement on Tuesday, citing the bill's extension of Trump's 2017 individual tax cuts and increased funding for the military and immigration enforcement. House Republican leaders set an initial procedural vote on the bill for 9 a.m. ET (1300 GMT). The House Rules Committee advanced the Senate bill overnight by a 7-6 vote with two Republicans - hardliners Chip Roy and Ralph Norman – voting against it. US Senate Republicans struggling to unite on Trump's $3.3 trillion tax-cut bill Johnson can afford to lose no more than three votes if all members are present, though a series of storms Tuesday night complicated lawmakers' travel plans, prompting some to drive through the night toward the Capitol. Hardliner anger over spending The loudest Republican objections against the bill come from party hardliners angry it does not sufficiently cut spending and includes a $5 trillion increase in the nation's debt ceiling, which lawmakers must address in the coming months or risk a devastating default on the nation's $36.2 trillion debt. 'What the Senate did was unconscionable,' Norman, a South Carolina Republican, said on Tuesday. One of several fiscal hawks who spoke out against the Senate bill's higher price tag, he accused the Senate of handing out 'goodie bags' of spending to satisfy holdouts. Trump for weeks has pushed for passage ahead of Friday's Independence Day holiday and kept up the pressure on Wednesday. 'Republicans, don't let the Radical Left Democrats push you around. We've got all the cards, and we are going to use them,' Trump said in a social media post. Democrats are united in opposition to the bill, saying that its tax breaks disproportionately benefit the wealthy while cutting services that lower- and middle-income Americans rely on. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that almost 12 million people could lose health insurance as a result of the bill. Trump's sweeping tax-cut, spending bill clears first US Senate hurdle 'This is the largest assault on American healthcare in history,' Democratic House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters on Tuesday, pledging that his party will use 'all procedural and legislative options' to try to stop - or delay - passage. The version of the bill passed by the Senate on Tuesday would add more to the debt than the version first passed by the House in May. The CBO on Tuesday raised its estimate for how much the Senate bill would increase the budget deficit through 2045 by $100 billion, to $3.4 trillion. The bill includes more than $900 million in cuts to the Medicaid program for low-income Americans. Those cuts also raised concerns among some House Republicans. 'I will not support a final bill that eliminates vital funding our hospitals rely on,' Republican Representative David Valadao of California said before Senate passage. Timing difficulties But some House Republicans worried about social safety-net cuts could find solace in the Senate's last-minute decision to set aside more money for rural hospitals, funding Representative Nick Langworthy, a New York Republican, called 'a lifeline that will be very helpful to districts like mine.' US Senate passes Trump's sweeping tax-cut, spending bill, sends to House Any changes made by the House would require another Senate vote, making it all but impossible to meet the July 4 deadline. Any Republican public opposition to the bill risks irking Trump, as was the case when the president slammed Senator Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican who announced his retirement after coming out in opposition to the bill. Another former Trump ally, the world's richest person Elon Musk, this week resumed an active campaign against the bill over social media, blasting its deficit-building effects. That has reignited a feud between Trump and Musk.
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Quad ministers condemn Pahalgam attack without naming Pakistan
Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar speaks as Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong, Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stand together at the start of their meeting of the Indo-Pacific Quad at the State Department in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 1, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque Listen to article The Quad grouping of the United States, India, Japan and Australia called on Tuesday for the perpetrators of an Pahalgam attack that killed 26 in India Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) to be brought to justice without delay. The April 22 attack sparked heavy fighting between nuclear-armed Pakistan and India in the latest escalation of a decades-old rivalry as India blamed it on Pakistan, which denied responsibility while calling for a neutral investigation. The US State Department issued, a joint statement by the foreign ministers of the grouping, who met in Washington, but stopped short of naming Pakistan or blaming Islamabad for the attack. India, till date, has not provided any evidence of Pakistan's alleged involvement in the attack. "The Quad unequivocally condemns all acts of terrorism and violent extremism in all its forms and manifestations, including cross-border terrorism," the ministers said in the statement. They called on all members of the United Nations to cooperate actively with "all relevant authorities" in delivering justice to the "perpetrators, organisers, and financiers of this reprehensible act", without any delay. Read: FO slams Modi's 'unfounded' allegations on Pahalgam attack On May 7, the Indian Air Force carried out an unprovoked attack on civilian targets in Pakistan and alleged that New Delhi had targeted "terrorist infrastructure". The strikes killed multiple Pakistani civilians and injure many more. The Pakistan Air Force (PAF), scrambled to counter the Indian aerial threat, shot down six IAF fighter aircraft including three French-made Rafales. The strikes sett off an exchange of attacks between the two countries by fighter jets, missiles, drones and artillery that killed dozens until a ceasefire on May 10. The ceasefire was first announced by US President Donald Trump on social media after Washington held talks with both sides, but India has differed with Trump's claims that it resulted from his intervention and threats to sever trade talks. India's position has been that New Delhi and Islamabad must resolve their problems directly and with no outside involvement. On Monday, India's foreign minister, Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, restated its position that trade was not a factor in the ceasefire. "Relationships will never be free of issues," he said, referring to the United States, adding, "What matters is the ability to deal with it and to keep that trend going in the positive direction."
Express Tribune
13 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Curtain finally falls on USAID
Listen to article The US foreign aid agency formally closed down on Tuesday, with President Donald Trump's administration trumpeting the end of the "charity-based model" despite predictions that millions of lives will be lost. Founded in 1961 as John F Kennedy sought to leverage aid to win over the developing world in the Cold War, the US Agency for International Development (USAID) has now been incorporated into the State Department — after Secretary of State Marco Rubio slashed 85 per cent of its programming. In a farewell to remaining staff on Monday, former presidents George W Bush and Barack Obama — as well as U2 frontman Bono — saluted their work and said it was still needed. Bush pointed to PEPFAR, the massive US effort to fight HIV/AIDS that he considers one of the top achievements of his 2001-2009 Republican presidency. "This program shows a fundamental question facing our country — is it in our nation's interest that 25 million people who would have died now live? I think it is," Bush said in a video message seen by AFP. Obama, who like Bush has been sparing in openly criticizing Trump, said that ending USAID was "inexplicable" and "will go down as a colossal mistake." "Gutting USAID is a travesty and it is a tragedy because it's some of the most important work happening anywhere in the world," the Democrat said. Rubio painted a drastically different picture of USAID, which was an early target of a sweeping government cost-cutting drive led for Trump by billionaire Elon Musk. Rubio said that USAID's "charity-based model" fueled "addiction" by developing nations' leaders and that trade was more effective. "Beyond creating a globe-spanning NGO industrial complex at taxpayer expense, USAID has little to show since the end of the Cold War," Rubio wrote in an essay. He also complained that many recipients of US aid do not vote with the United States at the United Nations and that rival China often enjoys higher favorability among the public. A senior State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that The Lancet study relied on "incorrect assumptions" and said the United States will continue aid but in a "more efficient" way. He said that PEPFAR will remain, with a priority on stopping HIV transmission from mothers to children. But he acknowledged the United States was no longer funding PrEP medication, which significantly reduces the rate of HIV transmission and has been encouraged by high-risk communities.
