Fact check: Which EU country returns the most irregular immigrants?
Minister of the Presidency of Portugal António Leitão Amaro, of the ruling centre-right Social Democratic Party, recently said that the Socialist Party failed to tackle illegal immigration during its roughly eight years in government between 2015 and 2024.
He said that Portugal is "one of the countries that returns the fewest illegal immigrants", but how do its return figures compare to those of other EU countries?
To find out, we took a look at official Eurostat statistics, which log the third country nationals returned following an order to leave each EU country every quarter.
And yes, Portugal is consistently ranked as one of the countries with the lowest return rates.
For example, the most recent dataset including every EU member is Q3 2024, which shows that Slovakia returned the fewest irregular migrants, having sent back 55 people, followed by Slovenia with 80 and then Portugal with 85.
On the other side of the spectrum was France, having returned nearly 4,000 people, followed by Germany and Spain with just over 3,000 people each.
It's a similar story every year: in Q1 2025, France, Germany and this time Cyprus returned the most irregular immigrants, according to Eurostat, with Luxembourg, Slovenia and Slovakia bringing up the rear.
The Portuguese figures for this quarter aren't yet available on Eurostat, but the country has generally been at the bottom end of the table every quarter since 2022.
The same is true for the number of orders to leave the EU which each member state has handed out, without necessarily having carried them out yet.
Eurostat figures show that Slovakia gave the fewest orders to leave to irregular migrants in Q3 2024 (80), followed by Portugal (120) and Estonia (135).
France was way ahead of the pack with 30,800, but Germany (13,660) and Spain (13,645) once again rounded out the top three.
Figures indicate the EU as a whole is ramping up efforts to clamp down on irregular immigration.
New figures released on Monday reveal that in the first quarter of 2025, 123,905 non-EU citizens were ordered to leave an EU country, and 28,475 people were returned to third countries following an order to leave.
Compared with Q1 2024, the number of non-EU citizens ordered to leave went up by 18.4% and the number of people returned to third countries was up by 6.4%.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
14 minutes ago
- Euronews
The two faces of Ursula: Reinvention or deception at the EU's helm?
In December 2019 Ursula von der Leyen returned to Brussels, the city where she spent her childhood, with the poise of a self-assured centrist and the promise of a visionary. The Green Deal stood at the centre of her first presidency, offering climate hope and a surprisingly collaborative touch, flanked by the liberal Danish Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager and Frans Timmermans, the socialist Dutchman - co-stars in her ensemble cast. That was Season 1. But as Season 2 gets underway, followers of her first term might be wondering if they're still watching the same show. Or at least asking if the lead character has been switched and a doppelganger has taken the helm. So what's happened - is Ursula von der Leyen suffering an identity crisis, or simply channelling her inner political shapeshifter? Different style, different priorities The new Ursula appears to be a pragmatic political realist, even Machiavellian. A significant part of this shift toward centralisation can be attributed to her powerful chief of staff, Bjoern Seibert, an adept puppet master skilfully pulling the strings of power within the Berlaymont building. During Season 1, maverick Commissioners such as France's Thierry Breton and Luxembourg's Nicolas Schmit developed as characters critical of von der Leyen's decisions. This has now disappeared from the script, and Ursula's gone from ensemble lead to solo act. Most importantly, they've been replaced with lower-profile allies who are kept in the dark on key decisions - most notably during the unveiling of the EU's long-term budget, when Commissioners reportedly saw the figures only moments before the official curtain raise on the proposal. Core priorities have seemingly vanished. There's an air of political amnesia, or perhaps strategic dissociation, where past commitments are forgotten or discarded. But what are Ursula von der Leyen's true colours? Is she still the 'Green Queen' of 2019, or has she transformed into the grey, power-consolidating 'VDL'? The curious case of the vanishing Green Deal Let's rewind to 2019, when von der Leyen made the Green Deal the crown jewel of her presidency. Back then, 'green' wasn't just a policy, it was a vibe. The Green Deal was supposed to transform Europe's economy, its agriculture and transport. Fast forward to today: the vibe's off. Her environmental mission seems increasingly distant, if not altogether abandoned. Today, the Green Deal is conspicuously absent, not just from rhetoric, but also from official documents. In the new long-term EU budget proposal, for instance, the term isn't mentioned once. Many of its pillars are being dismantled piece by piece. The most glaring example is the systematic rollback of Green Deal initiatives - such as the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - through so-called "Omnibus" simplification proposals, with the latest retreat involving the proposed Green Claims Directive—meant to combat greenwashing. More symbolic is the disappearance of the "Farm to Fork" strategy, once the farming side of the Green Deal, which has all but vanished from speeches, policy documents, and public messaging. Its omission from the Commission's long-awaited 'Vision for Agriculture and Food' was effectively a quiet burial, making the document less of a vision and more a eulogy. Officially, the Commission remains in denial, but the signs of abandonment are impossible to ignore. Europe's Beating Cancer Plan - missing a beat? Green isn't the only colour fading from von der Leyen's palette, telling a story of a shifting focus. Over in the health file, there's a quiet code blue, with a key dossier on life support. In her first term, von der Leyen championed the European Health Union, with the Beating Cancer Plan as a cornerstone. With €4 billion on the table, the Commission pledged a full-frontal assault on tobacco, alcohol, asbestos, and other risk factors for cancer. But momentum has slowed dramatically. Measures targeting tobacco and alcohol reduction have stalled, and once-prioritised regulations (such as those governing sunbed usage) have been quietly dropped. The new EU4Health budget reflects this decline. In 2024, €115 million was allocated specifically for cancer. In 2025, this has been slashed to €60 million, now also covering not just cancer but also cardiovascular disease and other non-communicable illnesses. With attention diverted to pandemic preparedness and other priorities, it's unclear how much of the original vision will survive. And with more open files than open funding lines, Brussels insiders are asking: is health promotion and the fight against cancer being reassigned to sleepy interns and relegated to just a historical footnote? Back to her roots: Defence and military power And yet, amid the abandonment of green and health priorities, von der Leyen appears more energised than ever, but on a different front: defence. A year into her second term, the former German defence minister has returned to familiar territory. With the Green Deal receding, she has seized the geopolitical moment to promote a stronger European defence industry. With her former life as Germany's defence minister back in vogue (and with Frans Timmermans no longer breathing green fire down her neck), von der Leyen has pivoted hard to European defence. An example: the EU's upcoming budget cycle (starting in 2028) proposes a fivefold increase in defence and space funding. National budgets on defence are also rising, spurred by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Her Commission has also recently proposed structural changes: redirecting cohesion funds to defence, relaxing fiscal rules to allow greater military spending, launching the European Competitiveness Fund (ECF), and offering low-interest loans under the SAFE scheme. There's also an emphasis on simplifying defence procurement rules and boosting joint R&D initiatives. Still to come: a military mobility package aimed at streamlining troop and equipment movement, and the unveiling of plans for a true "European Defence Union". With the US increasingly focused on the Indo-Pacific, the EU faces a test: can it become a credible security actor within NATO? And will von der Leyen's defence push bear fruit in time to deter potential threats—particularly from Russia—by 2030? The verdict: the jury's still out... From Green Deal visionary to defence strategist, von der Leyen's transformation has raised eyebrows across Brussels and beyond, leaving many confused. The contrast between the two mandates could not be starker. So, who is the real Ursula von der Leyen? Is she the eco-champion who once promised to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent? Or the iron-fisted strategist consolidating power and refocusing on geopolitical muscle? Perhaps both. Perhaps only one of them ever truly existed. Or maybe neither. What's clear is that the second mandate is not just more of the same: It's a whole new season and a new cast. With the same protagonist wearing the same blazer but with different habits and a different mind. As Brussels braces for the next plot twist, especially with US tariffs and budget wrangling, one thing's for sure: Ursula von der Leyen is playing a different game. And the rest of Europe? Still trying to figure out if this is a character arc... or a complete reboot.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Amsterdam funds first US weapons package to Kyiv under new initiative
The Netherlands said on Monday that it will contribute €500 million to purchase US military equipment to be sent to Ukraine, becoming the first NATO country to forge a new protocol to provide Kyiv with American weaponry after US President Donald Trump tightened crucial military aid following his re-election. Last month, Trump announced that the US will continue to supply weapons to Ukraine, which would be paid for by Kyiv's European allies, but did not provide information on how this new system was designed to operate. Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans announced in a post on X, formerly Twitter, that 'The Netherlands is the first NATO country to provide a package of €500 million in American weapon systems (including Patriot components and missiles).' The Dutch defence chief noted that these weapons are of significant importance to Ukrainian soldiers fending off Russian attacks on the frontline and are needed 'so that Ukraine can counter Russian aggression, also for the rest of Europe.' NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte welcomed the announcement on X, saying 'Great to see the Netherlands taking the lead and funding the first package of US military equipment for Ukraine under NATO's Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List initiative.' The NATO boss, former prime minister of the Netherlands, thanked allies for ensuring Ukraine remains equipped to continue to defend against the Kremlin's attacks and protect its skies and people. He also added that he hopes other NATO allies will make similar 'significant announcements' soon. The Dutch move comes a few weeks after several European countries including Germany and Norway purchased Patriot air defence systems from the US for Ukraine in a deal facilitated by NATO. On Friday, Berlin announced that it was providing a further two Patriot systems to Kyiv to further enhance its defence capabilities. US Ambassador to NATO Matt Whitaker also welcomed the Dutch announcement, asserting that it fulfils Trump's initiative of 'allies buying American weapons to help Ukraine defend itself, pressure Russia and boost US jobs'. Whitaker noted that he expects more NATO allies to follow suit and supply Ukraine through this new mechanism. NATO said previously that it will coordinate this new initiative, funded by European allies and Canada, and broken up in packages worth roughly €500 million. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy took to X to express his gratitude for Amsterdam leading the way in this new effort. 'Ukraine, and thus the whole of Europe, will be better protected from Russian terror. I am sincerely grateful to the Netherlands for their substantial contribution to strengthening Ukraine's air shield,' wrote Zelenskyy. 'he package is worth 500 million euros and includes American weapons, including missiles for the Patriots. The first such step among NATO countries and at a time when Russia is trying to scale up its strikes. This will definitely help protect the lives of our people!' Zelenskyy said this initiative is a result of the most recent NATO summit in The Hague in June. Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof said the weapons package will help Ukraine not only continue to fight for its freedom, but all of Europe's.
Euronews
13 hours ago
- Euronews
EU diplomats confirm they won't yet sanction Israel on Gaza
EU diplomats on Monday failed to agree once again on a partial suspension of Israel from the Horizon Europe fund in response to the war in Gaza, several diplomats said. Gathered online for their regular Mashreq/Maghreb Working Party and despite mounting pressure on Israel over the hunger crisis in Gaza, the 27 EU diplomats still couldn't reach any qualified majority on a European Commission proposal to cut Israel from partial access to the EU's €95 billion Horizon Europe research fund. 'The situation has not changed,' one EU diplomat said, referring to a formal meeting of EU ambassadors last week which also failed to agree to the Commission's proposal. The diplomat said the issue was now in the hands of the EU's foreign affairs ministers, who will meet informally on 29 August. With Israel facing global criticism over allowing starvation in the besieged strip and talks between Hamas and Israel at an impasse, the proposal itself would be a largely symbolic gesture. Israel would lose access to €200 millions' worth of future grants and investments in Horizon's European Investment Council (EIC) which specialises in so-called disruptive technologies. Commission officials say it would not affect support for fundamental or collaborative research. But even for a minimal sanction, there was no agreement among Europeans on Monday. Some EU countries have preferred to condemn Israel through individual initiatives like France's recognition of Palestine. The diplomat said support from the big countries like Germany or Italy, which is essential for a qualified majority vote to pass, was still lacking on Monday. Germany and Italy are part of those who 'prefer that dialogue with Israel continues', he said, while France, Spain and Ireland support the Commission proposal. Others including Romania and Finland 'are still examining' the text, he said. 'The refusal of certain member states to take even this smallest possible step to pressure Israel, while civilians continue to be killed and starved in Gaza, is absolutely incriminating,' said Martin Konecny, who heads the European Middle East Project in Brussels. Monday's meeting also took place a day after videos showing two Israeli hostages in Gaza appearing emaciated and distressed were released, sparking outrage among western leaders.
