logo
Senate GOP faces tough call over Trump demand to cancel recess

Senate GOP faces tough call over Trump demand to cancel recess

The Hill5 days ago
Senate Republicans are weighing whether to heed President Trump's call to cancel some or all of the August recess to approve key nominees or to use the full month to go home and sell the party's tax and spending law to voters, which top Republicans view as crucial to their midterm election hopes.
Having passed the party's 'big, beautiful bill' and package to claw back funding for public media and foreign aid, the Senate's plan was to motor ahead on scores of Trump nominations in the next two weeks, then leave for the extended break.
But Trump over the weekend urged Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) to keep everyone in town.
While some in the GOP would welcome lopping off a portion of the recess, Republicans view a month-long messaging push on the 'big, beautiful bill' as imperative for electoral success, especially with Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), the National Republican Senatorial Committee's chairman, admitting recently that it is not polling well enough for his liking.
'That's also an important part. We've got to go back and be able to talk to our constituents and explain to them what we just did in a way that will help in the midterm elections, which I know the president and we all care about,' said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), who is up for reelection next year and staring down a tricky primary fight.
'This would be one time when we would be back home and be able to do that,' Cornyn said.
Thune on Monday kept the door open to keeping Republicans in Washington.
'We're thinking about it. We want to get as many [nominations] through the pipeline as we can,' Thune said at the Capitol.
The GOP has more than 130 nominees awaiting floor action, including many out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and an initial batch of judicial choices, with more set to be advanced this week. Democrats have refused to concede time on any of the nominations, drawing each one out and forcing Republicans to consider their options.
Cornyn allowed that Trump had a 'legitimate point' in complaining about it, and Thune noted that Trump is the first president who has not seen any of his nominees be greenlit via voice vote or by unanimous consent.
'Not a single one,' Thune continued, adding that he and Trump have discussed possibilities of how to handle recess. 'Trying to get his team in place is something that we're very committed to and we're going to be looking at all the options in the next few weeks to try and get as many of those across the finish line as we can.'
In addition to nominations, the South Dakota Republican said government funding and the annual National Defense Authorization Act would top the to-do list if members are kept in town.
Keeping senators in D.C. in August wouldn't be unprecedented — especially under a Trump presidency.
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), then the GOP leader, canceled the first week of the August break in 2017 in order to keep up work to repeal and replace the Affordable Acre Act after the late Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) tanked their 'skinny repeal' push.
Just a year later, McConnell went a step further to scrap more than two weeks of the break in order to keep a sizable number of Senate Democrats in Washington instead of allowing them to be back home to campaign ahead of the midterm elections.
Feelings about the possibility this go-around are mixed. Conservatives on Monday indicated they are gung-ho about staying in town to advance the president's nominees.
Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) said members can remain in Washington and still sell the 'big, beautiful bill' in other creative ways. He noted that he did three tele-town halls last week that attracted 5,000 listeners to each.
'Whatever it takes to get his [nominations] across the finish line, we need to do. … We can still get back [home] on weekends,' he said, saying that it's possible only part of recess is affected.
Others, especially those up for reelection in 2026, are hoping Thune and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) can strike a deal to advance a group of less-controversial nominees in a single bloc.
Adding to that desire is that the chamber is hitting the tail end of a grueling six-month stretch. The Senate spent the first ten weeks of the year in session, more than double the usual amount. Lawmakers also took part in four overnight vote-a-ramas and saw their July 4 recess significantly curtailed due to passage of the tax law.
'Cooler heads can prevail,' said Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), who is likely running for a third term next year. 'Getting back home is our opportunity … to get back in when we haven't had the chance because we've been in session so much lately. A lot of us were kind of planning on the August time to really get back in and reestablish with some of those organizations we haven't had a chance to talk to this year.'
Rounds was also curt when asked if Thune should cancel the planned break.
'No,' he said. 'Of course not.'
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) concurred, as she represents a state that is not only furthest away and the most difficult commute from D.C., but also difficult to traverse within. Many communities in Alaska are only reachable to plane and August is the only time she can visit some.
'How do I do all of this if I don't have time out there?' Murkowski said. 'Our states are big. This is part of my day job too. You get us for the rest of the year back here, but there's got to be some time when we can actually be addressing the needs of our constituents back home.'
'I guard this recess,' she said, taking issue with the phrase 'recess.' 'Do you realize all the pictures I'm getting from people back home? … People are dipnetting, they're hauling in their fish, and I'm just looking at it thinking, 'I haven't even been able to do serious fishing, much less fun fishing.''
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A MAGA Voter's Reddit Post Breaking Down 5 Reasons They'll Be Voting "All Blue" In The Midterms Is Going Viral
A MAGA Voter's Reddit Post Breaking Down 5 Reasons They'll Be Voting "All Blue" In The Midterms Is Going Viral

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A MAGA Voter's Reddit Post Breaking Down 5 Reasons They'll Be Voting "All Blue" In The Midterms Is Going Viral

As of late, Donald Trump's MAGA base has NOT been happy with him. From his mishandling of the Epstein files to bombing Iran, Trump seems to be backtracking on many of his campaign promises, and his support, even from high-profile names, is slipping. A Reddit post by a MAGA voter has recently gone viral for breaking down five reasons why they are abandoning Trump and planning to vote blue in the 2026 midterms. Related: At the start of the post, the MAGA voter explained their last-minute decision to vote for Trump on Election Day... They described feeling that Trump "got his ass beat" by Kamala Harris in the presidential debate, but did not like that the DNC was "open to big corporations and corporate donors." Their decision to vote for Trump also was inspired by Trump joining forces with RFK Jr., which they felt could improve nutrition policies. "Nutrition is a huge thing for me..." Related: The MAGA voter also assumed that Trump could end the Ukraine/Russia war due to his close relationship with Vladimir Putin. "I felt Trump would calm down the Ukraine/Russia basically say 'stop this shit' and create a calmer world for us." But, according to the MAGA voter, everything went south with the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein files. "Guy thinks we're stupid. He campaigns on the Epstein files, realizes he's on there and now is telling us to stop worrying about it." The White House has called the Wall Street Journal's claim that Trump was notified by the Attorney General that his name was in the Epstein files a "fake news story." Related: The MAGA voter also called out Trump's attempts to get rid of the Department of Education. "I know he brought this up during his campaign, but I thought he'd be sensible enough to work across the aisle with Democrats on this matter, but this is insane." They also called out Trump's "Big, Beautiful, Bill" that they described as "abhorrently terrible." As well as Trump's tariffs increasing costs for young people. "Wtf is this guy thinking other countries will pay more. We're the ones having to foot the cost." They took issue with Trump's immigration and deportation policies call them "messed up," because Trump has given ICE "free will to do whatever." Related: And finally, the post ended with a promise to abandon Trump in the midterms. "I will absolutely be voting all blue come the midterms and will be voting for a sensible democrat next election." After reading the post, most people in the comments were not exactly applauding the MAGA voter for their switch-up. "Wow, this is someone who even seems to have paid more attention than most, but also somehow discounted 99% of things Trump said he'd do. I just can't with that level of cognitive dissonance," one user said. "'She didn't have any ideas that I considered fresh and new, so I figured I may as well vote for the guy who babbled utter nonsense instead,'" another user wrote sarcastically, referencing the voter's comments on the presidential debate. "This sounds like a lot of people in my family's rationale for voting Trump, who should have had enough common sense to think things through. They'll never admit they're wrong and vote democrat though. At least this person realized they were wrong, albeit way too late," this user wrote. "They really give him too much credit thinking these pie in the sky thoughts that'd he abolish everything he said he would, and replace it all with something way better, which he never had a plan to do." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds:

U.S. slaps 20.56% anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood lumber
U.S. slaps 20.56% anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood lumber

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

U.S. slaps 20.56% anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood lumber

The U.S. Commerce Department has decided to hike anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood to 20.56 per cent, with B.C. lumber organizations calling them unjustified, punitive and protectionist. The hiked softwood lumber duties come amid the growing trade war between Canada and the U.S., and represent the latest blow to B.C.'s beleaguered forestry industry. B.C. Forests Minister Ravi Parmar described the long-awaited rate hike as a "gut punch" for B.C.'s forestry industry which has seen thousands of workers laid off over the last few years. "U.S. President Donald Trump has made it his mission to destroy Canada's economy, and there is no sector that has faced more of that than the forestry sector," he told CBC News. "This is a big deal for our workers. This is going to have a significant impact. It will lead to curtailments," he added. The B.C. government has been urging the federal government to prioritize the softwood lumber industry in trade discussions with the U.S., and Parmar said the hiked duties would also impact U.S. homeowners needing lumber to rebuild or renovate their homes. "This is going to mean that Americans, in particular middle-class Americans, are going to be paying more to the tune of $15,000 to $20,000 more USD to purchase or to build a home." The B.C. Lumber Trade Council says in a statement that if the U.S. department's pending review on countervailing duties is in line with its preliminary results, the combined rate against Canadian softwood shipped to the United States will be well over 30 per cent. In April, the preliminary combined rate on Canadian softwood lumber was reported to be 34.45 per cent, up from the previous 14.54 per cent. Friday's decision is a final determination, with Parmar saying it would go into effect in the U.S. Federal Register shortly.U.S. lumber producers have long maintained that Canadian stumpage fees, for harvesting on Crown land, are an unfair government subsidy. B.C.'s Independent Wood Processors Association says in a statement that the U.S. Commerce Department's decision this week to raise duties also includes a requirement for Canadian companies to retroactively remit duties for products shipped to the United States since Jan.1, 2023. WATCH | B.C. premier urges feds to prioritze lumber deal: Association chair Andy Rielly says in a statement that the requirement to pay duties on products shipped in the last 31 months could not only force small B.C. producers to shut down, but may also threaten operators' personal assets as they may have to risk using their homes as collateral to secure bonds to pay. Prime Minister Mark Carney said earlier this month that a future trade agreement with the United States could include quotas on softwood lumber, an area that has caused friction between the two countries for years before the latest trade war. Producer urges province to change conditions The United States has long been the single largest market for B.C. lumber exports, representing over half the market for the approximately $10-billion industry. But amid a series of challenges for the province's forestry industry — including a mountain pine beetle infestation that has killed hundreds of thousands of trees — mills have been closing around the province in recent years, and major forestry companies are opening up new mills in the United States. In 2023, numbers from Statistics Canada showed B.C. had lost more than 40,000 forest-sector jobs since the early 1990s. Kim Haakstad, the CEO of the B.C. Council of Forest Industries, said the B.C. government should work to improve the production environment in the province to prevent future mill closures. In a statement, the council said that by activating timber sales, fast-tracking permits and cutting through regulatory gridlock, the province could send a signal that it is serious about rebuilding a sustainable forest argued that if the industry could get production levels back to historic levels, it could help keep forestry-dependent communities vibrant into the future. "That will bring more than $300 million to the provincial government, as well, to help address the deficit situation we're in," Haakstad said. Kurt Niquidet, the president of the B.C. Lumber Trade Council, highlighted that Trump also has initiated a federal investigation into the U.S. imports of lumber and timber citing "national security," which could further impact B.C.'s forestry industry when combined with the tariffs. "Softwood lumber is quite important for the United States. They can only supply about 70 per cent of their softwood lumber demand, and they're importing 30 per cent from elsewhere," he told CBC News. "25 per cent of that's really coming from Canada, and British Columbia is the largest softwood lumber producer within Canada."

'That kind of thing really dings Trump hard,' former Congressman Joe Walsh quipped of the opening episode to the show's 27th season.
'That kind of thing really dings Trump hard,' former Congressman Joe Walsh quipped of the opening episode to the show's 27th season.

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'That kind of thing really dings Trump hard,' former Congressman Joe Walsh quipped of the opening episode to the show's 27th season.

A top former member of the Republican Party has explained why the opening episode of South Park's 27th season hit President Donald Trump where it hurts. 'Remember, a lot of Trump's base, they're not Republicans. They're just men—they're guys who typically don't belong to a party, they don't vote all the time, and they watch South Park,' former Illinois Congressman Joe Walsh, who's since defected to the Democrats, told MSNBC. 'They watched an episode this week where Trump looked really silly and stupid—a big fat man with a teeny, tiny penis. I think that kind of thing really dings Trump hard, too,' he added. 'No pun intended.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store