
India actively engaging with US; hopes to sign first phase of bilateral pact by Oct: FM
'We are one of the countries which is actively engaged with the new administration of the United States of America to see how best we can get a bilateral trade agreement done,' he said during an interaction with the Indian diaspora here.
San Francisco, Apr 21 (PTI) Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Sunday said India is 'actively engaging' with the new US administration and hopes to conclude the first tranche of the bilateral trade agreement 'positively' by fall (September-October) this year.
'Equally, the priority that we gave to engage with the government here is more than obviously seen with the Prime Minister himself visiting the United States in February. You had the Commerce and Trade Minister come. I have come here because I also have the IMF and World Bank meeting.
'I am scheduled to meet the treasury secretary, my counterpart here. So the keenness with which we are engaging with the US administration, even as I talk, I think the US vice-president is in India. He will be engaging with the Prime Minister hopefully this evening or tomorrow,' she said.
The US and India have aimed for a bilateral trade agreement (BTA), which is a kind of free trade pact. The two have decided to conclude the proposed BTA in two tranches or phases.
'So, the long and short of engaging with the US is not just reciprocal tariff-related matter but in the interest of keeping an agreement in mind and in the interest of one of the largest trading partners with whim we need to have agreement we are working in order that by the fall this year we should have first phase of agreement signed,' she said.
The US President announced sweeping reciprocal tariffs (or import duties) on a number of countries, including India and China, on April 2.
However, on April 9, he announced a 90-day suspension of these tariffs until July 9 this year, except for those on China and Hong Kong, as about 75 countries approached America for trade deals. China is facing up to 245 per cent duty on its goods entering the US.
'In between all this, the Assistant USTR (US Trade Representative) had visited India to see the progress or to engage with the negotiating team who is dealing with the tariff-related negotiation and the bilateral trade agreement that we want to sign. In fact, the progress of the agreement, or the trade agreement that we are working on, at least a first tranche is something which we hope to conclude positively by the fall this year,' she said.
Responding to a query on India's future global leadership and how the current budget supports this ambition, Sitharaman highlighted India's progress in critical areas like semiconductors, renewable energy — including modular nuclear energy — digital infrastructure, and artificial intelligence (AI).
She further said the government at the Centre is working with the objective to make India a developed nation by 2047.
'Our government's primary focus is Viksit Bharat by 2047 and Prime Minister Narendra Modi has emphasised that it can be achieved by looking after the four main 'castes' — Women, Poor, Youth and Farmers,' she said.
India's focus is also on the 'Sunrise Sectors' which are important to build our capacities and areas such as Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) where India has emerged as a global leader, she said. PTI DP TRB
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Wire
22 minutes ago
- The Wire
The Rhetoric of Social Justice Ignores the Need for it
Since the general elections of 2019, national and regional parties, especially the Congress party, have increasingly woven social justice into their political narratives, promising empowerment through the constitutional ideals of inclusive governance. As Bihar gears up for its assembly elections, the discourse on social justice has again taken centre stage, often reprimanding the ruling political class for the non-implementation of social justice policies. The Union government's recent announcement to conduct a caste census signals an intent to better understand India's complex social stratification, aiming to craft targeted welfare policies for the marginalised communities, particularly the Other Backward Classes. Though the democratic discourse is infatuated with the agenda of social justice there is a visible gap between rhetoric and reality. The continued marginalisation of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes from the sphere of power and privileges, raise questions about the commitment of the state and the political elites to bring transformative change in their lives. The Indian constitution lays a robust framework for uplifting SCs and STs through three key pillars: protection from social humiliation and exploitation with provisions like the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, ensuring that their social dignity and civic rights are safeguarded, equitable representation through reservations in state institutions that allows these groups to avail themselves crucial positions of power and privileges in governance, and last, advancing economic empowerment via dedicated budgetary provisions and policy initiatives. Policy measures like the special component plan for SCs and STs in the state budget were introduced to ensure financial assistance for the economic empowerment of these sections. However, implementation has been inconsistent on all three fronts, often with token value, leaving large sections of these communities outside the ambit of social justice policies. Persistent social injustices Despite substantive legal safeguards like the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, caste-based discrimination persists. The National Crime Records Bureau recorded 57,582 cases of atrocities against SCs and 10,062 against STs in 2022, reflecting deep-rooted systemic oppression and the limit of the state machinery to curb the menace. From rural areas, where Dalit people face violence for minor assertions of dignity, to urban centres, where discrimination in housing and employment is rampant, caste continues to shape access to opportunities. Such incidents are witnessed even in the arena of state institutions like universities (the institutional murder of Rohith Vemula) and legislative bodies (which see little discussion on the issues of caste-based violence). This underscores the failure of the governing classes to enforce protective measures effectively. Reservation: A partial success The reservation policy, designed to ensure SC and ST representation in state institutions, has seen uneven progress. While lower-level posts (Group C and D) in public sector units like railways and banks are often filled, senior positions remain largely inaccessible to marginalised groups even now. Especially in higher education, leadership roles such as vice-chancellors and professors are predominantly occupied by unreserved categories, highlighting structural barriers. Similarly, in the higher judiciary, SC and ST representation among judges and key functionaries is negligible, undermining the promise of equitable participation. The downsizing of public sector units has further eroded opportunities for reserved posts, exacerbating their economic exclusion. The positions of power and privileges in major state institutions are dominated by the social elites. Further, the political class and civil society have failed to engage in crucial deliberation to make private economy more inclusive with the increased participation Dalit and Adivasis. They mostly survive as the precarious labour class, distanced from the entitlements and privileges enjoyed by the middle-class. Economic marginalisation One of the major objectives of the special component plan for SCs and STs is to provide income generating assets and skill so as to enable the marginalised social groups to have a sustained economic upliftment. It intends to advance composite economic development programmes to elevate their class position. Even such a significant initiative has often been reduced to a symbolic gesture today. Exclusive funds meant for SC and ST welfare are frequently underutilised or diverted, with successive governments failing to prioritise these allocations for a substantive welfare of these groups. Under the current Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government, this trend has continued, with flagship schemes for the general welfare of all (like the Jan Dhan Yojana) overshadowing the targeted welfare schemes and policies meant for marginalised groups. There are negligible initiatives to examine the precarious economic conditions of Dalits and introduce effective public policies and schemes for their empowerment and mobility. Beyond political rhetoric of social justice As social justice becomes a rallying cry in electoral politics, its transformative potential remains limited without concrete action. The constitutional framework, though robust, requires rigorous implementation through executive accountability and policy innovation. Political parties must move beyond populist rhetoric and prioritise social justice as a core governance agenda. While the ruling dispensation under the BJP has often pledged to uphold the ideals of social justice, its decade-long tenure has seen a steady rise in caste-based violence and a dilution of policies aimed at SC and ST upliftment. Though at the symbolic level it offered prominent political gestures (like naming Draupadi Murmu the president of India), there is an absence of new initiatives to enhance their representation in public and private sectors. The growing political rhetoric on social justice shall complement with substantive executive orders and fair implementation of policies. However, the governing elites hardly felt any moral pressure to perform under constitutional directives. Further, within the democratic polity, the Dalit-Adivasi claims for social justice and inclusivity have weakened or relegated to negligible space. Their movements are quelled and not allowed to flourish. Without a popular movement and mobilisation of Dalit, Adivasi and Bahujan groups, political elites would always hesitate to execute effective programmes for their welfare. The growing marginalisation of Dalits and Adivasis from the national discourse has allowed the traditional elites to dominate decision-making process and to neglect the social justice agenda. The future The national political discourse shall revolve around the welfare, security and advancement of the Dalit, Adivasi and Bahujan communities, ensuring their equitable participation in positions of power and privileges. The BJP and the Congress offer a visible space to the idea of social justice in their political manifestos, but overtly hesitate to ensure its appropriate implementation. To actualise the potentials of a social justice agenda, India needs a governing class that is sensitive and committed to the welfare of the marginalised social groups in a substantive manner. Further, there is a crucial need to amplify the Dalit and Adivasi voices for social justice, enabling new movements to drive national discourse for policy reforms. Finally, the social justice discourse needs to move beyond the claim for representation in public institutions and democratic polity. It needs to examine other spheres of power and privileges (like market economy, cultural industry, sports establishments, and so on) which are overtly dominated by the conventional ruling classes. The social justice agenda needs to be applicable to a broader arena of power to make it more diverse and representative through the participation of Dalit, Adivasi and Bahujan groups. Harish S. Wankhede is Assistant Professor, Center for Political Studies, School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.


The Print
22 minutes ago
- The Print
Nash Energy and Rincell Corporation Join Hands to Manufacture NMC Cells in India
Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India], July 22: Nash Energy, India's only mass-scale LFP cell manufacturer, and US-based Rincell Corporation, a developer of rechargeable cells based on next-generation chemistries, have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to collaborate on producing advanced battery NMC cells in India, marking a significant step toward strengthening the country's clean energy and electric vehicle sectors. * Strategic Partnership: Nash Energy and Rincell have signed an MoU to collaborate on sale and manufacturing advanced NMC battery cells in India. * Technology Transfer: Rincell will transfer its high-C rate cell technology to Nash Energy. * Manufacturing Setup: Nash Energy is India's first mass-scale cylindrical lithium-ion cell manufacturer. Nash Energy will establish a Giga factory capable of multi-chemistry cell manufacturing in India in a phased manner. * Market Focus: The partnership will target drones, defence, aerospace applications and electric vehicles, with a revenue-sharing sales model. * Customer Engagement & Roadmap: Both companies will collaborate closely with key customers, leveraging strong interest and momentum to shape next-generation battery cell designs and commercial agreements. Nash Energy has already emerged as a pioneer in the industry setting up India's first mass-scale LFP Cell manufacturing unit in Bengaluru, and has more than 15 Indian and global clients. Nash Energy plans to build a manufacturing plant with a capacity of around 10 GWh in a phased manner, aligned with customer demand and commercial commitments. Under the agreement, Rincell will transfer its cutting-edge technology for Nickel Manganese Cobalt Cathode (NMC) battery cells to Nash Energy. In return, Nash Energy will set up a manufacturing facility in India to produce these high-performance battery cells and lead go-to-market and commercialization efforts. The partnership will initially focus on producing Rincell's high-energy and high-power battery cell formats — the 18650 (4.1Ah capacity), 21700 (5.8Ah Capacity), and NMC cells (5Ah capacity with 5C and 4Ah capacity with 8C) — tailored to meet diverse customer needs. Both companies will work closely with Tier-1 and Tier-2 customers to build on existing purchase commitments and collaboratively explore next-generation battery cell designs The collaboration targets key sectors including drones, defense, aerospace applications and electric vehicles sectors, reflecting the growing demand for reliable, locally manufactured battery solutions. 'We're thrilled to partner with Rincell to bring advanced battery technology to India,' said Sanjay S. Wadhwa, Managing Director of Nash Energy. 'This initiative will help accelerate the adoption of clean energy and electric mobility in the country.' Jignesh Parikh, Co-Founder and CEO of Rincell Corporation, added, 'This partnership enables us to combine our cutting-edge technology with Nash Energy's local expertise, creating new opportunities to serve India's and the global fast-growing energy market.' The companies will continue to refine their technology roadmap based on customer feedback, ensuring they stay ahead in battery innovation. About Nash Energy Nash Energy is part of NASH Group and is India's first and only mass-scale LFP cell manufacturer with a 600Mwh capacity unit in Bengaluru. It is a leader in renewable energy solutions, committed to delivering sustainable power technologies globally. It also owns a R&D Centre in Japan and concentrates on making India self-reliant in the energy storage sector. About Rincell Corporation Rincell Corporation is based in US and was founded to accelerate the electrification of high-impact carbon emission products, fostering a sustainable future with a secure supply chain. Rincell is committed to US & allied manufacturing of its high-performance Silicon-Graphite, & Sodium-ion batteries for government and commercial applications. Logo: (ADVERTORIAL DISCLAIMER: The above press release has been provided by PRNewswire. ANI will not be responsible in any way for the content of the same) This story is auto-generated from a syndicated feed. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.


Scroll.in
22 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Aadhaar, ration card can't be included as proof for Bihar voter roll revision: EC to Supreme Court
Aadhaar cards, voter ID cards and ration cards cannot be included as standalone valid documents for the revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, the Election Commission told the Supreme Court on Monday. In a counter-affidavit filed in the court, the poll panel also stated that a person's citizenship will 'not terminate' on being found ineligible for registration in the electoral rolls. This came in response to the Supreme Court's July 10 order that asked the Election Commission to consider Aadhaar cards, voter identity cards and ration cards as valid proof for the electoral roll revision exercise 'in the interest of justice'. The court was hearing a clutch of petitions challenging the Election Commission's decision to carry out the special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections, which are expected to take place in October or November. The petitioners had challenged the poll panel's exclusion of the Aadhaar card and voter ID from the list of documents specified as proof of citizenship for those whose names were not included in the 2003 electoral roll. The Election Commission filed its affidavit in response to the petitions on Monday. On Aadhaar, voter ID The poll panel said in its affidavit that Aadhaar does not 'constitute proof of Indian citizenship'. 'However, this is not to say that Aadhaar cannot be used to supplement other documents to prove eligibility,' the Election Commission stated. The poll panel reiterated that the list of 11 documents that could be submitted as proof of citizenship was 'indicative and not exhaustive'. The enumeration forms include a voter's Electoral Photo Identity Card number and have an optional Aadhaar column, noted the Election Commission. It also told the court that there is a 'widespread existence of fake ration cards', which is why it has not been included in the list of the 11 documents. However, the electoral registration officer 'is obligated to consider' all documents presented as proof of eligibility, including the ration card, the Election Commission added. 'Decision to accept or reject the documents is dependent on the satisfaction of the electoral registration officer…and such decisions will be taken on a case-to-case basis,' said the poll panel. On including the voter ID card as a valid proof, it said the document is prepared on the basis of the electoral rolls. 'Since the electoral rolls itself are being revised, the production of the Electoral Photo Identity Card will make the whole exercise futile,' according to the Election Commission. The revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar was announced by the Election Commission on June 24. As part of the exercise, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list will need to submit proof of eligibility to vote. This means that 2.9 crore out of the state's 7.8 crore voters – or about 37% of the electors – will have to submit documentary evidence. Voters born before July 1, 1987, must show proof of their date and place of birth, while those born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, must also submit documents establishing the date and place of birth of one of their parents. Those born after December 2, 2004, will need proof of date of birth for themselves and both parents. If the officers are satisfied with the details provided, the voters will be re-enrolled to a new voter list by electoral registration officers. If not, they will be removed from the voter lists. A draft roll will be published on August 1 and the final roll will be out on September 30. On July 2, eleven INDIA bloc parties told the Election Commission that the special intensive revision of Bihar's electoral rolls risked disenfranchising more than 2.5 crore voters, as they may not be able to produce the necessary documents. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar on July 6 defended the exercise, claiming that the exercise had to be carried out as no one was satisfied with the current voter rolls. 'ECI competent to ask for relevant documents' The poll panel also stated on Monday that there was no violation of law or fundamental rights of any voter in the electoral roll revision process. 'The SIR [special intensive revision' adds to the purity of elections by weeding out inelgible persons from electoral rolls,' said the Election Commission. It added that the petitioners' arguments that only the Union government was can determine 'all aspects of citizenship, including its existence, is patently false, misconceived, erroneous and unsustainable'. On July 10, the Supreme Court verbally observed that only the Ministry of Home Affairs, and not the Election Commission, can remove non-citizens from the electoral rolls. Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, representing the petitioners, had argued that the special intensive revision improperly shifts the burden of proof from the Election Commission to the voter.