Varadkar says US is no longer 'reliable political and economic partner' to Europe
He also said the EU should be "generous" to the UK and "willing to make concessions" in the current negotiations as "Europe needs Britain" as a security and defence partner.
Advertisement
Mr Varadkar made the comments on LBC's Tonight with Andrew Marr.
He also told Mr Marr there would be "no harm in dusting down the old backstop" agreement between the EU and UK to "give a boost to the British economy".
Asked if he believes that the UK needs to turn back towards the EU and away from the USA, Mr Varadkar replied: "Yes, I do in short. Since 1945 we have had a de facto Pax Americana across Europe and the United States, where we could rely on the US as a security partner, sheltering under their umbrella in many ways, and also as a reliable political and economic partner.
"That's no longer the case. Even if in four years' time, a moderate Republican or a Democrat is elected, I don't think we can be certain that things are going to change back to the way they were before. The memory of the Second World War is now so long ago that things are different, and it creates a decision point for the UK as to whether it wants to go it alone, which in many ways was the Brexit philosophy, a global Britain trying to form alliances with almost anyone, anywhere around the world, to one that sees itself at the heart of European security and as part of the European economy. And I really hope that's a decision that the UK takes."
Advertisement
On areas he believes the EU and UK could have a stronger relationship, Mr Varadkar said: "I think there's definitely a lot to be said on a defence and security agreement. There's a lot to be said and a lot happening in relation to aligning our veterinary rules, which would be very helpful in relation to Northern Ireland in particular, in further reducing the remaining checks between Britain and Northern Ireland.
"I think there would be no harm in dusting down the old backstop, the agreement negotiated between me and Theresa May and the European Union at the time, and that allowed for free movement of goods and dynamic alignment of regulations. That would, I think, give a boost to the British economy.
"What the UK needs more than anything else is economic growth, and that would help with that, but I don't think that it would ever be realistic to expect the United Kingdom just to be a rule taker. If the UK is going to align its regulations and standards it would have to have a meaningful input into that."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
10 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Trump announces 25% tariff on India plus penalties for buying Russian energy
The US president said on Wednesday that India 'is our friend' but its tariffs 'are far too high' on US goods. He added that India buys military equipment and oil from Russia, which Mr Trump said has enabled the war in Ukraine. As a result, he intends to charge an additional 'penalty' starting on Friday as part of revised tariffs on multiple countries. The new tariffs could put India at a disadvantage in the US market relative to Vietnam, Bangladesh and, possibly, China, said Ajay Sahai, director general of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations. 'We are back to square one as Trump hasn't spelled out what the penalties would be in addition to the tariff,' he added. 'The demand for Indian goods is bound to be hit.' The announcement came after a series of negotiated trade frameworks with the European Union, Japan, the Philippines and Indonesia — all of which Mr Trump said would open markets for American goods while enabling the US to raise tax rates on imports. The president views tariff revenues as a way to help offset the budget deficit increases tied to his recent income tax cuts and generate more domestic factory jobs. While he has effectively wielded tariffs as a cudgel to reset the terms of trade, the economic impact is uncertain as most economists expect a slowdown in US growth and greater inflationary pressures as the costs of the taxes are passed along to domestic businesses and consumers. His approach of putting a 15% tariff on America's longstanding allies in the EU is also generating pushback — possibly causing European partners as well as Canada to seek alternatives to US leadership on the world stage. Washington has long sought to develop a deeper partnership with New Delhi. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has established a good working relationship with Mr Trump, and the two leaders are likely to further boost co-operation between their countries. At a population exceeding 1.4 billion people, India is the world's largest country and a possible geopolitical counterbalance to China. India and Russia have close relations, and New Delhi has not supported western sanctions on Moscow over its war in Ukraine. When Mr Trump met Mr Modi in February, the US president said India would start buying American oil and natural gas. He discussed his policies on trade and tariffs with reporters accompanying him on Tuesday on the flight home after a five-day visit to Scotland. He declined to comment then about reports that India was bracing for a US tariff rate of at least 25%, saying: 'We're going to see.' Mr Trump also said the outlines of a trade agreement with India had not yet been finalised.
New Statesman
10 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Maga zealots want to redraft the Civil Rights Act
Photo by Brendan Smialowski / AFP via Getty Images Donald Trump hoards attention like a preening gorilla at Washington's National Zoo, obscuring what his administration is actually doing. When asked in Scotland whether he would force Israel to give food to starving Gazans, for instance, he whined about not getting thank you cards for American aid and then offered up a Trumpian non-sequitur about how the stock market was booming. Such showboating is partly responsible for the growing view that Trump's style masks his real substance: that beneath the bombast lies a traditional Republican. Several of his predecessors, including Ronald Reagan, also wanted to expand executive power, abolish the Department of Education and rein in the administrative state. Trump's military build-up and raid on Iran have recast him as the heir to the Republican tradition of waging war abroad and cutting taxes and regulations at home. There is some truth to this. But away from the spectacle, Trump's Maga acolytes are undertaking a revolutionary redrafting of the purpose of the American government unlike what has come before. In Room 226 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building on 23 July, across the road from the Capitol, his congressional loyalists were prosecuting their case to remake the state. Eric Schmitt, chair of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, opened a hearing on ending diversity, equality and inclusion (DEI) with a tirade against the civil rights infrastructure established in the Sixties. He said the Civil Rights Act had led to 'a new racial caste system sanctioned and enforced by the administrative state'. Nevermind that an actual racial caste system existed before the Civil Rights Act. The Ur-text for Trump's most revolutionary followers is Christopher Caldwell's 2020 The Age of Entitlement. In it, Caldwell argues that the civil rights reforms formed 'a rival constitution, with which the original one was frequently incompatible'. This regime, Caldwell thinks, elevated a new social contract centred around anti-racism. 'I take the Caldwellian view,' the chief Maga influencer Charlie Kirk told the New York Times earlier this year, 'that we went through a new founding in the Sixties and that the Civil Rights Act has actually superseded the US Constitution.' Trump's disciples, in other words, are pursuing something more radical than Reagan or the Bushes ever conceived: the overthrow of the civil rights settlement that was erected in 1964. In his first week Trump overturned affirmative action and then went on to root out DEI programmes across the government and, by proxy, in those companies the state works with. (Reagan's team once drafted an executive order to overturn affirmative action but he never signed it.) The assault has also been fought by Trump's appointed judges: by overturning Roe vs Wade in 2022 and then affirmative action the following year. A month after the election Caldwell wrote in these pages that Trump's victory, like those of 1992 and 2008, was as much a social revolution as a political one. Put simply, Caldwell thought the age of woke was coming to an end. The irony, however, is that according to critics like Caldwell, some of Trump's most extreme supporters are no longer interested in scrapping the civil rights reforms they loathe – and are instead using them to pursue their own ends. In simpler terms, as Caldwell and others would see it, parts of the right have gone woke. Trump's assault on universities uses accusations of anti-Semitism, for instance, as a bludgeon with which to bully progressive institutions into submission. The administration's campaign has led Columbia University to adopt a much more expansive definition of anti-Semitism in order to curry favour with the administration. Caldwell thinks this is a mirror image of progressive attempts to compel conservatives into obedience under Democratic administrations. 'The Civil Rights Act of 1964 gives tremendous power to the executive branch to both override congressional and local democratic legislation and really bring pressure to bear, including financial pressure, on all sorts of institutions, not just government institutions, but also private universities,' Caldwell told me. Caldwell thinks Trump is not interested in scrapping 'this incredibly powerful tool' but wants to 'use it for himself and from what we know about Trump, it shouldn't surprise us. He has a tremendous instinct for power.' This power grab is happening as a new, overtly white identitarian politics is asserting itself in Washington. Jeremy Carl, who was a senior official in Trump's first term and has been nominated for a State Department role this time, wrote in his 2024 book The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism Is Tearing America Apart that white people needed to start seeing themselves as white in order to fight apparent discrimination against them, which he and others argue began in the Sixties. Carl's book is not a plea for America to return to the ideals of a 'colour-blind' or classically liberal society, but a manual for one in which racial groups compete for power. He wants to co-opt the language of woke. He writes that ''No justice, no peace' applies to white people as well'. Those on the right who dislike positive discrimination because it treats people differently based on their skin colour are now being outflanked by parts of the movement that want to vivify the concept of whiteness. Tribal white politics has once again found a place at the heart of American power. Away from Trump's pyrotechnic gaggles with reporters, he sits astride forces far outside of his control. [See also: Donald Trump, the king of Scotland] Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Related
New Statesman
10 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Letter of the week: Judicial review
Photo by Kunst and Scheidulin / Alamy Stock Photo As a former judicial colleague of Jonathan Sumption, I have always had great respect for his expertise as a historian and international lawyer. I found his article on Israel's conduct of the conflict in Gaza as compelling as it was deeply disturbing (Cover Story, 18 July). Baroness Deech's critical response in your latest edition seemed surprisingly aggressive (Correspondence, 25 July). More importantly, it failed entirely to engage with the substance of his analysis of the current situation, or even to offer a note of compassion for the horrific suffering of thousands of ordinary Palestinians of which we read every day. Another of your correspondents suggests that you give equal prominence to 'someone with similar qualifications putting forward the Israeli side of the argument'. That would be a valuable exercise if such a person could be found. Perhaps Baroness Deech has some suggestions. As Jonathan says, we are entitled to ask 'what Israel's defenders would regard as unacceptable, if the current level of Israeli violence in Gaza is not enough'. Robert Carnwath, former Supreme Court justice Independent witnesses According to Baroness Deech (Correspondence, 25 July) the Guide to Judicial Conduct calls on retired judges to be circumspect in voicing controversial opinions. This is wrong for two reasons. First, the guide says no such thing. It states 'there is no prohibition on retired judges… [from] engaging in political activity and wider public debate', so long as they do nothing to tarnish the reputation of the judiciary and the perception of its independence. Second, claiming the Israeli government is guilty of war crimes is hardly controversial. We are all witnesses to the mass killing, maiming and starvation of citizens in Gaza. Numerous reputable NGOs and experts have concluded that Israel is committing genocide. Joel Donovan KC, London W4 Zero imagination Gary Smith's position on green energy (Interview, 25 July) seemed intransigent and unimaginative. There will be no oil or gas jobs in the North Sea in 30 years' time, for the simple reason that there will be no oil or gas left. A transition is needed, as Smith admits, yet he fails to acknowledge net-zero policies will provide it. As the GMB's general secretary, Smith should see the transformative potential in green jobs for his members. Freddie Russell, aged 17, East Sussex Leavers of the left Oliver Eagleton criticises the government for a foreign policy that is too closely aligned with that of the US (The NS Essay, 25 July). It is bizarre to hear this from a Lexiteer. Many Remain supporters warned that erecting barriers between the UK and continental Europe would leave us a vassal of the US. Keir Starmer and his colleagues have made progress in rebuilding economic and security ties with our European allies, but much of the damage of Brexit remains. I would love to hear just one left-wing Brexit supporter take some responsibility for the dire situation we're in. Madeline Thompson, Cambridge Basta Normally I welcome articles on Europe, but this time Italy has had a raw deal (Vanity Fair, 25 July). Brits appreciative of Italian beauty and culture have been inhabiting Tuscany for centuries longer than Sting, Jamie Oliver and New Labour. If you're going to be sour, it's best to get the facts right. The airline is called 'Alitalia': it's a clever play on all' Italia (meaning 'to Italy') and ali Italia (Italian wings). And whatever Wikipedia says, parte means 'part' more often than 'side', but above all, the self-definition of the fascist journalist Malaparte is the obverse of Bonaparte. Perhaps Finn McRedmond would enjoy his Maledetti Toscani (Damned Tuscans)? Ann Lawson Lucas, Beverley, West Yorkshire Own goal Nicholas Lezard's anecdote about his lady-friend's revelation (Down and Out, 25 July) put me in mind of the time I took a girlfriend to Selhurst Park to see Crystal Palace play. She watched the teams warm up at opposite ends of the pitch. Then, five minutes into the match, she asked: 'Why don't they have a ball each so that they don't have to keep fighting for that one?' Clive Collins, Suffolk In sympathy My heart goes out to Hannah Barnes (Out of the Ordinary, 25 July). I hope writing that heart-wrenching column helped a tiny bit. I sometimes think the world is divided between those who have experienced great loss and those who have yet to do so. Margaret Bluman, London N19 Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Write to letters@ We reserve the right to edit letters [See also: One year on, tensions still circle Britain's asylum-seeker hotels] Related
