logo
Indian court allows Crocs to pursue infringement challenges

Indian court allows Crocs to pursue infringement challenges

NEW DELHI: An Indian court has revived nine-year-old lawsuits filed by Crocs Inc which accused several Indian companies of launching footwear identical to its popular rubber clogs, allowing the U.S. firm to press ahead with its infringement challenges.
The court's announcement late on Tuesday comes just as another international brand, Prada, is facing heat in India for showcasing sandals during a Milan fashion show which were similar to Indian ethnic footwear, sparking a nationwide furore. Prada later acknowledged they were inspired by Indian designs.
Crocs had sued six companies including Switzerland-based Bata's India unit as well as local players Relaxo and Liberty for allegedly copying the shape of its footwear but an Indian court had said in 2019 that the case could not be taken up citing technical grounds.
Crocs however filed an appeal in which the high court on Tuesday gave it permission to pursue the case saying 'the dismissal of Crocs' suits cannot sustain in law.'
X, India spar over lawyer's 'Tom, Dick, and Harry' remark for government officials
In the original court challenge, Crocs said the rivals should be restrained from selling the footwear which it called an obvious imitation of its rubber clogs.
Liberty, one of the companies sued by Crocs, argued that Crocs was not the originator of the designs and it too had merely copied the clog shape of footwear in use by others much prior.
Launched in Colorado in 2002, Crocs' quirky, bright and comfortable resin shoes quickly attracted a cult following. Over the years, they have become popular in India, where they are sold across several footwear stores.
India's footwear market is set to be worth $33.86 billion this year, according to market research firm Statista, and 97% of the market is dominated by non-luxury footwear.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India-US likely to take final decision on mini trade deal within 48 hours, India's CNBC-TV18 reports
India-US likely to take final decision on mini trade deal within 48 hours, India's CNBC-TV18 reports

Business Recorder

timean hour ago

  • Business Recorder

India-US likely to take final decision on mini trade deal within 48 hours, India's CNBC-TV18 reports

India and the United States are likely to make a final decision on a mini trade deal in the next 24 to 48 hours, local Indian news channel CNBC-TV18 reported on Sunday, citing sources. Currently, talks have only been completed on the mini trade deal and negotiations on a larger deal will begin after July 9, the news channel said in a post on X. India ready for trade deals but not to meet deadlines, minister says Average tariffs under the mini trade deal are expected to be 10%, the broadcaster said, citing unnamed sources.

Reuters' X account withheld in India citing legal demand: reports
Reuters' X account withheld in India citing legal demand: reports

Express Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Express Tribune

Reuters' X account withheld in India citing legal demand: reports

The official X (formerly Twitter) handle of international news agency Reuters has been withheld in India, reportedly 'in response to a legal demand,' Indian media reported on Sunday. Users attempting to access @Reuters and @ReutersWorld from within India were greeted with the message: 'Account withheld. @Reuters has been withheld in IN (India) in response to a legal demand.' While Indian media outlet The Print first reported the restriction took effect around midnight on July 6, the Indian government has denied issuing any recent legal directive related to Reuters' accounts. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) told India Today that no such request had been made, adding that the government was working with X to resolve what it termed a 'mistake' by the platform. 'There is no requirement from the Government of India to withhold the Reuters handle,' a ministry spokesperson told India Today. Citing official sources, Indian news agency PTI reported that the original demand for blocking Reuters' X account — along with several hundred others — dates back to Operation Sindoor, a military offensive launched in May during which India reportedly targeted sites in Pakistan. At the time, a number of social media accounts were withheld, though Reuters' had remained accessible until now. Government sources suggested that X appears to have acted on that earlier directive belatedly, possibly in error. Despite the restriction on the main handles, affiliated Reuters accounts — including @ReutersTech, @ReutersChina, @ReutersAsia, and @ReutersFacts — remain accessible within India. The agency's main website also remains unaffected. Reuters, which employs over 2,600 journalists in 165 countries, has not issued an official statement on the development. This is not the first time X has restricted access to accounts in India in response to legal demands. On May 8, 2025, the platform revealed it had received executive orders from the Indian government to block over 8,000 accounts. At the time, X said the orders included demands to block accounts belonging to international news organisations and prominent individuals — without specifying the posts in violation or providing sufficient evidence. The company, which was acquired by Elon Musk in 2022, has consistently expressed its disagreement with such demands, terming the blanket restrictions as censorship and a violation of free speech. 'Blocking entire accounts is not only unnecessary, it amounts to censorship of existing and future content,' X said in a May statement. However, it noted it was unable to publish the orders due to legal constraints.

Birkenstock cracks down on fakes in India, court-ordered factory visits held, sources say
Birkenstock cracks down on fakes in India, court-ordered factory visits held, sources say

Business Recorder

time3 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Birkenstock cracks down on fakes in India, court-ordered factory visits held, sources say

NEW DELHI: Indian court-appointed legal representatives inspected small-scale factories in recent weeks to seize suspected counterfeit Birkenstock footwear, after the German brand launched an infringement lawsuit, people familiar with the matter said. Birkenstock's case is occurring around the same time other shoemakers are in the news in India. Crocs this month secured a court nod to pursue a nine-year-old infringement case, while Prada is facing heat over showcasing sandals similar to ethnic Indian footwear without initially giving credit to India. Reuters is first to report the Indian case details related to Birkenstock sandals, which have evolved from a counterculture symbol to a trendy fashion item, and are also popular in India. In May, Birkenstock filed an infringement lawsuit in the Delhi High Court against four footwear traders, four factories and two unnamed individuals. Its complaint stated an internal investigation found counterfeits were being made in rural areas in and around the tourist hub of Agra, and sold locally and exported to other countries. On May 26, Delhi judge Saurabh Banerjee issued a confidential order that was only made public on the court's website last week. It said 10 local lawyers were appointed as commissioners to visit the suspected factories. The judge said commissioners can 'seize, pack and seal the infringing products', and his order included photographs that Birkenstock submitted showing the alleged counterfeit footwear and shoe boxes with the company's branding. The visits have been completed and reports were submitted confidentially to the judge, the three people familiar with the matter said on Saturday, asking to remain unidentified. The next hearing in the case is set for October 6. The visits were conducted in Agra, home to the Taj Mahal, and in India's capital New Delhi, the people said, declining to give further details from their inspection. Birkenstock did not respond to queries from Reuters and its lawyers from Delhi-based law firm Lall and Sethi declined to comment, citing the pending legal case. In his May order, Banerjee said he reviewed photographs and samples of the alleged counterfeit products in court, and they 'seem like a cheap knock off' of Birkenstock products. 'There is all likelihood of the public getting deceived … The differences, hardly if any, are not something which can be discernable to the naked eyes,' he wrote. Once popular with hippies, tech enthusiasts and medical professionals, Birkenstock gained widespread attention after Australian actress Margot Robbie wore a pair of pink Birkenstocks in the final scene of the 2023 hit movie 'Barbie'. In February, a German court said Birkenstock sandals do not qualify as art and are therefore not protected by copyright, dismissing a lawsuit brought by the German company. In India, Birkenstock footwear for women is priced between $46 and $233.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store