African state revokes privileges for French Embassy
In a statement on Saturday, the Algerian Foreign Ministry said the country's embassy in Paris is facing 'persistent obstacles' in the delivery and recovery of diplomatic bags. The ministry said it had summoned the French charge d'affaires to protest the French government's 'blatant violation of international obligations.'
Algiers said the measure, 'initially limited to the Algerian Embassy in France,' have been extended to consular posts as well, despite prior assurances from the French Foreign Ministry that it would review the measure.
The latest dispute adds to mounting tensions between Algeria and France, whose relations have been beset by a series of diplomatic flare-ups in recent months. The two countries have often clashed over post-colonial grievances, migration policy, and France's recent backing for Morocco's stance on the disputed Western Sahara – a territory Algeria has long supported in its push for independence.
In May, France announced it would expel Algerian diplomats in response to the former colony's decision to remove more than a dozen French officials, whom it accused Paris of appointing without following established protocols. Earlier in April, both countries expelled 12 diplomats in a tit-for-tat dispute sparked by the arrest of an Algerian official in France, prompting Paris to recall its ambassador.
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot recently declared that ties between France and Algeria were now 'totally blocked,' despite earlier efforts by President Emmanuel Macron and his Algerian counterpart, Abdelmadjid Tebboune, to ease tensions. During a phone call in late March, the two leaders pledged to pursue dialogue, and days later Barrot traveled to Algiers for talks on improving mobility and strengthening what Paris described as 'effective and constructive' consular cooperation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Why US and Russia are bound to cooperate beyond Earth
The head of Roscosmos, Dmitry Bakanov, has made a rare visit to the United States – his first official trip since assuming the top job at Russia's space agency. The occasion? To attend the launch of Russian cosmonaut Oleg Platonov aboard a SpaceX spacecraft and to meet with his counterpart, acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy. Whether or not he meets Elon Musk remains to be seen. But this trip is significant far beyond the question of private handshakes. This was, first and foremost, a political and diplomatic visit – the kind that's planned months in advance and requires high-level approval. That it's taking place now, in the midst of a direct confrontation between Moscow and Washington over Ukraine, speaks volumes. It marks the first in-person meeting between the heads of Roscosmos and NASA since 2018, when Dmitry Rogozin hosted Jim Bridenstine at Baikonur. Rogozin's own planned return visit to the US was blocked in late 2018, despite his openness to meeting Musk. His inclusion on Western sanctions lists made it politically toxic for Washington to host him. Subsequent Roscosmos chief Yury Borisov never even got the opportunity for face-to-face talks – the Biden administration declined, citing political optics during the Ukraine conflict. Communications were limited to a few phone calls. But with the return of Donald Trump to the White House and a reshuffled US space leadership, conditions for engagement have shifted. It hardly matters that the American side was represented by an acting official – Sean Duffy, appointed just two weeks ago – or that NASA has seen more leadership turnover than Roscosmos in recent years. Duffy doesn't make key decisions. He speaks for the White House. The symbolism lies in the fact that a meeting is happening at all, after years of virtual silence under the Biden administration. The timing is not accidental. The meeting coincided with the anniversary of the 1975 Apollo-Soyuz mission, when the US and USSR docked their spacecrafts in orbit at the height of the Cold War. Back then, both sides had nuclear weapons aimed at each other's capitals. And yet, they still shook hands in space. If they could do it then, the logic goes, they can do it now. The second reason for the visit – the flight of a Russian cosmonaut on an American spacecraft – sends an equally pointed message: despite geopolitical conflict, collaboration remains possible. NASA's reliance on Musk's rockets has only grown, especially after Boeing's Starliner program stumbled again. The next Starliner launch is planned as a cargo-only mission; crewed flights are on hold. Caution prevails. In this context, the Roscosmos visit functions as a subtle form of diplomacy: why fight down here when we could build together up there? The International Space Station (ISS) remains the last major joint venture between Russia and the US. Beyond it, nothing binds the two powers in peaceful cooperation. While technical matters were on the agenda, diplomacy took precedence. Still, two important points emerged from the talks. First, Sergey Krikalev – Russia's special presidential envoy for space – hinted that both sides have preliminarily agreed to extend ISS operations until 2030. Previously, the Russian government had only committed to supporting its segment of the station until 2028, anticipating that the first module of its next-generation Russian Orbital Station (ROS) would be launched by then. The US, meanwhile, has committed to operating its segment until 2030, with the possibility of continuing through 2032. Krikalev's statement carries weight. As a presidential envoy, he can speak with more flexibility than Bakanov, who is still bound by formal government directives. Nevertheless, the implication is clear: the door is open to extending joint operations well beyond 2028. Second, Bakanov stated that the two sides also discussed future space cooperation – including potential collaboration on the Russian orbital station and on deeper space missions. If negotiations go well, we could see the ISS extended through 2035, with Russia possibly participating in – or helping shape – a successor project: an ISS-2. For Trump, a renewed global space station could be cast as a diplomatic victory, potentially traded for Western concessions on Ukraine. If that happens, Russia's role in ISS-2, especially in partnership with BRICS countries, would elevate the project into a truly multipolar enterprise. A space station that is not just international, but universal. And then there is the Mars question – Musk's long-standing obsession and a second pillar of any future space agenda. A meeting between Bakanov and Musk, if it happens, would be behind closed doors and entirely unofficial. Just like when Vladimir Popovkin, a former Russian space chief, secretly met with Musk years ago. Bakanov's goal, it seems, is to demonstrate that Russia's aerospace sector has something to offer – that it is not a relic, but a relevant partner in humanity's next leap. If Russia does not participate in the Mars project, it risks being left behind. But what could attract Musk's attention? In reality, Russia has two trump cards: its nuclear-powered space tug technology and its deep, unmatched experience in space medicine. If harnessed wisely, these assets could give Moscow a seat at the Mars table – whether as partner or competitor. In sum, the Roscosmos visit to the US is about far more than a launch or a handshake. It's a signal – deliberate and strategic – that Russia still sees space as a domain for cooperation, not conflict. And that in the great void above us, there may yet be room for common article was first published by the online newspaper and was translated and edited by the RT team
Russia Today
2 days ago
- Russia Today
South Africa calls for global recognition of Palestine
South African Foreign Minister Ronald Lamola has called for a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict. In an address at a high-level UN conference aimed at advancing concrete steps toward peace, Lamola said South Africa continues to condemn the horrific events of October 7, where innocent Israeli citizens were killed. Re-affirming its anti-war stance, South Africa outlined key principles necessary to restore the credibility of the two-state solution. 'Firstly, all states must urgently recognise Palestinian statehood, and the territorial integrity and contiguity of Palestine should be established and respected. In this regard, South Africa welcomes the intentions of recognition of the state of Palestine by France as an important step towards achieving a two-State solution,' Lamola said. 'Secondly, there cannot be peace while the very existence of the Palestinian people is being threatened by Israel's continued genocidal actions in Gaza and the forced displacement of Palestinians in the West Bank. This is part of a systematic pattern of injustices and oppression of Palestinians since the adoption of Resolution 181 and the subsequent Nakba in 1948. These actions must be condemned, and the UN Security Council must act to protect the Palestinian people in whole and in part. 'Thirdly, preserving the viability of the two-state solution must include promoting safeguards such as the full respect for international law, including international humanitarian law, and human rights law. It is necessary for the immediate and full implementation of resolutions of the United Nations and the provisional measures, as well as Advisory Opinions of the International Court of Justice,' Lamola continued. The minister said all states, not just Israel, must follow their collective obligations under international law. They all must preserve the sanctity of international law and ensure accountability. Against this backdrop, the Hague Group was established, and the Madrid Group recently convened. Both initiatives aim to elevate the primacy of international law, promote accountability, and ensure a just peace. Lamola said all obstacles to a two-state solution must be removed. This includes an immediate ceasefire and a commitment to a peace process; the release of hostages by Hamas and political prisoners by the state of Israel; the halting of illegal Israeli settlement expansion; the removal of the illegal separation wall cutting across the occupied Palestinian Territory; and the resumption of all internationally reputable humanitarian relief efforts and the reconstruction of Gaza, which of course can only take place once there is peace. 'Global attention is on this conference. There is an expectation that we will deliver an effective response to the destruction of an entire population and a peaceful path for preserving the prospect of a viable Palestinian State existing side by side with the State of Israel in peace and security. This expectation is not misplaced, and it could not be higher,' he said. 'Eighty years since the founding of the United Nations, this is a matter that has plagued our collective conscience. The solution lies with a tangible re-commitment from all of us to the values that bind us.' UN Secretary-General António Guterres said statehood for the Palestinians is a right, not a reward. Denying statehood would be a gift to extremists everywhere. 'The only realistic, just, and sustainable solution is two States – Israel and Palestine – living side-by-side in peace and security, within secure and recognised borders, on the basis of the pre-1967 lines, with Jerusalem as the capital of both – in line with international law, UN resolutions and other relevant agreements,' Guterres said. He implored the international community not only to keep the two-state solution alive, but to take the urgent, concrete, irreversible steps necessary to make it published by IOL
Russia Today
3 days ago
- Russia Today
EU ‘not feared enough'
French President Emmanuel Macron has criticized the newly signed EU-US trade deal, stating that the bloc was not 'feared enough' during negotiations, according to sources cited by Euractiv. The agreement, concluded on Sunday during talks between US President Donald Trump and European Commission head Ursula von der Leyen at Trump's Turnberry golf resort in Scotland, sets a 15% tariff on the majority of EU exports to the US. As part of the deal, Brussels also committed to investing $600 billion in the US economy and buying $750 billion in American energy over the next three years. The US, however, will not face any EU tariffs on its exports. 'To be free, you have to be feared, and we haven't been feared enough,' Macron told the Council of Ministers in Paris on Wednesday, according to two attendees present during the meeting. Macron reportedly expressed regret that the EU 'does not yet see itself sufficiently as a power.' He urged Brussels to 'work tirelessly' to rebalance its relationship with Washington. The French president also called for an acceleration of the 'European agenda on sovereignty and competitiveness,' in what some have interpreted as a veiled critique of von der Leyen's leadership and priorities, Euractiv reported. 'France has always maintained a firm and demanding stance. This is not the end of the story, the negotiation has to continue,' Macron added. Government spokesperson Sophie Primas later confirmed at a press conference that Macron welcomed elements of the deal, particularly the increased visibility it offers to French businesses. However, she emphasized that the president considered the agreement 'incomplete.' Criticism of the deal has continued to mount within the French government. Prime Minister Francois Bayrou described it as a 'submission' on Monday, while several ministers have questioned both its content and the process behind it. 'We would have preferred that these negotiations take place in an official setting and not in a private golf course in Scotland,' Primas said, calling the location 'unusual.'
