logo
Why you should save tax on education loans

Why you should save tax on education loans

Mint23-04-2025
As the academic year comes to a close, senior graders across the nation are finalising their higher education plans, whether they are looking at options to study further within the country or overseas. An important consideration here is the cost of education. For many families, education loans become a crucial tool in bridging the financial gap between the aspiration of students and the paying capacity of parents. However, a crucial aspect that often gets overlooked is the potential for tax savings associated with education loans.
The latest episode of Mint Money Shots, presented by Invesco Mutual Fund, saw Deputy Editor at Mint, Neil Borate, decode the tax benefits of study loans. 'The entire interest component of an educational loan is tax deductible. There is no upper limit on this deduction,' he said. This provision offers significant financial relief to borrowers pursuing academic qualifications, both within India and overseas.
This benefit extends for a period of eight years, commencing from the year the borrower starts repaying the loan or until the interest is fully paid, whichever occurs earlier. This extended period of tax relief can significantly reduce the overall cost of education. Watch the full episode below,
Furthermore, financial institutions typically offer a repayment moratorium on education loans. Borate highlights that banks generally do not commence interest collection until the completion of the degree. Adding to this borrower-friendly approach, a moratorium period, often spanning one year after graduation, is usually provided before the commencement of interest accrual. This deferred repayment schedule eases the immediate financial burden on graduates as they transition into their careers.
Another significant financial advantage linked to education loans pertains to the Tax Collected at Source (TCS) rate applicable to foreign remittances for educational purposes. TCS is a tax deducted by the remitting bank during an outward transfer of funds.
Furthermore, TCS rate is also lower for an education loan. TCS or Tax Collected at Source is a tax deducted while making a foreign remittance. 'For example, if you transfer ₹ 20 lakh abroad to invest in US stocks, an amount of ₹ 4 lakh, or 20 per cent, is deducted by the bank, and only ₹ 16 lakh will be transferred. This amount can be adjusted against any tax payable by you, but it does affect your cash flow. The money can only come back after you file your return and get a refund,' he explained.
'However, this TCS rate falls to just 0.5 per cent if the purpose of remittance is education and the source of funds is a loan. In the example I gave, the bank will deduct just ₹ 10,000 rather than ₹ 4 lakh,' Borate further said.
This substantially lower TCS rate, thereby improving the cash flow for students and their families financing education abroad through loans.
In conclusion, education loans not only facilitate access to higher learning but also come with considerable financial benefits, including the tax deductibility of the entire interest paid over an extended period and a significantly reduced TCS rate on foreign remittances for education funded by these loans. These provisions make quality education more accessible and affordable for a wider range of students, whether they are looking for higher education in India or overseas. Full Interest Deduction: The entire interest paid on an education loan is tax deductible for up to eight years, with no upper limit.
Global Applicability: This tax benefit applies to education pursued both in India and abroad.
Deferred Interest Payment: Banks typically do not charge interest until the degree is completed, often followed by a one-year moratorium.
Significantly Lower TCS for Education Loans: Foreign remittances for education funded by a loan attract a TCS rate of only 0.5%, compared to the standard 20% for other remittances above ₹ 7 lakh.
First Published: 23 Apr 2025, 12:08 PM IST
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SBI on mega fundraising drive: To raise ₹45,000 cr in debt, equity in FY26
SBI on mega fundraising drive: To raise ₹45,000 cr in debt, equity in FY26

Mint

time4 hours ago

  • Mint

SBI on mega fundraising drive: To raise ₹45,000 cr in debt, equity in FY26

Mumbai: The State Bank of India is on a mega fundraising drive in FY26, with plans to tap both the debt and equity markets for up to ₹ 45,000 crore to beef up its capital ratios. The state-owned lender's board on Wednesday approved raising up to ₹ 20,000 crore through Basel III-compliant additional tier-I (AT1) and tier-II bonds. That comes even as the qualified institutional placement (QIP) of the bank's shares opened for subscription—its first since FY18 when it raised ₹ 18,000 crore. State Bank of India (SBI) has set the floor price for the QIP at ₹ 811.05 per equity share. The board approval for bond issues is part of SBI's annual capital planning, which includes QIPs of up to ₹ 25,000 crore. SBI chairman C.S. Setty had said earlier that the bank annually passes an enabling resolution to strike a balance between growth needs and strengthening its common equity tier-I (CET1) capital, Mint reported in June. While the bank does not currently require capital to meet CRAR (capital adequacy ratio) norms for credit growth, it remains open to raising equity capital if a favourable opportunity arises. Setty added that the timing remains uncertain, as the bank is looking for the 'right value'. SBI's capital adequacy ratio or risk buffer stood at 14.25% as of March against the regulatory requirement of 12.1%. Still, the bank lags peers like HDFC Bank (19.6%) and Bank of Baroda (17.2%). AT1 bonds, also known as perpetual bonds, do not have a maturity date but come with a call option, typically after five years. Tier-I bonds contribute to a bank's core capital ratio, while tier-II bonds contribute to the overall capital CRAR. Core capital and CRAR are part of a bank's risk buffers. A total of ₹ 8,000 crore was raised in FY25 via tier-I bonds by SBI and Canara Bank. On the other hand, banks mobilized a cumulative ₹ 37,870 crore through tier-II bonds last fiscal, of which ₹ 36,500 crore was raised by public sector lenders, as per data by Rockfort Fincap LLP. SBI was the largest issuer of bank bonds in FY25, raising a cumulative ₹ 27,500 crore. Of this, ₹ 5,000 crore through AT1 bonds and ₹ 22,500 crore through multiple tranches of tier-II bonds. With the estimated fundraising for FY26, the public sector lender is expected to be the largest bond issuer this year as well, according to market experts. So far in FY26, ICICI Bank and Dhanlaxmi Bank have tapped the bond market, both raising funds via tier-II instruments. SBI's AT1 bond issue, when it happens, will be the first for FY26. Experts say overall bond issuances through AT1 and tier-II bonds are likely to be lower compared with last fiscal due to a slowdown in credit growth. As such, AT-1 bonds are typically given by public sector banks, given their high trust factor due to sovereign backing. Initially popular with private banks as well, when introduced, issuances by private banks took a hit after the crash of Yes Bank in March 2020, which led to a write-down of such bonds and hit investor confidence for such paper issued by private sector lenders. 'FY2025 was a record year with ₹ 1.3 lakh crore of bond issuances. Within this, infrastructure bonds dominated issuances with a volume of over ₹ 90,000 crore,' said Anil Gupta, senior vice president & co-group head, financial sector ratings at Icra Ltd. 'During the last decade, public sector banks accounted for around 60% of issuances, and private banks made up the remaining 40%. But last year, the share of issuance by private banks dropped significantly to just 7.0%.' Gupta said that given the slowdown in credit growth, the bond issuances from banks are likely to moderate in FY26, and are likely to be dominated by public sector banks, while their private peers may focus on calibrating growth amid market conditions and elevated credit-deposit (CD) ratios. 'As most banks are well capitalised, and their internal accruals are sufficient to meet growth requirements, the share of issuances of debt capital instruments like AT1 or tier-II is likely to remain muted in overall issuances," he said. AT1 bonds generally carry a higher coupon compared with tier-II bonds due to their elevated risk profile. AT1 bonds are also generally rated at least one notch below comparable tier-II issuances as these instruments can be written down. PSU banks appear to be in no rush to tap the bond markets this year, even though several of them have already secured board approvals to raise funds, a routine annual process that doesn't always translate into immediate issuances, said Venkatakrishnan Srinivasan, founder and managing partner of Rockfort Fincap LLP. He said that not a single PSU bank has tapped the bond market so far in this financial year, in sharp contrast to the ₹ 39,000 crore they collectively raised during the same period last year. 'The reason for the delay is the prevailing surplus liquidity in the banking system. With credit offtake still moderate and deposit flows remaining robust, banks are sitting on comfortable liquidity buffers and don't feel the urgency to borrow. This is also reflected in the soft overnight rates and short-term money market yield,' said Srinivasan. He added that AT1 issuances continue to remain muted. Investor appetite for AT1s, which are perpetual in nature and carry loss-absorption features, including potential write-offs, has weakened significantly. This is largely due to earlier high-profile write-downs, both domestically and globally. These Basel III-compliant instruments now face credibility concerns, especially when the yields offered do not sufficiently compensate for the embedded risks. In this context, several PSU banks may prefer to raise capital through QIPs. These equity issuances help improve capital adequacy and also align with the government's disinvestment objectives by gradually diluting public sector ownership. State-owned banks have been actively raising funds via QIPs to help the government meet a regulatory deadline for divestment of stake in state-owned entities

Tech Mahindra starts the fiscal with caution and mixed signals
Tech Mahindra starts the fiscal with caution and mixed signals

Mint

time5 hours ago

  • Mint

Tech Mahindra starts the fiscal with caution and mixed signals

Tech Mahindra Ltd kicked off the fiscal with lower-than-expected revenue as low business outside its largest geographies dragged down growth, prompting the management to give out mixed signals on the road ahead. The Pune-based information technology (IT) outsourcer reported $1.56 billion in revenue for the April-June 2025 period, up 0.97% sequentially. Analysts expected better. A Bloomberg poll of 35 analysts expected the company to report $1.57 billion in revenue. A key reason for the slowdown in revenue growth is the business outside its biggest markets, the Americas and Europe. The company's revenue from markets outside its biggest geographies, which makes up a fourth of its revenues, declined 4.4% sequentially to $388 million. Still, much of the company's incremental revenue of $15 million was contributed by its communication business, which is also its biggest vertical, making up a little more than a third of its total revenue. For now, the management sounded cautious. 'The macro picture is still quite hazy. I feel that in certain sectors which have been, you know, impacted by tariffs and by demand activity, like auto, I think the sentiment is still not conducive to significant discretionary investments,' said Mohit Joshi, chief executive of Tech Mahindra, during the post-earnings press conference on Wednesday. Its commentary was similar to larger peer Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, which called out delays in decision-making and project implementation because of uncertain macroeconomic conditions. However, the third-largest IT services provider HCL Technologies Ltd said the macroeconomic conditions were stable and that it did not 'deteriorate as feared at the start of the quarter.' While TCS ended the first quarter with $7.42 billion in revenue, down 0.59% sequentially, HCLTech ended with $3.55 billion, up 1.34%. HCL guided for 3-5% revenue growth in constant currency terms for the full year. Like TCS, Tech Mahindra does not provide quarterly or yearly guidance. However, the management said it is too early to predict improvement or a further economic downturn. 'It's a mixed picture, and I feel that it's too early to say whether the tide has turned towards significant growth, or god forbid, towards a recession,' said Joshi. However, he added that deal wins will start ramping up from the second half. 'We expected that from Q2 onwards, as we said, and certainly the second half of the year, the deal wins that we've had will start contributing towards revenue growth rate,' said Joshi. Tech Mahindra reported new deal wins worth $809 million, up 44% on a yearly basis. In terms of geographies, the company gets almost half of its business from the Americas, which was also its best-performing market in the last quarter. A sore spot for the company was its net profit, which was $133 million, down 2.2% sequentially. However, a bright spot was Tech Mahindra's operating margins. Tech Mahindra reported 11.1% operating margins, up 60 basis points sequentially. One basis point is a hundredth of a percentage point. Chief financial officer Rohit Anand said the margins improved because of 'Project Fortius, operational levers such as favourable offshore mix' and 'continuous progress made on integration of portfolio entities.' The company's margin performance comes as a shot in the arm for its management, which seeks to increase its operating margin to 15% by March 2027 and grow its revenue faster than peers as part of a three-year road map called Project Fortius. Tech Mahindra aims to do so organically without any acquisitions, by investing in its key accounts and boosting growth in its non-telecom businesses, which have been the company's biggest cash cow in the past. At least one analyst was optimistic about the company's margin programme. 'Margin improvement despite revenue weakness is commendable and increases credence towards management's target of improving margins to 15% by FY27. We remain confident in the multiyear transformation ahead, which we back and remain positive about,' said Manik Taneja, executive director for IT services at Axis Capital. Still, the margin performance came at a cost to the headcount. Much like HCL, Tech Mahindra cut headcount by 214 employees to end last quarter with 148,517 people. HCLTech is the only company to have reduced headcount in the quarter. The company cut staff by 269 in April-June 2025 to end with 223,151 employees. As of now, TCS is the only company to add headcount last quarter. The country's largest IT service provider added 5,090 people in the first three months of the fiscal year to end with 613,069 employees. Churn in the lower end of Tech Mahindra's employee pyramid is followed by movement at the top. Since March 2024, thecompany's senior management has had at least 20 additions and exits. For now, this increase in headcount comes against the backdrop of a tariff war started by US President Donald Trump, coupled with geopolitical uncertainties. Both have put the IT expenditure of large companies, many of which count Tech Mahindra as their IT vendor, in limbo. The company's shares rose 1.94% to close at ₹ 1,609 on Wednesday. The 30-share benchmark BSE Sensex index closed 0.08% higher at 82,634.48 points. The earnings were announced after market hours.

SBI on mega fundraising drive: To raise  ₹45,000 cr in debt, equity in FY26
SBI on mega fundraising drive: To raise  ₹45,000 cr in debt, equity in FY26

Mint

time6 hours ago

  • Mint

SBI on mega fundraising drive: To raise ₹45,000 cr in debt, equity in FY26

Mumbai: The State Bank of India is on a mega fundraising drive in FY26, with plans to tap both the debt and equity markets for up to ₹ 45,000 crore to beef up its capital ratios. The state-owned lender's board on Wednesday approved raising up to ₹ 20,000 crore through Basel III-compliant additional tier-I (AT1) and tier-II bonds. The board approval for the bond issues comes even as the qualified institutional placement (QIP) of the bank's shares opened for subscription—its first since FY18 when it raised ₹ 18,000 crore. State Bank of India (SBI) has set the floor price for the QIP at ₹ 811.05 per equity share. The board approval for bond issues is part of the bank's annual capital planning, which includes QIPs of up to ₹ 25,000 crore. SBI chairman C.S. Setty had said earlier that the bank annually passes an enabling resolution to strike a balance between growth needs and strengthening its common equity tier-I (CET1) capital, Mint reported in June. While the bank does not currently require capital to meet CRAR (capital adequacy ratio) norms for credit growth, it remains open to raising equity capital if a favourable opportunity arises. Setty added that the timing remains uncertain, as the bank is looking for the 'right value'. SBI's capital adequacy ratio or risk buffer stood at 14.25% as of March against the regulatory requirement of 12.1%. Still, the bank lags peers like HDFC Bank (19.6%) and Bank of Baroda (17.2%) as of March. AT1 bonds, also known as perpetual bonds, do not have a maturity date but come with a call option, typically after five years. Tier-I bonds contribute to a bank's core capital ratio, while tier-II bonds contribute to the overall capital adequacy ratio (CRAR). Core capital and capital adequacy are part of a bank's risk buffers. A total of ₹ 8,000 crore was raised in FY25 via tier-I bonds by SBI and Canara Bank. On the other hand, banks mobilized a cumulative ₹ 37,870 crore through tier-II bonds, of which ₹ 36,500 crore was raised by public sector banks, as per data by Rockfort Fincap LLP. SBI was the largest issuer of bank bonds in FY25, raising a cumulative ₹ 27,500 crore during the year. Of this, ₹ 5,000 crore through AT1 bonds and ₹ 22,500 crore through multiple tranches of tier-II bonds. With this estimated fundraising for FY26, the public sector lender is expected to be the largest bond issuer this year as well, according to market experts. So far in FY26, ICICI Bank and Dhanlaxmi Bankhave been the only banks to tap the bond market, both raising funds via tier-II instruments. SBI's tier-I bond issue, when it happens, will be the first for the current financial year. Experts say the overall bond issuances through AT1 and tier-II are likely to be lower compared to last year due to a slowdown in credit growth. As such, AT-1 bonds are typically given by public sector banks, given their high trust factor due to sovereign backing. Initially popular with private banks as well, when introduced, issuances by private banks took a hit post the crash of Yes Bank in March 2020, which led to a write-down of such bonds and hit investor confidence for such paper issued by private sector lenders. 'FY2025 was a record year with ₹ 1.3 lakh crore of bond issuances. Within this, infrastructure bonds dominated issuances with a volume of over ₹ 90,000 crore,' said Anil Gupta, senior vice president & co-group head, financial sector ratings at Icra Ltd. 'During the last decade, public sector banks accounted for around 60% of issuances, and private banks made up the remaining 40%. But last year, the share of issuance by private banks dropped significantly to just 7.0%.' Gupta said that given the slowdown in credit growth, the bond issuances from banks are likely to moderate in FY26, and are likely to be dominated by public sector banks, while their private peers may focus on calibrating growth amid market conditions and elevated credit-deposit (CD) ratios. 'As most banks are well capitalised, and their internal accruals are sufficient to meet growth requirements, the share of issuances of debt capital instruments like AT1 or tier-II is likely to remain muted in overall issuances," he said. AT1 bonds generally carry a higher coupon compared with tier-II bonds due to their elevated risk profile. AT1 bonds are also generally rated at least one notch below comparable tier-II issuances as these instruments can be written down. PSU banks appear to be in no rush to tap the bond markets this year, even though several of them have already secured board approvals to raise funds, a routine annual process that doesn't always translate into immediate issuances, said Venkatakrishnan Srinivasan, founder and managing partner of Rockfort Fincap LLP. He said that not a single PSU bank has tapped the bond market so far in this financial year, in sharp contrast to the ₹ 39,000 crore they collectively raised during the same period last year. 'The reason for the delay is the prevailing surplus liquidity in the banking system. With credit of take still moderate and deposit flows remaining robust, banks are sitting on comfortable liquidity buffers and don't feel the urgency to borrow. This is also reflected in the soft overnight rates and short-term money market yield,' said Srinivasan. He added that AT1 issuances continue to remain muted. Investor appetite for AT1s, which are perpetual in nature and carry loss-absorption features, including potential write-offs, has weakened significantly. This is largely due to earlier high-profile write-downs, both domestically and globally. These Basel III-compliant instruments now face credibility concerns, especially when the yields offered do not sufficiently compensate for the embedded risks. In this context, several PSU banks may prefer to raise capital through QIPs. These equity issuances help improve capital adequacy and also align with the government's disinvestment objectives by gradually diluting public sector ownership. State-owned banks have been actively raising funds via QIPs to help the government meet a regulatory deadline for divestment of stake in state-owned entities Punjab National Bank raised ₹ 5,000 crore via a QIP in September 2024, and Bank of Maharashtra fetched ₹ 3,500 crore the following month. This year, Indian Overseas Bank raised ₹ 1,436 crore via a QIP that ended on 25 March. UCO Bank, Punjab & Sind Bank, and Central Bank raised a total of about ₹ 2,000 crore from their QIPs in the last quarter of FY25.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store