
The new Trump-led tax bill promises an American ‘golden age' – that conveniently ends with his presidency
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which passed narrowly with 215-214 votes, is centered on permanently extending tax cuts enacted during Trump's first term, while also creating new deductions to make good on his campaign promise of providing relief to the working class and families.
But there's a catch: those deductions would be available only through 2028, meaning that when Trump finishes his term in January 2029, his tax relief will have expired. And to sway fiscal hardliners, Republicans have filled the bill with cuts to social safety net programs that could drive millions of poor and disabled Americans off the benefits they depend on.
'This seems pretty overtly tied to the presidential election cycle. I am not aware that that's happened before,' said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), a nonpartisan watchdog group focused on government spending.
The bill now moves on to the US Senate, where lawmakers are expected to make their own changes. Democrats have little influence over the measure, which is crafted under the budget reconciliation procedure that allows it to be passed with simple majorities in both chambers.
As currently written, the bill is expected to add an outsize $3.4tn to the deficit through 2034, much of which is due to the permanent extension of tax cuts Trump signed in 2017. It would also allow taxpayers to write off overtime, tips and the interest paid on loans for cars assembled in the US, in line with Trump's campaign promises.
Parents would see the child tax credit increase by $500, and be given the option of opening 'Trump accounts' to save money to help their children afford a home or schooling once they turn 18, into which the government would deposit $1,000.
And while the legislation does not include Trump's promise to slash taxes on social security payments, it does offer a new $4,000 deduction for taxpayers aged 65 or older.
But once the year 2028 ends, so too do these deductions, as well as the government's deposits into any Trump accounts and the increased child tax credit. By that time, poor Americans will have begun navigating funding cuts and new requirements imposed on two of the government's biggest anti-poverty programs.
In 2027, new work requirements for some recipients of Medicaid, the healthcare program for poor and disabled Americans, would go into effect. The Urban Institute thinktank, based on an analysis of a similar policy, believes those would cost as many as 5.2 million people their health insurance coverage, largely because of enrollees not understanding the requirement or being unable to prove their compliance.
People who depend on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), which helps pay for groceries and other essentials, would also face work requirements beginning in October 2027. The left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates those would put about a quarter of Snap recipients, or nearly 11 million people, at risk of losing their benefits.
'To make the math work and to satisfy all camps, they have put together a kind of a structure in which Trump can be satisfied that he will see these provisions go into effect under his term, the deficit hawks and the spending hawks can be assured that, at least on paper, these cuts are coming, and then actually it will be somebody else's, some other Congress's actual job, to decide what happens to them after that,' said Alex Jacquez, a former economic policy adviser to Joe Biden who is now the chief of policy and advocacy at the Groundwork Collaborative think tank.
Despite the new deductions, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the wealthy will benefit most from the bill. Taxpayers with the highest incomes will see their household resources increase by four percent in 2027 and two percent in 2033, largely due to the extended tax cuts. The poorest tax payers would see their resources drop by four percent in 2033, largely due to the downsized benefit programs, the CBO forecast.
MacGuineas warned that the temporary deductions combined with the delayed start of the spending cuts will create a 'fiscal cliff' for a future Congress and president, who will face pressure to stop or further delay what could be a politically toxic combination of policies.
'You could have a big showdown in 2028, 2029 about what to extend, how to pay for it, if you do, whether you have to and whether to delay the offsets. And that could be, overall, a very ugly fiscal picture,' she said.
Cancelling the spending cuts and keeping the new deductions in place would cost $4.8tn, the CRFB forecasts – more than the government spent responding to the Covid pandemic.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
Deep Dive: Stripe vs. Adyen – Comparing Product Stacks and Pricing: By Sam Boboev
Two fintech heavyweights are vying for dominance in global payments: Stripe and Adyen. Both power a substantial share of online commerce, yet they've taken different paths to the top. Stripe, the Silicon Valley darling, built its name with developers and startups; Adyen, the Dutch powerhouse, quietly became the backbone for many large global retailers. Product managers and fintech founders on both sides of the Atlantic (especially in the US and EU) often face a strategic choice between these platforms. This deep dive examines how Stripe and Adyen stack up – from their product offerings to pricing models – and why it matters. Spoiler: Both companies have overlapping product categories (payments, fraud prevention, in-person solutions, and more), but their strengths and weaknesses can make each a better fit for different customer profiles. Let's dig in. The Payments Giants at a Glance It helps to frame the comparison with scale and performance. In 2024, Stripe processed about $1.4 trillion in total payment volume (TPV), growing 38% year-over-year, while Adyen was close behind with €1.29 trillion (+33% YoY). These figures underscore that both companies handle enormous transaction flows (roughly on par with ~1–1.5% of global GDP each). Adyen has long been profitable – it sustained an impressive ~50% EBITDA margin in 2024 – whereas Stripe historically reinvested for growth but finally achieved full-year profitability in 2024. In other words, Adyen is the rare fintech operating at bank-like profit levels, while Stripe proved its business model can scale financially. Both are now plowing resources into R&D and expansion, setting the stage for an intense rivalry. Stripe launched in 2010, targeting developers and small online businesses with easy-to-use APIs. Its strategy was bottom-up: win the hearts of startups and SMBs, then gradually move upmarket. Adyen, founded in 2006, took almost the opposite approach – a top-down focus on large enterprises and global retailers. Adyen built a single unified platform for 'unified commerce' (online, in-app, and in-store payments all in one), directly connecting to card networks and local payment methods. This made Adyen the go-to for many big multichannel merchants (think Uber, Spotify, Microsoft, McDonald's, H&M and the like), while Stripe became synonymous with the startup economy and SaaS world. Today, however, their offerings overlap significantly. Stripe now serves 50% of the Fortune 100 companies in some capacity, and Adyen is expanding its reach to mid-sized clients and platforms. Both are truly global – Stripe is used in 195+ countries with support for 135+ currencies, and Adyen similarly supports transactions worldwide (150+ currencies and dozens of local methods). A quick external perspective sums it up well: 'Adyen is better for midsize or large companies with multiple sales channels, whereas Stripe is good for small, online businesses.' In practice, Stripe's flat-rate pricing and plug-and-play simplicity make it popular among SMBs and tech startups. Adyen's custom approach and interchange-plus pricing appeal to high-volume, omnichannel businesses that can integrate a more complex solution. But these lines are blurring. Stripe has been aggressively courting larger enterprises (even Amazon inked a deal in 2023 to have Stripe process a significant portion of its payments across the US, Europe, and Canada). Meanwhile, Adyen is indirectly serving many SMBs via platform partnerships (for example, when Etsy or eBay use Adyen as their payments engine, thousands of small sellers are on Adyen's rails). The competitive arena is set: both companies offer a broad payments platform, but how do their product stacks and pricing compare in detail? Core Payments Infrastructure At their heart, both Stripe and Adyen are payments processors – they enable businesses to accept a wide range of payment methods and get paid online (and offline). Let's compare their core payments capabilities: Stripe and Adyen each support an extensive array of payment methods: global credit/debit cards (Visa, Mastercard, Amex, etc.), digital wallets (Apple Pay, Google Pay, etc.), bank transfers, and region-specific options (from **SEPA Direct Debit in Europe to ACH in the US, Alipay and WeChat Pay in Asia, Klarna/Affirm for BNPL, and many more). Stripe advertises access to 100+ payment methods out-of-the-box with a single integration. Adyen similarly prides itself on being a one-stop solution to 'offer your customers all their preferred payment methods with a single integration'. For example, a merchant using either platform can easily offer local favorites like iDEAL in the Netherlands or Boleto in Brazil alongside global cards. One difference is how these methods are integrated. Adyen built direct connections to many local payment schemes and card networks through its own licenses. This 'single platform' approach can improve authorization rates and reduce hops in the transaction process. Indeed, Adyen highlights its direct acquiring connections to Visa/Mastercard and even domestic networks, claiming it can optimize approval rates via intelligent routing (their RevenueAccelerate tools). Stripe, on the other hand, initially partnered with banks for acquiring in various regions, but over time it also obtained regulatory licenses and built out global infrastructure (Stripe has regulatory licenses in multiple jurisdictions and data centers worldwide, ensuring transactions are processed locally where possible for speed and better success rates). Both companies now can offer very high uptime (Stripe boasts 99.999% historical uptime, and Adyen is known for reliability as well) and the ability to settle funds in a currency of the merchant's choosing. Adyen explicitly lets merchants 'choose when and in which currency' to receive payouts, a flexibility important for international businesses. Stripe is almost universally lauded for its developer-friendly APIs and documentation. It provides client libraries in every popular programming language and famously simple code snippets. For a small business or product team, Stripe's developer tools can shorten integration time dramatically. (As an example, Stripe's drop-in checkout or pre-built UI components – Stripe Elements and Checkout – let you start accepting cards with minimal coding.) Adyen's platform is also robust, but the common refrain is that Adyen is not as 'plug-and-play' for small merchants. Adyen often requires a bit more initial setup and understanding of payment flows. That said, Adyen offers comprehensive APIs and SDKs too, along with client-side components (its Drop-in UI and Components for web/mobile) to handle payment method selection and encryption. The gap in ease has narrowed over time, but Stripe's polish in developer experience and documentation remains a strong differentiator. For a startup with a lean engineering team, Stripe's 'it just works' approach can be very attractive – everything from the initial integration to handling webhooks for events is well-supported. Adyen tends to shine for merchants that need fine-grained control and are willing to invest in a more bespoke integration. Transaction Performance: Both Stripe and Adyen invest heavily in optimizing payment success rates. Adyen's advantage of direct network connections means it can sometimes get slightly better authorization rates, especially in regions where local processing matters (for instance, processing European cards with a European acquiring license to avoid cross-border inefficiencies). Stripe has countered by developing its own smart routing and 'adaptive acceptance' algorithms, and by working with card issuers. Stripe even formed an Enhanced Issuer Network program to share data with card issuers, reportedly reducing fraud and boosting authorizations by 1–2% on eligible volume. In practice, both processors are top-tier in transaction quality; large merchants often run A/B tests between providers and find both Stripe and Adyen to be high performers, with differences depending on specific geographies or banks. It's not unusual for an enterprise to use multiple PSPs in active-active mode and route traffic between Stripe, Adyen, and others to optimize costs and uptime. Both companies understand this and continually roll out improvements (for example, Stripe has machine learning to retry failed payments at optimal times and auto-update saved card details, while Adyen recently introduced an AI-powered tool called Adyen Uplift to improve payment conversion by an average 6%). On core payment processing capabilities, both Stripe and Adyen offer a full-spectrum, global solution. Stripe wins praise for ease and developer tooling; Adyen wins praise for technical robustness and global unified infrastructure. For most standard online payments use cases (accepting card payments on a website or app), either will get the job done with high standards. The differences emerge more clearly when we expand into other aspects: in-person payments, platform payments, and value-added services. Source: Stripe vs. Adyen 2024 performance and strategy highlights NerdWallet on ideal customer profiles for Adyen vs Stripe Stripe Newsroom: Amazon expanding use of Stripe (enterprise win) Stripe Enterprise documentation (custom pricing options) Adyen official pricing page (interchange++ transparency) Codelevate 2025 PSP comparison (product features & pricing details) Fintech Wrap Up deep dive (TPV and product developments in 2024) Adyen website ('One platform' omnichannel messaging) Codelevate on strengths/drawbacks of each platform FXCintel analysis on Adyen's 2023 results (North America focus) Disclaimer: Fintech Wrap Up aggregates publicly available information for informational purposes only. Portions of the content may be reproduced verbatim from the original source, and full credit is provided with a "Source: [Name]" attribution. All copyrights and trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. Fintech Wrap Up does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the aggregated content; these are the responsibility of the original source providers. Links to the original sources may not always be included. For questions or concerns, please contact us at


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Employee benefit linked to financial stress takes aim at traditional 401(K)s as US debt skyrockets
Americans are increasingly turning to services that are setting off alarm bells. Instead of waiting for a traditional payday, workers are increasingly using apps like DailyPay, FlexWage, and Tapcheck to get paid the same day they work — sometimes just hours after clocking out. It's called on-demand pay, and it's growing fast as millions of households face financial stress. The service lets users withdraw wages they've already earned before their scheduled payday. 'It helps a lot of employees, especially ones in school who need to pay a bill while check isn't scheduled for another week,' one Reddit user said about DailyPay. 'But don't make it a habit — when you get paid in full, your check is little.' These apps are marketed as an alternative to payday loans. There's no interest, but workers typically pay a flat fee of $2 to $5 for instant access. Next-day deposits are often free. The rise of on-demand pay comes as Americans face mounting financial pressure from nearly every direction. Total household debt surged by $167 billion in the first quarter of 2025, reaching a record $18.2 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Around $5 trillion of that debt is non-housing, consumer debt. While credit card balances dipped slightly — falling $29 billion from the previous quarter — student loan debt jumped by $16 billion. Delinquencies spiked after the end of a multi-year pause on repayment reporting. Overall, 4.3 percent of household debt is now delinquent in some way. That situation is especially dire for Americans living paycheck to paycheck. Roughly one in three consumers struggle to manage their debt, and 35 percent say they can't pay all their bills on time, according to new survey data from digital finance firm Achieve. America's labor market has shown surprising resilience - analysts were recently surprised with how many US employees got jobs last month 'When people are overwhelmed and about to miss bill payments, they often don't know what steps to take,' Brad Stroh, the firm's CEO said about the survey's findings. The agency suggested consumers should avoid quick fixes to their debt problems like cash advances, saying they 'can deepen long-term financial challenges.' 'One significant concern with on-demand pay is the potential for high associated costs,' Austin Kilgore, an analyst at the Achieve Center for Consumer Insights, told 'The real danger emerges when individuals fall into a cycle of repeatedly accessing their wages early rather than managing their existing funds. 'This can lead to a situation where a significant portion of their income is consumed by fees, essentially preventing them from having full access to their earned money.' But the problem doesn't seem to stem from American employment opportunities. Early Thursday, the Labor Department released it's June jobs report that showed shocking resilience in the jobs market. Last month, America added 147,000 jobs, up from 139,000 added in May. Hidden in today's numbers was good news for debt-burdened Americans: the average wage is still increasing. Last month, employers typically paid $36.30 an hour for work, an $0.08 hourly increase from the month before. The positive numbers were shocking to many analysts, especially given the news on Wednesday.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Inside Barron Trump's outrageously lavish childhood as president's son bags his first girlfriend
Barron Trump was spoiled with expensive tuition and lived in a home fit for a king during his lavish childhood. The 19-year-old student, who is the only child of President Donald Trump and his wife Melania Trump, was born on March 20, 2006, and has remained largely out of the spotlight. But as reports emerge that the teen has bagged himself his first ever girlfriend, Femail delves into Barron's luxurious upbringing, taking a particularly close look at the hundreds of thousands spent on his education. Barron was born and raised in New York City and spent much of his childhood living at his dad's extravagant penthouse apartment, Trump Tower, in Manhattan. The sprawling home, worth an estimated $65 million, boasts of breathtaking views of Central Park and the Manhattan skyline. According to reports, Barron has a floor of his own in the lavish residence, with the home located on the top three floors of Trump Tower. Barron attended school in New York City until 2017, when his dad took office for his first term in the White House. He then attended middle and high schools in different locations across the country. For his primary education, Barron went to Manhattan's prestigious Columbia Grammar and Preparatory School. Tuition at the elite school is billed at $64,340 per year and increases by about $1,000 once you enter high school. Trump started his first term as president halfway through the school year in January 2017, so Barron remained with Melania in New York to finish up his time at Columbia. In September 2017, he started sixth grade at St. Andrew's Episcopal in Potomac, Maryland - just about a 45-minute car drive from Washington, D.C. The yearly middle school tuition at St. Andrew's cost $52,290. Once Trump's first term was up in 2020, Barron moved to Palm Beach, Florida and finished school there, at Oxbridge Academy in West Palm Beach. He graduated from Oxbridge Academy in Palm Beach, Florida, last May. Barron is currently a student at NYU and has just completed his freshman year. Melania and Baron attend the annual playground party with New York families to support Central Park's playgrounds on May 30, 2007 He has returned to live at Trump Tower while he completes his college education. President Trump revealed last month his 'formula for good parenting.' 'I always said the same thing. I said: no drugs, no alcohol, no cigarettes. I also would say don't get tattoos, but I don't say it too strongly, because a lot of people have gotten tattoos, and that's what they choose to do,' he told The New York Post in a podcast interview. Many of the president's supporters at rallies sport tattoos as do some members of Trump's Cabinet, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The president has made a point of not drinking, as his older brother, Fred Trump Jr., suffered from alcoholism and died young, at age 42. He boasted that his five children - Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka, Eric, Tiffany and Barron - were 'born smart.' 'Barron is great. He is very tall and good,' he added.