logo
French appeals court clears two over first lady gender rumours

French appeals court clears two over first lady gender rumours

Yahoo4 days ago
A French appeals court Thursday overturned convictions against two women accused of libel against French First Lady Brigitte Macron, after they spread false claims she used to be a man that reached the United States.
Disinformation on Macron's gender has circulated on social media for years. She has also been attacked over the 24-year age difference with President Emmanuel Macron.
The 72-year-old first lady, whose maiden name is Trogneux, has a brother called Jean-Michel.
Brigitte Macron filed a libel complaint against two women after they posted a YouTube video in December 2021, alleging she had once been a man named Jean-Michel.
In the video, defendant Amandine Roy, a self-proclaimed spiritual medium, interviewed Natacha Rey, a self-described independent journalist, for four hours on her YouTube channel.
Rey spoke about the "state lie" and "scam" she claimed to have uncovered -- that a certain Jean-Michel Trogneux had changed gender to become Brigitte, then married the president.
They discussed surgery she was supposed to have undergone, and revealed personal information about the first lady's brother.
The claim went viral, including recently among conspiracy theorists in the United States.
A lower court in September last year ordered the two women to pay 8,000 euros in damages to Brigitte Macron, and 5,000 euros ($5,500) to her brother.
But the Paris Appeals Court on Thursday let them off, including over a false claim of "grooming a minor", arguing they had made the mistake in "good faith".
The defendants will no longer have to pay the damages.
The court did not provide further explanations.
In a separate case, four men are to appear in court in October in Paris over allegations they harassed the first lady.
Among the accused is Aurelien Poirson-Atlan, born in 1984, a publicist known on social media as "Zoe Sagan" often linked with conspiracy theory circles.
Former US first lady Michelle Obama, ex-vice president Kamala Harris and New Zealand ex-premier Jacinda Ardern have also been the target of disinformation about their gender or sexuality.
cbr/ah/jj
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK Doesn't Know How Much Billionaires Pay in Taxes, MPs Say
UK Doesn't Know How Much Billionaires Pay in Taxes, MPs Say

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

UK Doesn't Know How Much Billionaires Pay in Taxes, MPs Say

The UK tax authority cannot identify how much tax the nation's billionaires pay on their wealth, hampering its ability to properly impose levies on the ultra-wealthy, according to lawmakers. His Majesty's Revenue and Customs has an incomplete grasp of the financial affairs of billionaires, the cross-party group of Members of Parliament on the Public Accounts Committee said in a report Wednesday, expressing disappointment over the lack of data collection on their wealth and assets.

Analysis: Russia hawks face new dilemma over Trump's 50-day Putin deadline
Analysis: Russia hawks face new dilemma over Trump's 50-day Putin deadline

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Analysis: Russia hawks face new dilemma over Trump's 50-day Putin deadline

The Russia hawks' initial reaction to President Donald Trump's tougher stance on Vladimir Putin was positive. That included a Monday joint statement from Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham and Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal calling Trump's threat of ramped-up economic penalties if Russia doesn't cut a peace deal in next 50 days 'a real executive hammer to drive the parties to the negotiating table.' But a day later, a real sense of skepticism about Trump's threats has crept in. The Russians have basically shrugged it off and even treated it as a green light to take what they can in the next several weeks. Ukrainians and foreign leaders have expressed fears about what happens over the next 50 days. And even some Trump allies in Congress and elsewhere are wondering: Why the delay? Why not pass the sanctions legislation that more than 80 senators already support today? Trump by Tuesday afternoon rejected criticisms of that timetable. 'Oh, I don't think 50 days is very long, and it could be sooner than that,' he said. 'I don't think 50 days is very long. ' The president has often pushed off major decisions and announcements by giving himself a future deadline that he might or might not abide by (often 'two weeks'). He did recently strike Iran right after a 60-day window he had given it to cut a nuclear deal that never arrived. But there seems to be a growing fear that this is just more kicking the can down the road or a pointless intermission. Perhaps most striking Tuesday were the comments of a pair of Republican senators. Sen. Rick Scott of Florida praised Trump for his desire to bring Putin to the table. But he said the Russian leader is 'not going to change.' 'I don't know why he gave him that many days. From my standpoint, I think Trump's being very generous,' Scott told CNN's Manu Raju. 'I would love there to be sanctions now. I'd love there to be tariffs now.' Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina said the 50-day timetable 'worries' him. Tillis said Putin could use the time to ramp up efforts to win the war quickly or try to gain power 'after having murdered and potentially collected more ground as a basis for negotiation.' As CNN's Matthew Chance noted, officials in Moscow were breathing a sigh of relief about an announcement that could have been much worse for them – and may now view it as license to do what they can over the next 50 days. While Russia has called Trump's threats and the weapons he said he's funneling to Ukraine 'very serious,' Russian officials like Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev – a key Putin ally – also publicly downplayed the 50-day timeline. 'Trump issued a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin,' Medvedev posted on X. 'The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. Belligerent Europe was disappointed. Russia didn't care.' The markets in Russia also appear to have shrugged. The New York Times reported Tuesday that Moscow's stock index jumped up 2.5 points on Tuesday, potentially because secondary sanctions appear more distant now – if they ever arrive. Fears that Trump is giving Russia too long a leash were also prominent in Europe. Officials including European Union foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas praised the tougher stance but cast the timeframe as a very long one. Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who has often allied with Trump, praised him for 'turning up the heat on Putin.' 'But why wait? Putin is butchering innocent people every day. Let's get this thing over,' Johnson posted on X, adding: 'Let's sanction the Putin enablers now.' The dilemma for Russia hawks is readily apparent. On the one hand, Trump is saying tougher things about Putin than he ever has before, and they want to give him credit for that – however belated they might think that pivot is. But given Trump's unpredictability and the fact that he's treated Putin with kid gloves plenty before, they might also view this as a smokescreen and not tough enough. So now that Trump appears to have soured on his Russian counterpart, they might want to gently push him toward more urgent action. What seems clear is that the concerns about the 50-day deadline have registered. Trump grew testy Tuesday when pressed on the matter. 'You should've asked that same question to Biden,' Trump said, repeating one of his frequent refrains that it's really his predecessor who is responsible for Putin's unprovoked invasion of its neighbor. 'Why did he get us into this war? You should ask that question.' Graham also seemed to respond to critics of the 50-day timeline, saying Trump very recently demonstrated how serious such deadlines can be – on Iran. 'If Putin and others are wondering what happens on day 51, I would suggest they call the Ayatollah,' Graham posted on X. 'If I were a country buying cheap Russian oil, propping up Putin's war machine, I would take President Trump at his word.' The comparison isn't perfect. Trump didn't threaten to bomb Moscow. And the option to get tougher on Russia is a lot easier for Trump to make; it basically just involves telling Congress to pass a bill it appears poised to pass whenever called upon. We'll see if Trump feels compelled to get tougher, quicker.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store