
Scott Morrison tells US Australia risks going to sleep on China threat after diplomatic ‘charm and flattery'
In a forthright appearance before the hawkish US House of Representatives select committee on the strategic competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist party, Morrison said China had changed diplomatic tack after he lost the 2022 election to Anthony Albanese.
'This included abandoning their economic and diplomatic bullying and coercion for more inductive engagement, laced with charm and flattery,' Morrison said. 'That said, the PRC still continues to engage in intimidatory behaviour by their military against Australia when it suits them without remorse.'
Morrison said while China's diplomatic tactics had changed, its objectives were unaltered: to isolate US influence in the Indo-Pacific and weaken efforts at countering Beijing's 'potential security threat'.
He said Australia should boost its defence spending to the 3.5% of GDP demanded of it by the US, arguing 'the world has changed' and that Chinese leaders sought to 'recast the world order to accommodate their illiberal objectives'.
Morrison accused the current Labor government of scrimping on defence spending in order to pay for the Aukus submarine deal, which will cost $358bn to the 2050s.
Morrison later told reporters Australian defence spending parsimony – in particular the 'displacement' of funds to prioritise Aukus – had been raised by the US in its review of the agreement.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
'It wasn't [meant to be] 'Aukus instead', it was 'Aukus as well',' he said. 'And 'Aukus as well' was at least going to add another half a percent of GDP, at least.'
Morrison said Australia should raise its defence spending to 3% of GDP by 2030 and 3.5% by 2035. The government spends a little over 2% of GDP on defence currently, with forecasts to lift that to 2.3% by 2033. To prioritise Aukus, significant cuts have reportedly been made to defence programs, training budgets and to senior defence ranks.
Australia has already paid $1.6bn to the US as part of the Aukus agreement. However, the future of the massive nuclear submarine deal remains uncertain as the Pentagon undertakes a review to ensure it does not weaken US naval capacity or diminish America's force posture to contain China.
Morrison, whose leadership between 2018 and 2022 endured a low in relations with Beijing, told the committee it was vital for western nations to resist Chinese attempts to interfere in politics and curb free speech.
Citing polling of Australians by the Lowy Institute, the former prime minister told US lawmakers that 'for the first time in quite a number of years there is a greater value on the economic partnership with China than concerns about the security threat'.
'That is an objective of the CCP [Chinese communist party], that western democracies go to sleep on the threat,' Morrison said.
'You need to build the internal resilience, and that means an appreciation of the potential threat. And that is somewhat in jeopardy in Australia.'
Morrison said the liberal world order faced a 'rising threat from authoritarian states who, not content with absolute control over their own populations to preserve their regimes, also seek hegemonic control over their own regions and to recast the world order to accommodate their illiberal objectives'.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'The Chinese Communist party government of the People's Republic of China is such a regime.'
And Morrison said Western countries were 'kidding themselves' if they thought dialogue would change Beijing's pursuit of their objectives.
'A free and open Indo-Pacific – that is a threat and a challenge to regime security in China,' he said.
'Discussion is fine, engagement is good – it's better than the alternative. But if we think that is going to produce change in the mindset of Beijing then we're frankly kidding ourselves.'
Appearing alongside Morrison before the committee hearing was Rahm Emanuel, formerly president Barack Obama's chief of staff, mayor of Chicago and US ambassador to Japan. Emanuel is widely considered to be a leading Democratic contender contemplating a run for the White House in 2028.
He argued the US – in a significant shift from the Trump administration's 'America First' doctrine – should lead a strong 'anti-coercion coalition' along with allies like Australia to counter Beijing's growing influence.
He cited China's trade sanctions on beef, wine and barley, imposed after Australia led calls for an inquiry into the origins of Covid-19, as examples of economic coercion, China's most 'pernicious and persistent tool'.
'Australia is the best kind of blueprint of what you want to replicate worldwide. They did it on their own,' Emanuel said. 'And China realised they couldn't isolate Australia.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UN climate chief warns Australia not to pick a ‘bog standard' 2035 carbon emissions target
The UN's climate chief has declared Australia's 2035 emissions target will define the country's future, and urged the Albanese government to not pick a 'bog-standard' number but to 'go for what's smart by going big'. Speaking in Sydney on Monday, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change executive secretary, Simon Stiell, cast the government's decision on the target – due by September – as the country's 'one shot' to build an 'on-ramp to the Asian clean tech boom', create hundreds of thousands of jobs and ensure the country's economic security and regional influence. The government is being heavily lobbied by industry and climate-focused organisations as it waits on advice about the 2035 target from the Climate Change Authority, a government agency led by chair Matt Kean, a former NSW Liberal treasurer and energy minister. Stiell, a former minister in the Grenadian government, did not say what the target should be, but said the decision was more than 'just the next policy milestone'. He said climate policy debates could be 'complex and contentious', but urged the country to not 'settle for what's easy'. 'If those debates deliver an ambitious, all-economy plan with public backing and political backbone then, whatever the naysayers might say, every hard-fought inch will be worth it,' he said at an event hosted by the Smart Energy Council, a clean energy industry organisation. 'Bog standard is beneath you … Go for what will build lasting wealth and national security. Go for what will change the game and stand the test of time.' Sign up: AU Breaking News email The Climate Change Authority last year said a preliminary assessment of scientific, economic, technological and social evidence suggested a target of cutting national emissions by at least 65% and up to 75% by 2035 compared with 2005 levels would be ambitious but achievable. Some organisations, including the Climate Council, the Australian Council of Social Service and the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering, argue Australia should be aiming to reach net zero emissions by 2035 if it is to play its part in keeping global heating as close to 1.5C as possible – a goal enshrined in the legally binding 2015 Paris agreement. Some business groups, including mining company Fortescue, have locked behind a campaign for a minimum 75% reduction target. They face opposition from other industry lobbyists that suggest the government should set a target that would do little more than the legislated 2030 goal of a 43% cut. The Coalition is considering whether it will go further and abandon its support for reaching net zero emissions by 2050. The former Nationals leader, Barnaby Joyce, has tabled a private member's bill that would abolish nearly all of the country's climate policies and commitments, including the net zero target. Stiell said he believed Australians knew unchecked climate change was 'an economic wrecking ball', and that climate disasters were 'already costing Australian homeowners $4bn a year – and that figure is only going one way'. He cited analysis that found the country could lose $6.8tn in GDP by 2050, and living standards could fall by more than $7,000 per person a year. But he said the 'global clean energy race' was under way, with trillions of dollars at stake, and with China and India investing in renewables at a level that was 'off the charts'. He said an ambitious target in Australia could 'anchor future industries – green hydrogen, clean metals, critical minerals – in policies that give investors confidence, give communities certainty [and] create good jobs paying good wages'. He said it would send a message 'so clear the world can't miss it – this country is open for clean investment, trade and long-term partnerships'. Stiell is in Australia as part of a global trip as governments weigh new commitments for 2035 before the Cop30 climate conference in Brazil in November. He arrived in Sydney after visiting Indonesia and Turkey. Turkey is vying with Australia and the Pacific to host next year's Cop31 summit. A decision will need to be made by Cop30, at the latest. It had been expected last year, but the UN operates a consensus process and Turkey has remained in the race despite most members of the deciding group of Western Europe and Other States having declared their support for the Australia-Pacific bid. Stiell was due to visit Canberra on Tuesday for meetings, including with the climate change and energy minister, Chris Bowen. He will be joined in the capital by the prime minister of the low-lying Pacific atoll nation of Tuvalu, Feleti Teo, who is speaking at the Australian National University and meeting with the prime minister, Anthony Albanese. More than 80% of Tuvalu's population of about 11,000 have entered a ballot for an Australian permanent residency visa, established as part of a climate-related treaty between the two countries. Under the deal, 280 places will be offered to Tuvalu citizens in the first year.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Popular potato chip brand sold at Coles and Woolworths to end production
A popular potato chip brand has been pulled from the shelves of Australia's two biggest supermarket chains. Outraged snack lovers have noticed that the entire Tyrrells range has quietly disappeared from Coles and Woolworths stores. Coles confirmed to Daily Mail Australia that it no longer stocks the brand and directed customers to contact the supplier for more information. Snackbrands Australia, the makers of Tyrrells, confirmed its demise, citing 'insufficient levels of consumer demand.' 'We always aim to bring delicious snacks to our consumers in line with their needs however we sadly had to retire the Tyrrells brand from the market due to insufficient levels of consumer demand,' a spokesperson said. 'We realise that there will always be true lovers of the brand out there however we need to balance the requirements of our consumers as well as our retail partners when making these tough decisions.' Daily Mail Australia has contacted Snackbrands Australia and Woolworths for further comment. Fans took to social media to express their disappointment at not being able to stock up before the range disappeared. 'It's been confirmed from Tyrells that Woolworths, Coles and IGA have stopped stocking these. Gone from their shelves without warning or even clearance tags. Didn't even get a chance to stock up,' a shopper fumed on social media. 'These were f***ing good, made in Australia with Aussie potatoes, and at $3.80 for 165g. Price does what it says, without stupid price hikes and fake offers. 'Maybe Colesworths couldn't deal with a product that didn't play their game?' The post attracted a divided response. 'Damn, that's really disappointing. They were the best chips on the shelves,' a fan wrote. Another added: 'These are the king of chips and I am heartbroken.' Others weren't surprised to hear that the brand had vanished from store shelves. 'Worked at a servo and this brand was always getting thrown out because nobody wanted them, even when marked down for quick sale,' one Aussie wrote. The Tyrrells range is still sold in selected Harris Farm stores. Fans have also spotted the Tyrrells range in IGAs, 7-Eleven and The Reject Shop, as well as online on Amazon. Originally created in Herefordshire in England, manufacturing relocated to Victoria in 2016, following its acquisition of Yarra Valley Snack Foods a year prior. The move created 120 jobs in the Yarra Valley as the region became the first location for Tyrrells' production outside of the UK. 'Yarra Valley was already doing premium potato chips and vegetable crisps like us, and Australia now being one of the foodiest nations on Earth, we think the premium share of the market here will grow' then-chief executive David Milner told the Australian Financial Review at the time.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Barefoot Investor Scott Pape exposes child's selfish act after they were given a car: 'Disaster'
The Barefoot Investor has dished out some tough love to a mother frustrated by her 30-year-old son's lack of gratitude after she gave him a car. Fed-up mum Lesley wrote to Scott Pape, describing her son as a 'disaster'. She explained that when he turned 18, she gave up the very first car she ever owned so he could enjoy some freedom and independence. 'It was a great little car with full service records and a reliable mechanic,' she wrote in her letter, published in his weekly newsletter. But five years later, her son dismissed the car as 'a hunk of junk'. Lesley reminded him: 'It wasn't junk when I gave it to you.' Now, after buying his third cheap car, Lesley said her son is 'heavily hinting' that she should hand over her current Mercedes - a car worth less than $10,000. Lesley told the Barefoot Investor she had no intention of giving him the Mercedes, but admitted her son's ingratitude had 'robbed her of the joy of giving' and begged for his advice. 'He hasn't asked outright, but the hints are constant,' Lesley wrote. 'After years of ingratitude and fleeting thanks, there's no way I'm handing it over. I've learned my lesson. 'But here's what hurts: I no longer feel joy in giving. I'm scared of being taken advantage of again.' In his reply, Mr Pape explained the issue was not a 'son thing' but a human experience, claiming people do not value an item they have not earned. 'You gave him your beloved first car, filled with memories and sacrifice. To him, it was just… free,' Mr Pape wrote. 'That stings. But it doesn't mean he's ungrateful about everything. It just means your giving needs boundaries.' Mr Pape advised Lesley to kindly but firmly shut down the idea of handing over her Mercedes to her son the next time he decides to hint at getting the vehicle. 'About the Merc? Next time he hints, shut it down kindly but firmly: 'Mate, I'm keeping it. You'll value your next car more if you buy it yourself.',' Pape wrote. 'Don't let his hints rob you of your joy in giving to others who appreciate it. The best things in life are earned – and that's a lesson he still needs to learn.'