Shipping giant Maersk cuts ties with companies operating in Israeli settlements
The decision, announced on Monday, comes after months of sustained pressure from pro-Palestine activists who have demanded the behemoth shipping and logistics company cut ties with companies profiting from Israel's occupation of Palestine.
In its statement, Maersk said that following a review of its operations in the occupied West Bank, it had decided to follow the guidelines of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), which maps out the names of companies operating in the settlements where around 500,000 Israelis live in contravention of international law.
"Following a recent review of transports related to the West Bank, we further strengthened our screening procedures in relation to Israeli settlements, including aligning our screening process with the OHCHR database of enterprises involved in activities in the settlements," the company said.
The OHCHR, mandated to compile a list of businesses that both operate and sustain the settlements in the occupied West Bank, released a database in 2020 naming more than 100 companies contributing to human rights abuses of Palestinians.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The list was amended in 2023.
'World is watching'
Activists who have been championing the call for Maersk to stop working with Israel welcomed the development.
However, they say the company now needs to halt the transportation of military equipment to Israel, including essential parts of its F-35 fighter planes, which have been used to flatten Gaza.
Activists claim that Maersk has played a fundamental role in servicing the Israeli army over the past 20 months in particular.
More than 55,000 Palestinians have been killed as a result of Israel's war on Gaza, which several countries, as well as many international rights groups and experts, now qualify as an act of genocide.
"Maersk continues to profit from the genocide of our people – regularly shipping F-35 components used to bomb and massacre Palestinians," Aisha Nizar, with the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM), said in a statement.
"We will continue to build pressure and mobilise people power until Maersk cuts all ties to genocide and ends the transport of weapons and weapons components to Israel," Nizar added.
Nizar said Maersk's decision to stop working with companies in the settlements sent a clear message to the global shipping industry that compliance with international law and basic human rights was not optional.
Gulf states linked to Israeli businesses on UN settlements blacklist Read More »
"Doing business with Israel's illegal settlements is no longer viable, and the world is watching to see who follows next," Nizar added.
Over the past year, Maersk has come under intense scrutiny by human rights groups in Denmark, where it is headquartered, and from other parts of the globe for continuing to transport military components to Israel.
They are demanding the company "cut ties with genocide".
In February, close to 1,000 activists protested at its headquarters in Copenhagen. Protests have also taken place in New York and Morocco.
In March, Maersk was also added to the official Boycott Divestment and Sanction (BDS) list.
Maersk did not immediately reply to Middle East Eye's request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Unrwa chief warns airdropping aid into Gaza can endanger civilians
The head of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, Philippe Lazzarini, has criticised the use of airdropped aid in Gaza, warning it risks killing civilians seeking relief. "Airdrops will not reverse the deepening starvation. They are expensive, inefficient & can even kill starving civilians. It is a distraction & screensmoke," he wrote in a post on X. Lazzarini called for an end to the siege on Gaza to allow UN aid to reach Palestinians by land. "At UNRWA, we have the equivalent of 6,000 trucks in Jordan & Egypt waiting for the green light to get into Gaza. Driving aid through is much easier, more effective, faster, cheaper & safer. It's more dignified for the people of #Gaza," he added.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Handala aid convoy now less than 185km from Gaza
The Handala boat, en route to Gaza in a bid to break Israel's blockade, is reportedly less than 185km from the besieged enclave. According to a live tracker, it has now passed the point where Israeli forces raided the previous humanitarian convoy, Madleen, in early June.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Political solution without Palestinian statehood is 'cynical and illegal', says ICJ lawyer
With France saying it will recognise Palestine in September, making it the first G7 nation to do so, other countries such as the UK and Germany, which are holding out, have called for a political solution to the Palestine issue. That two-state solution between Israel and Palestine, however, cannot be reached without recognising Palestine as a state, Ardi Imseis, a professor of law at Queen's University in Canada, told The National. Mr Imseis is a former UN official and has represented states before the International Court of Justice, which last year found Israel to be under an obligation to end its unlawful presence in the occupied Palestinian territory and make reparations for the damage caused. "Recognition is a political prerogative of states," he said. They can urge for a political resolution to the problem without recognising one or the other states, Mr Imseis said, although that "does not make sense". "This is because if you have a two-state solution, one would assume you would need to have two states be part of that solution," he said. Under international law, the Palestinian people have the right to self-determination in a state of their own. "This right is peremptory and inalienable," he said. The international community has an obligation to help Palestinians realise that right, he added. "However, if states make the emergence of a Palestinian state contingent on successful negotiations with Israel, then, in effect, that places Israel in a position of holding a veto power over the exercise by the Palestinian people of their right of self-determination," he said. "It's a cyclical, cynical and ultimately illegal policy." Mr Imseis said that Israel was a "bad faith illegal occupier" with no intention to allow the establishment of a Palestinian state. Following France's announcement, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lashed out at French President Emmanuel Macron and said that a Palestinian state would create a "launch pad to annihilate Israel". France, the US and the UK are three of the five members of the UN Security Council with veto power, if and when the next vote comes to admit the state of Palestine to UN membership. The US used its veto the last time such a vote took place, on April 18, 2024. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who is under increasing pressure from 220 Members of Parliament who wrote to him urging him to recognise a Palestinian state, said he does support the move. But, he said, it should be part of a "wider plan" which results in security for Palestinians and Israelis. At least 140 out of the world's 193 members of the UN General Assembly recognise Palestine as a state. In 2012, the General Assembly gave Palestine non-member observer state status. "That means, that within the UN system, the state of Palestine already exists," Mr Imseis said.
