logo
Why countries are suddenly broadcasting their spies' exploits

Why countries are suddenly broadcasting their spies' exploits

Mint22-06-2025
Israel's airstrikes on Iran exploded across the world's screens as a public display of military firepower. Underpinning that was a less visible but equally vital Israeli covert operation that pinpointed targets, guided the attacks and struck Iran from within.
Agents from Israel's spy agency, Mossad, operated inside Iran before and during the initial attacks earlier this month, Israeli officials said. The disclosure was itself an act of psychological warfare—a boast of Israel's ability to act with impunity inside Iran's borders and Tehran's failure to stop it.
Israel flaunted its tactical success by releasing grainy video emblazoned with Mossad's seal that it said showed operatives and drone strikes inside Iran.
Not long ago, such covert operations stayed secret. Today, belligerents from Ukraine to the U.S. increasingly broadcast their triumphs, with messages amplified in real time by social-media networks.
When T.E. Lawrence wanted to publicize his World War I secret forays deep into Ottoman territory, he wrote a book and articles. Nobody saw those commando raids for half a century until the blockbuster film 'Lawrence of Arabia" recreated his exploits.
T.E. Lawrence played a clandestine role in the Arab Revolt against Ottoman rule during World War I.
These days, barely hours pass before the world sees action footage of Ukraine's latest drone attacks on Russian military targets. Israel's detonation of explosives hidden inside Hezbollah militants' pagers played out in almost real time across the internet. The U.S. repeatedly fed social media the details—and sometimes imagery—of its special-operations strikes on Islamic State leaders in recent years.
The result is a major shift in warfare: Call it the battle of timelines. Spying and clandestine operations, in the traditional sense, have never been so difficult. Biometric data makes document forgery obsolete. Billions of cameras, attached to phones, rearview mirrors and doorbells, stand ready to capture the movements of any operative hoping to lurk invisibly. In seconds, artificial intelligence can rifle through millions of photos to identify the faces of foreign spies operating in the wild.
Instead, fighting in Ukraine and the Middle East is bringing a new doctrine to spycraft stemming from changes in both what their organizers seek to achieve and how information spreads. Operations that would have once been designed to remain under wraps are now meant to be seen, to produce spectacular optics. They play out not just on the battlefield, but also on social media, boosting morale at home while demoralizing the enemy watching from the other side of the screen.
'A major goal of covert operations is often to show an adversary's leadership that we have identified and can damage elements involved in lethal activity," said Norman Roule, a former senior U.S. intelligence officer. 'Demonstrating this capability is hoped to act as a deterrent and even to encourage an adversary to seek diplomatic solutions." Such operations aren't done lightly, because they are dangerous and risk exposure of sensitive sources and methods that once compromised can't be used in the future, he added.
'You don't waste such critical capabilities for a cheap political win," Roule said. 'That said, in addition to the operational impact, you can exploit such operations for propaganda, psychological impact or diplomatic gain."
Covert operations once remained secret long after they wrapped up, or they were revealed by chance. Allied World War II code-breaking efforts stayed largely unknown for three decades. Countless Cold War-era espionage operations gained public attention only after the Soviet Union collapsed. Central Intelligence Agency efforts to raise a sunken Soviet submarine went public accidentally, following an office burglary in Los Angeles.
Exploits dubbed black ops—because the operations stay in the dark—traditionally fed into a quiet game of signaling and deception. One reason the release of the Pentagon Papers alarmed the White House in 1971 was that some information in them could have only come from a U.S. bug planted in Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev's car, former President Richard Nixon said in 1984.
Fast forward to 2021, when President Joe Biden took the exceptional step of going public with highly sensitive intelligence about Moscow's plans to attack Ukraine. The pre-emptive disclosure of hard-won secrets didn't stop the invasion, but it did restore allies' perception of the U.S.—and American spycraft—which had been tarnished by the warnings of weapons of mass destruction that led to the Iraq War.
These days, secrecy is often beside the point. Almost weekly, Ukrainian drone attacks deep in Russia's interior play out to the same script: An ordinary bystander whips out a phone to capture the flicker of a Ukrainian drone against the night sky, seconds before it reduces some strategic target—an oil refinery, an air base or a rail depot—into a fiery ball.
Soon, the footage circulates on social media. In come amateur war analysts posting commercial satellite photos of the damage, followed by declarations of responsibility from the Ukrainian special services eager to demonstrate their capabilities to ordinary Russians scrolling at home.
'Ukraine does an excellent job in planning out these operations, and they know that in this day and age every attack is going to be filmed," said Samuel Bendett, a Russian-studies adviser at the Center for Naval Analyses in Arlington, Va., a federally funded nonprofit research organization. 'They're trying to design their attacks so that more and more Russians are aware of the war and are impacted by the war."
Kyiv feels obliged to wage a public propaganda war against Moscow because it isn't winning the shooting war. Israel goes public with results of its espionage and covert operations against Iran and its proxies to convince foreign governments and populations that Tehran is both dangerous and vulnerable.
The communication war is raging in an information free-for-all. Governments and elites that until the middle of the 20th century controlled their information environment are today trying just to navigate it, said Ofer Fridman, a former Israeli officer and a scholar of war studies at King's College London. 'Now they're struggling to communicate with their target audience through overwhelming noise," he said.
Compounding that is the digitization of almost all information—both new memos and dusty archives—meaning that no event is guaranteed to remain secret from hackers or publicity-minded politicians with access to files. The impact of data leakers including the National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden and the National Guard airman Jack Teixeira weighs heavily on intelligence officials.
Russia is still adjusting to this new form of warfare. The country has made filming or posting sensitive details about military attacks a crime in its front-line regions, punishable by fines. Not even the country's police and special services have been able to discourage civilians who, almost by instinct, take out their phones when Ukrainian saboteurs strike. Soldiers on the front lines, disobeying their own codes of conduct, regularly capture battlefield operations.
For its part, Russia has made minimal effort to cover its own tracks in its barely disguised spree of covert operations in Europe. The GRU, the Russian military-intelligence organization, has repeatedly hired European civilians over social media, paying them to burn down a shopping mall in Warsaw, or an IKEA in Lithuania, according to Western officials. When a Russian helicopter pilot who defected to Ukraine was shot dead in Spain last year, Russia's spy chiefs didn't deny involvement—they all but boasted of it.
'This traitor and criminal became a moral corpse at the very moment he was planning his dirty and terrible crime," Sergei Naryshkin, the head of Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service, told state media.
Write to Daniel Michaels at Dan.Michaels@wsj.com and Drew Hinshaw at drew.hinshaw@wsj.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Build on this joint statement to try and save Gaza
Build on this joint statement to try and save Gaza

The Hindu

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Build on this joint statement to try and save Gaza

A recent joint statement by about 30 western states, which includes the United Kingdom, France and Italy, has called for an end to the war in Gaza. It condemns Israel's 'drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food.' It says that the Israeli government is denying 'essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population', which it finds 'unacceptable'. And it calls Israeli plans to sequester and eventually force Palestinian citizens out of Gaza 'completely unacceptable'. This is the strongest western criticism yet of Israeli conduct across Palestine, and it has coincided with Israel's offensive on Deir al-Balah, the city which has acted as a refuge for thousands of displaced people. It has the infrastructure, logistical bases and personnel to keep people alive, and its destruction will be catastrophic. It appears unlikely that this western condemnation will deter Israel. With a few exceptions, western governments have been calling upon their ally, Israel, to stop or moderate its behaviour while also ensuring that Tel Aviv has not suffered serious diplomatic, economic or military costs for acting with impunity across Palestine. Further, neither Germany nor the United States, Israel's most steadfast backers and its largest arms suppliers, have signed that statement. This is a signal that there has been no change in their policies and may be another reason why Israel is unlikely to stop. But there is still time for the world to act and prevent the Palestinians from being destroyed. The facts Is Israel committing genocide? The International Court of Justice (ICJ) may take years to determine this. Several jurists, legal and other scholars argue that what is unfolding in Gaza is in fact a genocide. However, rather than guiding us to facts, this question has become politicised and an end in itself. And the facts are sickening. Gaza had a population of about 2.3 million people when the war began in October 2023. About 60,000 people are confirmed dead, perhaps half of them women and children, and 90% the population has been displaced multiple times. The United Nations says that Gaza's remaining population has been squeezed into about 46 square kilometres of land where systems of food, health and hygiene have collapsed. That is about 43,478 people per square kilometre, living in conditions that one would not wish upon any form of life. Tel Aviv's game plan But these numbers do not capture what is widely suspected to be a systematic destruction of human life and habitat in Gaza through a micromanaged plan of starvation. Israel has curbed aid inflow when the war began. Earlier this year, it imposed a total blockade of 11 weeks and followed it up with a new aid delivery system that, according to the western nations' statement, 'deprives Gazans of human dignity'. Israeli forces have killed about a thousand desperate people seeking limited amounts of food under degrading conditions. And the UN says a third of the population has been living without eating. Exhaustion is endemic. Starvation is widespread. And famine looms. Is this not a genocide? Israel does not allow foreign journalists to report freely from Gaza. And it discredits the non-Israeli accounts coming out of Gaza. This has allowed it to dispute any assessment of its likely endgame in the territory. That Israel is carrying out ethnic cleansing is clear. Israeli leaders have publicly stated their plan to control most of Gaza, force the Palestinians into a 'humanitarian city', and let them out only if they choose to leave for another country. Two former Israeli Prime Ministers, Ehud Olmert and Yair Lapid, have called this 'city' a 'concentration camp'. Conditions for a future generation of Palestinians in Gaza are being destroyed. And as Jean Drèze recently noted in this daily, once famine sets in, people will turn against each other, which will put an end to all solidarity and chances of reconstituting. It would then be used as evidence of Palestinian barbarism and sub-humanity — and thus further proof that the Palestinians are not a people. Stop the hedging The UN says that the 'last lifelines to keep people alive are collapsing', but the world can still step in. The world has a chance to halt the catastrophe. Governments can review the scale of their diplomatic, economic and military ties with Israel. International peacekeepers can be sent to Gaza. Russia, China and India could join their 'Global South' partners in exerting additional pressure on Israel to stop. The Gulf countries and Türkiye should stop hedging. The western nations' statement has '... urge[d] the international community to unite in a common effort' to end the war. Non-western governments can test western sincerity by offering to evolve a common approach. There are some of us who know what is going on in Gaza is an act that will end the idea that 'humanity is one and universal'. Therefore, we must do what we can. Governments and corporations have more influence, but individuals can act on their conscience too. The time to act is now. Otherwise, we will be hanging our heads in shame and regret. Atul Mishra teaches international relations at the Shiv Nadar University, Delhi-NCR

17th BRICS Summit: Bold words, blunt impact
17th BRICS Summit: Bold words, blunt impact

New Indian Express

time35 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

17th BRICS Summit: Bold words, blunt impact

If one were to go solely by the Declaration of the 17th BRICS Summit held in Rio de Janeiro without context, the Summit appears to be a roaring success. It hit the right notes on cooperation, projecting a cohesive voice for the Global South, and standing up to the Global North with calls for radical economic and governance reform. With the Declaration spanning over 100 clauses that cover the BRICS pillars of political and security, economic and financial, cultural and people-to-people cooperation, the Declaration at first glance appears both extensive and impressive. However, beneath the rhetoric, the document essentially reiterates past positions, which lack substance and fail to provide a clear roadmap for implementation. The core of the BRICS agenda has been to position and present itself as an alliance to counter Western dominance and advance Global South cooperation. The Declaration recognises the need for progressive tax reform to help reduce inequality. However, it limits itself to the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, while missing the opportunity to discuss and develop other mechanisms for just taxation, such as global corporate tax or programmes for regional tax cooperation among BRICS+ countries. The Declaration raises alarm about an increase in global military spending. It also reiterated BRICS' commitment to the peaceful resolution of international disputes through dialogue, consultation and diplomacy. It condemned the military strikes against Iran, a member of BRICS, in particular on 'peaceful nuclear facilities'. It called it a violation of international law and the Charter of the United Nations, as well as relevant resolutions of the IAEA. It raised grave concern about the continuous Israeli attacks against Gaza, obstruction of the entry of humanitarian aid into the territory and use of starvation as a method of warfare, and called for adherence to international law. It called for negotiations to achieve an 'immediate, permanent and unconditional ceasefire, the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip and all other parts of the Occupied Palestinian Territory'.

‘We'll wipe it out faster…'; Trump again threatens ‘very nasty' and ‘stupid' Iran over nuclear enrichment
‘We'll wipe it out faster…'; Trump again threatens ‘very nasty' and ‘stupid' Iran over nuclear enrichment

Hindustan Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘We'll wipe it out faster…'; Trump again threatens ‘very nasty' and ‘stupid' Iran over nuclear enrichment

Donald Trump has renewed his threats against Iran, just weeks after carrying out military attacks on three of its nuclear sites. The US President's statement comes in reaction to Tehran's stand that it will continue to enhance nuclear enrichment for civilian purposes. U.S. President Donald Trump meets with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at Trump Turnberry golf course in Turnberry, Scotland, Britain, July 28, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein(REUTERS) Speaking alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at a press conference in Scotland, Trump claimed that Iran was 'sending very bad signals, very nasty signals.' He called Iran's determination on enrichment 'stupid' and promised to completely shut it down. Trump warns Iran over nuclear enrichment Stressing that they shouldn't pursue nuclear enrichment, Trump said, 'We wiped out their nuclear possibilities. They can start again. If they do, we'll wipe it out faster than you can wave your finger at it.' 'We will do that gladly, openly and gladly,' he continued. Trump denounced Iran's rhetoric, stating that it has been quite offensive in both their words and their mouth. 'They got the hell knocked out of them and they…I don't think they know it. I actually don't think they know.' Also Read: Trump reveals why he cut ties with Epstein, claims his name was planted in files: 'He stole people who…' Iran says nuclear enrichment 'is so dear to us' Ahead of negotiations with the UK, France, and Germany this week, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi recently affirmed Tehran's right to enrich uranium. 'Our enrichment is so dear to us,' he said, calling it an achievement of Iranian scientists. While breakthroughs were reported, Iranian authorities characterized the negotiations as 'serious, frank, and detailed,' marking the first significant diplomatic flurry since the US assaults and the consequent conclusion of the confrontation with Israel. US forces attacked Iran's nuclear installations in Fordow, Esfahan, and Natanz on June 22 after an Israeli offensive that lasted 12 days. In response to American aggression, Iran targetted the biggest American military facility in the Middle East, Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar. US and Qatari officials said all missiles were intercepted and there were no fatalities or significant damage, despite Iran's claims of successful strikes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store