More than 130 properties offered for IP accommodation as Government looks to buy, not rent
A spokeswoman for Minister for Justice
Jim O'Callaghan
said 131 submissions were made in response to a call for properties for international protection accommodation to 'sell or lease'.
The preference was to purchase, she said. 'That is the direction we are going.'
Offers were being 'worked through and assessed', meaning it was not possible to say how many of the 131 had been offered for sale rather than lease. The spokeswoman could also not say if they were spread across every county or concentrated in a smaller number.
READ MORE
Not all would be suitable, the spokeswoman said, adding that they were being examined for building compliance, fire and other regulatory issues.
Last Tuesday, Mr O'Callaghan confirmed plans to purchase
Citywest Hotel in Dublin for more than €148 million
to make it a permanent processing centre for international protection applicants.
This would contribute to his plan to provide 14,000 State-owned beds for asylum seekers by 2028 rather than relying on private providers and would 'deliver significant long-term savings to the State as its moves from licensing to ownership,' a department spokesman said.
The 764-bed hotel and conference centre, which has been leased by the State since 2020, had capacity to accommodate 'approximately 2,300 people between the hotel and the convention centre', the spokesman said.
The latest invitation for submissions, published on the Government's E-tender website, seeks 'expressions of interest from property owners, private developers and building contractors who are interested in selling or leasing existing properties or buildings in turnkey condition [and] existing properties that require upgrading/refurbishment/renovation'.
'All properties acquired through this expression of interest process will be to provide accommodation for international protection (IP) applicants and must be on the terms of vacant possession,' the notice says.
According to tender documents, properties that will not be considered are buildings set aside for social housing; accommodation planned for use by other arms of Government; student accommodation; and nursing homes which are currently operating.
State-owned properties will be directly managed by the
International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS)
.
As of early 2025, IPAS was providing accommodation for more than 33,000 people across 325 accommodation centres.
Mr O'Callaghan said purchasing Citywest was 'a hugely significant step' towards reforming the international protection system – part of which was a 'stable and sustainable accommodation network'.
This was necessary to bring Ireland's system into compliance with the EU Asylum and Migration Pact which comes into force next year, he said.
It will require international protection applications to be processed within three to six months, fingerprinting and photographing of adult and child applicants and the establishment of designated accommodation centres.
'State-owned centres are part of the Government's long-term plan to reduce the reliance on private accommodation providers in communities resulting in better value for money of public funds and a more efficient international protection system,' Mr O'Callaghan said.
News of the Citywest purchase
sparked protests by some local residents
.
Protesters claimed to have gathered more than 8,000 signatures of people against the move by going door-to-door in Saggart, Rathcoole and Citywest. 'Ninety per cent of the doors we called to signed that petition. It shows that 90 per cent of people in the areas around here do not want this,' said Amanda Higgins at a demonstration outside Leinster House on Wednesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
US threatens EU with 17% tariff on food exports
The US has threatened to hit EU agricultural exports with 17 per cent tariffs in a twist to its trade conflict with Brussels, three people briefed on the discussions said. Such tariffs would hit everything from Kerrygold butter to Belgian chocolate and olive oil from the Continent, all of which are big sellers in the US. The eleventh-hour move, which EU officials characterised as an escalation of the transatlantic dispute, came ahead of a July 9th deadline to agree a deal between the two trading giants. US president Donald Trump imposed a 20 per cent 'reciprocal' tariff in April but reduced it to 10 per cent until July 9th to allow for talks. Until recent days, EU officials had been expecting that talks with the US would hold duties at the baseline rate. It was unclear if the 17 per cent on foodstuffs would be in addition to the other tariffs announced by Mr Trump or instead of them. Mr Trump has demanded that Brussels give American companies wide-ranging exemptions from regulations and cut its trade surplus with the US, but EU officials have rejected Washington's latest proposals on any such exemptions and food tariffs. [ Is Big Pharma lobby shielding Ireland from the worst of US tariffs? Opens in new window ] The EU is trying to secure its own carveouts for some products. One Brussels official said aircraft parts and spirits are among goods for which the bloc is seeking exclusions. They said that the two sides were working on a five-page draft 'agreement in principle', but this has very little agreed-upon text in it. Ursula von der Leyen , the European Commission president, said on Thursday that she hoped for an agreement in principle that would allow the sides to keep talking pending a final deal. However, Washington is pushing countries to agree binding deals by Mr Trump's deadline. Maroš Šefčovič, the EU trade commissioner, was warned of the proposed 17 per cent duties on agri-food on Thursday during meetings in Washington. The 27 member state ambassadors were informed on Friday. The value of EU agri-food exports to the US, including products such as wine, totalled €48 billion last year. Mr Šefčovič has repeatedly characterised the changing of EU regulations to suit the US as a red line. However, the EU is also on a deregulatory drive, weakening some environmental laws. EU countries are divided between accepting some higher tariffs in return for a period of certainty and those who wish to retaliate to put pressure on the US to compromise. Friedrich Merz, chancellor of Germany, the EU's biggest and most export-dependent economy, has been pressing the commission, which runs trade policy, to settle for a quick deal. He is anxious for exemptions from Mr Trump's sectoral tariffs of 25 per cent on vehicles and 50 per cent on steel. However, several ambassadors intervened in Friday's meeting to press for stronger action against Washington, said two people briefed on the meeting. Two EU diplomats said they had been told that the US had sketched out three scenarios for July 9th: Countries with an 'agreement in principle' would keep the 10 per cent tariffs, with possible further tariff relief at a later stage; for countries that failed to reach such an agreement, the tariffs would return to the level announced in April until a deal was struck; higher tariffs would be applied to countries that the US believes are not negotiating in good faith. As the EU prepares its possible retaliation for US duties on its products, member states have already approved counter-tariffs on €21 billion of annual US exports from July 14th. The commission is assembling a package of €95 billion more, including on aircraft and food. A commission representative said: 'The EU position has been clear from the outset: we favour a negotiated solution with the US, and this remains our priority ... At the same time, we are preparing for the possibility that no satisfactory agreement is reached.' The White House has yet to respond to a request for comment. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
After the Train: Irishwomen united – a book to be passed down the generations, with future cultural insurgency in mind
After the Train: Irishwomen United and a Network of Change Author : Evelyn Conlon and Rebecca Pelan editors ISBN-13 : 978-1068502309 Publisher : UCD Press Guideline Price : €30 From 1975 to 1977, Irishwomen United (IWU) – and the culture of change it generated – radically fed into the emancipation of Irish society that led to 2018's referendum to lift the constitutional abortion ban. In their deeds and words, IWU threw off much of the misogynistic, theocratic, social and mind control that was so oppressively exerted from 1922 with the formation of the postcolonial Irish 'Free' State. 'Lest they forget,' and as a blueprint for ongoing social justice transformation, After the Train has been durably designed and produced to weather many decades of reading and rereading: to be passed from hand to hand, and down the generations, with future cultural insurgency in mind. The 'train' of the title refers to the Irish Women's Liberation Movement 1971 stunt of bringing contraceptives from Belfast to Dublin's Connolly Station; a spark of civil disobedience which the IWU took up again in 1976 with its aptly named CAP (Contraception Action Programme). CAP openly and illegally distributed contraception, enacting the principle that women's control of their own fertility is the bedrock of female equality. Reading how inferior women's social and legal status was in Ireland in the early 1970s compared to now demonstrates the far-reaching impact of IWU and its cultural offshoots. Contributor Anne Speed writes: 'A wife was officially the property of her husband; rape was legal in marriage; contraceptives were banned since 1935; divorce was unconstitutional; a woman could not sit on juries; by law, children's allowances were paid to the husband, and it was legal to pay women less than men for the same job.' READ MORE IWU seized the narrative through the development of feminist publishing; set up organisations to tackle rape, the abortion ban and the plight of single mothers; and lobbied powerfully to affect equality through law reform and the trade union movement. [ From the archive: A history of Irish women in 50 objects Opens in new window ] Here's reader testimony to the revolutionary power of this skilfully edited collection: as the mother of a disabled adult son, I'm at the coalface of human rights travesties that have barely begun to be recognised as such by wider Irish society. My desire for disabled people's self-determination, inclusion and equality, and my understanding of how these might be achieved, feel turbocharged with After the Train on my shelf and in my heart.
RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Talk of revenge after acrimonious week for Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael
There are a few politicians in Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael who will spend this weekend contemplating revenge, maybe even plotting it. It is not a huge cohort, but there are enough there to make up a quorum of motivated individuals eager to maintain the internecine warfare of recent days. It all stems form the shockwaves generated by James Lawless' logical but politically unwise answer on RTÉ's This Week programme, that as things stand student fees could rise by €1,000 this year. Although the worried public outbursts from Fine Gael have ceased, the party remains steadfast in its view that Mr Lawless needlessly wounded the entire Government. One senior figure summed up the week saying, "we have many issues where we will lose support or struggle politically but this one could have been avoided." There is a feeling in the party too, as constituency office calls and emails are "off the charts," that it could be difficult to hold the line until October's Budget. Already there are broad hints that the final figure for student fees will be below €3,000 and the Budget reductions will this time be permanent Fianna Fáil believes it was Simon Harris' intervention that "escalated" the entire episode into a full-blown crisis which dominated Dáil debate for three days. The party's weekly meeting in Leinster House saw several TDs lash out at what was described as "media posturing" by Fine Gael. Those close to Simon Harris contend that he was merely trying to bring clarity to matters given his intricate knowledge of the topic as a former higher education minister himself. That defence drew nothing but guffaws from both Fianna Fáil ministers and TDs. "He's good like that isn't he," one scathingly said. Then there are those who are intent on settling scores. Battle plans from some foot soldiers have identified Minister of Agriculture Martin Heydon's efforts to retain the Nitrates derogation, as a possible point of attack. The Fine Gael tactics board has zoned in on Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan's upcoming decision on whether to accept the Judicial Council guidelines proposing an increase in personal injury awards, against the backdrop of rising insurance costs. Throughout the week, Independent ministers like Kevin 'Boxer' Moran have urged both parties to talk to each other more, and to be mindful of the financial strain many households are experiencing. Further up the chain the sores are felt less intensely though and there is a general view that Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael ministers are generally working well together. Reports of friction 'overstated' - minister Reports of deep friction and lasting damage to the Government's cohesiveness were "a bit overstated" according to one influential Cabinet minister. The switching of portfolios after the general election is even said to have boosted a sense of mutual respect with ministers possessing a greater understanding of their colleagues' workload. There is a view in the higher echelons of Government that in the context of the many challenges it faces, this week amounted to little more than a "bit of pushing and shoving" or good old fashioned "ground hurling". The true measure of the coalition's sense of unity will be the Budget negotiations. These will be framed against the worrying reality that the economic good times are most likely drawing to a close. That means caution will be the guiding principle in the months ahead for the Fine Gael's Minister for Finance and Fianna Fáil's Minister for Public Expenditure. Both Jack Chambers and Paschal Donohoe are said to be of a similar mind about the approach required, and their working relationship is described as close. It is that key axis and how it navigates a Budget amid growing uncertainty, and without the option of a cost-of-living package, which will ultimately reveal if the coalition can function collectively.
