Former Biden doctor asks to delay testimony to House committee investigating mental fitness
O'Connor was scheduled to testify on Wednesday, but is now in a disagreement with the committee over the scope of the questions he will be expected to answer during his testimony. The committee, led by Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., is interviewing the doctor as part of its investigation into Biden's mental fitness and his administration's use of an autopen.
A lawyer for O'Connor requested the testimony be delayed to July 28 or August 4 in a letter to Comer.
"Dr. O'Connor has legal and ethical obligations that he must satisfy and for which violations carry serious consequences to him professionally and personally," the letter says.
Biden Insists 'I Made The Decisions' As Republicans Investigate White House Autopen Use
"We are unaware of any prior occasion on which a Congressional Committee has subpoenaed a physician to testify about the treatment of an individual patient. And the notion that a Congressional Committee would do so without any regard whatsoever for the confidentiality of the physician-patient relationship is alarming."
Read On The Fox News App
A spokesman for the Oversight Committee replied in a statement that O'Connor and his legal team were merely trying to "stonewall" the process. The committee is planning to move forward with Wednesday's testimony, which O'Connor faces a subpoena to attend.
The committee said O'Connor is welcome to object to individual questions during his testimony. But O'Connor is not allowed, in the committee's view, to delay or decline a congressional subpoena due to concerns over questions about potentially privileged information.
Who Is Neera Tanden? The Controversial Dem Operative Who Testified On Biden's Mental Acuity
The debate over O'Connor's testimony comes weeks after a former top aide to Biden, Neera Tanden, told the Oversight Committee that she was authorized to direct autopen signatures but was unaware of who in the president's inner circle was giving her final clearance.
During Tanden's interview before Congress last month, which lasted more than five hours, she told lawmakers that, in her role as staff secretary and senior advisor to the former president between 2021 and 2023, she was authorized to direct autopen signatures on behalf of Biden, an Oversight Committee official told Fox News.
"Ms. Tanden testified that she had minimal interaction with President Biden, despite wielding tremendous authority," Comer said at the time. "She explained that to obtain approval for autopen signatures, she would send decision memos to members of the President's inner circle and had no visibility of what occurred between sending the memo and receiving it back with approval. Her testimony raises serious questions about who was really calling the shots in the Biden White House amid the President's obvious decline. We will continue to pursue the truth for the American people."
Read O'Connor's full letter to the committee below (App users click here)
Fox News' Kelly Phares and Madeleine Rivera and the Associated Press contributed to this report.Original article source: Former Biden doctor asks to delay testimony to House committee investigating mental fitness
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
24 minutes ago
- NBC News
White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett defends Trump's firing of labor statistics head
White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett on Sunday defended President Donald Trump's decision to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, as well as the president's claim that weaker-than-expected jobs reports were 'rigged,' but failed to produce any evidence to support Trump's claim. 'What we need is a fresh set of eyes over the BLS,' Hassett, the director of the National Economic Council, told NBC News' 'Meet the Press.' On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released a monthly jobs report that included weaker-than-expected numbers for July, plus major downward revisions of May and June's numbers. In a post on Truth Social on Friday, the president said the jobs numbers were 'rigged' and that he'd asked his team to fire BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer. 'We need accurate Jobs Numbers. I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate,' Trump wrote. In another Truth Social post, the president added, 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' On Sunday, Hassett cast similar doubt on the accuracy of the jobs numbers, pointing to past revisions that were made to jobs reports after then-President Joe Biden stopped running for re-election last year. 'There have been a bunch of patterns that could make people wonder. And I think the most important thing for people to know is that it's the president's highest priority that the data be trusted and that people get to the bottom of why these revisions are so unreliable,' Hassett told 'Meet the Press' moderator Kristen Welker. He added later in the interview that the Trump administration's goal was to understand why there was such a sizable revision to past months' jobs numbers. 'The bottom line is that there were people involved in creating these numbers. And if I were running the BLS and I had a number that was a huge, politically important revision, the biggest since 1968 actually ... then I would have a really long report explaining exactly what happened. And we didn't get that,' Hassett said. It's not uncommon for jobs reports to be revised in the months following their release, but Hassett on Sunday emphasized that July's revision was one of the largest he's seen in decades. Trump faced criticism from Democrats and Republicans in Congress on Friday when he decided to fire McEntarfer, with several Republican senators questioning whether the firing would actually help the Trump administration improve future jobs numbers. 'We have to look somewhere for objective statistics. When the people providing the statistics are fired, it makes it much harder to make judgments that, you know, the statistics won't be politicized,' Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., told NBC News on Friday. 'I'm going to look into it, but first impression is that you can't really make the numbers different or better by firing the people doing the counting,' he added. On Sunday, Hassett said that installing Trump's 'own people' will help achieve more 'transparent and reliable' jobs reports in the future. 'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable. And if there are big changes and big revisions — we expect more big revisions for the jobs data in September, for example — then we want to know why, we want people to explain it to us,' he said.
Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
Trump's $600 'rebate checks' from tariffs are just voter bribes
On July 28, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Missouri, announced legislation that would provide Americans with $600 'rebate checks,' supposedly due to the vast swathes of money being collected from President Trump's tariff policy. Hawley's proposal comes just days after Trump suggested the idea himself. I shouldn't have to remind a sitting senator, much less the president, of basic economics, but here goes. You can't just hand out money; doing so is either inflationary or adds to the deficit. MAGA is hurting Americans' wallets through tariff policy, and pretending as if the results have been so beneficial that we can afford to pay Americans a share of the benefit. All of this is an economically illiterate scheme to bribe voters, nothing more. It's not conservative fiscal policy. None of it. Hawley's proposal doesn't function as a rebate because the government doesn't have money to rebate. It's not as if Americans have paid too much in taxes, and the government is now returning those funds to their rightful owners. "Americans deserve a tax rebate after four years of Biden policies that have devastated families' savings and livelihoods," Halwey said in a statement. "Like President Trump proposed, my legislation would allow hard-working Americans to benefit from the wealth that Trump's tariffs are returning to this country.' For Americans to truly experience a rebate, the government needs to be in a budget surplus. If we are in a budget deficit, any form of spending comes from two sources. The first is through printing new money, which is the simplest way to create inflation. The second way is through borrowing money, which adds to the national debt, requiring higher revenue in the future to cover current spending. Briggs: Todd Young's political survival means never fully crossing Trump In the first eight months of fiscal year 2025, the federal budget deficit totaled $1.4 trillion. Such dire finances are worsened by the fact that Republicans passed a budget in July that is expected to skyrocket the deficit by, after accounting for interest costs, roughly $3.8 trillion over the next decade. If the $600 rebate were claimed by every man, woman and child in America, as Hawley suggested, this proposal would cost more than $205 billion. Even if narrowed to just those who filed an individual tax return, of which there were roughly 163 million in 2023, that cost would total nearly $98 billion. The United States has only generated about $125 billion from tariffs as of the end of July, a sizable increase from previous years but not enough to cover anything close to our budget deficit. As it is, Hawley is promising to refund Americans for revenue that doesn't come close to paying for all of our government spending. Republicans, under MAGA leadership, are continuing to run our country's finances into the ground. Tariffs, in themselves, mean that retailers inevitably pass along these additional import costs to producers. It is a cruel joke to hike people's cost of living through tariffs, then pretend to pay them back with money you don't have, in turn causing more costs to taxpayers down the road. In reality, all of this is just another populist attempt to bribe Americans into voting for more MAGA economics (if you can call it that). The economic illiteracy of the MAGA movement is frankly tiring. Federal spending is a political tool to entice Americans to vote MAGA, while Republican policies actually hurt working Americans. Hicks: Tariffs will cost families $2,500 this year — but wages won't rise to help Republicans often criticize Democrats when they attempt to employ similar strategies, as seen with the Biden administration's student loan forgiveness. But now, here are Republican leaders proposing to bribe voters. Hawley seemingly hasn't learned his lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic, in which he was a cosponsor of stimulus checks. The massive rise in government spending during the pandemic was a chief cause of the inflation that followed, and such action now is likely to yield the same results. Now, Trump and Hawley are drawing from the same playbook. If they had their way, America would be saddled with the financial consequences while they remain just fine. Hawley is one of the worst offenders of basic economics in the Senate and is much closer to a fiscal socialist than any sort of conservative. It is worrying that he continues to float his damaging proposals. Nobody in Trump's faction of the GOP has any interest in producing sound economic policy. Their only motivation is attempting to buy votes. Hawley's proposals only reveal that fact even more.
Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
Trump Tells Schumer to 'Go to Hell' as Talks Break Down
After hours of deliberation over President Donald Trump's stalled nominees, tensions between Senate Democrats and the White House reached a boiling point on Saturday evening. In a row that spilled over to social media, the President said that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer can 'go to hell.' In a post on Truth Social, Trump instructed Republicans not to make a deal with the Democrats, who he claimed were making 'egregious and unprecedented' demands in order to 'approve a small number of our highly qualified nominees.' 'Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the radical left lunatics, to go to hell,' Trump said. 'Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our country.' The stalemate is particularly poignant as the Senate has now embarked on its monthlong August recess. Democrats have largely denied fast unanimous consent votes regarding Trump's nominees, instead opting for roll calls. Addressing the Republican Party's complaints over this, Schumer said on Saturday: 'Historically bad nominees deserve historic levels of scrutiny. We have never seen nominees as flawed, as compromised, as unqualified as Trump's.' Schumer also addressed Trump's social media commentary, during which the President instructed Republicans to 'go home' and called for Schumer to 'go to hell.' 'Donald Trump attempted to steamroll the Senate to put in place his historically unqualified nominees, but Senate Democrats wouldn't let him,' Schumer said in a filmed address. 'In a fit of rage, Trump threw in the towel, sent Republicans home, and was unable to do the basic work of negotiating. Is this the 'art of the deal?'' 'Trump tried to bully us, go around us, threaten us, call us names, but he got nothing. He walked away with his tail between his legs.' Read More: In Averting a Shutdown, Schumer Ignites a Rebellion The lack of progress ahead of the August recess comes after Senate Majority Leader John Thune on Thursday accused Democrats of deciding 'to slow-walk every single civilian nomination from the President.' Thune said that in recent history, Presidents have had the majority of their nominees approved by unanimous consent or voice vote, but that 'zero' of Trump's civilian nominees had been confirmed by those means by Democrats this Congress. Thune vowed that Republicans would 'figure out a way to change it' if there's no progress moving forward. Shortly before Trump called time on the negotiations on Saturday, some GOP Senators aired ideas for alternative ways to advance Trump's nominees. Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas said: "The Senate should immediately adjourn and let President Trump use recess appointments to enact the agenda 77M Americans voted for.' Recess appointments refer to when a President can 'make temporary appointments when the Senate is not in session,' according to the Constitution. It enables a President to appoint their chosen nominees without Senate confirmation. Shortly after his election in November, Trump spoke out in favor of recess appointments. 'Any Republican Senator seeking the coveted leadership position in the United States Senate must agree to recess appointments (in the Senate), without which we will not be able to get people confirmed in a timely manner,' he said via a post on Truth Social. Later that same month, Thune said that 'all the options' would remain on the table to help the advancement of Trump's picks. Read More: Why Trump's Talk of Recess Appointments Is Dangerous There have also been reports that GOP Senators could, at some point, seek to change the Senate rules in order to confirm more Trump nominees. Amid discussion surrounding this earlier in the week, Sen. Alex Padilla of California, a Democrat and ranking member of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, urged caution. 'We can and should have thoughtful, bipartisan conversations in the Rules Committee on updating the confirmation process for the future, but Republicans should keep in mind that if they choose to go nuclear—yet again—it will have consequences long beyond Donald Trump's presidency,' Padilla warned in an online statement.
