logo
AI is no longer artificial

AI is no longer artificial

AllAfrica4 days ago

For centuries, the mirror has served a simple purpose: to reflect our image. It shows our form, lets us adjust our appearance, and studies our expressions. But it doesn't know us. A mirror is a passive, optical simulation – a reflection of form, not essence. You can stare into it for hours, yet it will never reveal your thoughts or identity. It's a surface, not substance. The more we gaze into mirrors, the more we focus on appearance. In that way, mirrors become feedback loops. First we create the reflection, then the reflection begins to shape us.
Today's mirrors are digital. Social media are reflecting us, but in a curated, filtered and performative way. They don't just show who we are – they show who we want to be, or pretend to be. As philosopher Jean Baudrillard warned in his theory of hyperreality, representations become more real than reality itself. We no longer live in the moment; we live for how the moment looks on screen.
In 2023, a Nature Human Behaviour study revealed that 64% of users felt 'more like themselves online' than in real life. That's not a connection – it's self -distortion. Social media are not a window to the world; They are a mirror of desire. Social media don't merely reflect life. They replace it with a version that's more symmetrical, more colorful, more shareable than reality. It's a simulated reality. Humans love simulated reality – whether it's the mirror, social media or video games – more than reality.
Simulation doesn't have to be digital. It can be psychological or cultural – any representation that imitates reality but isn't reality itself. If mirrors simulate our appearance and social media simulates our persona, then artificial intelligence now simulates our consciousness.
Tools like ChatGPT don't invent humanity – they re-present it. Trained on billions of words, they echo our thoughts, emotions, contradictions and dreams. When we speak to AI, we are not talking to something alien – we're speaking to a refined version of ourselves. AI becomes not just a mirror, but a hall of mirrors.
We've crossed into an era where the tools we've created don't just assist us – they reflect us back. AI finishes our sentences, answers our questions and creates our art. But as its responses grow more fluid, the line between mimicry and sentience begins to blur.
As technology evolves, we're losing our compass. Intelligence, once the proudest marker of human uniqueness, no longer belongs to us alone. We have no definitive metric to separate simulated thought from real consciousness. The Turing Test has been outpaced. As AI models mimic human reasoning, debate philosophy, write poetry and simulate empathy, we're left with a haunting question: What if mimicry becomes indistinguishable from sentience or from reality ?
Today AI doesn't just solve tasks – it simulates emotional presence. Tools now generate voice, video and conversation with uncanny intimacy. In a poignant example, a woman used ChatGPT to simulate conversations with her deceased mother to find solace. Replika, a chatbot app, has users reporting romantic connections with their avatars. Sixty percent of paying users claim to be in love with theirs.
Unlike humans, AI doesn't judge, tire or leave. It delivers perfect emotional labor – a task no human has ever managed to sustain. But as it simulates love, grief and care, we must ask: When does imitation become reality? Or when do people start loving imitation more than reality.
This is the defining crisis of our century: What makes us human if we are no longer the only beings who reflect, remember or respond with empathy?
In capitalism, we're valued for productivity. AI will surpass us. In relationships, humans are flawed. AI is endlessly understanding. In knowledge, we're fragmented. AI is total.
Ironically, AI might push us to rediscover what makes us human. That's not perfection but fragility. Our flaws and limitations may be our last claim to uniqueness. But even that is being challenged.
We are entering an ethical reckoning. What if, in the near future, the elderly find solace in digital companions rather than the presence of family? What if the children form attachments to voices that were never born – like Alexa or Google Home? If an AI listens better than a friend, what is the meaning of friendship?
We are heading into an era where a line must be drawn between artificial intelligence and artificial sentience because, if we don't, the real danger won't be that machines become human – but that we forget what being human even means.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Do universities need a rethink on AI use for students? Singapore's NTU case causes a stir
Do universities need a rethink on AI use for students? Singapore's NTU case causes a stir

South China Morning Post

timea day ago

  • South China Morning Post

Do universities need a rethink on AI use for students? Singapore's NTU case causes a stir

A case at Singapore 's Nanyang Technological University (NTU) involving three students accused of academic misconduct over the use of generative AI (Gen AI) has prompted observers to question if tertiary institutions need clearer processes to deal with disputes. The students were told by their teacher in a briefing for a module on health, disease outbreaks and politics at the School of Social Sciences that the use of ChatGPT and AI tools was not allowed in the 'development or generation' of their essay proposal and long essay, according to pictures of the slide that were published online. One student's appeal was being processed before a review panel that would include AI experts, while the other two scored zero for the assignment, local media reported. The students used online tools to organise their citations. The two who have been punished used ChatGPT in their research but said they did not use it to write their essays, according to local media outlet CNA. Fong Wei Li, a lawyer at Forward Legal who specialises in internet and social media law, told This Week in Asia that the saga showed the gaps in processes among universities in dealing with such disputes between teachers and students. 'Most universities acknowledge that Gen AI is part of our lives, but what universities don't go further in doing is consistent framework about processes for grievances; if a faculty accuses a student of using Gen AI and the student disputes it,' Fong said. 'There has not been a critical mass for these kinds of disputes, but do we want to wait for something to happen like it did at NTU before there is a process if a student disputes?'

AI is no longer artificial
AI is no longer artificial

AllAfrica

time4 days ago

  • AllAfrica

AI is no longer artificial

For centuries, the mirror has served a simple purpose: to reflect our image. It shows our form, lets us adjust our appearance, and studies our expressions. But it doesn't know us. A mirror is a passive, optical simulation – a reflection of form, not essence. You can stare into it for hours, yet it will never reveal your thoughts or identity. It's a surface, not substance. The more we gaze into mirrors, the more we focus on appearance. In that way, mirrors become feedback loops. First we create the reflection, then the reflection begins to shape us. Today's mirrors are digital. Social media are reflecting us, but in a curated, filtered and performative way. They don't just show who we are – they show who we want to be, or pretend to be. As philosopher Jean Baudrillard warned in his theory of hyperreality, representations become more real than reality itself. We no longer live in the moment; we live for how the moment looks on screen. In 2023, a Nature Human Behaviour study revealed that 64% of users felt 'more like themselves online' than in real life. That's not a connection – it's self -distortion. Social media are not a window to the world; They are a mirror of desire. Social media don't merely reflect life. They replace it with a version that's more symmetrical, more colorful, more shareable than reality. It's a simulated reality. Humans love simulated reality – whether it's the mirror, social media or video games – more than reality. Simulation doesn't have to be digital. It can be psychological or cultural – any representation that imitates reality but isn't reality itself. If mirrors simulate our appearance and social media simulates our persona, then artificial intelligence now simulates our consciousness. Tools like ChatGPT don't invent humanity – they re-present it. Trained on billions of words, they echo our thoughts, emotions, contradictions and dreams. When we speak to AI, we are not talking to something alien – we're speaking to a refined version of ourselves. AI becomes not just a mirror, but a hall of mirrors. We've crossed into an era where the tools we've created don't just assist us – they reflect us back. AI finishes our sentences, answers our questions and creates our art. But as its responses grow more fluid, the line between mimicry and sentience begins to blur. As technology evolves, we're losing our compass. Intelligence, once the proudest marker of human uniqueness, no longer belongs to us alone. We have no definitive metric to separate simulated thought from real consciousness. The Turing Test has been outpaced. As AI models mimic human reasoning, debate philosophy, write poetry and simulate empathy, we're left with a haunting question: What if mimicry becomes indistinguishable from sentience or from reality ? Today AI doesn't just solve tasks – it simulates emotional presence. Tools now generate voice, video and conversation with uncanny intimacy. In a poignant example, a woman used ChatGPT to simulate conversations with her deceased mother to find solace. Replika, a chatbot app, has users reporting romantic connections with their avatars. Sixty percent of paying users claim to be in love with theirs. Unlike humans, AI doesn't judge, tire or leave. It delivers perfect emotional labor – a task no human has ever managed to sustain. But as it simulates love, grief and care, we must ask: When does imitation become reality? Or when do people start loving imitation more than reality. This is the defining crisis of our century: What makes us human if we are no longer the only beings who reflect, remember or respond with empathy? In capitalism, we're valued for productivity. AI will surpass us. In relationships, humans are flawed. AI is endlessly understanding. In knowledge, we're fragmented. AI is total. Ironically, AI might push us to rediscover what makes us human. That's not perfection but fragility. Our flaws and limitations may be our last claim to uniqueness. But even that is being challenged. We are entering an ethical reckoning. What if, in the near future, the elderly find solace in digital companions rather than the presence of family? What if the children form attachments to voices that were never born – like Alexa or Google Home? If an AI listens better than a friend, what is the meaning of friendship? We are heading into an era where a line must be drawn between artificial intelligence and artificial sentience because, if we don't, the real danger won't be that machines become human – but that we forget what being human even means.

OpenAI wins US$200mn US defense contract
OpenAI wins US$200mn US defense contract

RTHK

time16-06-2025

  • RTHK

OpenAI wins US$200mn US defense contract

OpenAI wins US$200mn US defense contract OpenAI is tasked with developing AI prototypes to address "national security challenges." Photo: Reuters ChatGPT maker OpenAI was awarded a US$200 million contract to provide the US Defense Department with artificial intelligence tools, the Pentagon said in a statement on Monday. "Under this award, the performer will develop prototype frontier AI capabilities to address critical national security challenges in both warfighting and enterprise domains," the Pentagon said. The work will be primarily performed in and near Washington with an estimated completion date of July 2026, the Pentagon said. OpenAI said last week that its annualised revenue run rate surged to US$10 billion as of June, positioning the company to hit its full-year target amid booming AI adoption. OpenAI said in March it would raise up to US$40 billion in a new funding round led by SoftBank Group at a US$300 billion valuation. OpenAI had 500 million weekly active users as of the end of March. The White House's Office of Management and Budget released new guidance in April directing federal agencies to ensure that the government and "the public benefit from a competitive American AI marketplace." The guidance had exempted national security and defense systems. (Reuters)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store