Mum loses arm and leg after slipping on station platform into path of two trains
A mum has shared how she 'miraculously' survived being hit by two trains after she slipped and fell from the station platform.
Sarah de Lagarde was travelling home from work when the horrific incident unfolded.
She was at the High Barnet tube stop in north London in September 2022 when she fell between the train and the platform.
Two different trains then hit her before she was rushed to hospital.
READ MORE: Drivers in England warned over new £5 daily charge 'which could last two years'
Get breaking news on BirminghamLive WhatsApp , click the link to join
Following the ordeal, the mum-of-two had an arm and a leg amputated.
She now uses prosthetics and is bringing a legal claim against London Underground Ltd (LUL), which is part of Transport for London (TfL), for a breach of duty, The Mirror reports.
Speaking of her ordeal, she said the one thing that breaks her heart the most is the fact she lost her "ability to hug my two young children with both arms."
The first hearing in the case was held at the Royal Courts of Justice today (June 25).
Sarah, 47, hailed it a 'significant milestone' in her 'journey towards justice', with LUL defending the claim.
Speaking outside the Royal Courts of Justice following the hearing, she described the harrowing incident and the resulting impact it has had on her life.
The mum said: "I was commuting home from work. I fell through the gap. I was run over and crushed by not one, but two London underground trains on the Northern Line.
"Miraculously, I survived, but it cost me dearly – the first train took my arm, and the second train took my leg."
She added: 'That night I also lost my mobility, my independence, my dignity and, above all, my ability to hug my two young children with both arms.
'Today, I stand before you not just as a survivor, but as a voice for change.
"This afternoon's court hearing marks a significant milestone in my journey towards justice against Transport for London, and I am optimistic.
"As we prepare for the full trial, I am not just fighting for justice for myself but for a safer, more accountable transport network for all.'
Sarah said she suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder and has not returned to using public transport since the incident. She added: 'I'm absolutely terrified.'
At the preliminary hearing in London, Judge Roger Eastman said an eight-week trial would likely take place at the beginning of 2027, with a further hearing due to take place in September this year.
He added: 'I appreciate this is a very high value claim, potentially, and very serious claim.'
James MacDonald, representing Mrs De Lagarde, told the court the case was 'not an ordinary personal injury case'.
In written submissions, he said the issues the trial judge will have to decide include whether LUL was in breach by not having a system in place to ensure that the Platform Train Interface (PTI) is monitored as passengers are getting off a train at a terminus station.
Another issue is whether LUL 'was in breach by virtue of its train operators not being trained to look for passengers on the tracks when entering a station'.
Prashant Popat KC, for LUL, said: 'We recognise that this is a tragic case, and the claimant sustained some horrific injuries.'
In written submissions, he added: 'The defendant denies these allegations. It also pleads contributory negligence.
'The parties are agreed that the case should proceed first towards a preliminary issue trial on liability. This would encompass breach of duty, causation and the issue of contributory negligence.'
Thomas Jervis, a partner at law firm Leigh Day, which is representing Sarah, added: 'This case is incredibly important and may have a profound impact on how London's transport network is operated in the future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Mum loses arm and leg after slipping on station platform into path of two trains
A mum has shared how she 'miraculously' survived being hit by two trains after she slipped and fell from the station platform. Sarah de Lagarde was travelling home from work when the horrific incident unfolded. She was at the High Barnet tube stop in north London in September 2022 when she fell between the train and the platform. Two different trains then hit her before she was rushed to hospital. READ MORE: Drivers in England warned over new £5 daily charge 'which could last two years' Get breaking news on BirminghamLive WhatsApp , click the link to join Following the ordeal, the mum-of-two had an arm and a leg amputated. She now uses prosthetics and is bringing a legal claim against London Underground Ltd (LUL), which is part of Transport for London (TfL), for a breach of duty, The Mirror reports. Speaking of her ordeal, she said the one thing that breaks her heart the most is the fact she lost her "ability to hug my two young children with both arms." The first hearing in the case was held at the Royal Courts of Justice today (June 25). Sarah, 47, hailed it a 'significant milestone' in her 'journey towards justice', with LUL defending the claim. Speaking outside the Royal Courts of Justice following the hearing, she described the harrowing incident and the resulting impact it has had on her life. The mum said: "I was commuting home from work. I fell through the gap. I was run over and crushed by not one, but two London underground trains on the Northern Line. "Miraculously, I survived, but it cost me dearly – the first train took my arm, and the second train took my leg." She added: 'That night I also lost my mobility, my independence, my dignity and, above all, my ability to hug my two young children with both arms. 'Today, I stand before you not just as a survivor, but as a voice for change. "This afternoon's court hearing marks a significant milestone in my journey towards justice against Transport for London, and I am optimistic. "As we prepare for the full trial, I am not just fighting for justice for myself but for a safer, more accountable transport network for all.' Sarah said she suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder and has not returned to using public transport since the incident. She added: 'I'm absolutely terrified.' At the preliminary hearing in London, Judge Roger Eastman said an eight-week trial would likely take place at the beginning of 2027, with a further hearing due to take place in September this year. He added: 'I appreciate this is a very high value claim, potentially, and very serious claim.' James MacDonald, representing Mrs De Lagarde, told the court the case was 'not an ordinary personal injury case'. In written submissions, he said the issues the trial judge will have to decide include whether LUL was in breach by not having a system in place to ensure that the Platform Train Interface (PTI) is monitored as passengers are getting off a train at a terminus station. Another issue is whether LUL 'was in breach by virtue of its train operators not being trained to look for passengers on the tracks when entering a station'. Prashant Popat KC, for LUL, said: 'We recognise that this is a tragic case, and the claimant sustained some horrific injuries.' In written submissions, he added: 'The defendant denies these allegations. It also pleads contributory negligence. 'The parties are agreed that the case should proceed first towards a preliminary issue trial on liability. This would encompass breach of duty, causation and the issue of contributory negligence.' Thomas Jervis, a partner at law firm Leigh Day, which is representing Sarah, added: 'This case is incredibly important and may have a profound impact on how London's transport network is operated in the future.'
Yahoo
12-06-2025
- Yahoo
The tech arms race to beat fare-dodgers
This embedded content is not available in your region. Credit: mirr22_/Tiktok A technological arms race has broken out to combat the fare-dodging crisis plaguing Britain's railways. Faced with the prospect of £500m in lost ticket sales, rail operators are embracing artificial intelligence (AI) and so-called machine learning to crack down on freeloaders. Evasion tactics that once went little further than hiding in a train lavatory to avoid the guard have changed radically since ticket barriers – first trialled on the Tube in 1964 – were introduced at major stations and across commuter networks. Miscreants are often seen forcing their way through the barriers to avoid paying, a trend recently highlighted by Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, as he issued a call to arms. However, evasion tactics span well beyond brute force. The digitisation of ticketing in particular, with the bulk of payments made by bank card, travel card or mobile phone, has opened up whole new avenues for fare abuse and forced operators to respond with tougher safeguards. This embedded content is not available in your region. Credit: X/@RobertJenrick Transport for London (TfL), which puts its annual losses from fare-dodging at £130m, says that 4.7pc of Tube passengers – almost one in every 20 – skipped paying or stumped up the incorrect fare in the last financial year alone. Yet, across its wider network of the Tube, Overground, buses, Docklands Light Railway and Elizabeth Line, the rate of offending fell from 3.8pc to 3.4pc after fines were raised to £100. TfL aims to bring it down to 1.5pc by 2030 through an intelligence-led approach combined with new technologies and more proactive enforcement. While offending in London is well short of New York's 13pc evasion rate, Siwan Hayward, TfL's director of security, says that fare-dodging 'is not a victimless crime'. She says: 'It robs Londoners of vital investment in a safe and reliable transport network. The overwhelming majority of customers pay the correct fare, and it's unfair to those who do that a minority avoid paying.' The main weapon in TfL's armoury is its Irregular Travel Analysis Platform (ITAP), which uses ticketing and journey data, passenger information and CCTV to identify repeat offenders. The tool is integral for a TfL investigations team that seeks to identify 'high-impact offenders', some of whom cost the network up to thousands of pounds a year in lost revenue. After studying data, the team liaises with 500 uniformed enforcement officers and plain-clothes inspectors, who can demand proof of a ticket or travel card while staging sting operations in stations, sometimes supported by the British Transport Police. This crackdown led to TfL securing fines of £400,000 last year after prosecuting 360 of the most prolific offenders. Among the offences deployed by fare evaders are techniques known as zonal avoidance and re-tokenisation. The former, colloquially dubbed 'doughnutting', involves travel through zones that have not been paid for. In re-tokenisation, or 'card tumbling,' the fraudster deletes a virtual card from a digital wallet on a mobile device after a journey to prevent authorisation of the transaction overnight. The card is then reloaded, at which point it is allocated a new tokenised number, preventing it from being blacklisted. A similar con involves the use of a bank card with insufficient funds to pay for a ticket. Tube gates identify the card as genuine and will let the holder in and out, only for the payment to bounce when requested. One offender last year used a contactless card to avoid paying the correct fare on 202 journeys, resulting in £1,427 in fines. Other scams include the abuse of Freedom Passes, which offer free travel in London for the disabled and those aged 66 and over. Meanwhile, outside of the biggest cities, at least 2,000 of Britain's 2,500 or so stations still lack barriers. Therefore, bosses are required to rely on traditional checks to ensure passengers are paying. Graham Sutherland, chief executive of FirstGroup, which runs express trains on the West Coast and Great Western main lines, said on-train ticket checks remained vital to prevent 'revenue leakage'. But there is no doubt that technology has been a game-changer. LNER, which runs trains between London King's Cross and Edinburgh, has led the way among long-distance operators in deploying AI to uncover unusual ticket-purchase patterns and identify fraudsters, setting up a 'machine learning team' to work alongside its risk experts. A pilot project that began in 2023 immediately identified a customer who had failed to pay for £10,000 worth of travel. Using information uncovered by the new technology, the team then built a case, which resulted in the customer repaying the full loss to LNER. Paul Larder, at LNER, said the application of machine learning had been revolutionary. He said: 'Previously, we've relied on our revenue protection team to identify customers who deliberately purchase incorrect tickets for travelling on our services. 'By using AI, we can accurately analyse large amounts of information quickly and identify patterns that our team can investigate further.' While companies are ramping up efforts to catch offenders, a report from the Office of Rail and Road this month identified 'significant inconsistency' in how operators target fare-dodgers, which has led to unnecessary and unfair prosecutions. Lord Hendy, the rail minister, who put the cost of fare evasion in England outside London at £400m a year, said a planned new ticketing system as part of the nationalisation programme should reduce instances of people mistakenly buying the wrong tickets. However, for the thugs who push through – known as bumpers, jumpers and tailgaters – sturdier barriers are being created. Developed by Cubic Transportation Systems, the barriers stretch from the floor to shoulder height and use AI-aided scanning software to detect instances of fare-dodging. Cubic says the gates 'can accurately detect, record and flag fare evasion as it's happening, distinguishing between different types of fare evasion, such as pushing through and climbing under the paddles or tailgating'. Sir Sadiq Khan's TfL has not yet said if it will order the equipment. However, if they do, they may finally offer some solace to law-abiding passengers confronted by petty criminals cheating the system while regular staff, who are forbidden from staging physical interventions, look on.
Yahoo
10-06-2025
- Yahoo
Caught on camera: Masked men use stolen welcome sign to hide theft of Pride flags
FORT COLLINS, Colo. (KDVR) — Masked men using a stolen sign to block the theft of several Pride flags from people's front yards in a Fort Collins neighborhood were caught on camera. It was the first year Rebecca and Sarah Peck hung their flags in front of their home they had recently moved into. When they lived in Alabama, they say they would hang them all the time, with no problem. Trio of 'RuPaul's Drag Race' stars to headline Denver PrideFest's Center Stage Now, they feel violated knowing someone walked onto their property and made off with their belongings. When Sarah Peck was out cutting grass early Saturday morning, she noticed something was off. 'Then I finished and I was like, wait a minute,' said Sarah. 'What happened to our flags? Like all of them.' The three hanging in the couple's front yard are gone, along with the couple's hand-painted welcome sign. 'The whole process took a couple of weeks between the painting and drying. I wouldn't be surprised if it took a month of work for all of that,' said Sarah. 'I was more like, where'd they go … what happened. I was confused.' It was when a neighbor showed a video of two masked men appearing to use the same sign to hide the theft that neighbors were able to connect the dots. Sarah said, 'It was more of a shock, like this is our sign. It's very distinguishable.' The couple also learned that other homes in the neighborhood were targeted. 'From what I understand, we all had something Pride-related that was messed with,' said Sarah. 'One of the neighbors had a pride wreath that was messed with on their front door. I heard other flags getting taken as well.' Friends remember Jax Gratton two months after she went missing Sarah says she reported the situation to the police, hoping someone can recognize the people responsible. 'What was so offensive to you that you felt the need to come on our personal property and take our stuff?' Sarah asked. Around noon on Monday, the couple replaced the stolen flag while also taping a message to their front door. 'We're not going to be intimidated by it,' said Sarah. Sarah says the sign that was stolen was sentimental and she desperately wants it back. She wants to send a message out to the community to be vigilant. Meanwhile, if you can identify the people in the video, you are asked to give Fort Collins police a call at 970-221-6540. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
