logo
T2D Tied to Mortality in Both Ischemic and Nonischemic HF

T2D Tied to Mortality in Both Ischemic and Nonischemic HF

Medscape17 hours ago
TOPLINE:
Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) had approximately 20%-26% higher mortality rates following ischemic and nonischemic heart failure (HF) than those without diabetes, with similar patterns observed in both women and men.
METHODOLOGY:
Most epidemiologic studies assessing mortality risk in individuals with HF, categorized by etiology and diabetes status, have relied on clinical trials or hospital data, limiting their generalizability to the broader population.
Researchers conducted an observational retrospective cohort study using primary care and hospital data from England to examine the association between T2D and all-cause mortality in patients with ischemic or nonischemic HF.
Patients with newly diagnosed T2D were matched with up to four people without diabetes on the basis of sex, birth year, and general practice.
Incident HF events were defined as ischemic if they followed an ischemic heart disease event after the diagnosis of T2D; otherwise, they were classified as nonischemic. The outcome of interest was all-cause mortality.
A total of 73,344 patients with HF were included, of whom 18,296 had ischemic HF and 55,048 had nonischemic HF. Among patients with ischemic HF, 2806 women (mean age, 77.26 years) and 4447 men (mean age, 73.44 years) had T2D, whereas among those with nonischemic HF, 10,094 women (mean age, 78.33 years) and 9964 men (mean age, 74.83 years) had T2D.
TAKEAWAY:
During a median follow-up of 2.19 years for ischemic HF and 1.98 years for nonischemic HF, mortality was observed in 52.4% and 57.8% of patients, respectively.
Age-standardized mortality rates following ischemic HF were higher in patients with T2D than in those without diabetes (19.2 vs 15.1 and 20.4 vs 16.5 per 100 person-years in women and men, respectively), with similar findings following nonischemic HF in women and men.
T2D was associated with higher mortality rates following ischemic HF, with rates 26% higher in women (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.17-1.36) and 23% higher in men (aHR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.15-1.31).
Similarly, following nonischemic HF, T2D was associated with higher mortality rates in both women (aHR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.19-1.29) and men (aHR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.15-1.25).
IN PRACTICE:
'This [study] highlights the ongoing need to optimize the prevention and management strategies in the overall population of individuals with type 2 diabetes and HF to reduce the risk of premature mortality,' the authors of the study wrote.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Kajal Panchal, MSc, Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, England, and was published online in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism.
LIMITATIONS:
This study relied on health records that were collected routinely, which may have introduced measurement errors for certain covariates. The lack of data on echocardiography prevented distinguishing between HF with preserved or reduced ejection fraction. Additionally, confounding variables, such as body fat distribution, dietary factors, and physical activity, were either unavailable or poorly recorded in the databases.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands. Some authors reported being supported by the funding agency and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre. One author reported receiving consultancy fees, and another author reported being a consultant or speaker and receiving research grants from various sources.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK MHRA Approves ImmunityBio's ANKTIVA® Plus BCG for BCG-Unresponsive Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Carcinoma In Situ
UK MHRA Approves ImmunityBio's ANKTIVA® Plus BCG for BCG-Unresponsive Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Carcinoma In Situ

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

UK MHRA Approves ImmunityBio's ANKTIVA® Plus BCG for BCG-Unresponsive Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Carcinoma In Situ

ANKTIVA, a first-in-class, lymphocyte-stimulating agent, works synergistically with BCG to activate and proliferate natural killer (NK) and T cells, helping eliminate cancer Already approved in the U.S. and designated as a Breakthrough Therapy by the FDA, this marks ANKTIVA's first marketing approval outside the U.S. ANKTIVA plus BCG offers a new option for eligible patients among the 16,400 to 18,000 people diagnosed with NMIBC in the UK each year1 CULVER CITY, Calif., July 08, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ImmunityBio, Inc. (NASDAQ: IBRX) today announced that the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has granted marketing authorization for ANKTIVA® (nogapendekin alfa inbakicept-pmln) in combination with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for the treatment of certain bladder cancer patients. This is the first marketing approval outside the U.S. for this novel lymphocyte-stimulating agent. "With the MHRA's authorization of ANKTIVA plus BCG, we can now offer our immunotherapy outside the U.S. to help patients with a disease that, if not effectively treated, can lead to bladder removal," said Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, Founder, Executive Chairman and Global Chief Scientific and Medical Officer of ImmunityBio. "This immune-boosting, lymphocyte-stimulating agent, the first of its kind, is central to our Cancer BioShield platform, which is designed to restore immune function and support long-term disease control." "ImmunityBio is honored to have received this important authorization from the UK MHRA. In light of the United States Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing policy implemented on May 12, 2025, we are actively evaluating our go-to-market strategy for the UK," said Richard Adcock, CEO and President of ImmunityBio. ANKTIVA is a first-in-class IL-15 agonist that activates and proliferates natural killer (NK) cells and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. It is designed to restore immune competence by reversing lymphopenia—a condition in which cancer and conventional therapies, such as chemotherapy, radiation and checkpoint inhibitors, reduce the number and function of immune cells. Restoring immune function is essential for immunosurveillance, immunogenic cell death, and sustained tumor control. The BioShield platform's effectiveness can be monitored using a routine complete blood count (CBC). ANKTIVA was designated a Breakthrough Therapy by the FDA and received approval from both the FDA and MHRA based on its safety and efficacy outcomes of complete response (CR) and duration of response (DOR). In a single-arm, multicenter trial, 77 evaluable patients received ANKTIVA with BCG for up to 37 months. As of the November 2023 data cutoff, the duration of complete response for some patients exceeded 47 months and remains ongoing. These extended duration of complete responses beyond 24 months with ANKTIVA and BCG surpasses the benchmark for meaningful clinical results set by experts from the International Bladder Cancer Group. ImmunityBio has also submitted regulatory applications to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to expand availability of ANKTIVA across the 27 European Union (EU) member states, as well as Iceland, Norway and Liechtenstein. About NMIBC CIS Bladder cancer is the 10th most commonly-diagnosed cancer globally,2 and in the UK, the Action Bladder Cancer UK estimates approximately 23,000 patients are diagnosed annually.1 At the time of diagnosis, about 80% of cases are non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), wherein the cancer is found only on the inner layer of the bladder wall.3 The standard therapy for NMIBC is intravesical instillation (delivery to the bladder via a catheter) of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG).4,5 BCG is a benign bacteria that induces an immune response in the bladder in proximity to the cancer cells, leading to clearance of the cancer in many patients. In ~30-40% of patients, however, BCG will fail, and in ~50% that initially respond, cancer will recur.6 About ANKTIVA The cytokine interleukin-15 (IL-15) plays a crucial role in the immune system by affecting the development, maintenance, and function of key immune cells—NK and CD8+ killer T cells—that are involved in killing cancer cells. By activating NK cells, ANKTIVA overcomes the tumor escape phase of clones resistant to T cells and restores memory T cell activity with resultant prolonged duration of complete response. ANKTIVA is a first-in-class IL-15 agonist IgG1 fusion complex, consisting of an IL-15 mutant (IL-15N72D) fused with an IL-15 receptor alpha, which binds with high affinity to IL-15 receptors on NK, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells. This fusion complex of ANKTIVA mimics the natural biological properties of the membrane-bound IL-15 receptor alpha, delivering IL-15 by dendritic cells and drives the activation and proliferation of NK cells with the generation of memory killer T cells that have retained immune memory against these tumor clones. The proliferation of the trifecta of these immune killing cells and the activation of trained immune memory results in immunogenic cell death, inducing a state of equilibrium with durable complete responses. ANKTIVA has improved pharmacokinetic properties, longer persistence in lymphoid tissues, and enhanced anti-tumor activity compared to native, non-complexed IL-15 in-vivo. ANKTIVA was approved by the FDA in 2024 for BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer CIS with or without papillary tumors. For more information, visit INDICATION AND IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION FROM THE FDA LABEL INDICATION AND USAGE: ANKTIVA is an interleukin-15 (IL-15) receptor agonist indicated with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) for the treatment of adult patients with BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with carcinoma in situ (CIS) with or without papillary tumors. WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS: Risk of Metastatic Bladder Cancer with Delayed Cystectomy. Delaying cystectomy can lead to the development of muscle invasive or metastatic bladder cancer, which can be lethal. If patient with CIS do not have a complete response to treatment after a second induction course of ANKTIVA with BCG, reconsider cystectomy. DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION: For lntravesical Use Only. Do not administer by subcutaneous or intravenous routes. Instill intravesically only after dilution. Total time from vial puncture to the completion of the intravesical instillation should not exceed 2 hours. USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS: Pregnancy: May cause fetal harm. Advise females of reproductive potential of the potential risk to a fetus and to use effective contraception. ADVERSE REACTIONS: The most common (≥15%) adverse reactions, including laboratory test abnormalities, are increased creatinine, dysuria, hematuria, urinary frequency, micturition urgency, urinary tract infection, increased potassium, musculoskeletal pain, chills and pyrexia. For more information about ANKTIVA, please see the Full Prescribing Information at You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to FDA. Visit or call 1-800-332-1088. You may also contact lmmunityBio at 1-877-ANKTIVA (1-877-265-8482) About ImmunityBio ImmunityBio is a vertically-integrated biotechnology company developing next-generation therapies and vaccines that bolster the natural immune system to defeat cancers and infectious diseases. The Company's range of immunotherapy and cell therapy platforms, alone and together, act to drive and sustain an immune response with the goal of creating durable and safe protection against disease. Designated an FDA Breakthrough Therapy, ANKTIVA is the first FDA-approved immunotherapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer CIS that activates natural killer cells, T cells, and memory T cells for a long-duration response. The Company is applying its science and platforms to treating cancers, including the development of potential cancer vaccines, as well as developing immunotherapies and cell therapies that we believe sharply reduce or eliminate the need for standard high-dose chemotherapy. These platforms and their associated product candidates are designed to be more effective, accessible, and easily administered than current standards of care in oncology and infectious diseases. For more information, visit (Founder's Vision) and connect with us on X (Twitter), Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram. References: Action Bladder UK. Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. May 2021. Available at: World Cancer Research Fund. Bladder Cancer Statistics. 2022. Available at: Aldousari S, Kassouf W. Update on the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 4(1), 56–64. Holzbeierlein J, Bixler BR, Buckley DI, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO guideline: 2024 amendment. J Urol. 2024;10.1097/JU.0000000000003846. Grabe-Heyne, et al. Intermediate and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an overview of epidemiology, burden, and unmet needs. Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 2;13:1170124. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1170124. Kodera A, Mohammed M, Lim P, Abdalla O, Elhadi M. The Management of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Failure in High-Risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Review Article. Cureus. 2023 Jun 26;15(6):e40962. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40962. PMID: 37503461; PMCID: PMC10369196. Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, such as statements regarding clinical trial data and potential results and implications to be drawn therefrom, the belief that the MHRA authorization leads to increased revenue, the expectation that the EAP as previously reported will enable access to ANKTIVA for patients across all solid tumor types who have exhausted first-line therapy including chemo, radiation or immunotherapy, the RMAT designation as previously reported and potential results therefrom and regulatory submissions in connection therewith, the belief that ALC levels and NLR levels obtained from a CBC are predictors of clinical benefit and outcomes relating to overall survival, the belief that improving ALC levels and NLR levels correlates with enhanced overall survival and clinical benefit, the belief that reversal of lymphopenia correlates with improved survival, clinical trial and expanded access program enrollment, data and potential results to be drawn therefrom, anticipated components of ImmunityBio's Cancer BioShield platform, the development of therapeutics for cancer and infectious diseases, potential benefits to patients, potential treatment outcomes for patients, the described mechanism of action and results and contributions therefrom, potential future uses and applications of ANKTIVA alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents for the prevention or reversal of lymphopenia, potential future uses and applications of ANKTIVA alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents across multiple tumor types and indications and for potential applications beyond oncology, potential regulatory pathways and the regulatory review process and timing thereof, the application of the Company's science and platforms to treat cancers or develop cancer vaccines, immunotherapies and cell therapies that has the potential to change the paradigm in cancer care, and ImmunityBio's approved product and investigational agents as compared to existing treatment options, and the impact of the MHRA on the Company's ex-United States go to market strategy, including in light of the recently implemented United States Most Favored Nation pricing policy on the Company's go-to-market strategy in the United Kingdom, among others. Statements in this press release that are not statements of historical fact are considered forward-looking statements, which are usually identified by the use of words such as "anticipates," "believes," "continues," "goal," "could," "estimates," "scheduled," "expects," "intends," "may," "plans," "potential," "predicts," "indicate," "projects," "is," "seeks," "should," "will," "strategy," and variations of such words or similar expressions. Statements of past performance, efforts, or results of our preclinical and clinical trials, about which inferences or assumptions may be made, can also be forward-looking statements and are not indicative of future performance or results. Forward-looking statements are neither forecasts, promises nor guarantees, and are based on the current beliefs of ImmunityBio's management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to ImmunityBio. Such information may be limited or incomplete, and ImmunityBio's statements should not be read to indicate that it has conducted a thorough inquiry into, or review of, all potentially available relevant information. Such statements reflect the current views of ImmunityBio with respect to future events and are subject to known and unknown risks, including business, regulatory, economic and competitive risks, uncertainties, contingencies and assumptions about ImmunityBio, including, without limitation, (i) risks and uncertainties regarding the FDA regulatory submission, filing and review process and the timing thereof, (ii) risks and uncertainties regarding regulatory submissions in foreign jurisdictions, filing and review process and the timing thereof, (iii) whether the RMAT designation will lead to an accelerated review or approval, of which there can be no assurance, (iv) risks and uncertainties regarding commercial launch execution, success and timing, (v) risks and uncertainties regarding participation and enrollment and potential results from the expanded access clinical investigation program described herein, (vi) whether clinical trials will result in registrational pathways and the risks, (vii) whether clinical trial data will be accepted by regulatory agencies, (viii) the ability of ImmunityBio to continue its planned preclinical and clinical development of its development programs through itself and/or its investigators, and the timing and success of any such continued preclinical and clinical development, patient enrollment and planned regulatory submissions, (iv) potential delays in product availability and regulatory approvals, (x) ImmunityBio's ability to retain and hire key personnel, (xi) ImmunityBio's ability to obtain additional financing to fund its operations and complete the development and commercialization of its various product candidates, (xii) potential product shortages or manufacturing disruptions that may impact the availability and timing of product, (xiii) ImmunityBio's ability to successfully commercialize its approved product and product candidates, (xiv) ImmunityBio's ability to scale its manufacturing and commercial supply operations for its approved product and future approved products, and (xv) ImmunityBio's ability to obtain, maintain, protect, and enforce patent protection and other proprietary rights for its product candidates and technologies. More details about these and other risks that may impact ImmunityBio's business are described under the heading "Risk Factors" in the Company's Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 3, 2025, and the Company's Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 12, 2025, and in subsequent filings made by ImmunityBio with the SEC, which are available on the SEC's website at ImmunityBio cautions you not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. View source version on Contacts ImmunityBio Contacts: Investors Hemanth Ramaprakash, PhD, MBA ImmunityBio, Inc. +1 Media Sarah Singleton ImmunityBio, Inc. +1 Sign in to access your portfolio

How To Protect PHI In The Cloud: A Healthcare Guide
How To Protect PHI In The Cloud: A Healthcare Guide

Geek Vibes Nation

timean hour ago

  • Geek Vibes Nation

How To Protect PHI In The Cloud: A Healthcare Guide

Protected Health Information (PHI) refers to a person's health data, including medical records, diagnoses, treatment details, or billing information. This data can be collected and stored when individuals interact with healthcare providers, insurance companies, hospitals, or health-related platforms. Since this information is sensitive and personal, anyone who stores or manages PHI is responsible for keeping it secure, whether it's a healthcare organization, a digital health service, or a cloud provider. This includes information such as: Patient names Medical record numbers Health insurance details Social Security numbers Test results and prescriptions Dates of birth and addresses Billing and payment information PHI becomes especially sensitive because it combines personal identity with private medical data, making it a high-value target for cybercriminals. If this information is exposed or compromised, it can lead to: Identity theft Medical fraud Unauthorized use of insurance benefits Reputational harm Loss of trust in healthcare providers In the wrong hands, even a seemingly minor piece of PHI can be used to construct full identity profiles or conduct fraudulent activities, making the consequences of a data breach potentially devastating for both individuals and healthcare organizations. Moreover, mishandling PHI can trigger serious legal and financial penalties under privacy laws such as HIPAA (in the U.S.), which strictly governs how PHI should be stored, transmitted, and accessed. Because of this high sensitivity and legal responsibility, PHI demands the highest level of protection, especially when stored or processed in cloud environments. Key Challenges of Storing PHI in Cloud Environments Storing PHI in the cloud helps healthcare organisations scale quickly, reduce costs, and improve accessibility. However, it also brings several challenges. From legal compliance to security missteps, each issue needs to be addressed carefully to keep data safe. 1. Meeting Security and Compliance Requirements Healthcare data must comply with strict privacy and security laws such as HIPAA, GDPR, and local regulations. These laws define how PHI should be stored, accessed, and shared. In cloud environments, ensuring compliance requires strong encryption, strict access controls, audit logging, and regular risk assessments. If not implemented correctly, non-compliance can lead to serious penalties. 2. Understanding Shared Responsibility Cloud service providers manage the physical infrastructure and core services. However, healthcare organizations are still responsible for securing their data within the cloud. This includes setting up proper access control, using secure architecture, writing secure application code, applying data encryption, and regularly monitoring their systems. Without this, misconfigurations and security gaps are likely. 3. Rising Cybersecurity Threats PHI is a common target for cyberattacks because it holds high value. Threats like ransomware, phishing, and unauthorized access can lead to data breaches. If attackers gain access, the data can be sold, misused, or leaked, resulting in privacy loss, financial damage, and legal action against the healthcare provider. 4. Cloud Misconfigurations Simple mistakes such as leaving cloud storage buckets publicly accessible or forgetting to enable encryption can expose sensitive data. These misconfigurations often happen during manual setup or due to a lack of proper knowledge, and they're one of the leading causes of PHI exposure. Cloud platforms often rely on third-party tools for added functionality. If these external tools are not secure or compliant, they become a weak link. Healthcare organizations must evaluate every vendor they connect with to ensure they meet security standards. 6. Limited Visibility and Control In traditional on-premise systems, organizations can see and control everything. In cloud environments, that visibility is reduced. It becomes harder to track who accessed what data, when, and from where, especially if real-time monitoring tools like AWS CloudTrail or Azure Monitor aren't in place. 7. Data Location and Jurisdiction Risks Cloud providers may store data across global data centers. If PHI is stored in another country, it may fall under different legal systems. This can lead to conflicts with local regulations and affect data privacy. Healthcare providers must ensure that data is stored in permitted locations. Best Practices to Protect PHI in the Cloud Protecting PHI in the cloud requires a combination of the right technologies, strong policies, and well-planned system design. Below are some essential practices healthcare organizations should follow to keep individual medical data safe and compliant. 1. Choose a HIPAA-Compliant Cloud Provider Cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and GCP offer HIPAA-eligible services along with a signed Business Associate Agreement (BAA). For example, AWS HIPAA compliance ensures that healthcare organizations can use approved cloud services with the required security controls, encryption, and access management to safely process and store PHI. 2. Use Strong Data Encryption Data should be encrypted both at rest (when stored) and in transit (when being shared or moved). Most cloud platforms offer built-in encryption services. Organizations can also use Bring Your Own Key (BYOK) options for better control over encryption keys. 3. Implement Identity and Access Management (IAM) Not everyone needs access to all data. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to limit who can view or modify PHI. Also, enable multi-factor authentication (MFA) to add an extra layer of security when users log in. 4. Design a Secure Cloud Architecture Secure systems start with secure design. Use best practices like: Isolating sensitive workloads using virtual networks Applying firewalls and security groups Limiting public internet exposure Following the principle of least privilege These steps reduce the attack surface and help prevent unauthorized access. 5. Monitor, Audit, and Log Everything Set up continuous monitoring tools to detect unusual activities. Keep logs of who accessed what data and when. Regular auditing ensures that systems are working correctly and helps meet compliance standards. 6. Regular Backups and Disaster Recovery Create automatic backups of critical data and applications. Store them in secure, separate locations. Test your disaster recovery plans regularly to ensure systems can be restored quickly in case of an incident. 7. Train Your Staff Even strong technology can fail if employees are careless. Provide regular training on: Recognizing phishing attacks Following secure login practices Reporting suspicious activity Educated staff play a key role in keeping PHI safe. Conclusion Storing and protecting PHI in the cloud demands more than just a technical setup. It requires a security-first mindset backed by clear compliance measures. With growing data risks and strict regulations, healthcare providers must act wisely. Leveraging reliable and professional cloud consulting services ensures your cloud setup remains secure, HIPAA-compliant, and ready to scale with healthcare demands.

Judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from enforcing funding ban against Planned Parenthood
Judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from enforcing funding ban against Planned Parenthood

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from enforcing funding ban against Planned Parenthood

Source: CNN A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a provision of President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy law to defund Planned Parenthood's health care services. The order from US District Judge Indira Talwani, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, blocks the provision's enforcement for 14 days. The measure would bar Medicaid users from coverage with a health care provider that also provides abortion services. The Planned Parenthood Federation of America – along with Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts and Planned Parenthood Association of Utah – sued the administration earlier Monday, arguing that the funding ban would have devastating consequences across the country. While the legislation, which Trump signed on Friday, does not explicitly mention Planned Parenthood, the nationwide family planning and health care provider is in its crosshairs. The law prohibits federal funding for providers 'primarily engaged in family planning services, reproductive health, and related medical care' that also provide abortion. Planned Parenthood has warned that nearly 200 clinics nationwide – which also provide birth control, STI testing and treatment, and cancer screening – could close as a result of the bill's one-year ban on funds. Ninety percent of those clinics, Planned Parenthood says, are in states where abortion is legal. 'This case is about making sure that patients who use Medicaid as their insurance to get birth control, cancer screenings, and STI testing and treatment can continue to do so at their local Planned Parenthood health center, and we will make that clear in court,' Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement. The bill originally barred funds for ten years, before the Senate Parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, reduced the measure to one year. The Planned Parenthood Federation of America and the two local networks celebrated Monday's order, while warning in a statement of the consequences if the provision is ultimately allowed to take effect. 'Already, in states across the country, providers and health center staff have been forced to turn away patients who use Medicaid to get basic sexual and reproductive health care because President Trump and his backers in Congress passed a law to block them from going to Planned Parenthood,' the groups said. 'There are no other providers who can fill the gap if the 'defunding' of Planned Parenthood is allowed to stand.' CNN has reached out to the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for comment. Earlier Monday, anti-abortion advocates quickly railed against Planned Parenthood's suit. 'Planned Parenthood's desperation is showing as they run to the courts again to fix a crisis of their own making,' said Susan B. Anthony's Pro-Life America director of legal affairs and policy counsel Katie Daniel. Planned Parenthood is also battling the Trump administration in court over cuts to a federal teen pregnancy prevention program. Lawyers for five Planned Parenthood networks argued in a federal District of Columbia court this June that administration's changes to the program, including limits on language around diversity and equity, were vague and could bar Planned Parenthood from providing longtime services. This story and headline have been updated with additional developments. See Full Web Article

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store