Calcutta HC questions West Bengal about monthly allowance given to sacked non-teaching staff
Justice Amrita Sinha reserved the order in the matter but verbally questioned the state government for ' spending public money' through the disbursal of the amount, The Hindu reported.
The judge was hearing a writ petition challenging the provision of the allowance to the dismissed staff, according to the newspaper. The petition was filed by a candidate on the waitlist who was not recruited despite being on the merit list, allegedly due to irregularities in the hiring process.
On April 3, the Supreme Court upheld the Calcutta High Court's April 2024 order terminating the appointment of about 25,000 teachers and non-teaching staff by West Bengal's School Service Commission. The bench passed the order after observing that the recruitment process was 'vitiated by manipulation and fraud'.
The top court on April 17 permitted 'untainted' teachers to be retained until the end of the academic year or until fresh appointments are made, whichever is earlier. However, it did not grant relief to Group C and Group D employees, or non-teaching staff, whose appointments were also cancelled.
In response, the state government had announced in April that the sacked non-teaching staff would receive a monthly allowance until the Supreme Court delivered a verdict on review petitions filed by it, The Hindu reported.
During the hearing on Monday, the High Court questioned how the state government was paying a monthly allowance of Rs 20,000 to Rs 25,000 to the sacked non-teaching employees for 'sitting at home'.
'Thousands of [aspirants] remain unemployed but those whose appointments were cancelled are being paid to sit at home?' Sinha was quoted as saying by Live Law.
Advocate General Kishore Dutta, representing the state government, said that the amount was being disbursed in line with a government policy that cannot be disregarded.
The High Court noted that the money could not be given in a hurry as there were ' some protocols ' that had to be followed, The Indian Express reported.
Sinha also questioned the state government about whether there was any similar scheme for candidates who did not get jobs because of the irregularities in the recruitment process, The Hindu reported.
Dutta said that the allowance was 'being given purely on humanitarian grounds ' after the dismissed staff faced a ' sudden loss of livelihood '. He also highlighted that the scheme was 'temporary' and would end once the Supreme Court decided on the matter.
In April 2024, the High Court had passed its direction on the termination of the appointments based on the findings of a re-evaluation of the Optical Mark Recognition sheets from the 2016 recruitment examination in the case.
The re-evaluation found that the selected teachers had been recruited against blank Optical Mark Recognition sheets.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
CAQM amends enforcement date for denying fuel to end-of-life vehicles for NCR
New Delhi: The Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) on Tuesday announced that its order of denying fuel to end-of-life (EOL) vehicles in Delhi will now come into force on Nov 1, along with five high-vehicle-density districts of NCR. The NCR districts of Gurgaon, Faridabad, Ghaziabad, Gautam Budh Nagar and Sonipat were supposed to follow the no-fuel directive from Nov 1 onwards. Delhi's date for applying the restrictions has been aligned with the NCR districts now as several people had said that implementing the policy only in Delhi in July would be a failure as car owners would go to NCR to refuel. The restrictions in the rest of NCR will be imposed from April 1, 2026. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi CAQM partially amended its direction 89 on Tuesday after deliberations at its meeting. The ban on fuel to EOL vehicles came into force in Delhi on July 1. However, after public outcry, Delhi environment minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa wrote to CAQM on July 3, requesting the drive against EOL vehicles to be put on hold. He highlighted operational and technological shortcomings, including camera placements. Even chief minister Rekha Gupta on Sunday said her govt will urge Supreme Court to allow uniform rules on overaged vehicles in the national capital, in line with the rest of the country. LG VK Saxena also asked Delhi govt on Saturday to file a review petition in Supreme Court, urging reconsideration of its 2018 order mandating deregistration of EOL vehicles. "All EOL vehicles identified through the ANPR camera system or other such systems installed at the fuel pump stations shall be denied fuelling with effect from Nov 1 in Delhi and five high-vehicle density districts of Gurgaon, Faridabad, Ghaziabad, Gautam Budh Nagar and Sonipat, and from April 1, 2026, in the rest of NCR," CAQM said. CAQM stated that the amendment will allow Delhi govt some time to address technological gaps in the implementation of the ANPR system. CAQM has directed the transport departments of Delhi and NCR states to ensure proper installation and operation of the ANPR system. "The transport departments in Delhi and NCR states have also been directed to ensure that trials of the ANPR system are conducted and training of manpower is done in a timely manner. They shall also widely disseminate this direction among all stakeholders, including fuel stations, and ensure its strict compliance through effective enforcement measures," CAQM said. It directed NCR states to inform the commission about the liquidation of the large fleet of EOL vehicles on a monthly basis. All petrol vehicles over 15 years old and diesel vehicles over 10 years old on roads are considered EOL vehicles. In 2015, NGT passed an order to ban 10-year-old diesel and 15-year-old petrol vehicles in Delhi-NCR and directed their deregistration and scrapping. In 2018, Supreme Court upheld the NGT direction. On July 1, 80 EOL vehicles were seized, but this number fell to seven the next day. However, on the third day, the govt formally approached the CAQM to pause the drive.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
BDPO faces pay cut, disciplinary action over repeated non-compliance of info panel's orders
1 2 Chandigarh: Punjab State Information Commission (PSIC) has recommended strict disciplinary action and salary deduction against a block development and panchayat officer (BDPO)-cum-public information officer (PIO) for repeatedly ignoring commission directives under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 and bailable warrants. State Information Commissioner (SIC) Dr Bhupinder Batth issued the directions during a hearing on an appeal filed by a resident of Patiala. The appellant was awaiting information since Dec 14, 2022, despite multiple hearings and official notices spanning over two years. During the initial hearing on Dec 14, 2022, the respondent sought time to furnish the requested information. The matter was adjourned to March 28, 2023, when another delay was sought. On April 24, 2023, a show-cause notice was issued to the PIO, and the case was further deferred to May 29, 2023. When the PIO, Krishan Singh, failed to appear on May 29, the commission imposed a penalty of Rs 25,000 and issued bailable warrants against him. Despite this, he remained absent on July 18, Aug 16, and Sept 20, 2023. After the retirement of former SIC Maninder Singh Patti, the case was reallocated to SIC Dr Bhupinder Batth, with the next hearing scheduled for Jan 29, 2025. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo On that day, the appellant was unable to attend due to his wife's illness, but panchayat secretary Jarnail Singh appeared on behalf of the respondent. He informed the commission that Krishan Singh is now posted as BDPO, Chogawan, Amritsar. The commission directed both Krishan Singh and the present PIO of BDPO, Patran, to appear with point-wise replies. However, neither officer appeared, nor did they inform the commission of their absence. The appellant reiterated that no information was provided to him to date. The commission, upon reviewing the case file, noted that despite repeated notices and hearing orders, Krishan Singh consistently failed to comply. Moreover, the Rs 25,000 penalty imposed over a year ago remains unpaid, underscoring, as the commission observed, a "complete lack of regard for the RTI regime." Taking serious note of what it called a "deliberate and disrespectful" dereliction of duty, the commission recommended disciplinary action under Section 20(2) of the RTI Act, 2005 against Krishan Singh, now BDPO, Chogawan. The order was forwarded to financial commissioner, rural development and panchayats, with directions to ensure recovery of the Rs 25,000 penalty by deducting it from Krishan Singh's salary. They were instructed to initiate strict disciplinary proceedings under applicable service rules and submit an action taken report within 30 days of receiving the order. In addition, the commission granted a final opportunity to the current PIO (BDPO, Patran, Patiala) to appear before the commission on the next date of hearing with the complete information. Failing this, action under Section 20(1) of the RTI Act will be initiated. The case has been listed for further hearing on Oct 14. MSID:: 122319348 413 |
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
NGT notice to ministry, state govt over ‘illegal' construction on forest land
1 2 3 Cuttack: National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Monday issued notices to the Union ministry of environment, forests and climate change, Odisha govt and several officials over alleged illegal construction on forest land in Jajpur district. The petition, filed by Kailash Chandra Nayak of Nuadihi village under Danagadi tehsil, sought intervention against construction being carried out by the state govt on forest land in Danagadi and Sukinda blocks without mandatory approval under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The petitioner, represented by advocates Sankar Prasad Pani and Ashutosh Padhy, claimed these constructions are being carried out without any forest clearance from the Centre. A representation was submitted to the authorities on March 30, but no action has been taken so far, the petition claimed. The bench, comprising Justice B Amit Sthalekar (judicial member) and Dr Arun Kumar Verma (expert member), noted the matter "requires consideration" and issued notices to the additional chief secretary (forest, environment and climate change), district collector of Jajpur, BDOs and tehsildars of Danagadi and Sukinda and the divisional forest officer (Cuttack). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Pieces of Clothing you should Ditch over 40 Learn More Undo All respondents have been directed to file their counter affidavits within four weeks. The case was listed for the next hearing on Aug 25. According to the petition, massive concrete structures are being built using funds from the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) with the approval of Jajpur district collector, who is also the managing trustee of DMF. It was alleged that on Nov 21, 2023, the collector issued a letter to the Sukinda BDO for constructing activity rooms in 132 primary schools at a cost of Rs 13.20 crore. On Jan 24, 2024, he again approved Rs 13.10 crore for additional classrooms and Rs 14 crore for activity rooms in 140 schools under Danagadi block. The petition sought a halt on all non-forest activities being carried out on forest land without prior central approval and demanded that such constructions be declared illegal.
