Biden's Floating Pier Debacle In Gaza Was Even Worse Than We Thought; IG Report
The ill-fated pier system, dubbed 'Operation Neptune Solace' and operated by an Army and Navy outfit known as Joint Logistics Over-the-Shore (JLOTS), took about 1,000 U.S. forces to execute at a cost of $230 million.
More than 60 service members were injured and one died during non-combat duties on the mission, according to the Pentagon IG, although the manner of the injuries was not clear.
'Based on the information provided, we were not able to determine which of these 62 injuries occurred during the performance of duties or resulted off duty or from pre-existing medical conditions,' the report said.
Army Sgt. Quandarius Stanley was 'critically injured in May when high winds and heavy seas damaged the pier, causing four Army vessels to become beached,' The Air Force Times reported. Stanley died from the injuries he sustained months later.
The Navy reported damage to 27 boats and (Improved Navy Lighterage System) INLS equipment totaling about $31 million, according to the Times.
The Army's damage assessment is redacted.
Plagued by bad weather, the 1,200-foot-long floating pier reportedly had to be removed multiple times due to high winds and sea.
The Pentagon IG found that mission planners failed to identify such environmental factors, and that Army and Navy equipment malfunctioned because it was 'not interoperable.'
Lack of training and resources also reportedly hindered the operation's success.
The Inspector General said that the U.S. military under Biden failed to 'organize, train, and equip their forces to meet common joint standards.'
The pier debacle became a major embarrassment to the Biden administration, with congressional Republicans branding it a political stunt to placate the Democrats' pro-Hamas base during an election year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Insider
07-07-2025
- Gulf Insider
Elon Musk Launches New 'America Party'
Elon Musk has announced the formation of a new political party in the United States, weeks after a high-profile and public break with President Donald Trump. Posting on his social media platform X, the billionaire tech mogul unveiled the 'America Party,' describing it as an alternative to the entrenched two-party system. 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' Musk wrote, referencing an earlier user poll he conducted on the platform. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' Musk accused both Democrats and Republicans of contributing to national decline, stating: 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy.' Despite the declaration, it remains unclear whether the America Party has been officially registered with the Federal Election Commission. Musk has also yet to announce leadership details, a party platform, or plans to field candidates. The move follows Musk's dramatic fallout with Trump, whom he once strongly supported. After backing the Republican leader's 2024 re-election bid with $250 million in campaign funding, Musk was appointed to lead the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), tasked with identifying sweeping federal budget cuts. The relationship soured in May when Musk resigned from the role and publicly criticized Trump's economic policies—particularly a massive tax-and-spending bill recently signed into law. Musk argued that the legislation, which the president dubbed his 'big, beautiful bill,' would dangerously inflate the federal deficit. Estimates suggest the package could add more than $3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. As of Saturday, no filings for the America Party had appeared on the FEC's public database. — Agencies Also Read: Kazakhstan Plans To Establish Bitcoin And Crypto Reserve
Daily Tribune
06-07-2025
- Daily Tribune
Elon Musk Announces New Political Party After Rift with Trump
Billionaire Elon Musk says he's launching a brand-new political party in the US, just weeks after a very public fallout with former President Donald Trump. In a post on his platform X (formerly Twitter), Musk said he's forming the "America Party" — an alternative to the current two-party system made up of Republicans and Democrats. However, it's still unclear if this party has been officially registered with US election authorities. Also, since Musk was born outside the US, he can't run for president himself. He hasn't said who might lead the new party. The idea first came up during Musk's public spat with Trump. Once a strong supporter — even dancing with Trump at rallies and bringing his young son to the White House — Musk later stepped down from his role in Trump's administration and the relationship soured. During that time, Musk ran a poll on X asking people whether the US needed a new political party. On Saturday, referring to that poll, he wrote: 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party — and you shall have it! When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste and corruption, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' So far, the Federal Election Commission hasn't released any documents confirming the party's official formation. In the past, smaller parties like the Libertarian, Green, and People's Parties have tried to break through America's two-party stronghold — but none have made significant national progress. Musk's shift is a major turnaround. Just last year, he poured $250 million into Trump's campaign and was even appointed to lead the 'Department of Government Efficiency' — a group focused on cutting government spending. Now, he's turning his back on that world to try and reshape American politics.
Gulf Insider
06-07-2025
- Gulf Insider
US Support For Israel Comes At A Staggering, Multifaceted Price
When asked about the cost of their government's support of the State of Israel, some Americans will say it's $3.8 billion a year — the amount of annual military aid the United States is committed to under its current, 10-year 'memorandum of understanding' with Israel. However, that answer massively understates the true cost of the relationship, not only because it doesn't capture various, vast expenditures springing from it, but even more so because the relationship's steepest costs can't be measured in dollars. Since its 1948 founding, Israel has been far and away the largest recipient of American foreign assistance. Though the Ukraine war created a brief anomaly, Israel generally tops the list every year, despite the fact that Israel is among the world's richest countries — ranked three spots below the UK and two spots above Japan in per capita GDP. Driving that point home, even when using the grossly-understating $3.8 billion figure for US expenditures on Israel, America gave the Zionist state $404 per person in the 2023 fiscal year, compared to just $15 per person for Ethiopia, one of the poorest countries on Earth and America's third-largest beneficiary that year. Israel's cumulative post-World War II haul has been nearly double that of runner-up Egypt. What most Americans don't realize, however, is that much of Egypt's take — $1.4 billion in 2023 — should be chalked up to Israel too, because of ongoing US aid commitments rising from the 1978 Camp David Accords that brokered peace between Egypt and Israel. The same can be said for Jordan — America's fourth-largest beneficiary in fiscal 2023 at $1.7 billion. US aid to the kingdom surged after it signed its own 1994 treaty with Israel, and a wedge of Jordan's aid is intended to address the country's large refugee population, comprising not only Palestinians displaced by Israel's creation, but also masses who've fled US-led regime-change wars pursued on Israel's behalf. Then there's the supplemental aid to Israel that Congress periodically authorizes on top of the memorandum of understanding (MOU) commitment. Since the October 7 Hamas invasion of Israel, these supplements have exceeded the MOU commitment by leaps and bounds. In just the first year of the war in Gaza, Congress and President Biden approved an additional $14.1 billion in 'emergency' military aid to Israel, bringing the total for that year to $17.9 billion. One must also consider the fact that, given the US government runs perpetual deficits that now easily exceed $1 trillion, every marginal expenditure, including aid to Israel, is financed with debt that bears an interest expense, increasing Americans' tax-and-inflation burden. On top of money given to Israel, the US government spends huge sums on activities either meant to benefit Israel or that spring from Israel's actions. For example, during just the first year of Israel's post-Oct 7 war in Gaza, increased US Navy offensive and defensive operations in the Middle East theater cost America an estimated $4.86 billion. Those Gaza-war-related outflows have not only continued but accelerated. For example, earlier this year, the Pentagon engaged in an intense campaign against Yemen's Houthis. In proclaimed retaliation for Israel's systematic destruction of Gaza, the Houthis have targeted Israel, and ships the Houthis said were linked to Israel. In response, America unleashed 'Operation Rough Rider,' which often saw $2 million American missiles being used against $10,000 Houthi drones, and cost between one and two billion dollars. President Trump's military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities — amid a war initiated by Israel on contrived premises — cost America another one to two billion dollars, according to early estimates. Even before the attack on a nuclear program the US intelligence community continues to assess is not aimed at producing a weapon, the Pentagon was already spending more money on Israel's behalf, helping to defend the country from Iran's response to Israel's unprovoked aggression. The run-up to US strikes itself entailed a massive and costly mobilization of American forces and equipment to the region, as the Pentagon readied for multiple scenarios. Propelled by Israel's powerful US-based lobby, by Israel-pandering legislators, and by a revolving cast of Israel-favoring presidents, cabinet members, and national security officials, the United States has consistently pursued policies in the Middle East that place top priority on securing Israel's regional supremacy. Among the many avenues used to pursue that goal, none has been more costly than that of regime change, where an outcome that results in a shattered, chaotic state is seemingly just as pleasing to Israel and its American collaborators as one that spawns a functioning state with an Israel-accommodating government — and where the cost is often measured not only in US dollars but in American lives and limbs. Of course, the most infamous such regime-change effort was the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. 'If you take out Saddam, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region,' current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu assured a US congressional hearing. Doing his part to aid a Bush administration dominated by Israel-aligned neoconservatives bent on taking out one of Israel's regional adversaries, Netanyahu also said there was 'no question whatsoever' that Hussein was 'hell-bent on achieving atomic bombs.' The drive to topple Syria's Iran-allied Assad government is another prominent example of regime change on behalf of Israel, as the two countries sought to sever the 'Shia Crescent' that — due in great part to Saddam's ouster — presented a continuous pipeline of Iranian influence extending to Israel's borders. To the contentment of the US and Israeli governments, Syria is now led by an al Qaeda alumnus who's reportedly poised to relinquish Syria's long-standing claim on the Golan Heights, which Israel captured in 1967. Taken together, the price tag of US military operations in Iraq and Syria, including past and future medical and disability care for veterans, totals $2.9 trillion, according to Brown University's Costs of War Project. The human toll has been even more mind-boggling: upwards of 580,000 civilians and combatants killed, with perhaps two to four times that number indirectly perishing from displacement, disease and other factors. More than 4,600 US service-members died in Iraq, and 32,000 were injured, many of them enduring amputations and burns. Alongside mass suffering, these and other US interventions undertaken to ensure Israel's regional supremacy have fomented enormous resentment of the United States across the region. Click here to read more…
