
El Salvador threatens to send its violent gangsters to France after Paris Fashion Week criticised the country's mega-prisons
France could be getting an influx of some of the most notorious criminals from El Salvador's biggest mega prison.
The Central American country's president issued the grim warning after a Paris fashion show criticised the treatment of its inmates.
Nayib Bukele hit out at a collection shown by Willy Chavarria, a Mexican-American designer.
Responding to a post on X in which models wore white T-shirts and shorts - resembling uniforms worn by inmates at the Terrorism Confinement Centre - Bukele slammed the designer and accused Paris of 'glorifying criminals'.
In his rant, he said: 'We're ready to ship them all to Paris whenever we get the green light from the French government.
He followed that post with another showing a woman crying after being harassed in Paris.
Bukele captioned: 'This is the result of glorifying criminals in Paris. He who spares the wolf sacrifices the sheep'.
His second tweet caught the attention of X founder Elon Musk, who reposted in agreement.
The leader's press secretary said Bukele's response demonstrated his 'firm stance against the attempt to glorify criminality'.
In the fashion show, 36 men wearing the attire made in collaboration with the American Civil Liberties Union walked down the ramp.
They then fell on their knees and bowed their heads - a callback to pictures from the prison after the government announced it would be harsher on gangs.
Some models also wore T-shirts with America written upside down. Some commentators noted it was a way to emphasise his belief that El Salvador was heading in the wrong direction.
The designer's political messaging began even before the fashion show started - his invitations were styled to look like immigration summons.
It asked readers to attend to witness a 'presentation of humanity'.
For years, El Salvador has grappled with gang-related violence, which has left several people dead.
The murders, kidnappings, and extortion committed by gangs like the Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13) and the 18th Street Gang have led to the nation's reputation as one of the most dangerous in the world.
However, when President Bukele took over power in 2019, he made it one of his missions to fight organised crimes and gangs.
As part of his efforts, he opened CECOT, which now houses some of the most hardened criminals in the country.
But human rights advocates have criticised the prison for its treatment of its inmates - some have said inmates are forced to live in inhumane conditions.
Thousands of suspected gang members have been hauled to the prison in a desperate move to get them off the streets.
Unlike many other prisons, visitations and recreation are not allowed in CECOT. Inmates also do not have access to education.
Each of the 256 cells in the prison, located in Tecoluca, has around 156 inmates who are forced to sleep in metal bunk beds with no mattress or sheets.
The inmates are made to share just two toilets and two sinks. CCTV cameras monitor the cell around the clock, while an artificial bright light stays on throughout the day and night.
If an inmate is unfortunate enough to be sent into solitary confinement, they are forced to stay in a narrow pitch black cell with only a small ceiling hole providing a source of light.
The only time prisoners can leave their cells is when they have a court hearing, which is often via video link.
Their diet consists mainly of beans or pasta, as the government has forbidden meat.
Violence in prison is commonplace as members of rival gangs are forced to co-exist with each other.
Many of the prisoners will never be freed as they are serving between 100 to 200 years.
In April this year, US president Donald Trump said his government was looking at a proposal to detain US citizens in CECOT, an idea embraced by Bukele.
El Salvador has not made any attempts to hide the treatment of the prisoners.
Bukele himself has shared videos touting the conditions.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK food delivery companies increase checks on illegal workers
The UK's three largest food delivery companies have announced increased security checks for riders after ministers raised concerns about people working illegally for the firms. Uber Eats, Deliveroo and Just Eat have committed to increasing the use of facial verification checks and fraud detection technology in efforts to ensure only those with registered accounts can work on their platforms. The changes were announced after the firms met Home Office ministers on Monday to discuss people using the platforms to work illegally. The new measures also came a week after after the shadow home secretary, Chris Philp, claimed to have found people working illegally for the firms during a visit to a hotel used to house asylum seekers. The new checks will be rolled out in the next 90 days. Just Eat, who already use facial recognition checks, will be upping them from monthly to daily. Angela Eagle, minister for border security and asylum, said: 'This government will not turn a blind eye to illegal working. It undercuts honest business, hits people's wages and plays into the hands of the people-smuggling gangs. 'I welcome Deliveroo, Just Eat and Uber Eats' pledge to increase facial verification checks following today's round table. We will keep a close eye on their progress and continue discussions. Justin Madders, the employment rights minister, said: 'Illegal working opens the door to mistreatment and exploitation, undercutting legal workers in the process by driving down wages and working conditions. 'We're already delivering the biggest upgrade to people's rights at work in a generation as part of our plan for change, and we will continue to engage with these companies to ensure these rights are enforced, building a fairer labour market.' A Deliveroo spokesperson said: 'We take a zero tolerance approach to anyone abusing our platform, and today's meeting with industry partners and the Home Office represents progress in our collective efforts to combat illegal working. 'The industry leading measures Deliveroo put in place over the last year have had a positive impact, but criminals continue to seek new ways to abuse the system. Today, we have committed to further strengthening our approach, increasing daily facial recognition checks, and we welcome the industry's commitment to do the same.' An Uber Eats spokesperson said: 'We are committed to tackling illegal working and welcome continued collaboration with industry and the Home Office, which is essential in raising standards and ensuring consistency. We will continue to invest in industry-leading tools to detect illegal work and remove fraudulent accounts.' A Just Eat spokesperson said: 'Just Eat fully supports the government's efforts to tackle illegal working, and we are continuing to invest significant resources to protect the integrity of our network. 'Today, alongside the government and wider industry, we're committing to further action to strengthen our systems and safeguards in response to these complex and evolving challenges.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
How does Rupert Lowe's Restore Britain differ from Reform UK?
Just when you thought politics couldn't fragment any further, along come two new political movements on the far right, both spawned from Reform UK like replicating amoebae. The very newest is 'Restore Britain', which proclaims it is not a party but a 'movement'. That one is led by former Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe. The other is the creation of former Reform UK deputy leader Ben Habib, and is a party, albeit a slightly peculiar one. Habib was sacked from his Reform role by Nigel Farage after the general election last year, and left what he called 'the cult' soon afterwards. Although Reform UK is still arguably the main force on the right of British politics, with a comfortable polling lead over the Conservatives, it has many smaller competitors, and has itself – including in its previous incarnations (Ukip, Brexit Party) – shown a distinct tendency to splinter at the first sign of success. After all, its chair, Zia Yusuf, recently resigned and un-resigned in one day. They're a volatile lot. Hasn't Habib got a party already? Well, he did have. 'Integrity' was its name. It actually never registered with the Electoral Commission, and as a corporate entity it has now been renamed Advance UK Party Limited, according to the records at Companies House. Integrity Party Limited was originally incorporated on 19 November 2024. Its directors were Habib himself; Christian Russell (resigned 11 April 2025); Richard Shaw (also resigned on 11 April); and Mohammad Sohail (resigned 13 December 2024). So Habib is apparently now its sole director, and he is the only 'person with significant control', holding, directly or indirectly, 75 per cent or more of the shares in the company. So is it democratic? That remains to be seen. It's curious, because one of the reasons Habib gave for leaving Reform UK was the personal control Farage exerted on Reform UK Limited – but this has now altered significantly (albeit Farage would still be practically impossible for the membership to depose). For what it's worth, Advance UK seems to have an extremely complex, opaque and unworkable system of governance, as part private company and part conventional political party. So: the board of directors (currently just Habib) approves policy and 'oversees' what is referred to as 'the leadership', while party members elect 'the college', which elects the leader and can remove him or her. (Habib is officially 'leader in waiting'.) The college is overseen by its chair, who is also the chair of the board of directors (Habib, presumably). It's almost as if Habib deliberately created a structure guaranteed to create internal friction and splits because he enjoys a ruckus, and likes things done his way or not at all. Not unlike Farage, Yusuf, Lee Anderson, and Lowe, in fact. Is it extremist? Quite possibly. Habib got into some bother last year when, as a Reform UK spokesperson, he advocated leaving migrants to drown in the sea if they refused the offer of a boat that would return them to France: 'We could, as an idea, provide them with another dinghy into which to climb and then go back to France. If they choose to scupper that dinghy, then yes, they have to suffer the consequences of their actions.' Challenged by the Talk TV host Julia Hartley-Brewer on whether he would leave them to die, he added: 'Absolutely: they cannot be infantalised to the point that we become hostage to fortune.' Sadly, some agree with him. It's a crowded field, though? Indeed, as the far-right fringe tends to be (mirroring the far left, as it happens). There's also the remains of Ukip, now run militantly by street politician Nick Tenconi (after the previous leader defected to Reform); Reclaim, led by Laurence Fox, though it's electorally inactive; and the 'SDP', which it's fair to say is unrecognisable to those who recall the 1981 Roy Jenkins version. There's also the Heritage Party, English Democrats, BNP and Britain First. Plus others. Could it work? Maybe if it got massive financial support from Elon Musk – he's no fan of Farage, and favours Rupert Lowe, but Lowe is not leading Advance UK. What of Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain? Aside from the Farage factor, an even more extreme 'mass deportation' stance, and an obsession with grooming gangs, it is hard to see how Restore Britain really differs that much from Reform UK, Advance UK, or various of the other organisations. In fact, eccentric as ever – or maybe cunningly – Lowe has thrown his movement open to people in any party 'if they share our values and want to be part of a bottom-up movement that has the potential to transform Britain'. Indeed, Habib, on the day he launched his own party, also joined Restore Britain; Lowe, however, shows no sign of joining Advance UK. Habib claims to be in constant touch with the maverick anti-burqa MP. Will they split the right-wing vote? Not to any noticeable degree. Advance, Ukip, Reclaim and the others will probably continue to have negligible electoral impact, generally lacking resources, mass membership, well-known personalities, local organisations, sympathetic coverage in the right-wing press, or their own television station – all advantages enjoyed by Reform UK, which of course also now has a significant body of elected representatives (though these are inexperienced at best). The scrap between the Conservatives and Reform remains the more significant one, bearing in mind that closer links between those two would also alienate moderate pro-Europe Tories who would then back the Lib Dems or Labour instead, basically out of fear and loathing of Farage. 'Unite the right' sounds appealing, but it would mean the end of the Tories, so it won't happen at national level. Under first-past-the-post, the next election could be quite chaotic. Anyone else on the extreme-right populist bandwagon? The cynically minded might add Keir Starmer and the Labour Party, who, at least in their 'island of strangers' moments, seem to have the attitude that 'if you can't beat 'em, join 'em'. Joking aside, some centre-left and centre-right parties in Europe have become increasingly hardline on immigration, albeit none want to leave the EU. They're not that mad.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Italy to issue half million non-EU work visas over next three years
ROME, June 30 (Reuters) - Italy will issue nearly 500,000 new work visas for non-EU nationals from 2026 to 2028, a cabinet statement said on Monday, as part of a strategy to expand legal immigration channels in response to labour shortages. A total 164,850 people will be allowed in next year, aiming to reach a cumulative total of 497,550 new entries by 2028. It is the second such move Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has made since she took office nearly three years ago as the head of a right-wing coalition. The government had already decided to issue over 450,000 permits to migrants between 2023 and 2025. Alongside rules to allow in new workers, Meloni has taken a tough stance against illegal arrivals, moving to speed up repatriations and curbing the activities of charities rescuing migrants in the Mediterranean. "The quotas were determined taking into account the needs expressed by the social partners and the actual applications for work permits submitted in previous years, with the aim of a programme that responds to the needs of businesses and is also realistic," the statement said. An ageing population and a sagging birthrate highlight the need to attract foreign workers in the euro zone's third largest economy. There were some 281,000 more deaths than births in 2024 and the population fell by 37,000 to 58.93 million, continuing a decade-long trend. Agricultural lobby Coldiretti welcomed the government's plan, saying it represented an important step to guarantee the availability of workers in the fields and the country's food production. "The government will continue with determination to allow legal migration channels, benefiting important sectors of our economy," Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi told daily La Stampa on Sunday. To counter the ongoing depopulation and maintain current levels of inhabitants, Italy would need to take in at least 10 million immigrants by 2050, according to research by the Osservatorio Conti Pubblici think tank.