Alabama official says methane ‘likely' caused fatal home explosion in Oak Grove
This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, non-partisan news organization that covers climate, energy and the environment. Sign up for their newsletter here.
OAK GROVE — For the first time, an Alabama official has said that a fatal March 2024 home explosion above an expanding longwall mine in the central part of the Yellowhammer State was 'likely' caused by the ignition of methane, a gas produced in the mining of coal.
The revelation came in a letter from Kathy Love, director of one of the state's mining oversight agencies, to federal officials who had demanded state regulators act to mitigate the risk of escaping methane in the wake of the March blast that led to the death of Oak Grove resident W.M. Griffice.
Love had refused to release a copy of the letter, but Inside Climate News obtained the document—the state's only formal response to an unprecedented regulatory action by the federal Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement—through a Freedom of Information Act request of federal officials.
Both state and federal officials had previously avoided attributing the explosion to escaping methane, despite the continued release of the potentially explosive gas at the site of Griffice's home, which was completely destroyed in the blast. A state fire marshal's investigation into the explosion had deemed the cause of the blast 'undetermined.'
In court documents related to a wrongful death suit filed by Griffice's family, lawyers for Crimson Oak Grove Resources, the operators of the mine, have denied the private coal company is responsible for the explosion or Griffice's death. The coal company did not respond to requests for comment on this story.
In the letter dated Jan. 14, Love suggested that the home explosion was a tragedy that could not have been envisioned by the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act , the 1977 federal law governing longwall mining in the United States.
'The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA) was written to protect the public and environment from hazards created by coal mining,' Love wrote. 'And yet in 1977 the authors of the SMCRA regulations could not have envisioned all circumstances that might result in danger to the public. Such was the discovery of an uncapped abandoned well under Mr. Griffice's home emitting methane gas that likely caused the tragic event of March 8, 2024.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
An Inside Climate News investigation revealed last year that Alabama residents have complained about the risks of methane explosions above coal mines for decades.
'Currently we are living in fear of gas escaping from the underground mines and causing an explosion or burns,' one Alabamian wrote in a letter to regulators in September 1999. 'There have been people killed who were above longwall mines.'
Another coalfield resident, Bobby Snow, put it more colorfully at the time.
'You can go down there and play or go down there and hunt, but don't smoke or you'll be standing in your smutty underwear wondering what the heck happened because the methane gas is coming up out the ground,' he told regulators 25 years ago.
Longwall mining involves a large machine shearing swaths of coal hundreds of feet underground, releasing methane gas and leaving vast underground caverns that collapse once mining has moved on. That collapse, experts say, causes subsidence, or the sinking of the land above, a process that often damages surface structures like homes or businesses.
Fissures in the land above the mined area can also provide a path of escape for the methane released during mining. It's that escaping methane that Griffice's family claims was the cause of the explosion that left their loved one dead.
Oak Grove Mine has been labelled by experts as one of the 'gassiest' in the country.
Specific risks posed by water wells above coal mines have also been on the regulatory radar for years. Federal regulators published a technical manual on how to deal with gassy wells in 2011, well over a decade before Love wrote that such risks were largely unforeseeable. Federal regulators pointed Alabama regulators to the manual, which had already been highlighted by Inside Climate News, in their communications late last year.
December's so-called 'ten-day notice' was the first time in the state's history that the Alabama Surface Mining Commission, charged with regulating the surface impacts of underground coal mining in the state, had been put on formal notice by its federal counterpart to force a coal mine's compliance with the law or face further regulatory action.
In the ten-day notice, officials with the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement wrote that investigators had determined that Oak Grove Mine in western Jefferson County may be out of legal compliance for failing to adequately monitor potentially explosive methane emissions from the mine.
The notice by U.S. regulators was issued following a federal inspection of the mine and visits to residences across Oak Grove that came days after an Inside Climate News investigation into federal inaction on the issue.
The state's response, reported here for the first time, is the first clear move by state regulators to address concerns over the risks of longwall mining since the March 2024 explosion.
State regulators had previously failed to act to address such risks and citizen concerns. It took regulators months to hold a public meeting for citizens to voice those worries, and officials said they had little power to intervene. So far, Alabama legislators have made no move toward proposing legislation to address the issues in Oak Grove, or risks from longwall mining more generally.
The inspection report underlying the ten-day notice shows that federal investigators followed in the footsteps of Inside Climate News' reporting on Oak Grove, visiting the Griffice home and the mine as well as the homes of Lisa Lindsay, Clara Riley and Randy Myrick, all residents profiled as part of the newsroom's Undermined series.
Love's January response to state regulators also confirmed that state regulators believe they have the power to shut down operations at Oak Grove Mine if they believe there to be an imminent risk to citizens.
'It should be noted that on September 18, 2024, ASMC met with the management of Crimson Oak Grove Resources (Crimson),' she wrote. 'During this meeting, ASMC stressed to Crimson that ASMC had the full authority to shut down the mine unless actions were taken to address the severity of the situation. The management team expressed their understanding and their desire to voluntarily go above and beyond SMCRA required rules and regulations.'
Love wrote that because of the risks involved, 'all Alabama underground mine operators should be required to evaluate and strengthen processes for identifying and locating both active and abandoned water wells and implement active methane monitoring processes to further protect public health and safety.'
Federal and state regulators will then 'conduct oversight to validate mine operator compliance with revised procedures,' she wrote, which will be implemented through revisions to subsidence plans required for all Alabama underground mine operators.
Oak Grove Mine has had a checkered safety history below ground. The mine ended 2024 with a record 870 safety citations and orders, according to the Mine Safety and Health Administration, totalling more than $1 million dollars in penalties, So far, nearly $790,000 of those penalties have gone unpaid.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
3 Red Flags You Are Romanticizing As Love, By A Psychologist
These three red flags might look like love, but in reality, they're clear signs that someone isn't ... More right for you. Here's how to learn the difference. When a relationship ends despite your best efforts to make it work, you might think 'I just wanted to be loved.' Perhaps you even convince yourself that you're not meant for the love you're seeking. You may even start to feel that relationships never work out for you, and no matter how much you pour into them, you always come out empty-handed. If this pattern holds true for most of your relationships, it doesn't mean you don't deserve healthy love. Instead, you may be replaying certain relational patterns that land you the same outcome each time. More often than not, we mistake familiar pain for love. This is often a childhood dynamic that follows you into adult relationships. With each cycle of seeking love and failing to get it in your life, you might notice that what you've been drawn to isn't a form of love after all. Here are three red flags we tend to misinterpret and romanticize as love, and how to identify them. 1. You Mistake Emotional Intensity For Passion Emotional intensity in dysfunctional relationships manifests as extreme lows followed by extreme highs. You may experience intense feelings and a preoccupation with your partner that borders on obsession, or may be drawn to partners who feel this way about you. In such a dynamic, every fight threatens to break your relationship, shake your foundation and make you question your self-worth, but every make-up comes with the certainty of forever — a mindset where you believe love will win it all no matter how hard it gets. In such relationships, it's hard to find your footing or make space for what matters because you're always on damage control. You forget that true love offers safety without unrealistic expectations, acceptance without conditions and validation without needing to earn it. Individuals with an anxious attachment style are especially prone to this dynamic, as emotional inconsistency can magnify their longing. This is where people often mistake unpredictability for love. A 2018 study published in Interpersona investigated the link between emotional intensity and romantic feelings in 80 young adults. It found that moderate stress in romantic relationships can heighten romantic feelings, creating a cycle where instability feels more compelling than peace. In contrast, feelings decreased under both low and high levels of stress. The next time you are ruminating about your relationship, ask yourself, 'Is this really pushing me toward connection or am I just addicted to intensity?' 2. You Are Chasing Validation, Not Love When you're stuck in a romanticizing pattern, you often chase validation instead of love. What drives you — often unconsciously — is the belief that, 'If I can finally get this person to love me, then I'll be worthy.' You seek their validation because, deep down, you may believe, 'I am not enough' — a belief that likely formed in childhood when your needs were dismissed or you were seen as too demanding. This internalized shame shows up in relationships as striving for approval, blaming yourself when things go wrong and surrendering your agency to avoid rejection. You don't look for someone who gets you — you look for someone to save you from addressing the aspects of yourself that you are too embarrassed to look at. A 2019 study published in the International Journal of Psychophysiology concluded that emotional neglect was associated with reduced oxytocin levels and insecure attachment patterns which collectively predicted higher social fear and avoidance. That is, when your need for safety is not met, it can impact you at both physiological and psychological levels, fueling the need to gain validation, avoid confrontation and re-establish a sense of safety. So, in relationships, whenever you catch yourself overdoing it — trying too hard to show your worth or overperforming for others — it's not love you may be seeking, but validation. Ask yourself, 'Do I really want this person to love me or do I just need them to see me — so I can finally feel worthy of loving myself?' 3. You Are Mistaking Control For Security When people think of security in love, they think of someone they can rely on in times of need. Someone who can take the wheel from them when they are too tired to drive, take over household responsibilities while they rest or support them through a difficult time. Emotionally, it's the equivalent of them drawing a blanket over you as you sleep. You know with certainty that they're there for you. That's what security looks like for most — the sense that no matter what life throws at them, they won't be facing it alone. That's often not the case when you end up romanticizing control as security. These dynamics look subtle. It could be your partner: You may mistakenly start to believe that such signs of manipulation are care. A 2016 study published in Sex Roles investigated how certain romantic beliefs — such as idealizing love at all costs, viewing jealousy as a sign of commitment or believing that romantic relationships should be intensely emotional — are related to the tendency to romanticize controlling behaviors. The researchers surveyed 275 heterosexual women aged 18 to 50 and found that women who endorsed these beliefs were significantly more likely to view controlling behaviors (such as jealousy, possessiveness or making decisions for the partner) as romantic. This romanticization, in turn, was related to higher reported rates of both psychological and physical intimate partner violence. Instead of acknowledging these red flags, people may interpret them as signs of love. What feels like security may, in fact, be the normalization of control. When you're torn between love and what's right, ask yourself, 'If my closest friend were going through this, would I still think it's okay?' When you recognize that you may have been romanticizing red flags all along, you can finally begin to choose a connection that feels safe, steady and real. Want to know if control dynamics are shaping your relationship? Take this science-backed test to find out: Relationship Control Scale
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Woman Questions Whether She Should Leave Her Fiancé Because of How He Treats Her Daughter
A 27-year-old woman took to the internet looking for advice on how to handle her fiancé's relationship with her daughter from a previous marriage The fiancé refers to the child as "your daughter" and doesn't want to make parenting decisions People on the internet advised the woman to talk to him about how she is feelingA woman took to the internet looking for advice on how to handle her fiancé's refusal to parent her daughter. The 27-year-old shares in a since-deleted Reddit post that she has a 9-year-old daughter from a previous marriage. Her first husband passed away when her daughter was only 3 years old. Meanwhile, she has been with her 26-year-old fiancé for four years, and though she is "absolutely in love" with him, she admits that her "first husband was the love of [her] life." She notes that her fiancé "respects" her feelings about her late husband, "which only makes [her] love him even more." Her issue, however, is that her fiancé 'doesn't see or treat [her] daughter as his own.' When they discuss their future together, he always refers to their future children as "our kids," but when they talk about her daughter, he always says 'your daughter.' 'If I ask him to help me out with my daughter or ask what he thinks about a situation I always get 'She's your daughter so it's your decision,'' the woman shares. Now, when she pictures their future together, all she can see is her "fiancé and our kids playing and having a father, while my daughter gets left out." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "I love my fiancé so much and I truly would love to get married and start a family with him but I can't do it if it hurts my daughter,' the woman shares. 'My daughter is my priority, she's my one true love, the best thing that's ever happened to me, my best friend, the reason I'm still standing and I would do anything for her, even if that includes sacrificing my marriage.' She fears that ending their relationship may be the "only option," but asked if anyone had advice on how to handle the situation. People in the comments suggested that the woman should talk to her fiancé about how she is feeling before making such a big decision. 'Have you actually discussed it with him, that you want him to act as her father?" one user asked. "Maybe he thinks he's doing the right thing by not interfering with how you bring her up?' Another user suggested that the man may not be "deliberately excluding" her daughter, but rather "not wanting to overstep boundaries by parenting 'your' child." Read the original article on People


Forbes
3 days ago
- Forbes
5 Common Pre-Wedding Fears You May Have, By A Psychologist
It's normal to have pre-wedding jitters, but you should take a moment to ask yourself: are these ... More feelings coming from real concerns or just nerves about the big day? You may have heard the phrase that the best type of divorce is the one that happens before marriage. Given the life-changing nature of this union, it may seem logical to flee if the decision seems 'wrong.' But is it really the rational step we think it is? Wedding jitters hit nearly everyone before they say 'I do.' Many start to rethink their decision when the planning for the big day starts. Their anxiety might peak when they're shopping for wedding outfits, planning venues and finalizing guest lists. They start to visualize what their married life could look like, and they wonder — what if they decided not to go through with it? Suddenly, just like that, they're lying awake at night wondering if they're making a mistake and panicking when everyone around them tells them how excited they are. Pre-wedding anxiety, or 'wedding jitters,' are extremely common, even among couples in loving, committed relationships. These thoughts signal the emotional weight of transitioning into a lifelong partnership. Here are five common pre-wedding fears you may have and here's what they might mean. 1. 'I'm Not Ready' As couples go through transitional phases of their relationship, like moving in together and getting engaged, they find it harder to back out, more so because of situational constraints, rather than love and devotion to one another. As a result, it may lead to an unsettling sense of doubt and sometimes, even paralyzing anxiety. Some may even realize how unprepared they feel for this change. A 2020 study published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships suggests that this may be explained by inertia theory, which suggests that couples often 'slide' through relationship stages without consciously deciding to move forward. The further they go, the harder it becomes to leave. This could be due to constraints like shared history, relational investments (e.g., living together), feeling comfortable or simply, because of the expenses involved in the wedding. '(The relationship) was my comfort zone, even though I was miserable it was what I was used to. I feel like it's hard for some people to get out of that routine,' says Laura, a participant of the study. Weddings symbolize a life-altering commitment, so it's natural for your brain to start assessing threats. You might start to question whether you're emotionally, financially or mentally equipped for marriage and anything less than an affirmative 'yes' makes you doubt your decision. Sometimes, people think that they need to 'have it all figured out' before embarking on this journey. But in truth, no one ever feels completely ready. Feeling ready takes time. It's more of a journey than a destination. A more helpful question to ask is: 'Am I ready to grow with this person and be loyal to them for life?' 2. 'My Life Will Change Forever' 'I realized that getting married means spending the rest of your life with this person and not that I couldn't have made that judgment call when he asked (me to marry him). I could have, but I didn't. And at that point, it kind of clicked. This is a lifelong thing and I don't think that I can do that,' says Cassie, another respondent from the 2020 study. The magnitude of this decision scared her. Not everyone feels ready for such a drastic change. Marriage often means building a shared identity alongside one's own, shaping one's routine around a life with another person and adjusting to changing family dynamics. This can lead many to worry that they'll lose their independence or the things that bring them joy. It also strays from their version of what 'life as usual' looks like. Change is scary: this transformative phase of engagement often leads you to grieve the version of you that was 'single' and parts of the life you may be leaving behind. It's normal to mourn this period. However, remember that marriage shouldn't take away from the things or the people you love, and that change can also positively impact your life. 3. 'What If They're The Wrong Person?' The time between your engagement and marriage is when tensions tend to peak for both partners in the relationship. They start to seek out potential red flags during this period that they may have previously ignored. What if your partner is a bigot? What if they dislike the activities and hobbies you enjoy? What if you realize that the two of you don't have as much in common as you previously thought? This is the time when couples may start projecting their fears onto each other and fighting more often. They may also consider ending their relationship or distance themselves from their partner to get some space. 'I wanted space to think about why I was having such a bad feeling about it, and I felt like being with him was making it really difficult to follow through with a really hard decision because I loved him,' explains Ruth, another participant from the 2020 study. Sometimes, partners go through 'relationship cycling' when they break up temporarily, only to resolve their issues and patch up later. However, there are also times when significant red flags arise that shouldn't be ignored. '(He) called me names, didn't like the relationship that I had with my mother. I found out he had been married, but not just once before, but two times. He cheated on his wife, not once but several times and so those red flags just continued to go up. And then as days, then weeks, then months went on, I formed a concrete wall,' another participant mentions. In such cases, it's essential to choose emotional safety and trust your judgement when something doesn't sit right with you. Additionally, it might be helpful to reflect on whether your fears about compatibility existed prior to the engagement. These are worth paying attention to, as they speak to relationship patterns that can determine your future. 4. 'Am I Settling?' Settling often means being with someone who doesn't match your expectations and accepting less than what you want or deserve. It can stem from a fear of loneliness, low self-esteem or choosing short-term comfort over long-term happiness. Research also confirms that a fear of being single is a common reason behind settling for less in relationships. You might wonder if you should've waited longer. Maybe, you would have found someone more ambitious, attractive or fun. In the age of dating apps and endless options, this fear has become more common than ever before. Many people think they can always 'do better,' even when they're with a highly compatible partner. This stems from the 'paradox of choice,' where having too many options makes it harder to make a decision, and ultimately lowers our satisfaction with the choice we make. Because of this, it might be tough to decipher between genuinely settling and being realistic. Even when you make good decisions, you may experience fear or regret because of the sheer presence of other choices. Remember that no partner is perfect. The real question is whether your values and goals as partners align and whether you feel emotionally safe and enriched. Ask yourself if you're okay with having an imperfect future with this person, or if you're choosing them just because you're scared to be alone. 5. 'Will Marriage Ruin What We Have Now?' Many consider romantic love the foundation of marriage and fear that long-term commitment inevitably kills romance. You might worry that it'll change or ruin your relationship and that once the honeymoon phase fades, you'll fall into a set routine and risk losing the passion you have now. But research states otherwise. A study published in Review of General Psychology conducted a meta-analysis of 25 studies and found that romantic love can exist in and help sustain long-term relationships, as long as it doesn't border on obsession. While obsession may lead to a spike in satisfaction in a relationship early on, it may negatively impact long-term relationships due to jealousy and control issues. What matters more in long-term relationships is companionate love, where the partners have a calmer, friendship-like connection. When your lover is also your best friend, your relationship takes on new meaning. You have to keep putting in effort to sustain it, and you gain the reassurance that you'll always have someone to weather the storm with. And despite valid fears, the idea of marrying your best friend can, indeed, be a profound source of comfort. Major life transitions are bound to scare you. But it's okay — and even necessary — to explore those fears. What do they mean? Where are they stemming from? Are they based on real-life concerns that need to be addressed? The idea that you should 'just know' if your partner is the one is overrated. So, talk about your thoughts, face your fears with honesty and remember that what matters most is that the decision feels right to you, despite the nerves. Does your relationship make you feel confident in the possibility of marriage? Take this science-backed test to learn more: Relationship Satisfaction Scale