logo
Income Tax FY 2024-25: How senior citizens can save more under these key provisions

Income Tax FY 2024-25: How senior citizens can save more under these key provisions

Mint5 days ago
As income tax return filing for Financial Year (FY) 2024-25 gains traction, taxpayers across the nation, especially senior citizens, are looking for ways to reduce and bring down their overall tax liability. Two key provisions of the Income Tax Act i.e., Section 80TTA and Section 80TTB provide deductions on the interest income for those selecting the old tax regime.
Section 80TTA permits individuals below 60 years of age and Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) to claim a deduction of up to ₹ 10,000 on interest earned from savings accounts held in banking institutions, post offices or cooperative societies. This particular benefit applies only if the taxpayer files under the old tax regime. Furthermore, this deduction does not apply to fixed or recurring deposits.
Senior citizens who are aged 60 and above can claim deductions of up to ₹ 50,000 under Section 80TTB. These deductions are permitted on interest earned from savings, fixed deposits, recurring deposits with banking institutions, post offices or cooperative banks.
Explaining the same point further, CA Sonu Jain, Chief Risk and Compliance Officer, 9Point Capital said, 'Senior citizens can save more tax under the old regime using Section 80TTB, which allows a deduction of up to ₹ 50,000 on interest from both savings accounts and fixed deposits. In contrast, those below the age of 60 get ₹ 10,000 under Section 80TTA,'
He further added that, 'Senior citizens should also be cautious of the fact that this benefit isn't available if the new regime is opted for when filing the ITR.'
It is critical to keep in mind that under the new tax regime applicable in FY 2024-25 and beyond, deductions under Section 80TTA and 80TTB are not permitted. That is why keeping the same thing in mind, taxpayers should carefully evaluate whether to opt for the lower slab rates under the new regime or simply stick with the old regime to claim the benefit of these exemptions.
In the case of taxpayers with high interest income, especially senior citizens, remaining in the old regime may provide greater benefits in FY 2024-25. Keeping the same points in mind, the tax saving potential of Section 80TTB makes it a crucial component of financial planning especially for retired government employees.
Further, those relying heavily on interest income for meeting their monthly expenses should check and analyse the long term tax implications before switching regimes as the old regime permits more flexibility through numerous deductions.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or tax advice. Readers are advised to consult a qualified tax professional before making any decisions related to investments and income tax planning.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bet value doesn't qualify as income under I-T Act: Egaming firms to SC
Bet value doesn't qualify as income under I-T Act: Egaming firms to SC

Business Standard

time2 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Bet value doesn't qualify as income under I-T Act: Egaming firms to SC

The bet money placed by users in online real-money games (RMG) is neither accrued nor received by casinos and, therefore, should not be considered as income under the Income Tax Act, RMG intermediaries told the Supreme Court on Tuesday. As per the Income Tax Act, a consideration is defined by law as any sum or value that is either received or recoverable from a user or a client in return for a service that has either been provided or will be provided. Since online RMGs do not accrue or receive the monies deposited by users for themselves, it cannot be considered taxable income, the counsel for the companies told the Court. He further explained that when people play against the casinos, they settle with the winners and losers and then take whatever is left as surplus. "We are not valuing the bet but the right to win. It's a different concept from bet far as the face value of the bet is concerned, it belongs to the winner," he said. The court will continue hearing online RMGs' arguments until Friday. In the last hearing, the companies had argued that the GST provisions before October 2023 were inadequate to impose a 28 per cent tax on online gaming operators in the manner attempted by the authorities. The government's reliance on Rule 31A of the GST Rules (value of supply in case of lottery, betting, gambling, and horse racing), introduced in 2018, was challenged because it lacked statutory authority under the Central GST (CGST) Act, the companies had said. On Tuesday, online RMGs also contended that attempts to tax actionable claims like betting and gambling as 'goods' by amending the Goods Rate Notification were flawed. Until October 1, 2023, there was no entry for actionable claims in the Customs Tariff Schedule, making their classification as goods unsustainable under GST. The petitioners (online gaming companies) explained to the court the distinction between platform fees, on which GST is already paid, and prize pool contributions made by players, which are held in trust and returned to winners. They claimed that prize pool contributions do not constitute consideration and thus cannot be taxed under GST. In the case of online games, they argued that these games are played against each player, with the online gaming operator merely providing platform services, and that the platform operator, as the supplier of platform services, has discharged GST during the relevant period at the specified rate. The division bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan is hearing the case, which deals with the absence of clear taxing provisions to enforce tax collection before the October 2023 overhaul. The case, with an estimated financial impact of Rs 2.5 trillion, is one of the biggest tax battles in India's history. The matter will continue on Wednesday.

Online RMGs tell SC bet money is not taxable income under Income Tax Act
Online RMGs tell SC bet money is not taxable income under Income Tax Act

Business Standard

time3 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Online RMGs tell SC bet money is not taxable income under Income Tax Act

The bet money placed by users in online real-money games (RMG) is neither accrued nor received by casinos and, therefore, should not be considered as income under the Income Tax Act, RMG intermediaries told the Supreme Court on Tuesday. As per the Income Tax Act, a consideration is defined by law as any sum or value that is either received or recoverable from a user or a client in return for a service that has either been provided or will be provided. Since online RMGs do not accrue or receive the monies deposited by users for themselves, it cannot be considered taxable income, the counsel for the companies told the Court. He further explained that when people play against the casinos, they settle with the winners and losers and then take whatever is left as surplus. "We are not valuing the bet but the right to win. It's a different concept from bet far as the face value of the bet is concerned, it belongs to the winner," he said. The court will continue hearing online RMGs' arguments until Friday. In the last hearing, the companies had argued that the GST provisions before October 2023 were inadequate to impose a 28 per cent tax on online gaming operators in the manner attempted by the authorities. The government's reliance on Rule 31A of the GST Rules (value of supply in case of lottery, betting, gambling, and horse racing), introduced in 2018, was challenged because it lacked statutory authority under the Central GST (CGST) Act, the companies had said. On Tuesday, online RMGs also contended that attempts to tax actionable claims like betting and gambling as 'goods' by amending the Goods Rate Notification were flawed. Until October 1, 2023, there was no entry for actionable claims in the Customs Tariff Schedule, making their classification as goods unsustainable under GST. The petitioners (online gaming companies) explained to the court the distinction between platform fees, on which GST is already paid, and prize pool contributions made by players, which are held in trust and returned to winners. They claimed that prize pool contributions do not constitute consideration and thus cannot be taxed under GST. In the case of online games, they argued that these games are played against each player, with the online gaming operator merely providing platform services, and that the platform operator, as the supplier of platform services, has discharged GST during the relevant period at the specified rate. The division bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan is hearing the case, which deals with the absence of clear taxing provisions to enforce tax collection before the October 2023 overhaul. The case, with an estimated financial impact of Rs 2.5 trillion, is one of the biggest tax battles in India's history. The matter will continue on Wednesday.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal rejects Congress' appeal against tax demand on ₹199 crore income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal rejects Congress' appeal against tax demand on ₹199 crore income

The Hindu

time5 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal rejects Congress' appeal against tax demand on ₹199 crore income

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on Tuesday (July 22, 2025) has rejected the Indian National Congress' appeal against an income tax demand on an income of ₹199.15 crore, saying that the party filed its returns past the deadline for availing of exemptions due to political parties, and that it also violated cash donation limits. 'We thus conclude that the assessee's return filed on 02.02.2019 is not within the 'due' date to make it eligible for the impugned exemption,' the ITAT said in its order. According to the order, the Congress filed its income tax return for the financial year 2017-18 on February 2, 2019. As per the Income Tax Act, 1961, political parties are allowed a later deadline for filing their returns. For the financial year 2017-18, that deadline was December 31, 2018. In its return, the Congress had declared nil income for 2017-18 after claiming an exemption of ₹199.15 crore under Section 13A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, the ITAT ruled that, since the return was filed late, it was not eligible for this exemption. In addition, the assessing officer also found that the Congress had received ₹14.49 lakh as cash donations, which exceeded the limit of ₹2,000 per individual. According to changes made to the Income Tax Act made through the Finance Act 2017, political parties can receive donations above ₹2,000 only through formal banking channels, not cash. Overall, the party's declared total receipts of ₹199.15 crore against expenses of ₹197.43 crore, thereby showing a surplus of ₹1.71 crore. However, the Income Tax Department's assessment order on July 6, 2021, denied that the income could be exempted from tax, making the full receipt amount taxable. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) then upheld this decision on March 28, 2023, following which the Congress approached the Appellate Tribunal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store