Pakistan, China Working On New Regional Bloc With Potential To Replace SAARC: Report
Pakistan and China are working on a proposal to establish a new regional organisation that could potentially replace the now-defunct South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), according to a media report on Monday.
Quoting diplomatic sources familiar with the development, the Express Tribune newspaper reported that talks between Islamabad and Beijing are now at an advanced stage as both sides are convinced that a new organisation is essential for regional integration and connectivity.
Citing sources, the paper said that this new organisation could potentially replace the regional bloc SAARC, which comprises India, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, the Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.
A recent trilateral meeting between Pakistan, China and Bangladesh in Kunming, China, was part of those diplomatic manoeuvres, they said, adding that its goal was to invite other South Asian countries, which were part of SAARC, to join the new grouping.
However, Bangladesh's interim government had dismissed the idea of any emerging alliance between Dhaka, Beijing and Islamabad, saying the meeting was not 'political'.
'We are not forming any alliance,' foreign affairs adviser M Touhid Hossain had said.
According to sources, India would be invited to the new proposed forum, while countries like Sri Lanka, Maldives, and Afghanistan are expected to be part of the grouping.
The main purpose of the new organisation is to seek greater regional engagement through enhanced trade and connectivity, the newspaper said.
It added that if the proposal is materialised, it would replace the SAARC, which has been suspended for a long time due to the India-Pakistan conflict.
Its biennial summits have not taken place since the last one in Kathmandu in 2014.
The 2016 SAARC Summit was to be held in Islamabad. But after the terrorist attack on an Indian Army camp in Uri in Jammu and Kashmir on September 18 that year, India expressed its inability to participate in the summit due to 'prevailing circumstances'.
The summit was called off after Bangladesh, Bhutan and Afghanistan also declined to participate in the Islamabad meet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
14 hours ago
- First Post
'Trump is desperate': Mamdani counters US president's jibes, says 'will fight back'
Zohran Mamdani, an Indian-origin candidate for New York City mayor, has hit back at US President Donald Trump, calling him 'desperate' after Trump threatened to deport him. Mamdani accused Trump of using personal attacks to distract from his failures. read more Zohran Mamdani, New York's Indian-origin mayoral candidate, has fired back at US President Donald Trump after Trump threatened to deport him, calling the president 'desperate.' Mamdani accused Trump of trying to divide people and using personal attacks to distract from his failures to help working-class Americans. In a video posted on X, Mamdani vowed not to back down, saying he would keep fighting against Republican efforts to silence dissent. 'Yesterday, Donald Trump said that I should be arrested. He said that I should be deported. He said that I should be denaturalised,' Mamdani said during a rally in New York. 'He's saying these things not only because of who I am—a potential first immigrant mayor, first Muslim, and first South Asian mayor of this city—but because he wants to distract from what I fight for. I fight for working people.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Since Mamdani's primary victory, Trump has repeatedly attacked him, calling him a 'communist' and a 'lunatic,' and making remarks about his background. Mamdani criticised Trump for fuelling division instead of addressing the struggles of working-class Americans across the country. He also condemned Trump's major tax and spending proposal, known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which faces a key vote in Congress on Thursday. More from World Is Zohran Mamdani at risk of losing his US citizenship? Mamdani claimed Trump is attacking him to avoid discussing the bill, which he argues would cut healthcare access and leave more people hungry. His comments come a day after Trump threatened to arrest Mamdani over his promise to limit New York City's cooperation with federal immigration authorities. 'Well then, we'll have to arrest him,' Trump said during a visit to a Florida detention centre, referring to Mamdani's vow not to assist ICE. 'We'll be watching over him very carefully on behalf of the nation.' Trump also falsely claimed Mamdani might be in the US illegally, saying, 'A lot of people are saying he's here illegally.'
NDTV
14 hours ago
- NDTV
Why Eating With Hands Is So Alien To The West, Why It Is Not To The Rest
Trigger Warning: Abusive comments ahead "Disgusting... like animals. I***F if it's culture... still disgusting." "Spoons exist for a reason, if you ask me." "That's f***ng psychotic - that's the same hand he literally wipes his a** with." "So unsanitary and 3rd world." "Animals such as dogs and cats and even ants etc. have better personal culture when eating than they do." If you're wondering where these are from, they're just a small sample from the thousands of racist, unfiltered, and dehumanising comments flooding social media in response to a now-viral video of Zohran Mamdani, the 33-year-old Democratic nominee for New York City's mayoral race in 2025, eating biryani with his bare hands. Zohran says his worldview is inspired by the 3rd world while eating rice with his hands — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) June 29, 2025 Yes, you read that right. A man eating food with his hands. Not committing a crime, not making a policy blunder. Just eating, the way millions do around the world. Eating with hands may not be a practice familiar to the West, but ridiculing those who do things differently definitely seems to be. Mamdani, the son of Ugandan academic Mahmood Mamdani and Indian-American filmmaker Mira Nair, was raised in a household where hand-eating was not just accepted, it was the norm. Like in many South Asian homes, meals weren't just about nourishment. They were rituals of connection, of culture, of comfort. And here's the thing: Eating with hands isn't just a cultural quirk or family tradition. It's ancient, intentional, and, dare we say, more delicious (A study shows this too). Since The Oldest Civilisations Way before forks and knives strutted into European dining rooms, humans were already eating. And eating fine without them. The Egyptians, Greeks, Mesopotamians and, yes, the people of the Indus Valley Civilisation (around 2500 BCE), all ate with their hands. It wasn't messy or uncouth. It was a mindful way of consuming food, believed to prime the body for digestion. In fact, the sacred Indian texts, the Vedas and the Upanishads, mention eating with hands as a practice that aligns the body and spirit with the act of eating. Each bite becomes a sensory experience involving sight, smell, taste, and touch. Ayurveda, India's ancient medical system developed more than 3,000 years ago, reinforces this. Wellness expert Luke Coutinho also further explains that touch stimulates digestive enzymes and signals the body to prepare for nourishment. So, while cutlery may offer convenience, hands offer connection - to food, to tradition, and to self. Geography Shaped Our Plates It also comes down to food types. Indian cuisine, with its fluffy rice, soft breads, aromatic gravies and tangy pickles, lends itself beautifully to hand-eating. Mixing and scooping with fingers allows us to combine textures and flavours exactly the way we want, a piece of naan dipped just right into dal, or a portion of rice mashed with curry to perfect consistency. In contrast, much of Western food - think roasts, grilled meats, pastas (with less spices and flavour) - is structured, needing to be cut or portioned. Hence, the rise of knives and forks. But even in the West, hands weren't always shunned at the table. What The? Cutlery didn't always rule Western dining tables. Forks first appeared in southern Europe around the 11th century, gained some popularity in 14th-century Italy thanks to pasta, and slowly made their way across Europe. But they weren't always welcome. Many considered them unnecessary. In America, forks became commonplace only in the late 18th to early 19th century. Before that, early colonists mostly used spoons... and hands. That's right. Hand-eating was once done by Americans themselves. Formal dining etiquette, and the cutlery obsession that came with it, was largely a classist invention. In medieval and Renaissance Europe, aristocrats used forks and knives as markers of sophistication. Manuals like The Courtier by Baldassare Castiglione outlined elite table manners to separate the wealthy from the working class. Today, you can spot these 'royalty' people teaching on social media on the 'right' way to eat food items. View this post on Instagram A post shared by William Hanson (@williamhanson) Anyhoo, back to history. As the middle class grew, they mimicked the nobility, adopting these customs to climb the social ladder. In the US, women played a major role in establishing table etiquette within families, helping normalise cutlery use among the middle class. Distinctively, Americans developed a fork-switching method (cutting with the knife in the right hand, then switching the fork over to eat) a practice celebrated as uniquely "American". In contrast, Indian dining didn't evolve as a display of wealth or class but as an expression of spirituality and culture. Eating with hands wasn't about status - it was about sustenance. What About Chopsticks? And then there are chopsticks. Slender sticks of wood or metal that have travelled across continents to become symbols of elegance and finesse. Originally developed in China over 3,000 years ago, chopsticks were first used for cooking and serving. By around 400 AD, they evolved into the main utensil for eating, spreading to neighbouring countries like Japan, Korea and Vietnam. But much like the fork in Europe, chopsticks were once a marker of sophistication and class, associated with refined etiquette and deeply rooted cultural values. In Japan, chopsticks (hashi) are more than just tools, they're part of a dining philosophy. From the way food is prepared into bite-sized pieces to the rules about how you rest your chopsticks between bites, every gesture reflects mindfulness and respect for the meal. Using them incorrectly, like pointing them at someone or sticking them upright in a bowl of rice, is considered not only rude but spiritually inappropriate, as it mimics funeral rituals. In Korea, the tradition is different. Chopsticks are often made of metal, and they're used alongside a spoon, a practice believed to have originated in royal court dining. Meals are communal, laid out with many side dishes, and using both chopsticks and a spoon ensures shared food is handled delicately and respectfully. Today, chopsticks have shed their once "exotic" label in the West and are now celebrated as markers of taste and cosmopolitan flair. From sushi restaurants, ramen bars, to pan-Asian fine dining spots. Religion Too Now, back to our fork, knife, spoon and eating with hands debate. Out of everything else, religion too played a significant role in promoting eating with hands. The right hand holds a significant place in Indian cultural beliefs and practices, deeply intertwined with many religious rituals and traditions. It is customary for Indians to use their right hand not only for eating but also for a variety of auspicious activities (like sharing prasad or applying tilak or giving blessing). This stems from a shared belief system where the right hand is considered pure, representing good deeds and positive intentions. This tradition is rooted in several religions in India, including Hinduism, Islam, Sikhism, and Jainism. The left hand, on the other hand, is traditionally viewed as impure, often reserved for tasks associated with personal hygiene. Let's Talk Dirty: The Matters Of Hygiene The only argument that the people who are calling eating with hands seem to be clinging to is hygiene. However, according to cultural anthropologist Dr Aditi Verma, "In Indian society, dining practices are not just about satisfying hunger; they are symbols of the society's broader perception of cleanliness and respect." Washing hands before and after the meals were also practiced as a tradition, which by the way, eliminates the question of hygiene. In every gesture made with the right hand, there lies a respect for the spiritual and physical purity that Indian culture holds dear. The influence of these beliefs extends beyond the dining table into daily life. For instance, when exchanging goods or money, or even shaking hands, many Indians still prefer using their right hand, as a gesture of goodwill. As urban lifestyles evolve, there has been a slight shift away from these customs, but they remain a vital element of cultural identity and heritage, especially in traditional communities. So, hand, knife, fork, spoon or chopsticks - whatever you want to use, the bottom line is this: people should be able to eat the way they want to without being subjected to racism, ridicule or mockery. Especially not for enjoying a plate of biryani the way it's meant to be eaten - by licking your fingers clean.
Time of India
14 hours ago
- Time of India
Jaishankar in US: EAM again refutes Trump's claim of brokering peace between India-Pakistan, slams selective stance on terror
After PM Narendra Modi, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday once again clarified that the ceasefire between India and Pakistan was a bilateral arrangement, without foreign mediation. The former diplomat criticised the selective global response to terrorism following the deadly Pahalgam attack on April 22. Speaking at a press conference in Washington DC during his ongoing three-day visit, Jaishankar reiterated that the 2021 ceasefire was negotiated directly by military officials of the two countries. The clarification comes in response to past remarks by US President Donald Trump, who had claimed credit for brokering peace between the two South Asian neighbours. 'It is a fact that often countries do not take a position when some other countries are victims of terrorism, which they would do when they themselves are. In that respect honestly, we have been much more consistent and principled. When terror attacks happen elsewhere outside India, we have largely followed the same position that we have taken when they have happened in India,' the minister said. Also Read : Jaishankar reacts to 500% US tariff bill over Russian oil; Says 'will have to cross that bridge when we come to it' Live Events He emphasised that diplomacy involves encouraging nations to support each other in such situations. 'Countries are not backing each other sufficiently enough and part of diplomacy is to exhort them, encourage them, persuade them, motivate them to do that, and which is why it's important to speak up, and which is why it's important to carry them with us to the best possibility,' he added. When asked about the US's role in mediating the India-Pakistan ceasefire following Operation Sindoor , Jaishankar refuted any third-party involvement. 'The record of what happened at that time was very clear and the ceasefire was something which was negotiated between the DGMOs of the two countries,' he said. Jaishankar, in Washington for the Quad foreign ministers' meeting, also met Indian-origin US officials including FBI Director Kash Patel and US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Discussions spanned bilateral cooperation on counterterrorism, drug trafficking, organised crime, and the broader global security landscape.
