logo
South Korea passes commercial Bill revision to tackle ‘Korea discount'

South Korea passes commercial Bill revision to tackle ‘Korea discount'

Business Times8 hours ago
[SEOUL] South Korea's parliament passed on Thursday (Jul 3) a revision to the Commercial Act to expand the fiduciary duty of board members to protect the interests of minority shareholders and try to boost the country's corporate market valuations.
President Lee Jae-myung, who was elected last month, had pledged to support the legislation to help eliminate what is known as the 'Korea discount'.
The discount refers to the lower valuations that South Korean companies typically trade at relative to their global peers, partly reflecting the dominance of family-owned conglomerates that have been criticised for putting their interests ahead of other shareholders.
A previous version of the Bill approved by parliament was vetoed by the conservative government of Lee's predecessor.
The latest version was a compromise backed by the conservative main opposition party.
'I am confident that the stock market improvements of revising the Commercial Act and eliminating negative competition factors will make the situation better than now,' Lee said at a news conference earlier on Thursday.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Lee said he had expected the country's benchmark Kospi stock index to rise above 3,000 points just by normalising the country's system, after six months of a leadership vacuum, and reaffirmed his pledge to usher in a period when the index tops 5,000.
It has been part of Lee's 'Kospi 5,000' initiative to amend the Commercial Act, along with other market reforms including winning an upgrade from emerging market to advanced market by global index provider Morgan Stanley Capital International.
'The amendment will raise foreign investors' confidence in domestic capital markets and the possibility of South Korea winning developed market status from index provider MSCI in the coming years,' said Seo Sang-young, an analyst at Mirae Asset Securities.
However, groups representing both large and small businesses expressed concern that the amendment does not do enough to protect directors from lawsuits, or company boards from speculative investors.
'We hope that discussions on ensuring defence measures for management rights... will take place as soon as possible,' said a statement from eight local business lobby groups, including the Federation of Korea Industries, the Korea Chamber of Commerce & Industry and the Korea Federation of SMEs.
The government plans to set up a task force on winning developed market status, the country's vice finance minister said this week, after MSCI said last month in its annual review that it would continue to monitor market accessibility in South Korea.
The Kospi rose 1.34 per cent on Thursday to close at 3,116.27 points, the highest since Sep 27, 2021, as investor sentiment was also buoyed by optimism around US tariffs after the trade deal with Vietnam reached by US President Donald Trump's administration. REUTERS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Latin America court calls for unified climate action as legal fights mount
Latin America court calls for unified climate action as legal fights mount

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Latin America court calls for unified climate action as legal fights mount

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox SANTIAGO - States have the obligation to cooperate in reducing emissions and protecting the environment to counteract climate change, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) said in an advisory opinion issued on Thursday. The court holds jurisdiction over 20 Latin American and Caribbean countries and the advisory opinion, requested by Colombia and Chile, said that countries must also regulate and monitor corporate emissions. States must also set emissions goals based on the best available science and should proportionate with contributions to respective emissions and not put on undue burden on future generations. The ruling builds on a global wave of climate litigation as countries, organizations and individuals are increasingly turning to courts for climate action. Last year, the European Court of Human Rights said climate inaction violates human rights and a South Korean court said that the country's climate change law does not effectively shield future generations. Vanuatu has also urged the top United Nations court to recognize the harm caused by climate change in its judgment on the legal obligation of countries to fight it and address the consequences of them contributing to global warming. The ruling is expected this year. REUTERS

Trump close to victory on flagship tax Bill
Trump close to victory on flagship tax Bill

Straits Times

time4 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Trump close to victory on flagship tax Bill

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The tax and spending Bill would be a major landmark in US President Donald Trump's political life, sealing his vision of US domestic policy into law. WASHINGTON - US lawmakers teed up a final vote on US President Donald Trump's marquee tax and spending Bill for the morning of July 3 after bruising Republican infighting nearly derailed the centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda. Almost 24 hours after debate began, Mr Trump appeared close to victory as Congress edged towards passing his 'One Big Beautiful Bill', despite misgivings in his party over a text that would balloon the national debt while launching a historic assault on the social safety net. The Bill would be a major landmark in Mr Trump's political life, sealing his vision of US domestic policy into law – and coming after he scored recent wins including in the Supreme Court and with US strikes that led to a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Speaker Mike Johnson struggled through the night to corral his rank-and-file Republican members after the package scraped through a series of 'test' votes in the House of Representatives that laid bare deep divisions in the party. It was on course for a final vote that would put it on Mr Trump's desk to be signed into law after passing its last procedural hurdle in the early hours of July 3 . 'We feel very good about where we are and we're moving forward,' an upbeat Mr Johnson told reporters at the Capitol. 'So we're going to deliver the Big, Beautiful Bill – the president's 'America First' agenda – and we're going to do right by the American people.' Funds for mass deportation The timetable could slip however as Democratic minority leader Hakeem Jeffries continued a long speech opposing the Bill that delayed proceedings by several hours. Originally approved by the House in May, Mr Trump's sprawling legislation squeezed through the Senate on July 1 but had to return to the lower chamber for a rubber stamp of the senators' revisions. The package honors many of Mr Trump's campaign promises, boosting military spending, funding a mass migrant deportation drive and committing US$4.5 trillion (S$5.7 trillion) to extend his first-term tax relief. But it is expected to pile an extra US$3.4 trillion over a decade onto the country's fast-growing deficits, while shrinking the federal food stamps program and forcing through the largest cuts to the Medicaid health insurance scheme for low-income Americans since its 1960s launch. While Republican moderates in the House are anxious that the cuts will damage their prospects of reelection, fiscal hawks chafed over savings that they say fall far short of what was promised. Mr Johnson has to negotiate tight margins, and can likely only lose three lawmakers in the final vote, among more than two dozen who had declared themselves open to rejecting Mr Trump's Bill. 'Abomination' The 869-page text only passed in the Senate after a flurry of tweaks that pulled the House-passed version further to the right. It offsets its tax relief with around US$1 trillion in health care cuts, and some estimates put the total number of recipients set to lose their insurance coverage under the bill at 17 million. Scores of rural hospitals are expected to close. Mr Johnson had been clear that he was banking on Mr Trump leaning on waverers, as the president has in the past to turn around contentious House votes that were headed for failure. The Republican leader has spent weeks hitting the phones and hosting White House meetings to cajole lawmakers torn between angering welfare recipients at home and incurring his wrath. 'FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!' Mr Trump, 79, thundered in one of multiple posts to his Truth Social platform as the July 2 marathon voting session spilled into July 3 . The Bill would underline Mr Trump's total dominance of the Republican Party in his second term, and comes as he relishes a major Supreme Court victory last week that curbed lone judges from blocking his radical policies. But House Democrats have signaled that they plan to campaign on the bill to flip the chamber in the 2026 midterm elections, pointing to data showing that it represents a historic redistribution of wealth from the poorest Americans to the richest. Mr Jeffries held the floor for his Democrats for more than four hours ahead of the final vote, as he told the stories of everyday Americans whom he argued would be harmed by Mr Trump's legislation. 'This bill, this one big, ugly Bill – this reckless Republican budget, this disgusting abomination – is not about improving the quality of life of the American people,' he said. AFP

New UK economic initiatives on government's first anniversary
New UK economic initiatives on government's first anniversary

Business Times

time5 hours ago

  • Business Times

New UK economic initiatives on government's first anniversary

THIS week, the UK government commemorates the first anniversary of its landslide election victory. Despite its big legislative majority, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has had a bumpy year in power and is seeking to regain the initiative with major new economic initiatives. This includes a comprehensive industrial strategy and new trade plan, both released in late June. These documents are designed to enhance the attractiveness of the UK to international investors, including in the Asia-Pacific region, ahead of potential further economic turbulence in July as the 90-day US tariff pause is scheduled to come to an end, barring any further changes of policy from US President Donald Trump. The starting point for the 10-year industrial strategy is that the global economy has entered a new era, especially with the re-election of Trump last November. Yet, in this Vuca (volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous) landscape with new risks to UK security and living standards, there is also significant opportunity. The strategy highlighted plans to turbocharge development in eight high-potential economic sectors representing 32 per cent of the economy. These are: advanced manufacturing, creative industries, life sciences, clean energy, defence, digital and technologies, professional and business services, as well as financial services. The government believes the United Kingdom is well-placed to seize advantage in all of these areas as a relatively open, entrepreneurial and dynamic economy. This includes a significantly sized finance industry, as well as universities and scientific institutions that are all internationally competitive. Building on political stability Starmer also hopes that, for the first time in the post-Brexit era, the UK investment landscape can be boosted by newfound political stability. The current government may be the first to last a four to five-year parliamentary term, without any change of prime minister, since the coalition administration led by then-prime minister David Cameron from 2010 to 2015. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Building from this relative political longevity, the Starmer government wants to try to build a new, deeper relationship with businesses. This includes a 'more muscular approach from government… to back British businesses, invest in our comparative advantage and take punts in pursuit of growth and productivity'. To be sure, this is probably not heralding a return to the UK government approach in the 1960s and 1970s of so-called picking winners to help ensure specific companies gain a comparative advantage in key sectors. What it does amount to, however, is not only designating growth sectors like clean energy, but more decisively addressing related questions such as what regulatory climate is needed for the UK to thrive. Meanwhile, the trade strategy comes on the back of several recent international wins for Starmer in this area. That is, a trade deal with India, a Brexit reset agreement with the European Union and a tariff deal with the US. Beyond these, the new strategy seeks, in the midst of growing protectionism, to rejuvenate the ideas of Scottish economist Adam Smith who authored The Wealth of Nations in 1776 – for the mid-2020s. The Starmer government wants the country to rediscover its heritage as a 'great trading nation', leveraging UK strengths, including diplomatic and industrial. The government also wants to see old ideas updated, including transforming 'services trade from a so-called invisible add-on to the balance of payments… heralding it as the indispensable core of the UK's contemporary export earnings'. More targeted deals The focus of the UK strategy is not just major powers like the US and India, but also a wide range of middle economies around the world. These include both key emerging markets like the Gulf Cooperation Council states and Mexico, alongside industrialised economies such as Canada, Switzerland and South Korea. Reflecting recent think tank reports, the new trade strategy's focus is not only on comprehensive long-term trade agreements with key partners. The Tony Blair Institute for Global Change recently highlighted that only three new trade agreements were inked from 2020 to 2024, and these are expected to boost exports by a modest £9.5 billion (S$16.6 billion) in the long run. This underscores the poor match between trade agreements, which tend to be time-consuming and goods focused, and the UK's core strengths in services and digital trade, as well as diminishing returns on investments. Over the same period, however, successive UK administrations resolved some 640 market access barriers, whose strategic bilateral market gains increasingly have the potential to deliver higher value, faster. An example cited as good practice is the UK's digital economic agreement with Singapore, which leverages British strengths as a tech and services leader and was negotiated relatively quickly in 2022. So rather than doubling down on slow-moving and broad trade agreements, the new trade strategy advocates for more targeted services-orientated market access deals that can be negotiated faster and deliver bigger economic impact. Starmer is hoping that this economic blitz of new strategies can help the government regain its footing after a challenging first year. Amid potential new US tariffs turmoil this month, the Starmer team thinks more investors could perceive the UK as a safe haven. In part, this is because of London's status as Europe's key financial centre. The pound sterling is still the world's fourth-largest reserve currency after the US dollar, the euro and the yen, amounting to around 5 per cent of global foreign exchange reserves. In turn, the government hopes this could lead to a big political reset moment, before the summer legislative recess begins, so it could try to move back onto the front foot and deliver the prime minister's pledged 'decade of renewal' well into the 2030s. This is plausible, although the Starmer team remains buffeted by a range of challenges, including over its controversial welfare reforms. In this context, there is growing speculation in Westminster of a possible July cabinet reshuffle. Starmer could potentially move weaker-performing members of his top team, among them Chancellor Rachel Reeves, after her challenging year in office. Taken together, the one-year anniversary of Starmer's government therefore has the potential to be a tipping point as it seeks to reset itself after an uneven 12 months in power. While the administration has such a big majority it will likely serve a four or five-year term, its ultimate success still remains in the balance. The writer is an associate at LSE Ideas at the London School of Economics

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store