
Major US cities on high alert after airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities
The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) in Washington, DC, released a similar advisory, noting increased coordination with local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies to share intelligence and ensure the safety of residents, visitors, and businesses. While MPD reported no known threats, it confirmed an increased police presence around religious institutions.In Los Angeles, Mayor Karen Bass also weighed in, stating that city authorities are 'closely monitoring any threats to public safety' in the aftermath of the US military operation.advertisement"There are no known credible threats at this time and out of an abundance of caution, LAPD is stepping up patrols near places of worship, community gathering spaces and other sensitive sites. We will remain vigilant in protecting our communities," Bass wrote in a post.Paul Mauro, a former NYPD Inspector, told Fox News that law enforcement is likely giving "special attention" to locations tied to communities potentially impacted by the strike. "You never know what's going to develop," he said, referring to patrols at both Israeli-linked sites and Shia mosques, given Iran's Shia identity.AIRLINES AVOID MIDDLE EASTSeveral international airlines diverted flights away from large swathes of the Middle East on Sunday, following U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Data from tracking platform FlightRadar24 showed a notable shift in flight paths, with aircraft rerouting to avoid Iranian and nearby airspace."Following US attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, commercial traffic in the region is operating as it has since new airspace restrictions were put into place last week," FlightRadar24 said on social media platform X.Flight tracking data showed a near-total absence of commercial air traffic over Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Israel, as airlines opted for alternate routes — either north via the Caspian Sea or south through Egypt and Saudi Arabia.In a televised address from the White House, US President Donald Trump announced that the American air force struck Iran's three main nuclear sites: Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow."Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier. Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight's was the most difficult of them all by far, and perhaps the most lethal," the President said.Speaking to Fox News, Trump said that six bunker-buster bombs were dropped on Fordow, while 30 Tomahawk missiles were fired against other nuclear sites. US B-2 bombers were involved in the strikes, an official told news agency Reuters.Must Watch

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Hamas says it has given a ‘positive' response to the latest ceasefire proposal in Gaza
DEIR al-BALAH, Gaza Strip: Hamas said Friday it has given a 'positive' response to the latest proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza but said further talks were needed on implementation. It was not clear if Hamas' statement meant it had accepted the proposal from U.S. President Donald Trump for a 60-day ceasefire. Hamas has been seeking guarantees that the initial truce would lead to a total end to the war, now nearly 21 months old. Trump has been pushing hard for a deal to be reached, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is due to visit the White House next week to discuss a deal. The Hamas statement came as Israeli airstrikes killed 15 Palestinians in Gaza early Friday, while a hospital said another 20 people died in shootings while seeking aid. The U.N. human rights office said it has recorded 613 Palestinians killed within the span of a month in Gaza while trying to obtain aid. Most were killed while trying to reach food distribution points run by an Israeli-backed American organization, while others were massed waiting for aid trucks connected to the United Nations or other humanitarian organizations, it said. Efforts ongoing to halt the war Trump said Tuesday that Israel had agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, during which the U.S. would 'work with all parties to end the war.' He urged Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen. In its statement late Friday, Hamas said it 'has submitted its positive response' to Egyptian and Qatari mediators. It said it is 'fully prepared to immediately enter into a round of negotiations regarding the mechanism for implementing this framework.' It did not elaborate on what needed to be worked out in implementation. A Hamas official said the ceasefire could start as early as next week but he said talks were needed first to work out how many Palestinian prisoners would be released in return for each freed Israeli hostage and to specify the amount of aid that will enter Gaza during the truce. Hamas has said it wants aid to flow in greater quantities through the United Nations and other humanitarian agencies. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to discuss the response with the press.


Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tejas Mk1A to finally fly out of factory this month: HAL chief says
Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) will roll out the first Tejas Mk1A fighter from its Nashik production line by the end of July, with integration and test firing of the Astra air-to-air missile scheduled for early August, Chairman and Managing Director DK Sunil told TOI. Nashik Facility Marks Key Expansion in Production The Nashik line marks HAL's third production facility after two existing lines in Bengaluru. 'The first aircraft from Nashik is already in final assembly and under testing. We expect the rollout in a month,' Sunil said. The facility is expected to produce three to four aircraft in its inaugural year, eventually supporting an annual output of eight. HAL is also leveraging a private-sector supply chain—VEM Technologies (centre fuselage), Alpha (rear fuselage), and L&T (wings)—to add six aircraft per year, increasing total production capacity to 30 by 2026–27. GE engine delays In 2021, India signed a deal worth $716 million for 99 General Electric F404-IN20 engines to power the Tejas fighters. Deliveries of the GE F404-IN20 engines, which power the Tejas Mk1A, were delayed to March 2025 due to supply chain disruptions, including the collapse of a South Korean components supplier. As a result, HAL planned to rotate the limited available engines to conduct critical test flights, aiming to deliver 12 Tejas Mk1A units this year. HAL has hinted at possible penalties for GE over missed delivery timelines. Also Read: Uttam Radar not so Uttam for Tejas? HAL picks imported Israeli radar over DRDO's desi AESA radar by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Missile Integration Scheduled for August HAL will integrate the DRDO-developed Astra missile in early August. 'We need to have some of the other issues sorted out like the firing of the missile, the Astra missile, which we plan to do in August, early August,' Sunil said. Indigenous radar replaced by a foreign one Earlier this month, it was reported that the indigenous radar may be replaced by the Israeli system. HAL has faced criticism for continuing to use Israeli ELTA radars in Tejas Mk1A under the current contract instead of switching midstream to the indigenous Uttam AESA radar. Sunil explained that although HAL initially contracted for 40 ELTA radars, certification delays for the Uttam radar and DRDO 's electronic warfare suite necessitated temporary reliance on imported systems. 'We waited until March this year, but when progress still hadn't been made, we moved forward,' he said. Addressing ASQR and legacy dependencies In response to concerns from the Indian Air Force regarding unmet aircraft staff qualitative requirements (ASQRs), Sunil attributed delays to legacy design issues and dependencies on partner agencies such as ADA and DRDO. 'Parallel efforts are underway to close these issues across multiple aircraft. It's not that there's no effort—it's just that the closure needs to be more structured,' he stated. Live Events Indian Air Force's future plans The Indian Air Force plans to induct a total of 352 Tejas aircraft from both the Mk1A and Mk2 variants. HAL remains on track to deliver all 12 Tejas Mk1A aircraft scheduled for this year. With engine supplies stabilising in the next fiscal and full production—with public and private sector capacity—expected to reach 30 aircraft annually by 2026–27, HAL aims to fulfil its commitments under the Tejas Mk1A programme.


Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who has the hand on Pakistan's nuclear button?
Amid reports of India hitting Pakistan 's nuclear-related military infrastructure during Operation Sindoor and US President Donald Trump repeatedly making claims about his intervention averting a nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan, John Kiriakou , a controversial former CIA officer and whistleblower, has claimed in a viral video that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is under the control of an American general. "The command and control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal has been placed under an American general by the Pakistani government,' Kiriakou said. Kiriakou is known for publicly confirming the US government's use of waterboarding and other forms of torture during the post-9/11 "War on Terror". He was stationed in Pakistan in the early 2000s as part of the CIA's counterterrorism operations and managed CIA–ISI joint operations. During his time there, he played a key role in the capture of Abu Zubaydah, a senior member of al-Qaeda, in 2002. Zubaydah was one of the first high-value detainees captured after the 9/11 attacks. In 2012, he was charged under the Espionage Act for leaking the identity of a covert CIA officer to a journalist and was imprisoned. Kiriakou has since become an outspoken advocate for whistleblower protections and a critic of US intelligence practices. Last month, a Pakistani security expert, Imtiaz Gul, ignited a controversy by claiming that Pakistan's strategically important Nur Khan airbase is under American control and even senior Pakistan Army officers are not allowed there. The airbase is also close to the Strategic Plans Division, which is said to be in charge of Pakistan's nuclear weapons. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Fungo nas unhas: um truque simples reduz facilmente Acabe com os Fungo Undo India called Pakistan's nuclear bluff during Operation Sindoor, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar repeatedly saying that India will not submit to Pakistan's nuclear blackmail. The control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal has been a subject of a lot of debate ever since 1998 when it joined the ranks of nuclear powers after conducting atomic tests. Besides Kiriakou's claim, various theories have been doing the rounds. There is speculation that the US has an emergency plan ready for Pakistan's nuclear weapons while many think close military cooperation between the two countries suggests a degree of American control over Pakistan's nukes. Live Events You Might Also Like: Does America have a plan to capture Pakistan's nuclear weapons? America's plan to "snatch-and-grab" Pakistan's nuclear weapons America's concerns over Pakistan's nuclear arsenal go decades back. It was reported by NBC News in 2011 that the US has a contingency plan to "snatch-and-grab" Pakistan's nuclear weapons, if and when the US President believes they are a threat to either America or its interests. Plans had been drawn up for dealing with worst-case scenarios in Pakistan, NBC news reported quoting several US officials, who said that ensuring security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons had long been a high US security priority even before 9/11 terrorist attacks. Among the scenarios drawn by the report were Pakistan plunging into internal chaos, terrorists mounting a serious attack against a nuclear facility, hostilities breaking out with India, or Islamic extremist taking charge of the government or the Pakistan army. NBC said in its 2011 report that the greatest success of the US war on terrorism, the military operation that killed Osama bin Laden in his safe house in Pakistan, had fuelled concerns about Pakistan's nuclear arsenal. The report said there were increasing suspicions among US officials that Osama had support within the ISI and the Abbottabad operation had emboldened those in Washington who believed an orchestrated campaign of lightning raids to secure Pakistan's nuclear weapons could succeed. In the aftermath of the bin Laden raid, US military officials testified before Congress about the security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons and the threat posed by "loose nukes" - nuclear weapons or materials outside the government's control. Earlier Pentagon reports also outlined scenarios in which US forces would intervene to secure nuclear weapons that were in danger of falling into the wrong hands. In an interview with NBC News in 2011, former Pakistan military ruler Pervez Musharraf had warned that a snatch-and-grab operation would lead to all-out war between the countries, calling it "total confrontation by the whole nation against whoever comes in". Pervez Hoodbhoy, Pakistan's best known nuclear physicist and a human rights advocate, too, said a US attempt to take control of Pakistan's nukes would be foolhardy. "They are said to be hidden in tunnels under mountains, in cities, as well as regular air force and army bases," he said. "A US snatch operation could trigger war; it should never be attempted." Despite such comments, interviews with US officials, military reports and even congressional testimony indicated that Pakistan's weaponry had been the subject of continuing discussions, scenarios, war games and possibly even military exercises by US intelligence and special forces regarding so-called "snatch-and-grab" operations, the 2011 NBC News report said. "It's safe to assume that planning for the worst-case scenario regarding Pakistan nukes has already taken place inside the US government," Roger Cressey, former deputy director of counter-terrorism in the Clinton and Bush White House, had told NBC News. "This issue remains one of the highest priorities of the US intelligence community ... and the White House." Pakistan's "emerging threat" to the US American concerns over Pakistan's nuclear arsenal narrated in the NBC News report in 2011 must have only grown over time as Pakistan stockpiled more nukes and also achieved greater military power. A decade later, in 2021, a Brookings article mentioned the American plan to capture Pakistan's nukes: "Indeed, since the shock of 9/11, Pakistan has come to represent such an exasperating problem that the U.S. has reportedly developed a secret plan to arbitrarily seize control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal if a terrorist group in Pakistan seemed on the edge of capturing some or all of its nuclear warheads," wrote Marvin Kalb. "When repeatedly questioned about the plan, U.S. officials have strung together an artful, if unpersuasive, collection of 'no comments.' Last year, the US was alarmed by a new development in Pakistan. A senior White House official said in December that nuclear-armed Pakistan was developing long-range ballistic missile capabilities that eventually could allow it to strike targets well beyond South Asia, making it an "emerging threat" to the US, Reuters reported. Deputy National Security Adviser Jon Finer's surprise revelation underscored how far the once-close ties between Washington and Islamabad had deteriorated since the 2021 US troop withdrawal from Afghanistan. Speaking to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Finer said the number of nuclear-armed states with missiles that could reach the US homeland "is very small and they tend to be adversarial," naming Russia, North Korea and China. "So, candidly, it's hard for us to see Pakistan's actions as anything other than an emerging threat to the United States," he said. An official told Reuters that the threat posed to the US is up to a decade away. Finer's speech came a day after Washington announced a new round of sanctions related to Pakistan's ballistic missile development program, including for the first time against the state-run defense agency that oversees the program.