Prada looks at collaboration with Indian footwear artisans after sandal scandal
MUMBAI/MILAN (Reuters) -Prada is looking to collaborate with "artisanal footwear" makers in India in a partnership, it said on Friday, two weeks after the Italian luxury group triggered a controversyby debuting ethnic sandals resembling 12th-century Indian ones.
After viral photos from a Milan fashion show drew criticism from Indian artisans who make the sandals - named after the historic city of Kolhapur in Maharashtra state - Prada was forced late last month to acknowledge that its new open-toe footwear was inspired by ancient Indian designs.
The furore even saw sales of Indian sandals boom, with sellers and artisans seeing the controversy as a way to promote the heritage craft by tapping into nationalist pride.
Prada said in a statement to Reuters that it held talks remotely on Friday with the Maharashtra Chamber of Commerce, which represents 3,000 Kolhapuri sandal artisans, and discussed potential opportunities for future collaboration.
"The next step will be for Prada's supply chain team to meet a range of artisanal footwear manufacturers," the company said.
The Maharashtra Chamber of Commerce said that Lorenzo Bertelli, son of Prada's owners and head of its corporate social responsibility, joined the talks on Friday.
The chamber of commerce said that during the talks Prada said it aimed to launch a limited-edition "Made in India" Kolhapuri-inspired collection of sandals in partnership with Indian artisans.
India's luxury market is small but growing, with the rich splurging on designer fashion, top end sports cars and pricey watches.
Prada does not have any retail stores in India, and its products are usually reserved for the super rich who shop overseas.
The sandal scandal left the social media abuzz for days with criticism and sarcastic memes, with Indian politicians, artisans and the Maharashtra Chamber of Commerce demanding due credit to Indian heritage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Nissan has a genius plan to make money from auto tariffs
Nissan was not quite ready to become a subsidiary at the start of the year. On February 13, Honda CEO Toshihiro Mibe announced that the two Japanese carmakers would not consummate their merger agreement, which would have created the third-largest carmaker in the world by sales. Related: Toyota and Honda play a giant role in US-Japan trade negotiations Apparently, at the last minute, Honda proposed to divert from its original intention to one where "Honda would be the parent company and Nissan the subsidiary through a share exchange," a condition that broke down talks. Nissan and Honda (HMC) announced their intent to merge in December. Still, a month earlier, Nissan execs told the Financial Times that the automaker had "12 to 14 months" to survive if circumstances didn't improve. In May, Nissan announced it will be laying off 20,000 workers, about 15% of its workforce, including the 9,000 it announced in 2024 would be laid off through March 2028. Nissan is also closing seven of its 17 global factories. The moves are all part of a recovery plan to reduce costs by $3.4 billion. But instead of reducing costs, Nissan's latest move raises money by using the current tariff environment to its advantage. While President Donald Trump's administration has been in close contact with the auto industry throughout the process, the 25% auto tariffs he imposed in April have had long-lasting repercussions, as intended. Trump declared Liberation Day on April 2, 2025, but the auto industry, particularly in Japan, had been preparing for this eventuality for months. "We will be looking at how to absorb short-term shocks and what concrete measures we can take to deal with these shocks, as well as how to deal with them in an all-Japan manner," said Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association Chairman Masanori Katayama. Additionally, Katayama said the group discussed its strategies to absorb and mitigate potential tariffs with the country's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry officials. Nissan is reportedly negotiating a creative strategy to earn money while also helping a fellow Japanese automaker. Related: Nissan makes shocking move to battle tariffs Nissan is in talks to supply cars to Honda in the U.S., using the unused manufacturing capacity at its Canton plant in Mississippi. The company is considering building Honda pickup trucks at the Canton plant, where it currently builds models like its Frontier pickup. Nissan said in a statement viewed by Reuters that it would continue to work with Honda but would not speculate on any future plans. While Trump has pushed back his negotiations by another month, it appears that the U.S. and Japan are still far apart in negotiations. Ryosei Akazawa, Japan's lead trade negotiator, said Tuesday that negotiations must include auto industry concessions. Akazawa said he held a 40-minute phone call with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik, where "we are trying to agree on a package of measures." According to Reuters, those measures include expanded trade, non-tariff barriers, and cooperation on key economic security issues. However, the biggest issue on the table is Japan's auto sector. "There's no point striking a deal with the U.S. without an agreement on automobile tariffs," Akazawa said. "The two countries must garner trust through sincere dialogue, and reach common ground step by step. Through such a process, my job as negotiator is to agree on a full package as soon as possible." While General Motors still has the highest market share at 17% and Ford ranks third with a 13% market share, foreign models from Asia round out the top five, according to Cox Automotive data. Toyota ranks second with 15% U.S. market share, while Korean brand Hyundai ranks fourth with 11%. Toyota's fellow Japanese brand, Honda, is fifth in the market, with 9%. Related: President's latest interview gives US automakers much-needed boost The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Hamilton Spectator
4 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Anand says Indo-Pacific strategy will have economic focus but maintain values
OTTAWA - Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand says the economy is becoming the primary focus of Canada's relationships in the Indo-Pacific — a shift that appears linked to Canada's recent moves to overcome its security dispute with India. Anand was in Japan and Malaysia this week for her first trip to the region since taking over as foreign minister in May. Her message coming out of that trip was that Canada's foreign policy is shifting — though not abandoning — the priorities set by the previous Liberal government of former prime minister Justin Trudeau. 'It is important for us to revisit our policy — not only in the Indo-Pacific but generally speaking — to ensure that we are focusing not only on the values that we have historically adhered to,' Anand said Thursday in a teleconference from Malaysia. 'Foreign policy is an extension of domestic interest and particularly domestic economic interests. This is a time when the global economy is under stress.' The Trudeau government put language on environmental protection, labour standards and gender equality in its trade agreements. Goldy Hyder, head of the Business Council of Canada, said that made Canada appear 'a bit preachy' to other countries. He said Canada has to be respectful in the way it stands up for democratic values. A focus on the economy is quickly becoming a defining trait of the government of Prime Minister Mark Carney, a former central banker who is intent on building up Canada's domestic capacity and reshaping its trade and security plans to rely less on the United States. Carney has been mostly focused on Europe so far; he has visited the continent three times since March. Anand's visit this week 'sets the stage' for Carney's planned visits this fall to the Association of South East Asian Nations leaders' summit in Malaysia and the APEC forum in South Korea, said Vina Nadjibulla, research vice-president for the Asia Pacific Foundation. Anand visited Tokyo to sign an information-sharing agreement that could lead to defence procurement deals, before heading to Malaysia for a meeting of the Association of South East Asian Nations, or ASEAN. Her visit also comes as Canada tries to restore ties with India after two years of diplomatic chill following the 2023 shooting death of Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar near Vancouver — a crime Ottawa linked to agents of the Indian government. The RCMP said last year it had evidence of New Delhi playing a role in acts of homicide, coercion and extortion targeting multiple Sikh-Canadians. Canada subsequently expelled six senior Indian diplomats; New Delhi expelled six Canadian diplomats in response. India claims Canada is enabling a separatist movement that calls for a Sikh homeland — Khalistan — to be carved out of India, and calls that a violation of its sovereignty. Carney began to thaw the relationship in June. He invited Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the G7 summit in Alberta and the two leaders agreed to reinstate their high commissioners. The two countries are also starting security talks. As the world's most populous country, India is seen as a critical partner as Carney pushes to disentangle Canada from its heavy reliance on trade with the U.S. The two countries have engaged in on-and-off negotiations on a trade deal since 2010, with frequent pauses — including Ottawa's suspension of talks after the Nijjar assassination. Hyder said India's corporate sector has been urging Canadian corporations to continue expanding trade in spite of the tensions between Ottawa and New Delhi. 'One day this is all going to be resolved, and we don't want to have lost all that time,' he said. He said the reduced number of Canadian diplomats has made it more challenging for members of his council to engage in India, because there are fewer trade commissioners in India to help Canadians connect companies with contacts and opportunities on the ground. Hyder, who spoke just before leaving for a fact-finding mission to India, said the appointment of high commissioners will set the tone for eventual trade talks. He said a trade deal would be helpful but is not 'a precondition' for boosting trade, and suggested Ottawa should focus on scaling up the roads and ports needed to meet Asia's demand for Canadian commodities. Vijay Sappani, a fellow with the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, said an India trade deal could come quite soon. 'If we put in the right efforts on our end, I feel like we could probably get a free-trade agreement done before the end of this year, if not (the first quarter) of next year,' said Sappani. 'There is no Indo-Pacific without India, and if we want to play in the global markets, where we've been kind of shunned … then we need to step up to the plate.' Sappani said Ottawa should seek assurances from India that it will never play a role in violence in Canada. In turn, he said, Ottawa could commit to not having politicians show up at any event where there are displays commemorating those who took part in violence in support of the Khalistan movement. 'That is the biggest thing that we Canadians can do to stop some level of irritants within the Indian side, and trade definitely will come on back on the table,' he said. Anand would not say how soon Canada and India could appoint top envoys, or start trade talks. 'We will take the relationship with India one step at a time,' she said Thursday. 'That timeline will be steady, not immediate.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 12, 2025.
USA Today
5 hours ago
- USA Today
Would Mamdani's 'millionaire tax' chase the rich out of New York City?
In her unsuccessful 2024 presidential campaign, Democratic candidate Kamala Harris pledged to preserve most of Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts, with at least one notable exception: She would have raised taxes on the wealthiest Americans. Now, the Democratic nominee for mayor of New York is floating a similar proposal. Among other plans, Zohran Mamdani wants to raise income taxes on the wealthiest New Yorkers by 2%. The idea, in both cases, is to create revenue by taxing rich people and use the money to pay for other initiatives. Harris sought taxes from the wealthy to pay down the nation's estimated $2 trillion deficit. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, wants free city buses and a freeze on New York rents. Taxing the rich has worked before. In the World War II era, the wealthiest Americans endured a top tax rate above 90% to buoy the economy. But would it work now? Millionaires might flee higher taxes The standard objection is that raising taxes on wealthy Americans will chase them away. They will leave the city, the state or the country, or take steps to avoid paying taxes, such as moving wealth offshore. Here's how opponents greeted Mamdani's proposal: New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, who could veto a tax hike, has said it would prompt millionaires to flee. 'I don't want to lose any more people to Palm Beach,' she told a television interviewer, according to the New York Post. In a commentary for Reuters, financial writer Marty Fridson warned of 'the possibility, if not the probability, that many high earners will leave NYC to escape the added tax bite.' The New York Times assembled a rail of escape-from-New-York quotes from business leaders. Sample: 'We may consider closing our supermarkets and selling the business,' said John Catsimatidis, owner of the Gristedes chain, speaking to The Free Press. Mamdani's campaign estimates that a 2% tax on New Yorkers earning more than $1 million a year would raise $4 billion a year. That projection wouldn't pan out, of course, if enough millionaires left the city to avoid the tax. Are 'millionaire tax' warnings overblown? Are the dire warnings overblown? Maybe so, according to copious research on taxes and their impact on migration. But a lot depends on whom you ask. Higher taxes don't generally prompt wealthy people to move, said Kamolika Das, local policy director at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a left-leaning think tank. 'Tax policies just really don't drive relocation decisions,' Das said. 'They've been claiming this for a long time, and there's just very scant evidence to support it.' A 2023 study by the nonpartisan Fiscal Policy Institute found 'no evidence of significant tax-motivated migration' from New York State, even after tax increases. The main reasons: Top 1% earners move at a lower rate than other income groups. And when they do move, they generally relocate from one high-tax area to another. In 2004, New Jersey raised its top income tax rate on high earners by 2.6 percentage points. 'In the next year, a total of 37 millionaires left,' said Lindsay Owens, executive director of the Groundwork Collaborative, a progressive thinktank. 'But in that very same year, the millionaire population of New Jersey increased by more than 3,000 individuals.' Not all researchers agree. California lost high earners over taxes Fridson, the Reuters columnist, cites a study from the nonprofit California Center for Jobs & the Economy. It shows a net loss of $5.3 billion in personal income tax from high earners leaving California in a five-year span after a 2016 ballot measure that extended higher taxes on the wealthy. Higher taxes in New York 'will raise revenue. There's no question of that,' said Jared Walczak, vice president of state projects at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation. But a tax hike 'does drive some people out,' he said, 'and it can be more significant in New York City than it would be at the state or the national level.' Leaving the United States over taxes is one thing, Walczak said. Moving from Manhattan to Hoboken, New Jersey, is quite another. 'It is much harder to leave a country than to leave a state,' he said, 'and harder to leave a state than to leave a city.' Walczak notes that the 2% tax increase proposed by Mamdani is a flat rate on all income earned by a wealthy New Yorker, 'down to their first dollar.' It would raise the top tax rate in the city from roughly 3.9% to 5.9%. At that rate, high earners 'would be paying more in city taxes in New York than they would be paying in state taxes in most states,' Walczak said. The remote-work boom of recent years spawned pandemic "boom towns," generally lower-tax cities that filled up with refugees from higher-tax cities who could work remotely. "I could work for a firm in New York City but take my residence to, I don't know, Austin, Texas, where they don't have any income tax," said Therese McGuire, professor of strategy at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management. Research by the Tax Foundation shows that high-tax states tend to lose residents to other states, while low-tax states tend to gain them. Taxes are one factor among many, including jobs, weather, quality of life and the broader cost of living. Other studies suggest that millionaire tax flight is happening, but 'only at the margins,' and at a negligible rate. 'We make our decisions about where to locate ourselves and our families based on a whole host of considerations, many of which are not pecuniary,' Owens said.
