Senior N. Korean presence at PLA banquet marks thaw in China Ties
Chinese Ambassador to North Korea Wang Yajun hosted the event at the embassy on Tuesday to mark the 98th anniversary of the founding of the People's Liberation Army, which falls on August 1, North Korean state media reported Wednesday.
"The banquet participants raised their glasses for … the militant friendship and unity between the armies of the DPRK and China, and for the continuous strengthening and development of the Chinese People's Liberation Army,' the Rodong Sinmun, the official newspaper of the ruling Workers' Party of Korea, reported.
DPRK is the abbreviation for North Korea's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
The celebration was notably attended by senior North Korean officials, including Vice Defense Minister Kim Kang-il, Deputy Director of the General Political Bureau of the Korean People's Army Pak Yong-il, Deputy Director of the Party Central Committee Mun Song-hyok and Vice Foreign Minister Pak Myong-ho.
Pak Yong-il delivered a congratulatory speech at the reception, according to the Chinese Embassy in Pyongyang.
'He stated that the Chinese and Korean militaries fought side by side in multiple wars to resist imperialist invaders, standing shoulder to shoulder in the same trench and creating a shining example of friendly unity,' Pak was quoted as saying in a Chinese-language statement provided by the Chinese embassy.
'The DPRK side is willing to work together with the Chinese side, in accordance with the noble will of the top leaders of the two parties and two countries, to jointly make efforts to provide solid support for the development of DPRK–China friendly relations and the socialist cause of both countries," Pak was quoted as saying in the statement.
North Korea has marked the PLA anniversary in various ways — though not consistently each year — such as publishing occasional editorials in the Rodong Sinmun or dispatching envoys to banquets hosted by the Chinese Embassy in Pyongyang.
Although this year did not mark a quinquennial milestone such as the 90th or 95th anniversary, North Korea still dispatched senior officials to the PLA event. The move echoed the 2017 reception for the 90th anniversary, which was attended by then–Deputy Minister of the People's Armed Forces Kang Sun-nam.
Beijing and Pyongyang reconnect
Tuesday's event was one of the emerging signs of thawing ties between China and North Korea, following a period of strained relations that overlapped with North Korea's closer alignment with Russia.
North Korea on July 9 sent higher-ranking officials than in previous years to a banquet hosted by the Chinese Embassy in Pyongyang, commemorating the 64th anniversary of the 1961 Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance between the two countries.
While last year's event was attended by Kim Sung-chan, president of Kim Il Sung University and chair of the DPRK-China Friendship Parliamentary Group under the rubber-stamp Supreme People's Assembly, this year saw the presence of Kang Yun-sok, vice president of the SPA Presidium — a notable upgrade in diplomatic protocol.
The Rodong Sinmun published the article "DPRK-China Friendship and Cooperation Strengthening Along the Socialist Path," highlighting the enduring significance of the treaty on July 11, the day the treaty was forged.
The Rodong Sinmun has traditionally carried an article marking the anniversary of the 1961 pact. Speculation of strained ties arose when no such article appeared last year. However, this year, the coverage reappeared.
Although 2024 was designated as the "Year of DPRK-China Friendship" to commemorate the 75th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the two countries, no high-profile events took place that year.
Separately, North Korea's state-run tourism website DPRK Tourism posted a schedule of international train routes in mid-July. The list included round trips between Pyongyang and Beijing, Pyongyang and Dandong, and Pyongyang and Moscow.
All three routes had been suspended since February 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Service on the Moscow line resumed in mid-June this year, while the Beijing and Dandong routes to China remain inactive. If resumed, cross-border passenger rail service with China would return more than after five and a half years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Wang Son-taek] As NATO falters, the SCO advances](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F07%2F23%2Fnews-p.v1.20250723.aeda4d9065f746e8965f661ef19a7644_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Wang Son-taek] As NATO falters, the SCO advances](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Wang Son-taek] As NATO falters, the SCO advances
When the Cold War ended in 1991, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization inevitably faced serious concerns over its continued existence. NATO had been a multilateral alliance ensuring peace and stability against potential invasion by the Soviet-led socialist bloc. But with the collapse of the Soviet Union and other socialist forces, the justification for NATO's existence disappeared. After much deliberation and debate, NATO has sought to redefine its role by emphasizing its function as a supporter of the US-led liberal international order on a global scale. However, NATO now finds itself seriously weakened by the "ally-bashing" policy of US President Donald Trump. In the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, while NATO member states agree on the need to strengthen military capabilities, they find themselves bewildered and betrayed by the excessively aggressive demands of the United States. While NATO member states are suffering from dizziness, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, led by China and Russia, is displaying a contrasting vitality. Judging by the recent diplomatic movements of the two leading nations, it is clear that the SCO is gaining new momentum. It cannot be ruled out that the SCO may become a meaningful multilateral alliance capable of rivaling NATO. Among those engaged in SCO-related diplomacy, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has shown the most dynamic activity. On July 9 and 10, he attended the ASEAN Regional Forum in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and articulated Russia's position. In normal times, his participation would not be particularly noteworthy. But now it holds significance. Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the country has borne the stigma of a war criminal state and shown signs of diplomatic isolation for more than three years. This time, by attending the ASEAN forum, Russia signaled a more active diplomatic posture. Following his Kuala Lumpur visit, Lavrov flew to Wonsan, North Korea. He was warmly received by Chairman Kim Jong Un, and they discussed enhancing strategic cooperation between North Korea and Russia. Lavrov demonstrated solidarity with North Korea by actively participating in tourism promotion events celebrating the opening of the Wonsan-Kalma tourist zone, one of Chairman Kim's flagship projects. Lavrov's efforts to manage the relationship with North Korea will likely help Russia escape its diplomatic isolation. Lavrov's next destination after Wonsan was Tianjin, China, to attend the SCO foreign ministers' meeting. He held a meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and paid a courtesy visit to President Xi Jinping. During the talks, Lavrov coordinated the schedule for Russian President Vladimir Putin's visit to Beijing. Putin is scheduled to attend the SCO summit in Tianjin at the end of August and then participate in China's Victory Day military parade in early September. This summit, following Xi Jinping's visit to Moscow in May, marks the second summit between the Chinese and Russian leaders in four months. Lavrov also met with India's Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar in China and reaffirmed a commitment to deepening the strategic partnership between the two countries. Notably, he proposed reviving the RIC (Russia-India-China) trilateral cooperation framework. This initiative, aimed at building a multipolar order to replace the US-centered unipolar world, is significant as it seeks to structurally reshape the international system. China has also been exhibiting dynamic diplomacy this year. In April, President Xi Jinping toured three countries — Vietnam, Malaysia and Cambodia. In May, he paid a state visit to Russia. In June, he visited Kazakhstan to attend the China-Central Asia Summit. While Xi's foreign travels are not unprecedented, in light of rumors suggesting his political downfall, his recent trips symbolize a proactive diplomatic posture. Xi notably met with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov and Indian Foreign Minister Jaishankar during the SCO foreign ministers' meeting. Despite ongoing tensions over border issues, China's success in improving relations with India could position it as a mediator in the India-Pakistan conflict, thereby expanding its diplomatic influence. This indicates that China is trying to turn the tide diplomatically through the SCO summit. The frantic diplomatic moves by China and Russia are significantly influenced by the bizarre foreign policy of the United States. Since taking office in January, President Trump has imposed absurdly high tariffs on other countries and demanded concessions in return for reducing them. Most notably, he has pressured US allies — key pillars of American hegemony — to increase defense spending and cost-sharing, often behaving like an unpredictable hegemon. Many countries around the world remain anxious and uncertain, unable to find proper responses to the intimidation by the world's sole superpower. The problem is that, while the United States is undermining its own leadership, the next most powerful nation — China — is widely perceived as a bully due to its lack of empathy and rigid leadership style. As a result, it has not been seen as a viable alternative. In particular, China experienced a dark chapter in October 2022, ahead of Xi Jinping's third-term inauguration. During that period, multiple senior Chinese diplomats issued a flurry of threatening messages to certain countries, claiming to showcase the greatness of China. This heavy-handed approach backfired and led to a substantial loss of soft power. However, China now seems to be working to reverse that image, portraying itself as a possible alternative to the US amid American leadership fatigue. If China successfully hosts this year's SCO summit, its image and international standing are likely to improve. While the SCO has 10 full members, it also includes two observer states and 14 dialogue partners, indicating considerable potential as a multilateral cooperation body. If President Trump continues his current foreign policy line, we will soon witness the SCO expanding and gaining weight. Conversely, should the US revise its current course, China and Russia's recent diplomatic momentum may subside, and NATO could find space to recover. Whether the SCO emerges as a genuine counterweight to NATO depends less on China and Russia, and more on the choices made in Washington.
Korea Herald
12 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Lee, Kazakh president hold phone talks, discuss bilateral cooperation
President Lee Jae Myung held phone talks Wednesday with Kazakhstan's president and discussed ways to enhance bilateral cooperation, Lee's office said. During the call, Lee expressed gratitude to Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev for sending a congratulatory message on the launch of his administration, presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said in a written briefing. The two leaders agreed to expand cooperation in areas such as infrastructure and critical minerals, Kang said. Lee also voiced hope that the two countries' strategic partnership, established in 2009, will continue to grow stronger. In particular, he thanked Tokayev for his active support for the repatriation of the remains of Gen. Hong Beom-do, a historic South Korean independence fighter against Japan's 1910-45 colonial rule of Korea. Hong led Korean independence forces to major victories against Japanese troops in 1920. He moved to the Soviet Union the following year to escape Japanese persecution, and in 1937 was forcibly relocated to present-day Kazakhstan under Soviet leader Joseph Stalin's deportation policy targeting ethnic Koreans. He died in Kazakhstan's Kyzylorda region in 1943, two years before Korea regained independence. His remains were repatriated to South Korea in 2021. Lee also called for continued interest and support for South Korean companies operating in Kazakhstan, the office said. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
14 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Toddlers cramming for English tests: Time for a legal ban?
Bill seeks to curb intensive English courses for young kids amid frenzy over elite English preschools A legislative proposal seeking to ban intensive early English education for toddlers and cap lesson hours for young children was submitted to South Korea's National Assembly on Wednesday, amid a continued frenzy over English-language preschools. The bill, introduced by Rep. Kang Kyung-sook of the minor Rebuilding Korea Party, proposes banning private English instruction for children under 36 months and limiting lessons for those aged 3 and older to 40 minutes per day. Violators could face penalties such as suspension of business or revocation of business licenses. 'Early childhood is a stage when children naturally learn through play and grow both physically and mentally,' states the bill, which seeks to amend the current law regulating the private education industry. 'Private education at this stage not only yields limited educational benefits relative to its excessive cost, time and difficulty, but also raises concerns about potential violations of young children's rights. Prompt policy reform is urgently needed.' While private English academies, commonly known as English kindergartens, have long catered to parents seeking early exposure to English for their children, the latest legislative move comes amid an intensifying race to gain admission to elite educational programs. Children typically enter English kindergartens around the age of 4 or 5, but industry sources say more parents are now enrolling children as young as 3 in preparation courses to boost their chances of acceptance. This trend is especially pronounced in areas like Seoul's Gangnam district, known for its high concentration of private academies. One famous English kindergarten with three branches in Gangnam requires prospective students as young as 3 years old to take an entrance exam. The test includes tasks such as identifying the correct English spelling of pictured objects and describing images in full English sentences. The trend of early English education is spreading beyond Gangnam, according to a joint survey released on June 10 by the Rebuilding Korea Party and the civic group World Without Worries About Private Education. Last year, private academies in five cities across Gyeonggi Province — Goyang, Anyang, Seongnam, Yongin and Hwaseong — offered 376 English classes for toddlers, an increase of 101 from 275 classes the previous year. The average daily lesson time at these institutions was five hours and eight minutes, nearly two hours longer than the three hours and 20 minutes received by first and second graders in elementary school in 2024. However, a separate survey conducted by the World Without Worries About Private Education showed that nine out of 10 daycare and kindergarten teachers nationwide are skeptical about English education for young children. Of the 1,733 respondents, 87.7 percent said English instruction offered by institutions such as English kindergartens was "unnecessary." When asked to identify the most serious issue with early English learning, 63.5 percent pointed to "caregivers demanding academic performance from children without considering their developmental stage." As for potential solutions, 65.6 percent supported "expanding public education," while 62.7 percent called for "reforms to the entrance exam-oriented education system." Other suggestions included "enhancing parental guidance on early development (57.6 percent)" and "regulating academies targeting young learners (50.7 percent)." Regarding the appropriate starting age for private education, 49 percent answered that it should begin after entering elementary school, followed by age 5 (30.5 percent) and age 4 (11.9 percent). Meanwhile, some parents claim that restricting private education constitutes an excessive violation of their personal freedoms. 'For children who are naturally gifted in languages, whether it's Korean or English, English kindergartens can provide a great learning environment. Dismissing them altogether without considering individual differences could ultimately harm a child's future,' Bu Dae-hye, a 35-year-old office worker in Seoul whose 3-year-old son attends an English kindergarten in Bundang, Gyeonggi Province, told The Korea Herald. "Parents know their children best, and making the right educational choices for them should be a given. Regulating that through law doesn't align with the principles of a democratic society."
