
Lee, Kazakh president hold phone talks, discuss bilateral cooperation
During the call, Lee expressed gratitude to Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev for sending a congratulatory message on the launch of his administration, presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said in a written briefing.
The two leaders agreed to expand cooperation in areas such as infrastructure and critical minerals, Kang said.
Lee also voiced hope that the two countries' strategic partnership, established in 2009, will continue to grow stronger.
In particular, he thanked Tokayev for his active support for the repatriation of the remains of Gen. Hong Beom-do, a historic South Korean independence fighter against Japan's 1910-45 colonial rule of Korea.
Hong led Korean independence forces to major victories against Japanese troops in 1920. He moved to the Soviet Union the following year to escape Japanese persecution, and in 1937 was forcibly relocated to present-day Kazakhstan under Soviet leader Joseph Stalin's deportation policy targeting ethnic Koreans.
He died in Kazakhstan's Kyzylorda region in 1943, two years before Korea regained independence. His remains were repatriated to South Korea in 2021.
Lee also called for continued interest and support for South Korean companies operating in Kazakhstan, the office said. (Yonhap)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
21 minutes ago
- Korea Herald
Lutnick says he could hear 'expletives' out of Korea following trade deal with Japan
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Thursday that he could hear "expletives" out of South Korea after Japan reached a trade deal with US President Donald Trump's administration earlier this week. Lutnick made the remarks, apparently suggesting that the tariff deal between the United States and Japan might have created a sense of urgency for South Korea, which seeks to reach a deal to avoid or lower the Trump administration's 25 percent "reciprocal" tariff set to kick in on Aug. 1. "I could hear the expletives out of Korea when they read the Japanese deal because the Koreans and the Japanese ... they stare at each other," he said in a CNBC interview. "So you can imagine what they were thinking when they saw that Japan made that deal ... They were like, 'Oh man!," he added, underscoring that Koreans "very much" want to make a deal. On Tuesday, Trump announced the deal with Tokyo that would lower the threatened 25 percent reciprocal tariff for Japan to 15 percent in return for Japan's agreement to invest US$550 billion in the US, increase US rice imports by 75 percent and buy 100 Boeing aircraft, to name a few. During the interview, Lutnick said that he will engage in a meeting with South Korean negotiators in Washington on the day, after bilateral high-level trade talks, slated for Friday, were postponed. Korea's Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan and Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo are currently in Washington amid Seoul's stepped-up efforts to strike a deal with the US "Of course, they are going to be in my office today talking," the secretary said. Seoul and Washington had planned to hold "two-plus-two" trade talks on Friday, where Seoul's Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol, Trade Minister Yeo, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer were set to get together.
![[Robert J. Fouser] Japan lurches right](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F07%2F24%2Fnews-p.v1.20250724.3531c2cf50c74e47b90e2c7eec5e6df7_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Robert J. Fouser] Japan lurches right](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75)
Korea Herald
4 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Robert J. Fouser] Japan lurches right
To date, an election for the House of Councilors, the upper house of the Japanese Diet, would not have been big news, but results from the recent election on July 20 changed that. The ruling Liberal Democratic Party and its coalition partner, the Komeito party, lost their majority while recently formed populist far-right parties performed surprisingly well. In particular, the Sanseito party led by right-wing provocateur Sohei Kamiya won 14 seats, pushing up its total in the chamber from one seat to 15. The upper house is the weaker of the two houses of the Diet, but the results offer insight into the direction of Japanese politics. They were also a sharp rebuke to Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba after less than a year in office. What happened in Japan and where is the nation headed? Since the right-wing populist wave that began in 2016, first with the Brexit vote in the UK and then with the election of Donald Trump as president in the US, populism has swept across Europe and attracted support in other important democracies, such as Brazil and, to a lesser extent, South Korea. Only Japan, long noted for its stable, consensus-driven politics, seemed immune. Not anymore. The reasons for the right-wing turn mirror those in other places: economic insecurity, fear of immigrants and the rise of alternative media. These trends feed on each other, giving life to politicians who rage against immigrants, LGBTQ+ people, the mainstream media, big tech, green policies and whatever else 'globalists' support. In the process, fringe conspiracy theories grow and become mainstream. The right-wing populist script is similar but takes on a different cast as it spreads from one country to another. In Japan's case, the Sanseito emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic with YouTube videos promoting conspiracy theories and vaccine skepticism. Kamiya threw anti-immigrant and anti-LGBTQ+ sentiment into the mix and campaigned on the slogan 'Japanese First.' He has stated that he drew inspiration from Donald Trump's MAGA movement in the US. Support for the Sanseito in Japan came primarily from younger voters who feel that the 'Japanese dream' of a stable job, a house and a secure retirement is slipping away from them. After years of stable prices, inflation has hit 3 percent, and home prices are rising while wages remain stagnant. The influx of foreign workers exacerbates feelings of insecurity. Younger generations elsewhere share these feelings but have different outlets for expressing them. In the US, Trump consistently underperformed with younger voters in 2016, 2020 and 2024. His strongest support has come from voters 45 and older. Younger voters in the US lean left and have fueled progressive insurgencies in the Democratic Party. In South Korea, meanwhile, younger voters have split by gender, with more men supporting the conservative People Power Party and women supporting the Democratic Party of Korea in ever larger numbers. In the German election earlier this year, the youth vote split into two extremes. The left-wing Die Linke won the most youth support, whereas the far-right Alternative fur Deutschland came a close second and mainstream parties did poorly. In Japan, older voters continue to support the LDP and the slightly center-left Constitutional Democratic Party, the main opposition party. While the LDP saw a sharp drop in percentage of votes, the CDP remained stagnant. The Japanese Communist Party, meanwhile, which attracted younger voters in the late 20th century, has failed to do so in recent years, and its core support base continues to age. To young voters in Japan, as elsewhere, the established mainstream parties represent the status quo that they want to change. In theory, the two left-leaning parties, the JCP and the smaller left-wing Reiwa Shinsengumi party should appeal to younger voters because they support drastic change. The problem is that younger voters view them as old and tired as well, with little chance of getting close to power. This leaves the far-right as the most attractive vehicle for young people seeking easy answers to their worries. The Sanseito and the other far-right party, the Conservative Party of Japan, together won 17 percent of votes in electoral districts, and 21 percent of the national proportional vote. Those numbers put them behind only the LDP in terms of votes earned, which suggests that they have staying power. Japan has clearly entered a period of political instability. The big question is what the center will do. Will it embrace a new direction that renews the 'Japanese Dream'? Or will it hunker down on the past and let the far-right grow? Robert J. Fouser, a former associate professor of Korean language education at Seoul National University, writes on Korea from Providence, Rhode Island. He can be reached at robertjfouser@ The views expressed here are the writer's own. -- Ed.
![[Editorial] Securing a fair deal](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75)
Korea Herald
4 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] Securing a fair deal
Korea must secure tariff terms no worse than Tokyo's as investment and export stakes grow As Japan and the United States conclude a high-profile tariff agreement, attention has quickly turned to South Korea. Tokyo's willingness to open its agricultural market, commit to joint energy projects and pledge a record-breaking $550 billion in US-bound investment has earned it a reduction in reciprocal tariffs from 25 percent to 15 percent — a benchmark now hardening into a minimum standard for Washington's other major trading partners. South Korea finds itself in a more compressed timeframe. The bilateral 2+2 ministerial trade talks scheduled for July 25 in Washington were postponed because US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had an urgent scheduling conflict. Seoul's Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol was informed just before departure, though Korean industry and trade officials already in Washington are continuing working-level consultations. Seoul has emphasized that the postponement does not reflect any change in negotiating intent. But with the reciprocal tariffs slated to resume on Aug. 1, time is growing short. The Japan-US deal has raised the stakes. In addition to securing a 10-point tariff cut, Japan agreed to increase US rice imports by 75 percent, purchase 100 Boeing aircraft and participate in the Alaskan liquefied natural gas project. The US government claims the agreement will generate hundreds of thousands of domestic jobs and boost strategic industries. For South Korea, where more than 60 percent of 2024's $66 billion trade surplus with the US came from automobiles, a failure to match Tokyo's deal could erode competitiveness in a key export sector. Automakers like Hyundai and Kia, which compete directly with Japanese peers in the US market, would be particularly exposed. In anticipation of this, Seoul has assembled a proposed investment package exceeding $100 billion, drawing on commitments from major conglomerates such as Samsung, SK, Hyundai and LG. The plan, modeled loosely on Japan's, may expand further as talks progress. Additional participation in LNG development, including through public financial institutions, is also under review. However, Tokyo's massive pledge — roughly double Korea's in proportionate terms — and its acceptance of politically sensitive concessions raise the bar significantly. Washington's pressure tactics remain blunt. US President Donald Trump has warned that only countries that open their markets will be rewarded with lower tariffs, threatening 'much higher' duties otherwise. His administration has also criticized South Korea's non-tariff barriers, from digital platform regulations to agricultural restrictions. While Seoul has ruled out rice and beef as bargaining chips, citing food security, the government is reportedly exploring other forms of market access, including in digital trade and manufacturing partnerships. In parallel, Seoul must navigate additional entanglements. US demands around defense cost sharing, semiconductor collaboration and regulation of Korean digital platforms all intersect with the trade agenda. Meanwhile, reports indicate the European Union may also be nearing a 15 percent tariff agreement with Washington — a sign that may further isolate South Korea unless it can close a deal soon. Tokyo's agreement is not without trade-offs. Much remains unclear about the terms and timelines of Japan's commitments. But the symbolism of its 15 percent tariff outcome is already shaping expectations. For South Korea, the goal must be to avoid terms materially worse than those given to Japan or the EU. Any outcome perceived as inferior would carry real consequences, both economically and diplomatically. Protecting high-employment, high-surplus sectors such as automobiles and steel must be a central priority. To that end, South Korea's negotiators must aim for a calibrated strategy: offering proportionate concessions, targeting returns in industrial cooperation and investment, and securing transition support for exposed sectors. As deadlines near and peer deals take shape, the challenge is no longer just to reach an agreement, but to secure terms that protect South Korea's standing in its most critical export market.