
US and Vietnam finalise trade agreement, easing tariff threats and expanding market access
The rate is lower than an initial 46 per cent levy Mr Trump announced in April on goods from Vietnam which was due to take effect next week.
Mr Trump said that goods from Vietnam would face a 20 per cent tariff and that any trans-shipments from third countries would face a 40 per cent levy.
Details were scarce and it was not immediately clear how the trans-shipment provision would be implemented.
Vietnam would also provide the United States with more market access, with US exports to the country facing no tariffs, Mr Trump said.
That agreement appears to include US exporters of large-engine cars, according to Mr Trump and Vietnamese state media.
'It is my Great Honor to announce that I have just made a Trade Deal with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,' Mr Trump said on Truth Social.
'It is my opinion that the SUV or, as it is sometimes referred to, Large Engine Vehicle, which does so well in the United States, will be a wonderful addition to the various product lines within Vietnam,' Mr Trump said.
Vietnamese President To Lam asked in a phone call with Mr Trump earlier on Wednesday that the United States recognise Vietnam as a market economy and remove restrictions on the exports of high-tech products to the country, Vietnam News Agency reported.
Those changes have long been sought by Vietnam and dismissed by the US.
Since Mr Trump imposed tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars in Chinese goods in his first term, US trade with Vietnam has exploded although almost all of it in the form of goods to the United States from Vietnam as importers sought workarounds for the China levies.
Since 2018, Vietnam's exports are up nearly three-fold from less than $US50 billion ($A76 billion) that year to about $US137 billion in 2024, Census Bureau data shows.
US exports to Vietnam are up only about 30 per cent in that time - to just over $US13 billion last year from less than $US10 billion in 2018.
The White House and the Vietnamese trade ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Mr Trump announced a wave of tariffs for countries around the world on April 2, before pausing the implementation of most duties until July 9.
More than a dozen countries are actively negotiating with the Trump administration to avoid a steep spike in tariffs on their exports.
Trump's administration has teased that a deal with India is also coming soon but it has said that others may not be ready by July 9.
The United Kingdom negotiated a limited trade deal with the Trump administration, accepting a 10 per cent US tariff on many goods, including cars in exchange for special access for aircraft engines and UK beef.
Like the agreement struck with the UK in May, the one with Vietnam resembles more a framework than a finalised trade pact.
China and the United States also came to a truce in a tit-for-tat tariff battle that resulted in China restoring US access to some rare-earth minerals but the two sides left most of their disagreements to later negotiations.
The high potential tariff rate for Vietnam on shipments to its largest export market reflects its large trade surplus with the United States, which US government data shows topped $US123 billion last year.
A hefty tariff could significantly limit access for Vietnam-made goods to its main market and upend the Communist-run country's export-oriented growth model.
The government said last month that it would stick to its target for economic growth of at least eight per cent this year despite the looming risk from the tariffs.
Vietnam has already taken several measures to reduce its trade gap with the United States, including cutting tariffs on a wide range of US goods, pledging to buy more goods from the United States and stepping up its crackdown on some trade with China over possible fraud on rules of origin of exports.
Sources told Reuters last month that the United States wanted Vietnam to reduce the use of Chinese tech in devices that are assembled in the country before being exported to the United States.
Vietnam has said it wanted to maintain harmonious trade ties with both the United States and China, its largest trading partner on which it heavily relies on for materials and equipment for its manufacturing industries.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
39 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Iran's latest decision reveals flaw in Trump's big plan
If before the strike Iran seemed able to race for a bomb but was not yet quite ready, after the strike it is dependent on playing a giant game of nuclear three-card monte. Iran will keep shuffling its nuclear assets around, as the Mossad, US intelligence agencies and the banned UN inspectors will constantly be looking for human intelligence or satellite evidence of the tunnels and caves where the projects might be hidden. 'After the strike the old problem remains: Iran has enriched uranium, it has centrifuges and there are no inspectors,' said Jake Sullivan, who helped refine strike plans against the Iranian program when he served as national security adviser under president Joe Biden, who decided against using them. 'With mowing the lawn, you have uncertainty, instability and continued military action,' he said. 'Yet if you try to do a deal, President Trump will confront the same problem he had before: Do you insist on complete dismantlement, which Iran probably won't agree to even now? Or try to contain the program,' allowing for some form of low-level, highly inspected enrichment, 'in a way that gives you confidence they can't go for a nuke?' The Pentagon is not exactly encouraging that confidence. Its chief spokesperson, Sean Parnell, said on Wednesday (Thursday AEST) that he believed Iran's nuclear program had been pushed back 'probably closer to two years' – an assessment that, if accurate, would mean that Trump bought less time with the attack than president Barack Obama did when he signed the 2015 accord that froze Iran's program. With their main production facilities buried beneath the rubble, the only leverage the Iranians have these days is the suggestion – with no proof – that their stockpile of 10 or so bombs' worth of fuel survived, and their surviving nuclear scientists have access to it. Maybe they are bluffing. But it is the best card they have to play. And the only way to be sure, Sullivan noted, is 'with a deal, one that ensures every inch of the program is inspected'. Other experts agree. 'We can't yet judge how likely the covert nuclear weapons production scenario really is,' said Robert Einhorn, a former US diplomat and Brookings Institution nuclear expert who dealt with the Iranian program a decade ago. But, he noted, 'it is a potential pathway for Iran building a small nuclear arsenal relatively soon, and so we must do what we can to block it', chiefly getting International Atomic Energy Agency monitors back into the country's widely distributed nuclear facilities, including two suspected new enrichment centres. Iranian officials have accused the agency's director-general, Rafael Mariano Grossi, of complicity in the attacks. Grossi says he had no involvement or advance warning. Early talk of a meeting between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, to reach a post-strike nuclear deal – presumably a more restrictive one than was on the table before the attack – has melted away, at least for now. The Iranians insist they want assurances they will not be attacked during negotiations again. It is unclear that they would believe such a commitment even if it is offered, since Trump declared in mid-June that he was giving them two weeks to respond to a final US offer. The B-2 bombers were over their targets two days later. With Iran's leaders portraying the end of the conflict with Israel as a victory, and downplaying the damage done by US strikes, experts see little hope of an accord that would satisfy both sides. 'They are not going to agree to unconditional surrender next week or even next month,' said Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, using the term Trump employed before he ordered military action. 'I think that's a process which plays out the more we tighten the economic grip on their ability to export oil.' The central question, of course, is what lesson the Iranians emerge with as they survey the damage done. Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth have declared there is only one lesson for the Iranians: their nuclear program is over. That is why Trump and Hegseth are so invested in the narrative that the program was 'obliterated', suggesting it could never be revived. Loading Most experts expect Iran to come to a different conclusion; that countries that inch toward a nuclear weapon – but stop short of crossing the line, as Iran did – get bombed. In contrast, countries that race for an arsenal do not. The Israelis bombed the Osirak reactor in 1981 to keep Iraq from getting the bomb, though Saddam Hussein resurrected the program before the first Gulf War, only to have it discovered and dismantled. (He famously did not build it anew before the US-led invasion in 2003.) A little more than two decades later, Muammar Gaddafi gave up his nascent nuclear program, before many of the components were unboxed, a move he may have regretted as he was chased across Libya and killed eight years later. In 2007, Israeli jets took out a Syrian nuclear reactor that was being constructed with the help of North Korea, to prevent the Assad government from going down the nuclear road. In all three cases, the countries had not yet made it to the cusp of a bomb. Loading Iran may conclude from the events of the past 10 days that its wiser choice for the future is to follow the path of North Korea. Rather than walk up to the nuclear line, it stepped over it, conducting its first nuclear test in 2006, when president George W. Bush was in office. Since then, North Korea has developed an arsenal of 60 or more nuclear weapons, experts say, and it is creeping up on a capability to reach the United States with its missiles – one of the reasons Trump is pushing so hard for a 'Golden Dome' defensive shield. One former senior intelligence official noted that if Iran already had nuclear weapons, rather than inching toward them, neither Israel nor the United States would have taken the risk of attacking. It is a mistake, he added, that the Iranians are not likely to make twice.


Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
S&P 500, Nasdaq new record highs on strong labour data
The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq have touched fresh record highs after a stronger-than-expected jobs report pointed to a resilient labour market amid concerns about US President Donald Trump's tariff policies potentially weighing on the economy. Nvidia was trading at a record high, up 2.2 per cent, and was track to become the most valuable company in history, with the chipmaker's market capitalisation nearing $US4 trillion ($A6.1trillion). Data showed nonfarm payrolls increased by 147,000 jobs last month after an upwardly revised 144,000 advance in May, while economists polled by Reuters had forecast payrolls rising 110,000. Unemployment fell to 4.1 per cent last month, against expectations of a rise to 4.3 per cent. "We were all expecting the hard data would start to show some cracks, and we really haven't seen that with the jobs report coming in much better than expected," said Brian Klimke, chief market strategist at Cetera Investment Management LLC. "That just puts the Fed on pause and gives it more time to wait right now because the labour market is really resilient." Traders quickly priced out chances of an interest-rate cut in July, with the odds of a 25-basis-point reduction in September at 69.2 per cent, according to CME Group's Fedwatch tool, down from 74 per cent a week ago. The data was released a day early because of the Independence Day holiday on Friday. Trading volumes were lighter than usual on Thursday with markets due to close early. Another dataset showed the number of Americans filing new applications for jobless benefits fell to a six-week low last week. US services sector activity picked up in June as orders rebounded but employment contracted for the third time this year, underlining the impact of policy uncertainty on businesses. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq extended their record-winning session as signs of a resilient economy and easing trade tensions following a series of agreements between the United States and other countries continue to propel stocks higher. Meanwhile, the blue-chip Dow was just 0.8 per cent below all-time highs touched in December. All three main indexes were on track to end the holiday-truncated week on a positive note, if gains hold. Meanwhile, Republicans in the US House of Representatives advanced President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill toward a final yes-or-no vote, appearing to overcome internal party divisions over its cost. The legislation is expected to add $US3.4 trillion ($A5.2 trillion) to the nation's $US36.2 trillion ($A55.1 trillion) in debt over the next decade, according to nonpartisan analysts. In early trading on Thursday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 284.02 points, or 0.64 per cent, to 44,769.03, the S&P 500 gained 41.23 points, or 0.67 per cent, to 6,268.65, and the Nasdaq Composite gained 161.74 points, or 0.79 per cent, to 20,554.87. Shares of chip design software firms Synopsys and Cadence Design Systems climbed three per cent and 3.7 per cent, respectively, in premarket trading after the US lifted export restrictions on chip design software to China, signaling a thaw in trade tensions between the world's top two economies. Tripadvisor climbed 15 per cent after the Wall Street Journal reported activist investor Starboard Value had built a more than nine per cent stake in the online travel company. Datadog jumped 9.4 per cent after the cloud security firm was set to replace Juniper Networks on the S&P 500. US solar stocks jumped in early trading, with First Solar rising about 10 per cent to become the top-performing individual stock on the S&P 500 index. Advancing issues outnumbered decliners by a 2.53-to-1 ratio on the NYSE, and by a 2.29-to-1 ratio on the Nasdaq. The S&P 500 posted 36 new 52-week highs and one new low, while the Nasdaq Composite recorded 85 new highs and 13 new lows.

AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
Trump to speak to Putin as he seeks Ukraine truce
US President Donald Trump said he would speak to Russian leader Vladimir Putin on Thursday, the latest call in his effort to broker an end to the war in Ukraine. 'Will be speaking to President Putin of Russia at 10:00 A.M. Thank you!' Trump announced on social media.