Why aluminium prices are rising and what to expect next
ADVERTISEMENT Aluminium, an essential component of modern industry, plays a vital role in sectors ranging from construction and transportation to packaging and renewable energy. As of June 2025, aluminium prices are trading between $2,450 and $2,600 per ton in the key London Metal Exchange. The recent uptick—about 10–15% since January —is largely driven by renewed US-China tariffs, supply chain disruptions, and rising energy costs. The imposition of higher tariffs on aluminium imports into the US, aiming to protect domestic producers, led to a surge in commodity prices that contributed to global price volatility.
Over the past decade, the aluminium market has experienced significant shifts driven by geopolitical tensions, energy prices, and evolving demand patterns—particularly influenced by China, the world's largest producer and consumer.
China, which accounts for nearly 60% of global aluminium output, is experiencing a slowdown in manufacturing activity. A recent contraction in its manufacturing sector has raised concerns about reduced demand from the world's largest commodity consumer. Over the past decade, China's aluminium output has surged, supported by state-backed investments and a robust manufacturing base. However, environmental policies and energy constraints have recently led to production curbs, especially in coal-intensive regions.
ADVERTISEMENT In 2025, China's aluminium demand is expected to remain relatively stable, with modest growth in the construction and EV sectors offset by a slowdown in real estate and exports. Meanwhile, supply-side reforms and energy transition policies are likely to keep production growth in check, contributing to tighter domestic balances and increased reliance on imports.Globally, aluminium supply and demand have seen moderate growth over the last ten years. From 2015 to 2024, global aluminium demand grew at an average annual rate of 2.5%, driven by increased consumption in electric vehicles, infrastructure, and green technologies. However, supply growth has been constrained by environmental regulations, energy costs, and geopolitical disruptions.
ADVERTISEMENT Aluminium prices have been notably volatile in the past decade. In 2015, prices hovered around $1,600 per metric ton, reflecting oversupply and weak demand. Prices gradually recovered, peaking above $3,000 per ton in 2021 amid post-pandemic stimulus and supply chain disruptions. Since then, prices have fluctuated due to macroeconomic uncertainty, energy costs, and trade tensions. Global aluminium mine supply has experienced moderate growth in recent years, due to rising demand for lightweight, sustainable materials and the global energy transition. However, geopolitical tensions, environmental concerns, and regulatory changes continue to pose risks to supply stability. In 2025, mine supply is expected to remain tight due to delays in new project developments and logistical challenges.
ADVERTISEMENT Looking ahead, aluminium prices are expected to remain volatile through the rest of 2025. Amid persistent geopolitical tensions, constrained supply from China, and growing demand from alternative markets like India and the Middle East are likely to keep prices firm in the second half of this year.
However, downside risks remain. A potential global recession, weakening industrial output, and high interest rates could dampen demand and exert downward pressure on prices. Aluminium's strategic importance continues to grow, but the market faces a complex mix of opportunities and challenges. While long-term demand remains strong, especially from green industries, short-term volatility driven by macroeconomic and geopolitical factors will likely define the aluminium landscape in 2025.
ADVERTISEMENT
(The author Hareesh V. is head of Commodities, Geojit Investments. The views expressed are personal.)
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Cold War camaraderie: Why US refuses to take Pak to task
It was in 1991 that India-US relations began to acquire a strategic shape. With the Cold War concluded and the Soviet Union reduced to a diminished Russia, the US found itself in an unfamiliar role—as a lone superpower with global responsibilities. It recognised the dangers of complacency in victory and quickly began pivoting from its Atlantic preoccupations to the Asia Pacific, anticipating a new set of challengers. The growing rise of China, while facilitated in earlier decades by the US itself, had begun to look less like an opportunity and more like a coming storm. India, geographically positioned next to China, democratically stable and increasingly open to global markets, became a natural component of this new architecture—a potential US partner. Yet, for much of its early strategic phase, the India-US relationship remained cautiously transactional. Military-to-military ties grew at a measured pace, beginning with the Malabar exercises in 1992. Somehow, the trust deficit remained a Cold War legacy. The 1998 Pokhran nuclear tests were a shock to Washington and created an immediate rift. But this proved temporary. President George W Bush's outreach, culminating in the landmark civil nuclear deal, and external affairs minister Pranab Mukherjee's 2005 speech at RAND Corporation marked a turning point. India, at that point, became a more serious US partner. The devil in the relationship remained Pakistan. The US equivocation on Pakistan's role in cross-border terrorism has been one of the most vexing elements of this evolving relationship. Despite overwhelming evidence of Pakistan's nurturing of terror networks, Washington has not held Islamabad to account. It has always had the leverage—economic, diplomatic and military—but rarely used it. The oft-cited reason is strategic: an overstated fear of pushing Pakistan further into China's embrace. In reality, it is also an emotional and historical inertia rooted in the Cold War, SEATO, CENTO and years of military camaraderie.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
India Issues Stern Reply To Trumps Tariff Hike Threat, Says Targeted By US
New Delhi: The Indian government has issued a strongly worded response following US President Donald Trump's recent threat to impose additional tariffs on Indian goods. The statement, released on Monday by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), asserts that India is being unfairly singled out by both the United States and the European Union for its continued imports of Russian oil. In the official statement, the MEA said, "India has been targeted by the United States and the European Union for importing oil from Russia after the commencement of the Ukraine conflict. In fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability." India emphasized that its energy imports are essential to ensuring domestic affordability and energy security amid global market disruptions. "India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion." Statement by Official Spokesperson — Randhir Jaiswal (@MEAIndia) August 4, 2025 Backing its claims with data, the MEA pointed out the scale of ongoing EU-Russia and US-Russia trade, calling the criticism of India "unjustified." "The European Union in 2024 had a bilateral trade of Euro 67.5 billion in goods with Russia. In addition, it had trade in services estimated at Euro 17.2 billion in 2023. This is significantly more than India's total trade with Russia that year or subsequently. European imports of LNG in 2024, in fact, reached a record 16.5mn tonnes, surpassing the last record of 15.21mn tonnes in 2022." "Europe-Russia trade includes not just energy, but also fertilizers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel and machinery and transport equipment. Where the United States is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilizers as well as chemicals. In this background, the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable. Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security." Earlier in the day, US President Donald Trump took to Truth Social, sharply criticizing India's trade with Russia amid the ongoing Ukraine war. "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA," Trump wrote. Trump announced the imposition of a 25% tariff on Indian goods starting August 1, 2025, citing India's trade policies and its alignment with the BRICS bloc. According to Trump, India's tariffs on US products are among 'the highest in the world.' He labeled India's actions as part of a broader anti-American agenda.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
‘My way or the tariff way': Trump's global guessing game
Works at Times of India website's editorial desk with a keen eye for national, international, and business developments. Often found buried in books/novels in free time. If Donald Trump had a motto specifically for his tariff strategy, it could just be: 'Deadlines are made to be moved.' This 'my or the tariff way' negotiation strategy of Trump, often directed by his mood swings, is keeping the nations and their economies guessing and giving their stock markets a whiplash. Across the globe, trading partners are learning that the enforcement timeline is anything but predictable. What begins as a fiery threat often morphs—delays, shifts, softens, then flares up again. Whether it's China, the EU, or India, the playbook remains the same: set a 'hard' deadline, rattle the markets, then move the goalposts. Take India, for example: A bold 26 per cent 'reciprocal tariff' warning in April, shifted to July, became a 25 per cent formal order for August 1—now bumped to August 7. That's not a trade policy; it's a tariff treadmill. Mexico is another example that gets tariffs imposed but then- comes a mysterious phone call between the two countries' leaders and- it's a pause! So, what gives? Delay by design? Is this just another case of Trump being Trump—or is there a method behind the delay of the 'no-delay' deadline. Some see this as a classic Trump power move: set the world on edge with hard deadlines, then pull back just enough to keep markets guessing and rivals sweating. Every postponement becomes a chance to claim dominance. As he might later boast, 'They begged us for time. We stood strong,' or some version of it. But beyond the posturing, there may be strategic calculations. By repeatedly threatening- but not immediately enforcing- tariffs, Trump builds leverage without inviting instant blowback. Domestically, it helps delay the inflation hit; internationally, it leaves adversaries off-balance while talks continue behind the scenes. In essence, it's the art of the tariff tease- maximum pressure, minimal cost- and maybe added power trip? India: Caught in the spotlight After months of transactional back-and-forth,India found itself staring down a 26 per cent tariff threat in April—later dialled down to 25 per cent and supposedly effective August 1. Now that, too, has been pushed to August 7. Add to that a still-un-defined 'penalty' over India's defence and energy ties with Russia, and the policy fog thickens. Majority of India's $85+ billion in exports to the US are under threat. But with the deadline in constant motion, the uncertainty keeps the investors guessing and bracing for a storm that may never make it to the land. US-India trade deal still needs to happen Ironically, Trump's tariff threats might be doing what five rounds of negotiations haven't: injecting urgency into a stalled India-US trade deal. Even without enforcement, the ripple effects are real- shaken buyer confidence, disrupted planning cycles, and a sense of uncertainty hanging over bilateral ties. A deal could: Stabilise expectations and give both sides a rules-based framework Let India retain protection for core sectors while gaining market access Hand the leaders of both the nations a 'win' that they sell to each of their people India gets access to US tech while US gets access to India's relatively cheaper labour De-risk future trade amid rising geopolitical shifts Tariffs: Performance, power move- or both? Amid the moving goalposts and the deadline- are the tariffs just for show? Not likely. But performance could be a part of it. Right now, the tariffs come as a simple enforcement tool. Trump's erratic timeline keeps pressure on adversaries, keeps him in the headlines, and positions him as a relentless negotiator who is simply 'protecting his nation's interests'. To his credit, this unpredictability is portrayed as strength and kindness for showing 'willingness to deal'- even when the policy itself keeps shifting. For countries like India, the challenge is twofold: adapt to the fluidity of Trump's tariff tactics while pushing for longer-term trade certainty. Because even without duties in place, the shadow of tariffs alone can disrupt supply chains, pricing, and sentiment. And now, with the August 7 deadline just around the corner, the question lingers: will he or won't he? Even if tariffs do finally come into place- why did a 'strict deadline' with 'no delays' get delayed again… and again… and again? Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
