BMW reports 29% drop in profits
The company posted a profit after tax of €4 billion ($4.6 billion), down 29% from the same period last year, according to a company report issued on Thursday. It marked the automaker's third consecutive first-half decline.
BMW said US import duties on cars and vehicle parts, imposed by President Donald Trump in April, weighed heavily on earnings.
EU automakers are still digesting the new 15% tariff agreed upon by Washington and Brussels, which is due to take effect in August. The trade deal, signed on Sunday, has sparked backlash across the bloc, with some EU officials calling it 'scandalous' and 'a disaster,' saying it secured no concessions from Washington.
BMW didn't disclose how much the US tariffs cost it in the first half but warned that trade-related charges could shave 1.25 percentage points off its automotive margin this year, potentially costing billions.
CEO Oliver Zipse welcomed the tariff deal but cautioned that the duties still burden exports and hurt consumers.
BMW also flagged intense 'competitive pressure,' particularly from China.
Other German automotive giants reported even steeper drops. Volkswagen and Audi saw earnings tumble by over a third, while Mercedes' profits plunged more than 50%.
The sector's downturn has fueled fears over the health of the EU's economic powerhouse. Germany endured a recession last year, and the IMF now expects zero growth in 2025, the weakest outlook among G7 nations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
China turns to BRICS partner for coffee amid US tariffs
Beijing has authorized nearly 200 Brazilian companies to export coffee to the Chinese market amid escalating trade tensions between the South American nation and the US, according to the Chinese embassy in Brazil. The greenlight follows Washington's decision to impose a hefty tariff on Brazilian coffee and other goods. The 50% tariff, which took effect in late July, targets coffee and meat – two key sectors of Brazil's economy. The move comes amid the broader trade war launched by US President Donald Trump against multiple countries. 'China has approved the authorization of 183 new Brazilian coffee companies to export to the Chinese market,' the embassy said Saturday in a post on Twitter, adding that the measure took effect on July 30 and will remain valid for five years. 🚢☕️ #café brasileiro na china! A China aprovou a habilitação de 183 novas empresas brasileiras de café para exportação ao mercado chinês. A medida entra em vigor em 30 de julho de 2025 e tem validade de 5 anos.#CaféBrasileiro#Exportação#China#BrasilChina# Brazil's Ministry of Industry and Foreign Trade has estimated that 35.9% of exports to the US will be affected by the tariffs, warning that annual losses could reach up to $14.5 billion. During the 2024/2025 crop year, Brazil exported 7.468 million bags of coffee to the US, making it the largest destination for Brazilian coffee exports, according to the Brazilian Coffee Exporters Council. The US accounted for 16.4% of Brazil's total coffee exports. In monetary terms, that amounted to $1.9 billion in coffee exports, along with $1.35 billion worth of meat. China's growing appetite for coffee appears to align with its latest move to expand imports from Brazil. According to data from the International Coffee Organization, coffee consumption in China grew by 15% in the latest season. At the same time, the number of branded coffee shops in the country surged by 58% over the past 12 months, reaching 49,691 outlets, according to market intelligence firm Alegra Group. The rapid expansion signals China's emergence as a key growth market for global coffee producers. Trump has defended the steep tariffs on Brazilian goods, citing what he called a 'witch hunt' against former President Jair Bolsonaro, despite the fact that the US ran a $6.8 billion trade surplus with Brazil in 2024. Trump had previously justified his trade policies by claims that he intended to correct trade imbalances.
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Kremlin assesses US ‘threats' to Russia's trade partners
US threats to impose secondary sanctions on Russia's trading partners are illegal and a breach of other nations' sovereign rights, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said. Washington recently warned India, China, and Brazil of potential restrictions over their imports of Russian energy. Matthew Whitaker, the US ambassador to NATO, called such measures an 'obvious next step' to end the Ukraine conflict. Responding at a press briefing on Tuesday, Peskov said: 'We hear many statements that are essentially threats and attempts to pressure countries into cutting trade relations with Russia.' 'We believe that sovereign states should have, and do have, the right to choose their own trade partners, partners for economic cooperation, and to independently determine the forms of cooperation that serve their national interests,' he added. In an interview with Bloomberg on Monday, Whitaker claimed that purchasing Russian oil amounts to sponsoring hostilities in the Ukraine conflict. He asserted that introducing sanctions on importers would cut off Moscow's main source of revenue. India, one of the largest importers of Russian crude alongside China, responded that it would 'safeguard its national interests and economic security,' calling the idea of targeting the country over energy purchases 'unjustified and unreasonable.' New Delhi has also pointed to ongoing Western trade with Russia, despite repeated pledges to sever economic ties. Beijing likewise defended its economic cooperation with Russia, stating that China will 'always ensure its energy supply in ways that serve our national interests.' 'China will firmly defend its sovereignty, security, and development interests,' the Foreign Ministry said on Monday, adding that 'coercion and pressure will not achieve anything.' In July, Brazil condemned similar remarks by NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte about potential secondary sanctions on BRICS nations trading with Russia, calling them 'totally absurd.' All three countries also highlighted what they described as Western hypocrisy toward importers of Russian energy, noting that both the US and the EU have maintained trade relations with Moscow.
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
South Africa downplays envoy absence in US tariff talks
South African International Relations Minister Ronald Lamola has said Pretoria's current lack of an ambassador to the US has not affected the country's ability to negotiate an agreement, following Washington's decision to impose steep 30% tariffs on imports. Speaking at a joint media briefing on Monday at the Germiston Civic Centre in Ekurhuleni, alongside Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau, Lamola addressed the diplomatic fallout after former South African ambassador to the US Ebrahim Rasool was expelled in March. 'We had an ambassador in the US and that ambassador was expelled,' said Lamola. 'President (Cyril) Ramaphosa has always prioritised the US in terms of ambassadorial responsibility.' Lamola said the expulsion has complicated the process of appointing a new ambassador. 'The fact that our ambassador was expelled means that the new process to appoint the ambassador will not be as easy as it would have been when an ambassador had not been expelled,' he said. 'We have to take all careful consideration, all due diligence, and I can confirm that that process is at an advanced stage. The President, at the right time, will announce who will become the ambassador of South Africa to the US.' Lamola said that the appointment would be made solely by the president, in accordance with the Constitution. The 30% tariffs, introduced by the administration of US President Donald Trump, are set to take effect at 12:01 a.m. on August 8. While other African countries, such as Lesotho and Zimbabwe, will face a 15% tariff, South Africa has been singled out for a significantly steeper duty. Lamola, however, dismissed suggestions that the absence of an ambassador had weakened South Africa's negotiating position. 'Ambassadors do not negotiate any trade deals,' he said. 'The trade deal is being negotiated under the leadership of the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC), with coordination and support from the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO).' Lamola confirmed that South Africa currently has a chargé d'affaires (a diplomat) in Washington who engages with key stakeholders but does not lead negotiations. 'There are countries that do have ambassadors in Washington. They don't have a trade deal. So, the trade deal is negotiated by the relevant line function department. In this instance, it is the DTIC, which we are supporting, including our chargé d'affaires in the US, who does from time to time point to the relevant people,' he said. He further rejected claims that the absence of an ambassador directly caused South Africa's failure to secure a tariff exemption. 'If that were the case, all countries with ambassadors in Washington wouldn't be having the same challenges we're facing,' said Lamola. 'This is a global phenomenon, not a South African problem.' Rasool, who previously served as ambassador to the US from 2010 to 2015 during the Barack Obama administration, was reappointed in January 2025 under the Joe Biden and later Trump administrations. Rasool was dismissed in March after the remarks he made during a webinar hosted by the Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection (Mistra), under the theme 'Implications of Changes in US Administrations for SA and Africa'. During the event, Rasool urged South Africans to familiarise themselves with the country's national interest framework, calling it a critical guide amid shifting global dynamics. Rasool was critical of the 'Make America Great Again' movement, linking it to demographic changes in the US and warning of ideological resistance to emerging multipolarity. He also raised concerns about South Africa's handover of the G20 presidency to the US. Meanwhile, Lamola added that Rasool's replacement was imminent. 'Obviously, the president may consult whoever he deems necessary and prudent to appoint this ambassador. But the process is at an advanced stage,' he published by IOL
