Pakistan would have understood that they cannot fight with us in direct war: Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis on Monday expressed his gratitude to the Indian Defence Forces for giving a befitting reply to Pakistan, stating that the "neighbouring country has now understood that they cannot fight with India in a direct war."Maharashtra CM Fadnavis highlighted that Mumbai's status as India's economic capital makes it a potential target, necessitating a review meeting with defence forces to assess the state's security preparedness and future planning.Speaking to reporters, CM Fadnavis said, "Our military has shown Pakistan its place. Pakistan's many airbases and terror hotbeds were destroyed. By now, they would have understood that they cannot fight with us in direct war, but we have seen in history that they have chosen proxy wars as well. Hence, the economic capital of Mumbai has become vulnerable, and hence we had the review meeting today regarding the preparations and further planning..."The review meeting took place two days after India and Pakistan agreed to stop all firing and military action on land, in the air, and at sea. However, hours after that, reports came of Pakistan violating the cessation of hostilities with India's air defence intercepting Pakistdrones amid a blackout in Srinagar and various other parts of Jammu and Kashmir, Rajasthan and Punjab.Earlier, Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde thanked all three services for giving a befitting reply to Pakistan and said that Mumbai is the financial capital and the state government needs to be "fully alert", as the city was earlier targeted by terrorists in 2008."An important meeting related to security has taken place with the Army, Navy, Air Force and Civil Defence under the chairmanship of the CM. A discussion was held to appoint a nodal officer. This is the financial capital, so Mumbai is always targeted. We need to be fully alert," Eknath Shinde told ANI.He also thanked Prime Minister Narendra Modi for empowering the defence forces with a free hand in responding to threats."I want to thank all three services for giving a befitting reply...Thanks to PM Modi for giving free hand to all three services. Earlier, no one ever dared to give free hand to the armed forces, no matter how bad the situation was," he added.The security meeting, chaired by CM Fadnavis at his official residence, was attended by top officials from the defence forces and key state departments.Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar were also present at this meeting on security and preparedness in the state. From the Indian Army, Lt. General Pawan Chadha, Colonel Sandeep Seal, from the Indian Navy, Rear Admiral Anil Jaggi, Naval Commander Nitesh Garg, and from the Indian Air Force, Air Vice Marshal Rajat Mohan, were present at the meeting. Representatives from the Reserve Bank, JNPT, BPT, Mumbai Stock Exchange, National Stock Exchange, ATS, and Home Guard were present.The meeting discussed the exchange of intelligence information, more use of technology and what precautions to take. The cooperation expected from the state government with the defence forces and the establishment of a faster coordination mechanism were discussed.State Chief Secretary Sujata Saunik, Secretary in the Chief Minister's Secretariat, Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department Iqbal Singh Chahal, Director General of Police Rashmi Shukla, Mumbai Police Commissioner Deven Bharti, Mumbai Municipal Corporation Additional Commissioner Vipin Sharma, Additional Director General of Police, Civil Security Prabhat Kumar, Additional Inspector General of Police, Intelligence Department Shirish Jain, Additional Chief Secretary, Disaster Management, State Sonia Sethi, as well as Mumbai District and Mumbai Suburban District Collectors and officers of other departments were also present in the meeting.The 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks , orchestrated by the Pakistan-based terrorist outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba, claimed the lives of over 170 people and left hundreds injured. Rana's extradition and subsequent interrogation are part of India's ongoing efforts to bring all conspirators of the attacks to justice.Operation Sindoor was launched on May 7 to strike multiple terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied-Kashmir after a deadly attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam last month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Russia's 'Mr Nobody' gambles all with film on Kremlin propaganda
Live Events 'Persona non grata' 'Like musketeers' (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel When Moscow invaded Ukraine, Pavel Talankin , a staff member at a secondary school in Russia's Ural Mountains, was ordered to film patriotic lessons, songs and morning the school's event organiser and also a keen videographer, found the propaganda work so depressing that he wanted to quit his job in the industrial town of he received what he says was the strangest message of his life.A Europe-based filmmaker got in touch, offering to collaborate on a project to document the abrupt militarisation of Talankin's school in the wake of Russia's February 2022 invasion of its had earlier seen a post from a Russian company looking for people whose jobs had been affected by the war. Talankin said he was ready to receiving the foreigner's offer Talankin did not sleep all project changed his life teaming up with David Borenstein and shooting many hours of footage, Talankin last summer fled Russia with seven hard discs, leaving behind his mother, brothers and sisters and the town he the smuggled-out footage Borenstein, a Denmark-based US filmmaker, directed what became " Mr Nobody Against Putin ", an award-winning 90-minute documentary which exposes the intensity of the propaganda at Talankin's school and throughout premiered at the 2025 Sundance film festival in project cost Talankin dearly. Local officials banned his former colleagues from contacting him, he became a hate figure for supporters of the war and his school librarian mother was upset."I have become a persona non grata," Talankin, 34, told AFP from Prague, where he is now outlawed all criticism of the Russian military and the Kremlin and Talankin knew he had taken huge he has no regrets."I would do it all over again."He has been buoyed by the support of people featured in the film including those who lost their loved ones in the former colleague said she became ashamed that she, too, was "part of the system."The documentary reaped awards at festivals and the film crew hopes it will be available to wider audiences in Europe later this year. Borenstein said the film's success had been a "relief" because the multi-national crew overcame numerous obstacles including communication and above all he was "really scared" that if the film flopped Talankin's sacrifice would come to nothing."I knew the whole time that Pasha would have to leave Russia to make this project happen," Borenstein told AFP, referring to his co-director by his diminutive."That is a huge sacrifice for him, because his mum is there, his whole life is there, he does not speak English, not at that time."Talankin has not been able to join the crew to present the film at the Sundance festival in Utah and elsewhere due to paperwork issues, but the team hopes this will soon now he is learning English and adjusting to his new life in said he was heartened by the reactions at the viewer in the Czech Republic said he hated Russians but the film made him reconsider. "We knew nothing about what was happening to you," Talankin quoted the Czech as saying."It is a powerful and poetic piece of cinema," said producer Alexandra Fechner, who is promoting the film in France."This film shows the hidden side of propaganda in Russia , which targets the youngest members of society, children who are being taught a rewritten version of history and given guns!" she the war in its fourth year, Moscow has put society on a war footing and leveraged the educational system to raise a fiercely pro-Kremlin film features Wagner mercenaries telling children about hand grenades and teachers calling Ukrainians "neo-Nazi", and includes an audio recording of a wailing mother at her soldier son's critics also point to the documentary's empathy and light one episode, a history teacher tells pupils that the spiralling prices could soon make gas unaffordable for Europeans."The French will soon be like musketeers, riding horses, and the rest of Europe too," he said that by viewing the footage sent by Talankin nearly every day, he understood the effect of the dehumanising war-time at the beginning he found some of the clips shocking, months later his mind had become so used to the onslaught of the propaganda that he did not see the footage depicting the Wagner mercenaries as something abnormal."I was able to replicate among myself some of the feelings that maybe the students and people in the school felt," he said. "Looking at this propaganda every single day was a lesson in how desensitised you can become to it."A lot of the footage had not made it into the film, including the school's preparations for the possibility of a nuclear is located close to one of Russia's most sensitive sites, the Mayak nuclear reprocessing said Borenstein did not want the viewers to "drown in the enormous amount of negative material.""I have plans for this footage," Talankin said. "Sooner or later I will start slowly releasing it."
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
As Iranian missiles approached a US base, one nation stepped in to avert a wider war in West Asia
Live Events 19 missiles in the air, a ceasefire on the line A phone call, and a breakthrough (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel On the evening of June 23, when Iranian missiles raced toward the largest American military base in the Gulf, senior Qatari officials were deep in high-level talks about defusing regional didn't expect the conflict to reach their doorstep — until the walls began to to Qatar's foreign ministry spokesperson Majed Al-Ansari, defense personnel interrupted a meeting with the Qatari Prime Minister in Doha on Monday with urgent warnings: Iranian missiles were incoming. Moments later, the thunder of interceptors filled the skies above the Qatari capital, Ansari told attack came days after U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and pushed the region to the brink of a broader capitals braced for impact. In Kuwait, shelters were opened. In Bahrain, roads were closed. Some residents in Dubai and Abu Dhabi rushed to buy supplies or book flights Al Udeid Air Base , the largest U.S. installation in the region, American military personnel had already begun evacuating. Qatar, meanwhile, activated its early warning radar system and scrambled 300 troops to deploy Patriot missile batteries. 'Towards the end it was very clear… Al Udeid Base was going to be targeted,' a Qatari defense official told around 7 p.m. local time, radar confirmed that Iranian missiles were airborne. According to Al-Ansari, Qatar's military intercepted seven missiles over the Persian Gulf, and another eleven over Doha. A single missile struck an uninhabited area near Al Udeid, causing minimal damage.U.S. President Donald Trump later said that 14 missiles had been fired, but Qatar's account put the number at 19. Al-Ansari told CNN the missile defense operation was 'Qatari-led', though coordinated with U.S. Tehran had warned Gulf nations months earlier that any U.S. attack on Iranian territory would make American bases across the region 'legitimate targets,' Al-Ansari said no specific warning was given ahead of this strike. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reportedly reiterated that stance in Istanbul just one day earlier, telling Gulf counterparts that retaliation was imminent if the U.S. the attack, Iran's National Security Council said the strikes posed 'no dangerous aspect to our friendly and brotherly country of Qatar and its noble people.' But Al-Ansari dismissed speculation that Qatar had quietly allowed the strike in exchange for a future diplomatic opening.'We do not take it lightly for our country to be attacked by missiles from any side,' he told CNN. 'I would not put my daughter under missiles coming from the sky just to come out with a political outcome. This was a complete surprise to us.'Just as Qatar's leadership was weighing how to respond, a call came from President Trump to Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani. Trump relayed that Israel was willing to agree to a ceasefire, and asked Qatar to relay that message to Iran.'As we were discussing how to retaliate to this attack… this is when we get a call from the United States that a possible ceasefire, a possible avenue to regional security had opened,' Al-Ansari country's chief negotiator, Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Al-Khulaifi, reached out to Tehran. Simultaneously, Prime Minister Al Thani spoke to U.S. Vice President JD Vance. With both channels active, a deal was quickly arranged.'All options were on the table that night,' Al-Ansari recalled. 'But we also realized that was a moment that could create momentum for peace in a region that hasn't been there for two years now.'
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
NATO's 5% pledge: Rearming the West or rebalancing the world
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel In an era where geopolitical boundaries are blurred and warfare has morphed from trenches to tech, NATO 's recent commitment to invest 5% of GDP annually in defence by 2035 sends a thunderous signal—not just to adversaries, but to allies questioning the alliance's strategic relevance. The Hague Summit Declaration, adopted by 32 member states, marked a pivotal moment in transatlantic security thinking. The question now is whether this is a forward-looking strategy or a reactionary bulwark clinging to the past the core of the declaration lies an emphatic reaffirmation of Article 5—the principle that an attack on one NATO member is an attack on all NATO members. However, the real headline is the proposed ramp-up in defence and security-related spending: 3.5% of GDP earmarked for traditional defence infrastructure and capabilities, and an additional 1.5% for resilience, critical infrastructure protection, and innovation. This is a fundamental reset of NATO's budgetary posture, reflective of a world no longer anchored to the certainties of post-Cold War strategic rationale behind this move is evident in the literature. From Russia's protracted war in Ukraine to hybrid warfare tactics deployed through cyberattacks, misinformation campaigns, and economic coercion, the threats facing the Euro-Atlantic region are no longer just physical; they are systemic. However, the implications of NATO's new doctrine stretch far beyond including Ukraine's security under the umbrella of NATO's own, the alliance is signalling that Kyiv's stability is no longer peripheral—it is central to the European defence architecture. Although the declaration stops short of directly naming Russia as an aggressor, it unequivocally categorises it as a long-term threat. The political calculus here is clear: to maintain unity among diverse member states while advancing a credible deterrent pledging 5% of GDP—especially in times of economic uncertainty, rising public debt, and shrinking fiscal room—will not be without domestic blowback. For many European countries, where defence budgets have long played second fiddle to social spending, the pivot will require not only financial reallocation but also political will. The path to 2035 will be fraught with parliamentary debates, economic trade-offs, and inevitable scrutiny from taxpayers questioning the utility of militarisation during said, NATO's blueprint smartly distinguishes between "hard power" and 'soft shield' spending. By allocating up to 1.5% for cyber defense , critical infrastructure, industrial innovation, and civil preparedness, the alliance acknowledges the multidimensional nature of modern warfare. Drones, AI, satellite technologies, and quantum encryption will define future battles. This is NATO's attempt to future-proof compelling aspect of the declaration is its call to dismantle internal defence trade barriers and catalyse transatlantic industrial cooperation. The subtext? Europe's dependence on American defence systems must evolve into a mutual technological collaboration. With U.S. domestic politics becoming increasingly isolationist and polarised, especially in light of looming electoral uncertainties, Europe has no choice but to shoulder more of the strategic burden of timing of this declaration cannot be ignored. This occurs at a time when questions are being raised about the longevity of American leadership and the cohesion of Western alliances. Populist politics, migration crises, climate-induced conflicts, and digital disruptions are redrawing the map of security concerns. In this light, NATO's 5% commitment is as much about deterrence as it is about staying for all its ambition, the declaration raises a philosophical question: can militarised investment alone secure peace in a world where most battles are fought in cyberspace, legislatures, and courtrooms? While NATO shores up its arsenal, adversaries weaponize currency systems, manipulate public opinion through AI-generated propaganda, and infiltrate supply chains. In such a scenario, defence must be defined not only by missiles and manpower but also by legal resilience, technological agility, and economic its closing remarks, the summit's declaration looks ahead—to Türkiye in 2026 and Albania thereafter. Symbolically, this eastward shift in NATO meeting venues reflects a changing strategic frontier. The frontlines are no longer confined to the Fulda Gap but extend into the Black Sea, Indo-Pacific, and digital cloud networks connecting us NATO's 5% pledge is more than just a budgetary item. It is a test of collective resolve in a fractured global order. If implemented wisely—with strategic clarity, equitable burden-sharing, and an eye on emerging threats—it could become a blueprint for securing liberal democracies in a multipolar, volatile world. But if the focus remains confined to tanks and treaties while ignoring the algorithmic and institutional battlefields of the 21st century, NATO risks building a fortress for yesterday's warThe author is Department of Commerce, Assistant Professor and Research Supervisor, St. Thomas College (Autonomous), Thrissur, Kerala
