Turkey ramps up political influence in the Western Balkans – DW – 07/06/2025
With a height of 50 meters (160 feet) and space for around 8,000 worshippers, the Namazgah mosque in Albania's capital Tirana is one of the most impressive Islamic places of worship in the Western Balkans.
It was partly funded with around €30 million ($34 million) by the Turkish religious authority Diyanet. Its architectural inspiration is the Blue Mosque in Istanbul.
In October 2024, after a construction period of around ten years, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan came to Tirana for the inauguration of the mosque. While there, he signed an agreement to cooperate with Albania on agriculture and education, and donated a number of Turkish-made drones to the country. Diyanet also secured influence on the board of the new mosque and a Turkish imam was appointed, which was cause for dismay among Albanians.
"The Namazgah mosque shows how Turkey is acting as a regional power in the Western Balkans, and working to increase its influence by building places of worship," Nathalie Clayer, a social scientist at the School of Advanced Studies in Social Sciences (EHESS) in Paris, told DW. The construction of mosques as a means to project soft power is also closely linked with furthering economic, political and military interests, she explained. "But local actors do have room to maneuver, and they use it," Clayer added.
However, even if a mosque is built with external funding, the initiative usually begins with local communities, who also cover part of the costs. In the case of representative religious buildings in capital cities, the interests of national and external players are additionally taken into consideration, as Clayer pointed out. "A country's prestige, the needs of the Muslim community, national self-assurances, assertions made with respect to other religions: these are all factors that play a role in the construction of a place of worship and in the choice of architectural models," she told DW.
Nowadays, Turkey is the leading nation in terms of funding new mosques in the Western Balkans. However, this was not the case in the first years following the breakup of the former Yugoslavia. In 1995, Saudi Arabia was the main sponsor for the reconstruction of mosques in Bosnia and Herzegovina that had been destroyed during the war. It was only in the wake of Erdogan's rise to power in 2002 and 2003 that Turkey increasingly took the lead.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Saudi Arabia, meanwhile, has increasingly withdrawn under the country's de facto ruler Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Many Saudi-funded mosque projects have been handed over to local partners. Bin Salman has instead prioritized the restoration of historic mosques in Saudi Arabia, and the preservation of its own cultural heritage. It's all part of his Vision 2030, a set of reforms that prioritizes economic and social changes in Saudi Arabia.
Turkey regards itself as the heir of the Ottoman Empire and stresses its claim to regional power. This claim goes beyond religion, as Rebecca Byrant, an expert in cultural anthropology at Utrecht University, explained. According to her, funding the construction of mosques is just one element of Turkish infrastructure policy, not only in the Western Balkans, but also in the Caucasus, Central Asia, North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa. The construction of mosques must therefore to be viewed in a wider geopolitical context, the expert said.
Whether railroad lines, ports, hotels or shopping districts: Turkish investors are on the move in a big way from Sarajevo in Bosnia and Herzegovina, to Batumi in Georgia, from Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan, to Turkish-occupied northern Cyprus and Senegal.
The futuristic skyline of Astana, for instance, was mainly realized by Turkish construction companies, according to Bryant. Many tenders went to construction companies with direct ties to Erdogan. Bryant calls this form of political influence "infrastructure imperialism."
Mega-projects such as in the Turkish-controlled part of northern Cyprus, where Erdogan inaugurated a complex comprising the presidential palace, parliament building, large hotels and a mosque (which had not yet been completed at the time of the inauguration) in May 2024 are "geopolitical places where Turkey expresses its ideas about the future," as Bryant explained.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
In her view, Erdogan is drawing on ethnic, religious or historical similarities and using rhetoric about "a common destiny" that links Turkey with these countries. The projects were intended to signal that "we are the future. We are more modern than the West," Bryant said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
GMF25: Limbourg calls for European-led 'Public Service AI'
Under the theme "Breaking barriers, building bridges," DW's GMF25 opens with a strong focus on the future of AI and its implications for democracy and public access to information. The opening ceremony was streamed live on YouTube . Photos can be found here . "What kind of AI do we want shaping our information ecosystems?" DW Director General Peter Limbourg asked, "I call for the creation of a European AI – independent, transparent, and built on public values, not private profit. It can become a Global Public Service AI – if we build it together. This is our opportunity to shape the future – not just of the media, but of democracy itself. If we want to preserve the integrity of journalism and the diversity of voices, we must take responsibility for the tools that shape how people access information and understand the world." Limbourg also called for the need to regulate Big Tech platforms: "If we do not regulate Big Tech, it will regulate our democracy. Just take a look at the United States." His opening remarks set the tone for DW's 18th Global Media Forum, which brings together nearly 900 participants from over 100 countries across three venues in Bonn. As AI reshapes the flow of information and public discourse, the conference explores how media, policy, and technology leaders can collaborate to safeguard independent journalism and protect open societies. DW Director General Peter Limbourg Image: Björn Kietzmann/DW In her keynote address, EU Commissioner for Enlargement Marta Kos underscored the need for the EU to strengthen support for quality journalism: "Media organizations need financial sustainability. With the demise of USAID our work has become a lot more difficult in our partner countries. We're stepping in in many places, but we cannot replace U.S. financing everywhere," she said, adding: "Today we face an abundance of information. … This forces us to rethink how the EU supports quality journalism. We also need to defend democratic spaces … to make journalistic work possible. Our strongest tool is the EU's enlargement process itself. We are working with independent countries to make sure their legislative frameworks support free and independent journalism." Kicking off the forum, North Rhine-Westphalia's Minister for Federal, European and Media Affairs Nathanael Liminski highlighted the mounting pressure of the media amid a rapidly evolving media landscape shaped by AI and disinformation and underlined the need to regulate Big Tech: "We have major U.S. platforms dominate attention – and now I see two priorities: Introducing levy on large platforms. The new German government has committed itself to this role, ensuring that the revenues are used for strengthening the media sector. Second, we must protect the rights of content creators in the age of AI. Creative work must be rewarded fairly." EU Commissioner for Enlargement Marta Kos delivered a keynote speech at the Global Media Forum 2025 Image: Björn Kietzmann/DW DW's Global Media Forum 2025 is underway across three locations in Bonn – the Bundeskunsthalle, Kunstmuseum Bonn, and DW Headquarters – marking the conference's first tri-location format in the city. This year's program sees political leaders, journalists and media experts take on the most pressing challenges facing global media today – from fighting disinformation and pushing back against digital censorship to boosting media literacy in the age of AI. The agenda also zeroes in on shrinking funding for journalism, the fight for media pluralism, rebuilding public trust in times of conflict, and why inclusion and journalist safety matter more than ever. North Rhine-Westphalia's Minister for Federal, European and Media Affairs Nathanael Liminski Image: Florian Görner/DW Day 1: Breaking digital walls and ensuring access to information Digital censorship and access to information take center stage on day one of DW's Global Media Forum 2025, along with a range of other urgent media challenges. The panel "How authoritarian regimes build digital walls - and how to overcome them " brings together key voices including Andreas Gebhard (re:publica Berlin); veteran of the Tiananmen Square democracy movement Pokong Chen; and Gypsy Guillén Kaiser (Committee to Protect Journalists). Drawing on their varied backgrounds in civil society, journalism and digital advocacy, the panel explores how governments restrict access to information – and how international actors are pushing back to protect media freedom and journalists. Also on the day's agenda: members of the DG8 public media leaders, including the BBC, RFE/RL, and host DW as well as global media leaders including E-jicom and TVP World – will tackle another pressing challenge: "Ensuring continued access to information: How to build bridges in volatile times. " This session responds to the recent USAGM funding cuts that have impacted global media. At stake: how to sustain access to trusted news, independent reporting and civic information in the regions most affected. The day closes with the DW Freedom of Speech Award ceremony, streamed live on YouTube , honoring Georgian journalist Tamar Kintsurashvili for her work fighting disinformation and promoting media literacy in Georgia. Over two days, the program dives into how AI is reshaping journalism – raising new questions about ethics, accuracy, and editorial control – with keynotes, workshops, breakout sessions, and panel discussions tackling the toughest questions in conflict reporting amidst disinformation, post-crisis storytelling, and the shifting media terrain across the Global South and beyond. Check out the full GMF 2025 program for more details. For real-time updates, highlights, and behind-the-scenes impressions, follow @DW_GMF and the hashtag #GMF25 across all major social media platforms. Stay connected with the GMF on YouTube , LinkedIn , Facebook and X – and through our newsletter.
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Why is Trump meeting five African presidents this week? – DW – 07/07/2025
US president has invited the leaders of Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mauritania and Senegal to Washington this week. Experts suggest that there will be more on the agenda than just commercial opportunities. "A White House official explained last week that 'President Trump believes African countries offer incredible commercial opportunities that benefit both the American people and our African partners,'" says DW's Washington correspondent, Ines Pohl. "In a recent update, Trump highlighted the vast commercial potential of African nations, suggesting stronger economic ties could be mutually beneficial. However, his administration has cut back on US foreign aid to Africa, viewing it as wasteful and incompatible with his 'America First' agenda. Instead, the focus is shifting toward trade and investment, particularly in West Africa's critical minerals sector and regional security." Trump's approach to Africa appears to have evolved since his first term. During a White House meeting on January 10, 2018, he famously referred to Haiti and several African countries as "shithole countries." "We recall those harsh words, but things have changed," says Prof. Suleymane Bachir Diagne of Senegal who teaches and researches at Columbia University in New York City. "Africa is now on the radar of the Trump administration. The continent is recognized as a place to make deals." But if Trump's agenda truly centers on deals and 'America First,' why invite the presidents of these five relatively small economies? "It's surprising," Diagne says. "One might expect the usual suspects — large economies like South Africa or Nigeria. Instead, we have these five countries, which few anticipated." In terms of trade volume with the US, the five countries are relatively minor players. However, all possess significant untapped natural resources: "Controlling migration and drug routes — that's what Donald Trump is truly interested in," says Zakaria Ould Amar, an international consultant from Mauritania. "These five countries lie directly on refugee and migrant paths that have, over the years, sent tens of thousands of people to the US-Mexico border. International drug routes also run through this region." Amar suggests that these security issues will dominate Trump's talks with the five African leaders. "Economically, these countries are currently of little significance. I can't see what Trump could realistically negotiate with them in terms of trade or business." American affairs expert Prof. William Ferreira from Guinea-Bissau is skeptical: "I doubt this meeting will bring tangible benefits to the African countries involved. There's no such thing as a free lunch." "Our president's trip to Washington to meet Trump is not good news for Guinea-Bissau or its people," he says. Ferreira notes that the Trump administration has halted or drastically cut funding for aid projects in Africa and also in Guinea-Bissau, dimming any hopes tied to the meeting in Washington. For Guinea-Bissau's President Umaro Sissoco Embalo, however, the gathering presents an opportunity to showcase himself as a respected statesman on the international stage, despite significant internal challenges. His term officially expired in February, yet he remains in office amid questions of legality. The fate of scheduled elections in December remains uncertain. "All five regimes, not just Guinea-Bissau, are grappling with major institutional problems and breaches of the rule of law," Ferreira says. "But that doesn't bother Trump. He wants to demonstrate he still has allies in Africa. For the five presidents, this event is a chance to present themselves as important and legitimate leaders internationally. And in fact, from their perspective, it greatly elevates their standing." Gabon's current president, Brice Oligui Nguema, has faced serious corruption allegations and is linked to the recent coup that ousted Ali Bongo Ondimba. Liberia faces severe social challenges. Joseph Boakai has been president since January 2024. Mauritania's President Mohamed Ould Ghazouani, a general and politician, has been in office since August 2019 but the country faces serious social problems. Senegal, led by President Bassirou Diomaye Faye since 2024, confronts accusations of facilitating illegal international migration. Guinea-Bissau remains embroiled in institutional crises, with civil society groups accusing Umaro Sissoco Embalo of dismantling democratic structures and aiming to establish a dictatorship. His legitimacy is seen as derived not from the people but through international endorsements like the Washington meeting. Lesmes Monteiro, presidential advisor in Guinea-Bissau, offers a contrasting view. "Sissoco Embaló's inclusion among Trump's chosen five is a diplomatic triumph," he told DW. "He is a determined leader, respected and received by the world's most powerful statesmen: Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, Emmanuel Macron, and now Donald Trump." Monteiro highlights ideological alignment as a key factor in the selection. "Trump and our president share similar values: a strong emphasis on national sovereignty and traditional values. Guinea-Bissau's geostrategic position is very important to the US, and economically, the country could become interesting to the US in the medium term." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
6 hours ago
- DW
Can Denmark keep the EU green? – DW – 07/07/2025
Denmark says cutting emissions will help the EU defend itself and compete with China and the US. However, keeping the EU's beleaguered green deal alive amid a climate policy backlash won't be easy. The streets of Denmark's second city Aarhus are full of clues that this is a climate-conscious country. Bottle recycling machines greet pedestrians at regular intervals; bike paths are teeming with cyclists in rain or shine — often with kids or cargo in tow; and out in the bay where the Kattegat connects the Baltic and North Seas, turbines help generate more wind power per person than almost any other country in the world. It was here that the Nordic nation chose to launch its six-month stint heading up the EU Council, the body representing the bloc's 27 national governments. And a word that's fallen out of vogue in European policy-making circles made the cut in Denmark's stated priorities: "Green." "There's a lot at stake," Climate and Energy Minister Lars Aagaard told DW as Denmark's EU presidency kicked off. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Gone are the days when climate policies dominated the European Union's agenda; when school climate strikers demonstrating in towns and cities across the bloc prompted policymakers to come up with the so-called Green Deal, dubbed Europe's "man on the moon moment" by the EU Commission back in 2018. Since then, the realities of radically shifting geopolitics have swung like a wrecking ball onto Europe's political consciousness — from Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine and the resulting energy and inflation crisis, to US President Donald Trump's tariffs and mounting existential fears in European industries from car-making to chemicals. Green parties lost out in most countries in last year's European elections after what many analysts dubbed a backlash against green policies. The EU's big promises to slash emissions have already been enshrined in law, allowing the bloc to keep up its claim of climate leadership on the global stage — especially with Washington pulling out of the Paris climate deal. But bit-by-bit, lower-profile elements of Europe's green legislation are coming under fire in debates on how to ease burdens on businesses to help the EU compete with the likes of China and the US. "We support a climate policy driven by innovation, investment, and responsibility — not by radical bans or ideology," leaders of the EU's biggest political grouping, the center-right European People's Party, said in a statement late last month. "We are ambitious, yet pragmatic," they wrote. While those leaders praised a series of red-tape-cutting plans laid out by the EU's executive, climate campaigners have rejected the moves. Recently, Brussels also sparked their ire by shelving draft anti-greenwashing rules. To keep climate action moving, Denmark is finding new ways to frame the argument: By casting the green transition as a key ingredient in Europe's bid to boost its military independence. "Climate change is about defense. Europe's strategic autonomy is threatened, and it's threatened partly because we are so extremely dependent on the import of fossil fuels," Energy Minister Aagaard said — referring to the bloc's past dependence on Russian oil and gas and its new plans to gradually ban their sale. "Bringing Europe into a position where we can produce more of the energy we need, where we get more energy efficient, where we create a strong economics based on decarbonized energy, for me that's also the response," he added. Denmark's center-left-led government has given security top billing in its EU presidency, following on from Poland which held the rotating role for the first half of 2025. The Danish defense ministry has also gone further than most EU states in its national bid to beef up military independence, by extending conscription to women. Still, researchers acknowledge Europe's race to rearm brings its own challenges for climate policymaking. Emissions linked to military work tend to be top secret, and researcher Jens Mortensen says the search for more critical materials like rare earth metals may "delay or slow down the green transition." "In the short term defense spending is prioritized, and there will be a concern about what it does to our emissions," Mortensen, a political scientist who lectures on global environmental governance at Copenhagen University, told DW. "But right now we probably have to. That's the feeling in the North: We have to. We feel very exposed." Not all EU governments share the Danes' assessment that going green will equip the EU to better defend itself and compete internationally. The political challenge that lies ahead became evident last week when the European Commission proposed a new legally binding stepping stone on the EU's path to achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Under the latest proposals, the EU must cut greenhouse emissions 90% by 2040 compared to 1990 levels. "As European citizens increasingly feel the impact of climate change, they expect Europe to act," Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen said recently. However, Italy, Czechia, and Poland have been critical of the bill, which still requires approval from EU states and lawmakers. "Our country is not yet ready to implement such ambitious plans," Poland's environment minister, Paulina Hennig-Kloska, told news channel Polsat last week. "The EU's reduction target must be realistic, and the contributions of individual countries toward achieving it must be varied," she said. Climate campaigners, meanwhile, were disappointed that the draft legislation allows states to include carbon credits gained through investments in environment projects outside Europe in their climate accounting. "Most international offsets aren't worth the paper they're written on and have done nothing to cut emissions. They're also a waste of taxpayers' money," Michael Sicauld-Clyet of the World Wildlife Fund said last week. Researcher Jens Mortensen saw the compromise as a means to an end. "We have to give in on certain issues," he said. "It's controversial, but it was necessary to convince skeptics." Convincing skeptics will be Copenhagen's daily business through the rest of 2025. Asked whether he expected to get Czechia and others on board with emissions-cutting targets, Minister Lars Aagaard said: "Time will show." "I know that there are short-term concerns in a number of European countries that climate change politics can be a challenge to economic development," he added. "But I also think that it's important for all of us to remember that meeting our climate targets is part of what should make Europe competitive in the longer run." Lecturer Jens Mortensen says Denmark can only hope to keep countries talking about climate policies, rather than turning political tides, due to the limits of its role. "It's really about trying to reframe current challenges and the mess we're in to say: 'Don't forget the green transition.' We are aware it's lost its top priority."
