Facing the Invisible Tank: A Hong Kong Bookstore's Stand for Freedom
I was taken aback when I opened the bookstore's website. Right on the homepage, a bold message in Cantonese read: "Become a hunter, not unsuspecting prey."
This is the reality of today's Hong Kong. The invisible threat of the National Security Law (NSL), enacted in 2020, hangs in the air like a suspended round from a silent tank. It is ready to strike at any time, from anywhere.
Hunter Bookstore is located in Kowloon. At the entrance, a red slip of paper bears the word "Freedom." Below it, a poster urges: "Face your fear head-on."
Inside, among shelves of ordinary titles, are books on the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, as well as works by pro-democracy activists arrested by Hong Kong police. These books are banned in mainland China. Since the NSL took effect, they have been removed from public libraries. Swept away by a growing tide of self-censorship, they have quietly vanished from mainstream bookstores. Anti-government demonstration held in Hong Kong in 2019. (©Sankei by Kinya Fujimoto)
The store is run by 32-year-old Leticia Wong, a former pro-democracy district councilor.
"People seemed to resign themselves to the fact that our freedoms were being stripped away, one by one. I couldn't stand by and watch anymore," she said.
The crackdown began in 2019. Slogans from the anti-government, anti-Chinese Communist Party protests were banned. Even common phrases like "Hong Kong, add oil," a cheer of encouragement, were sometimes restricted for "evoking protest sentiments." Over time, people began to censor themselves out of fear — to protect themselves.
Wong was once a political journalist for a local paper. She later became a district councilor, but after the NSL came into effect, she resigned in protest. She refused to pledge loyalty to the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.
Eventually, Wong found herself drawn to bookselling and opened her own store.
But the shop offers more than books. It also sells illustrated cards inspired by historian Timothy Snyder's guide to resisting tyranny. Each card carries a principle: hold on to your beliefs, summon courage, believe in the truth. Cards featuring 20 principles for resisting tyranny. (©Sankei by Kinya Fujimoto)
Friends and customers often ask Wong if she's afraid to be selling these kinds of books.
When I ask her the same question, she replies, "I want to ask the opposite. Why are you afraid? What exactly is so frightening? If you look fear in the eye, you might realize it's not as terrifying as it seems."
Hunter Bookstore has been inspected several times by government officials.
"They're just trying to intimidate. If I've broken a law, they can arrest me," Wong says calmly.
On a large mirror inside the shop, a message written in Cantonese reads: "What you fear is yourself." Staring back is your own reflection.
When asked which resistance card is the most popular, Wong replied, "Do not obey in advance."
Hunter Bookstore is a quiet beacon of resistance — and a symbol of the silent defiance among Hongkongers living under growing self-censorship.
( Read the article in Japanese . )
Author: Kinya Fujimoto, The Sankei Shimbun
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
5 hours ago
- CTV News
B.C. funds more policing as hate crimes rose by 23 per cent between 2022 to 2023
The B.C. RCMP Divisional Headquarters is seen, in Surrey, B.C., on Thursday, Jan. 11, 2024. (Ethan Cairns / The Canadian Press) Hate aimed at religion, sexual orientation and race or ethnicity has jumped in British Columbia, setting off a funding increase for the RCMP's hate crimes unit. Public Safety Minister Garry Begg announced an additional $734,000 for the RCMP's anti-hate crime unit in the province as police-reported hate crimes rose by an average of 23 per cent from 2022 to 2023. Chief Supt. Elija Rain in charge of the provincial RCMP major crime section says the additional funding marks a 'significant expansion' to combat hate-related crimes, which he says are often 'fuelled by conflict and unrest in other parts of the world.' Begg says hate crimes related to religion rose by 51 per cent during the same period, while crimes related to sexual orientation were up by 43 per cent. The extra money for the hate crimes unit — the only one of its kind in Canada — will pay for six more officers and an intelligence analyst for a year, but Begg says the funding will grow as the need increases. The government says the funding will also strengthen investigations through the criminal-justice process, ensuring police are equipped with required evidence for prosecutors, and that victims of the crimes are supported through the court process. This report by Wolfgang Depner of The Canadian Press was first published July 4, 2025.
Japan Forward
9 hours ago
- Japan Forward
Japan-US Security Challenges from the Atlantic to the Pacific
Hudson Institute's Japan Chair challenges conventional international relations thinking by integrating a wide range of perspectives toward beyond-the-horizon policy issues. JAPAN Forward is pleased to amplify the voices of its experts by sharing this report with our readers. The world's strategic focus is today centered on regions far distant from the Indo-Pacific in the Middle East, on Israel's June 13 preemptive strike on Iran's nuclear infrastructure, joined by the United States on June 21. And on Israel's continuing efforts to root out Hamas in Gaza, in addition to Russia's ongoing aggression against Ukraine. Yet, the challenges to stability and security in the Indo-Pacific have only intensified. At the time of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, then-Prime Minister Fumio Kishida cautioned lest Ukraine preview the future of East Asia. His concerns are even more relevant today. On the Korean Peninsula, Kim Jong Un, now with Vladimir Putin's support, has continued to advance North Korea's nuclear and missile programs, daily increasing the threat posed to the security of the Republic of Korea, Japan, and the United States. In turn, Seoul, Tokyo, and Washington have moved to enhance alliance-based trilateral security and intelligence cooperation. Meanwhile, China has intensified and expanded the People's Liberation Army's (PLA) threatening military exercises that simulate an attack on or blockade of Taiwan. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth recently reminded the audience at the Shangri-la Dialogue that Xi Jinping has ordered the PLA to be prepared to invade Taiwan by 2027. The Chinese naval aircraft carrier "Shandong" sails. China Central Television Online showed this on July 2 as part of a training exercise around Taiwan. (via CCTV Online via Kyodo) . A Taiwan contingency could present Japan with security-related challenges for the defense of Japan as well as the alliance. As former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe observed, "A Taiwan contingency is a contingency for Japan …it is also a contingency for the Japan-US Alliance." And a decision by the US to engage in a Taiwan contingency is, as Abe noted, likely also to involve Japan. Former diplomats, defense officials, foreign policy and security analysts have recognized Japan's likely involvement. Liberal Democratic Party Vice President Taro Aso has expressed his view that a Taiwan contingency would likely present Japan with a "survival-threatening situation," which would evoke a response under Japan's Peace and Security legislation. Articles by Admiral Yoji Koda, former commander of the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force and Nobukatsu Kanehara, former assistant chief cabinet secretary, have addressed issues related to the defense of Japan and the alliance. Keio University professor Ken Jimbo wrote that a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would inevitably lead to a joint Japan-US response. Meanwhile, Japan's think tanks, the Japan Forum for Strategic Studies, the Sasakawa Peace Foundation, and the Research Institute for Peace and Security have convened study groups and conferences focused on a Taiwan contingency. Unfortunately, the articles and conference reports have all too quickly faded from public debate and the political forum, left by Japan's political leaders to backroom discussions and foreign ministry and Ministry of Defense bureaucrats. It's a political exercise of whistling past the policy graveyard. Yet, within Japan and across the alliance, diplomats and defense planners have increasingly focused on a Taiwan contingency. The joint statement issued at the March 2016 Security Consultative Meeting, for the first time, referred to the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait for Japan and United States' security interests. Subsequent joint statements have reiterated their importance. Over the past several years, the media have reported Japan-US agreement on operational plans in the event of a Taiwan contingency. Also, Japanese and US forces have conducted joint exercises focused on China as a hypothetical enemy. Today, Japan's 2016 Peace and Security laws provide the legal framework for Tokyo's response to a Taiwan contingency. The laws establish distinct operational commitments under distinct security situations. For example, an "Important Influence Situation" is defined as "having an important influence on Japan's peace and security that could lead to a direct armed attack on Japan itself if left unattended." The laws would enable the SDF to provide rear-area support to United States forces engaged in activities aimed at securing the objectives of the security treaty. They do not allow the provision of weaponry, but they support the provision of ammunition, refueling, and aircraft maintenance in support of combat operations. LDP's Taro Aso referred to an "armed attack, anticipated armed attack, or survival-threatening situation" in his remarks on Taiwan. He added that Japan could use force in response to "an armed attack against a foreign country that is in a close relationship with Japan, which, as a result, threatens Japan's survival." An attack by the PLA on US forces engaged in a Taiwan contingency could bring about a survival-threatening situation for Japan. Looking ahead, what is to be done? For starters: In both Tokyo and Washington, policymakers must consider and work through various scenarios involving a potential United States decision to engage in a Taiwan contingency. This would not only enhance deterrence but also serve to develop an alliance-based response across a broad spectrum of potential conflict and escalatory scenarios. Joint military exercises toward this end are critical. This will also require policymakers in Tokyo and Washington to work closely to align their countries' respective national interests with respect to China, Taiwan, and a Taiwan contingency. At the same time, diplomats and defense officials should work to coordinate respective national policy decision-making processes. Because a Taiwan contingency could occur unexpectedly, time would be of the essence in developing critical policy responses. A situation in which the United States moves to engage in a Taiwan contingency while the Diet debates its response and what support it can provide its ally should be avoided at all costs. Finally, political leaders in Japan and the United States need to bring the complexities and potential consequences of a Taiwan contingency into the public forum. This is critical to ensure a sustainable, long-term political foundation for future policy decisions. Unfortunately, this remains a work in progress. And 2027 is only 18 months away. Author: James J Przystup Senior Fellow, Japan Chair, The Hudson Institute The Hudson Institute's Hudson Chair contributed this report on July 4, 2025. Learn more about Hudson on its home and Japan Chair pages.
CTV News
10 hours ago
- CTV News
Pro-Palestinian group seeks to block UK government's decision to ban it under anti-terrorism laws
Demonstrators shout and gesture toward a police line during a protest by Palestine Action group in London, Monday, June 23, 2025. (AP Photo/Frank Augstein) The pro-Palestinian activist group Palestine Action sought Friday to temporarily block the British government's decision to ban it under anti-terrorism laws after activists broke into a military base last month and vandalized two planes. The ban is set to come into force at midnight after being approved by Parliament earlier this week. It would make membership of the group and support of its actions a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Raza Husain, a lawyer representing the group's co-founder Huda Ammori, said his client had 'never encouraged harm to any person at all.' 'We ask you, in the first instance, to suspend until July 21 what we say is an ill-considered, discriminatory and authoritarian abuse of statutory power which is alien to the basic tradition of the common law and is contrary to the Human Rights Act,' the lawyer quoted his client as saying. Justice Martin Chamberlain is expected to give his decision at the end of Friday's hearing. The proposed ban was triggered after pro-Palestinian activists broke into a Royal Air Force base in Brize Norton, damaging two planes with red paint and crowbars in protest at the British government's ongoing military support for Israel in its war in Gaza. Police said that the incident caused around seven million pounds (US$9.4 million) worth of damage, with four people charged in connection with the incident. The four, aged between 22 and 35, were charged Thursday with conspiracy to commit criminal damage and conspiracy to enter a prohibited place for purposes prejudicial to the interests of the U.K. No pleas were entered at Westminster Magistrates' Court in central London and the four are scheduled to appear July 18 at the Central Criminal Court. U.K. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organization a few days after the break-in, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful.' She added that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage.'
