Sarawak to play key role in ASEAN power grid, says Abang Johari
KUALA LUMPUR (May 25): Sarawak is stepping up plans to deeply integrate into the ASEAN Power Grid, said Sarawak Premier Tan Sri Abang Johari Tun Openg.
He said the East Malaysian state has been supplying electricity to West Kalimantan, Indonesia, for the past six years, and it is currently in the process of supplying electricity to Brunei.
'Prime Minister (Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim) has asked me to study the possibility of supplying power from Sarawak to Sabah and to connect to Brunei.
'Sarawak will play its part to contribute to the ASEAN Grid,' he said at the Sustainable Leadership Fireside Chat-Leading ASEAN's Sustainable and Digital Frontier at the ASEAN Women Economic Summit 2025 (AWES 2025) held at a hotel (Shangri-La) here today.
Abang Johari said Sarawak is also actively enhancing its grid infrastructure to strengthen power distribution across the state and beyond.
Sarawak has targeted to generate 10 gigawatts (GW) of energy production by 2030 and 15 GW by 2035.
The session was moderated by UOB Malaysia Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Ng Wei Wei.
UOB Malaysia is the main sponsor of AWES 2025, with Kuok Brothers Sdn Bhd as the empowerment partner.
On women and leadership, the Premier said the role should be assigned based on merit and qualifications, rather than gender, while societal acceptance of women as leaders is crucial in the right step forward.
Citing examples, he said India's Indira Gandhi and Pakistan's Benazir Bhutto who had served as prime minister in their respective country had shown that despite societal biases, effective leadership can rise above gender-based limitations.
He also said the societal acceptance of women in leadership roles is crucial, as some Asian cultures still face gender bias, but examples like Indira Gandhi and Benazir Bhutto show that change is possible.
The two-day inaugural AWES 2025, which began Saturday, was held on the sidelines of the 46th ASEAN Summit, held under Malaysia's 2025 Chairmanship. It was attended by over 700 delegates representing government, business, and civil society across ASEAN.
Themed 'Empowering Women, Energising ASEAN: Pioneering Economic Integration for a Resilient Tomorrow', AWES highlighted the urgent need to position women at the forefront of ASEAN's economic transformation, particularly in addressing current challenges such as global tariff wars, digital transformation, and sustainable development.
It also featured discussion and strategic brainstorming sessions, leadership lab and mentorship programme. – Bernama Abang Johari Tun Openg Asean power grid lead power supply
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
a day ago
- Borneo Post
Rectify systemic infringement on Sabah's constitutional and economic rights - LDP
Chin KOTA KINABALU (July 4): Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) treasurer general Chin Kian Ming has issued a strongly worded statement, condemning the federal government under the leadership of Prime Minister Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim for continuously delaying, weakening, and even denying the constitutional rights granted to Sabah under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). The party warned that such actions constitute a double betrayal of the political dignity and economic future of the people of Sabah. Chin expressed deep dissatisfaction over the federal government's failure to fulfill Sabah's rightful entitlement to the 40% net revenue return. According to Articles 112C and 112D of the Federal Constitution, this return mechanism should have been a cornerstone of Sabah's financial autonomy. However, the revenue formula originally scheduled for completion by July 2024 has yet to be announced or supported by any legal implementation mechanism. Chin criticized, 'This is no longer just administrative delay — it reflects institutional disregard and a blatant violation of constitutional principles.' He pointed out that Article VIII of MA63 clearly requires that the provisions of the Agreement be implemented through legislation or other formal mechanisms, especially regarding the rights of the East Malaysian states. However, to date, the federal government has not taken any meaningful legal action to return powers to Sabah. The related committees have become mere 'symbolic platforms' with no tangible progress in restoring Sabah's legal position. He also harshly criticized the federal government for continuously relying on and enforcing the Petroleum Development Act 1974 (PDA) and the Territorial Sea Act 2012 (TSA) without the consent of the Sabah state government. These two Acts effectively strip the state of control over petroleum and maritime resources. Such actions clearly violate Paragraph 24 of the Inter-Governmental Committee (IGC) Report, which states that land and natural resources shall remain under the exclusive jurisdiction of the state unless otherwise amended by the State Legislative Assembly. He further pointed out that although Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution was amended in 2019 to restore Sabah and Sarawak's status as 'partner states' (rakan sekutu), this restoration has had no substantive impact in practice. Sabah continues to be treated as a second-class state in matters of federal budget allocation, project prioritization and national policy consultation, which is a serious departure from the founding spirit of the Federation in 1963. According to Chin, the federal government's persistent denial of Sabah's rightful status and autonomy has led to long-term structural developmental imbalance. Despite being one of the richest states in Malaysia in terms of natural resources, Sabah continues to suffer from the highest poverty rates and weakest access to education and healthcare services. This reflects not only economic exploitation, but also systemic neglect of Sabahans' right to survival and development. Chin emphasized that Sabah should enjoy localized decision-making powers in education and healthcare. According to Paragraphs 15 and 17 of the IGC Report, Sabah is entitled to tailor policies to local conditions. However, the reality is that the highly centralized federal system severely suppresses local reforms, leading to shortages in rural hospitals, deteriorated school infrastructure, and a massive outflow of local talent — creating a vicious cycle of 'resource extraction and entrenched poverty.' He also expressed concern over the gradual erosion of Sabah's rights in language and cultural-religious diversity. MA63 guarantees the right for Sabah to continue using English as an official administrative language and to preserve the state's multireligious environment. However, recent years have seen increasing pressure from federal unification policies that threaten Sabah's generational tradition of harmonious multiculturalism. Even more worrying is the systemic weakening of Sabah's immigration autonomy. According to Paragraph 6 of the IGC Report, Sabah has the legal authority to control the entry and residence of non-state residents to preserve demographic balance and social stability. The federal government's repeated attempts to pressure Sabah into relaxing these controls have led to increasing issues with illegal immigration and demographic imbalances, fueling deep public anxiety. He stressed that the Malaysia Agreement 1963 is not just a historical document, but a living political covenant that serves as the foundation of Sabah and Sarawak's entry into Malaysia. If the spirit of this covenant continues to be undermined, it will ultimately destabilize the unity of the Federation itself. He called for the immediate implementation of the 40% revenue return mechanism; the repeal of federal laws imposed without East Malaysia's consent; and full restoration of state autonomy in natural resources, education, healthcare, land and immigration. Chin further declared its intention to pursue additional political and legal measures, including proposing motions in the Sabah State Assembly, seeking judicial review, and strengthening strategic alliances with other local political parties to defend East Malaysian rights. 'We will no longer settle for symbolic gestures. The people of Sabah demand real autonomy and genuine respect — not hollow rhetoric and double standards. 'MA63 is not a relic of the past, but a living legal contract. If the federal government continues to violate its terms, it is not just betraying Sabah — it is undermining the rule of law in Malaysia. The Liberal Democratic Party stands united with the people of Sabah to defend our rightful entitlements, our resources, and our future,' Chin concluded in its statement.
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
UOB, FMM, SMF ink deal to boost manufacturing ties
From left: Federation of Malaysian Manufacturing president Tan Sri Soh Thian Lai, UOB Malaysia CEO Ng Wei Wei, UOB deputy chairman and CEO Wee Ee Cheong, Singapore Deputy Prime Minister and trade and industry minister Gan Kim Yong and deputy investment, trade and industry minister Liew Chin Tong. PETALING JAYA: United Overseas Bank (M) Bhd (UOB Malaysia) has signed a tripartite memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers (FMM) and the Singapore Manufacturing Federation (SMF) to strengthen regional economic integration and promote foreign direct investment (FDI) flows. The bank, in a statement, said the partnership aims to strengthen the Malaysia-Singapore manufacturing corridor by leveraging UOB's regional network and expertise to help businesses, especially SMEs, expand across borders and grow sustainably. It supports the 2025 Asean Summit's theme of inclusivity, of which Malaysia chaired and hosted, ensuring that businesses of all sizes can participate in and benefit from regional growth. The agreement also builds on the momentum of the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ) agreement between both governments. UOB Malaysia CEO Ng Wei Wei said the bank is proud to be an early JS-SEZ supporter, having launched the Green Lane with Invest Johor, set up SEZ Desks, and introduced fast-track account openings. 'Since 2024, UOB has committed RM11.5bil in financing to support businesses in Johor and is actively facilitating RM10bil of FDI flows into the zone. 'Through this MoU, we look forward to working with FMM and SMF to help their members seize cross-border opportunities and contribute to Asean's industrial growth,' she said. The MoU reflects UOB's long-term commitment to Asean's sustainable growth, aiming to promote cross-border opportunities and deepen collaboration in trade, investment, and manufacturing between Singapore and Malaysia, for stakeholders and ecosystem partners. To support these efforts, UOB will provide advisory services, including tailored market entry and in-market guidance for FMM and SMF members. These services will help businesses navigate the financial and operational aspects of establishing a presence in Singapore, Malaysia, and across South-East Asia. FMM president Tan Sri Soh Thian Lai said the collaboration sets the stage for more cross-border success stories under the JS-SEZ.
Malaysia Sun
3 days ago
- Malaysia Sun
NATO circles China in more ways than one
The alliances latest summit avoided confronting Beijing but could not cover up the efforts to contain the Asian great power The June NATO summit, held in The Hague, ended with a significant headline: a collective pledge to increase annual defense spending to 5% of GDP by 2035. This bold target, far exceeding the current 2% benchmark, signals a new era of militarization in the West, reflecting anxieties about a rapidly changing world order. While China was notably absent from the summit's final declaration, the specter of the Asian giant loomed large over the event. The omission appears tactical rather than strategic - a thinly veiled attempt to avoid escalating tensions, even as NATO members ramp up rhetoric and military preparations clearly aimed at containing Beijing. Though the summit declaration remained silent on China, the alliance's leadership left little doubt about their true concerns. NATO's secretary general, Mark Rutte, used the summit sidelines to sound alarm bells over China's "massive military build-up". Echoing the now-familiar Western narrative, Rutte linked China - alongside Iran and North Korea - to Russia's military operations in Ukraine, accusing Beijing of supporting Moscow's war efforts. These remarks followed Rutte's June address at London's Chatham House, where he described China's military expansion as happening "at breakneck speed" and labeled Beijing, Tehran, Pyongyang, and Moscow as an "awful foursome." This framing makes clear that the NATO establishment and US leadership regard China not as a partner or even a rival, but a threat. The perception of China as an imminent danger was also echoed at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore in May, where US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth warned of a potential Chinese military move against Taiwan and reiterated Washington's commitment to regional allies - albeit while pressing them to increase their own defense budgets. His remarks left no doubt: the US strategic focus is firmly on the Indo-Pacific, even at the expense of its traditional European commitments. In a notable diplomatic snub, the leaders of Australia, Japan, and South Korea - the so-called "Indo-Pacific partners" of NATO - cancelled their plans to attend the summit in The Hague. This decision, viewed by observers as a pointed message, undermined NATO's aspiration to consolidate its influence in the region. Since the 2022 Madrid summit, when NATO adopted its "Strategic Compass" and for the first time classified China as a "systemic challenge," the alliance has moved steadily to incorporate the Asia-Pacific into its strategic thinking. It now considers developments in East Asia as directly relevant to Euro-Atlantic security. As such, NATO seeks deeper cooperation with Australia, Japan, South Korea, and New Zealand to uphold what it calls the "rules-based order" - a euphemism for Western hegemony. However, the absence of these Indo-Pacific leaders suggests a growing discomfort with NATO's expanding footprint. For many regional actors, NATO's presence in Asia represents not stability, but the risk of being drawn into geopolitical conflicts under the guise of shared security. Further adding to regional unease, French President Emmanuel Macron delivered a controversial message at the Shangri-La Dialogue, warning Beijing that NATO could be involved in Southeast Asia unless China convinces North Korea to withdraw its troops from Russia. This statement not only mischaracterized Beijing's independent foreign policy and its complex relations with Pyongyang but also marked a sharp departure from France's previous resistance to NATO's involvement in Asia-Pacific matters. Such remarks, however, are increasingly aligned with the alliance's real trajectory: NATO is no longer content with transatlantic defense. Its strategic horizon is now global, and its compass points East. NATO-China relations, once limited and mostly symbolic, are now strained to the point of near-hostility. The first Chinese representative visited NATO headquarters in 2002, and both sides cooperated on anti-piracy operations in the Gulf of Aden after 2008. Since then, however, the relationship has eroded amid intensifying geopolitical competition and diverging security philosophies. Beijing has become increasingly vocal in its criticism. Chinese authorities responded sharply to Rutte's remarks at The Hague, accusing NATO of spreading disinformation about China's stance on Ukraine and conflating the Taiwan question - which Beijing insists is a purely domestic matter - with a war between states. Chinese officials emphasized that NATO's role in the Asia-Pacific is unwelcome and destabilizing, viewing the alliance as a Cold War relic now repurposed to uphold US dominance and contain China's rise. For China, NATO is not just a military alliance, but a political tool used by Washington to limit Europe's engagement with Beijing. From this perspective, NATO's eastward ambitions threaten to derail the potential for constructive China-Europe cooperation, replacing it with division and distrust. China's concerns are not limited to NATO. The revival of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD), the emergence of the "Squad," and the 2021 formation of AUKUS - a trilateral pact between the US, UK, and Australia - have only deepened Beijing's fears of encirclement. The AUKUS agreement, under which Australia is to receive nuclear-powered submarines from the US worth $240 billion, has introduced a new and dangerous element into regional security dynamics. Canberra will gain long-range strike capability for the first time and become only the second nation - after the UK - to receive access to US nuclear propulsion technology. Though the Trump administration has initiated a formal review of AUKUS, few expect significant changes. On the contrary, the pact is likely to reinforce the militarization of the region and increase the risk of nuclear proliferation. In contrast to NATO's bloc-based approach, China promotes a regional security framework rooted in multilateralism, inclusiveness, and dialogue. Beijing advocates for an ASEAN-centered architecture and supports institutions like the ASEAN Defense Ministers' Meeting Plus (ADMM-Plus), the Code for Unplanned Encounters at Sea (CUES), and the East Asia Summit. It also backs the Conference on Interaction and Confidence Building Measures in Asia (CICA) and has launched the Global Security Initiative to advance regional stability. Most significantly, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) has emerged as a key platform for Eurasian states to coordinate on security, with the June meeting of defense ministers in Qingdao underscoring its role in promoting collective peace without resorting to confrontation or hegemonism. The NATO summit may have avoided naming China, but it failed to conceal the reality of growing confrontation. While the alliance doubles down on military spending and expands its strategic reach into Asia, the Global South and a number of key Asia-Pacific states appear increasingly wary of NATO's global ambitions. As the world stands at a strategic crossroads, two competing visions of international security are on display. On one side, NATO and its partners advocate a "rules-based order" backed by military alliances and deterrence. On the other, China offers a model grounded in multipolarity, multilateral cooperation, consensus-building, and mutual respect. The choice, increasingly, is not between East vs. West - but between confrontation and coexistence. (
