
Ryanair's challenge to Covid-19 aid for German airline Condor rejected by European court
A legal challenge by
Ryanair
against the
European Commission's
approval of
Covid-19
aid granted by Germany to charter airline Condor has been dismissed by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Two loans were granted by German bank Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau and accompanied by a State guarantee in 2020 after the pandemic restrictions grounded air travel. The move was later approved by the European Commission.
The loans consisted of a total nominal amount of €400 million, while the aid element amounted to €144.1 million. At the time of the first decision, the two loans amounted to a total of €550 million with the aid element was €267.1 million.
Condor was part of the Thomas Cook Group, which collapsed in 2019, forcing the airline to file for insolvency. Those proceedings were extended to April 2020 when an investor lined up to rescue the airline pulled out of the deal.
READ MORE
Ryanair's action argued the commission failed to take into account the damage caused to Condor's business by its own insolvency when it ruled that the aid from the German state did not breach EU law.
Following that action, the General Court of the European Union annulled the commission's decision to allow the aid the following year, but suspended its ruling pending a further decision by officials.
[
An EU court has halted a German bid to give €550 million state aid to airline Condor following a challenge by Irish carrier Ryanair.
Opens in new window
]
On Wednesday, the court dismissed the action, and said the fact that Condor is in difficulty and has received rescue and restructuring aid 'does not prevent it from also receiving aid in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic'.
The court rejected Ryanair's evidence contesting the commission's view that Germany's aid to the airline was compatible with EU law as it was meant to compensate Condor for damage caused by natural disasters and exceptional circumstances.
Bobby Healy on why Manna drone delivery could be the 'biggest technology company in the world for its space'
Listen |
67:08
'Ryanair has not demonstrated that the commission should have had doubts as to the direct causal link between the travel restrictions linked to the Covid-19 pandemic and the damage suffered by Condor,' it said.
The court said Condor was a 'sound and viable' undertaking whose difficulties were linked to those of its parent company. 'The commission could therefore expect the investors to express an interest in its purchase,' it said.
[
Ryanair's O'Leary got €3.8 million pay package last year
Opens in new window
]
It also rejected Ryanair's argument that the European Commission failed to ensure the aid at issue compensated only the costs generated by the travel restrictions linked to the pandemic and not the costs associated with Condor's pre-existing difficulties.
Similarly, Ryanair's arguments alleging the commission failed to take into consideration a potential risk of double compensation as a result of the rescue aid from which Condor previously benefited were rejected.
Ryanair also failed to demonstrate that the aid at issue is discriminatory in relation to other airlines operating in Germany, in particular Ryanair itself.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
EU plans to buy carbon credits to meet climate targets
The European Commission is set to propose counting carbon credits bought from other countries towards the European Union's 2040 climate target, a commission document seen by Reuters shows. The commission is due to propose a legally binding EU climate target for 2040 on 2 July. The EU executive had initially planned a 90% net emissions cut, against 1990 levels, but in recent months has sought to make this goal more flexible. This in response to pushback from governments, including Italy, Poland and the Czech Republic, concerned about the cost. An internal commission summary of the upcoming proposal, seen by Reuters, said the EU would be able to use "high quality international credits" from a UN-backed carbon credits market to meet 3% of the emissions cuts towards the 2040 goal. The document said the credits would be phased in from 2036 and that additional EU legislation would later set out the origin and quality criteria that the credits must meet alongside details of how they would be purchased. The move would in effect ease the emissions cuts - and the investments required - from European industries needed to hit the 90% emissions cutting target. For the share of the target met by credits, the EU would buy "credits" from projects that reduce CO2 emissions abroad - for example, forest restoration in Brazil - rather than reducing emissions in Europe. Proponents say these credits are a crucial way to raise funds for CO2 cutting projects in developing nations. But recent scandals have shown some credit generating projects did not deliver the climate benefits they claimed. The document said the commission will add other flexibilities to the 90% target, as Brussels attempts to contain resistance from governments struggling to fund the green transition alongside priorities including defence and industries - who say ambitious environmental regulations impede their competitiveness. These include integrating credits from projects that remove CO2 from the atmosphere into the EU's carbon market so that European industries can buy these credits to offset some of their own emissions, the document said. The draft would also give countries more flexibility on which sectors in their economy do the heavy lifting to meet the 2040 goal, "to support the achievement of targets in a cost-effective way". A commission spokesperson declined to comment on the upcoming proposal, which could still change before it is published next week.


The Irish Sun
6 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
UK may ban airlines from charging for hand luggage – but it could hike your flight price, experts warn
AIRLINES could be banned from charging British passengers bringing hand luggage on flights, it is claimed. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is understood to be considering proposals to change the rules after the EU Parliament transport and tourism committee Advertisement 5 Heidi Alexander, Transport Secretary, is reported to be considering the proposals Credit: Alamy 5 New rules could mean everyone gets a free carry-on bag Credit: Getty 5 But the new rules could drive up air fares for passengers Credit: Alamy If the new law is approved, passengers flying on any EU airline will be allowed a free cabin bag to put in the overhead locker - as long as it weighs no more than 7kg and measures up to 100cm. Ryanair and Wizz Air introduced fees for large cabin bags in 2018, and easyJet followed suit in 2021. However, the likes of British Airways and already include two pieces of cabin baggage as standard in their base fairs. But there are fears some airlines will put up ticket prices to claw back revenue losses - with some claiming the proposals are unworkable due to lack of space and warn flights maybe delayed. Advertisement Read more news A transport source spoke to the Due to varying rules across airlines, the European Parliament hopes to create a common standard across the board for carry-on luggage. The proposals are still under discussion by member states and a time frame for implementation are unclear, though a meeting is scheduled for July. The UK source told the i the Government was also looking at changing the law in the coming months, although policy development is at an early stage. Advertisement Most read in News Travel A Department for Transport spokeswoman said: 'We do not comment on speculation but continue to closely monitor the EU's proposals on air passenger rights reforms. 'We want to make sure passengers can travel with ease, which is why we landed a deal with the EU to allow millions more British nationals to use e-gates at airports in time for the summer holidays.' Primark launches new range of cabin bags on wheels - they're approved by all budget airlines & there's matching carry-ons too Airlines have warned they may need to increase ticket prices which would impact all passengers, including those travelling with smaller bags. Airlines for Europe Managing Director Ourania Georgoutsakou told : 'The European Parliament should let travellers decide what services they want, what services they pay for and, importantly, what services they don't.' Advertisement Airlines for Europe also warned that its members won't be able to comply with the new rule due to lack of space. A typical cabin seats 180 passengers but has room for only 90 trolley bags in the overhead lockers. Airlines for Europe also warned that its members won't be able to comply with the new rule due to lack of space. A typical cabin seats 180 passengers but has room for only 90 trolley bags in the overhead lockers. Advertisement Last year, there were Speaking to "We're working with the other airlines in A4E to try to agree standardised sizes, but we haven't reached an agreement with them yet." While the rules continue to be discussed, check out this Advertisement Plus the Expert opinion on what the new rules mean for you Head of Travel Lisa Minot weighs in. EUROPEAN plans to force all airlines to allow passengers to bring a bag weighing less than 7kg into the cabin as well as an under-seat bag seem on the face of it to be a good outcome for travellers. But there could be a sting in the tail for flyers going forward. Low cost airlines have for years been keeping the price of base fares low by adding on an ever more dizzying array of extra charges. And these ancillary charges now make up an increasing percentage of their profits. These extra charges now make up more than 30per cent of Ryanair's revenue. Between October and December last year, Ryanair's ancillary revenues were worth £884million. Airlines argue that if they are forced to comply with the new laws, the base fares will have to rise for every passenger across the board, including those flying smaller bags. They also point out many airlines won't be able to comply with the new rules as typically planes that carry 180 passengers only have room for 90 trolley bags. But on the plus side, forcing all airlines to adhere to the same rules can only be a good thing. Right now, the disparity between the size and weight of bags and the prices airlines charge is hideously complicated and can often lead to passengers being caught out. 5 Potential new rules could mean all passengers can bring a free carry-on bag onboard Credit: Alamy 5 Passengers boarding on a Ryanair plane at Timioara Traian Vuia International Airport Credit: Getty


RTÉ News
10 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Why new homes may not get planning in Dublin after 2028
"The chain is only as strong as its weakest link." Eighteenth century philosopher Thomas Reid's quote could be applied to building houses in Dublin. That weak link is water. Local authorities in the capital will be unable to grant planning for new homes from 2028 onwards unless Uisce Éireann, formerly Irish Water, gets the green light for a massive new drainage scheme. For a city facing an acute housing crisis, that would be catastrophic. The Ringsend treatment plant in Dublin's south inner city is currently approaching maximum capacity. Other facilities are near or above their limits. If Dublin continues to build homes without additional wastewater capacity it risks polluting the sea around the capital, putting Ireland in breach of EU water standards affecting users of amenities such as beaches and swimming areas. If there is not sufficient water treatment, councils may have to turn down planning applications. Uisce Éireann's plan is called the Greater Dublin Drainage scheme. It would provide water treatment for half a million people in the capital and in parts of Meath and Kildare. It includes a 14km orbital sewer from Abbotstown which would connect a treatment plant in Clonsagh with an 11km outfall pipe running far out to sea north of Howth. But the project has been tied up in the planning process for seven years at a time when the housing crisis has worsened. A planning application was originally lodged for the scheme in 2018, it was subject to a judicial challenge in 2020, and due to one legal defect went back to An Coimisiún Pleanála in 2021. Uisce Éireann submitted further information last year and is still waiting for approval. This lengthy process was triggered by an appeal by one sea swimmer. The seven-year delay has seen costs for the project rise from €600m to €1.3bn. Even if the planning board gives permission for the drainage scheme, it could still be delayed again by another judicial review. If that happens, local authorities are unlikely to be able to give planning approval for new homes in many parts of north Dublin. This is an area where there are plans for significant numbers of new housing projects. Undoubtedly wastewater is the most acute issue facing Uisce Éireann. But the provision of water itself is a huge challenge too. Currently the River Liffey supplies 85% of the requirements for 1.7m people, and that is not viewed as sustainable. Uisce Éireann says the impact of climate change is already evident, and it will worsen. It says: "Extreme weather in the form of both droughts and intense rainfall will affect both the availability and quality of water." There are serious concerns about supplies for the capital and the midlands with residents in Mullingar already living with restrictions. The current sustainable production of water in the Greater Dublin Area is 620 million litres daily. In the week up to Sunday 22 June this year, the average usage was 635 million litres with storage in treated water reservoirs also used to meet demand. Supplies are very tight and there is little headroom for more housing with the population expected to grow by 25% by 2040. Uisce Éireann's plan is to use 2% of the water flowing from the River Shannon and pipe it to Dublin. It would be sourced from the Parteen Basin in Lough Derg which lies between Co Clare and Co Tipperary. Parteen is a reservoir which holds water used at the Ardnacrusha hydroelectric plant. The water would be treated nearby at Birdhill, Co Tipperary and transferred by gravity to a reservoir in south Dublin via a buried pipeline. This is not a new plan. The current iteration dates back to 1996. It has been agreed by the Government, and Uisce Éireann expects to submit a planning application at the end of this year. But there are objections to its environmental impact. The schemes to address water supplies and drainage to keep up with the demands for housing will require more money. Some €10.3bn has been allocated to Uisce Éireann for capital projects between now and 2029. The organisation says it requires a further €2bn. Next month the National Development Plan will be published by the Government and it is likely to address funding for Uisce Éireann. But even if the money is allocated, the organisation has a steep hill to climb if it is to make sufficient progress to meet growing requirements for more homes.