Coalition is wedging itself on climate crisis with net zero debate, warns Liberal MP in Scott Morrison's former seat
Simon Kennedy, the member for the Sydney seat of Cook, previously held by Scott Morrison, told a closed-door meeting of Liberal and Nationals MPs at Parliament House that the Coalition should be 'wedging' Labor on energy policy, not backsliding on efforts to cut carbon emissions.
The previously unreported comments were prompted by former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce's private member's bill to overturn net zero, announced last week.
After a series of anti-net zero statements from Joyce and climate sceptic MPs including Barker MP Tony Pasin, Joyce, and Nationals senator Matt Canavan, Kennedy was the only Coalition MP to speak up for net zero policies. His intervention prompted calls of support from a range of Coalition MPs across parliament.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
Both the Liberals and the Nationals are reviewing net zero policies after their May election loss. A review of the Coalition's 2022 federal election defeat noted perceptions of the Morrison government's response to issues including the climate crisis had seen it lose voters, including to teal independents.
'My personal belief and the community's belief is that we need to be serious on climate and reducing energy prices,' Kennedy told the meeting.
'There's a debate on net zero and they [the public] interpret us as not being serious on climate.'
Party room deliberations are traditionally kept confidential.
Kennedy described climate and energy policies as 'Labor's weakest point,' predicting the Albanese government would miss its targets for renewables uptake and emissions reductions.
'It's a false dichotomy that we have to choose between lowering energy prices and lowering emissions,' he said.
'We should be wedging them on their own plan, not ourselves.'
Guardian Australia approached Kennedy about his comments. He said the Coalition should be leading a robust debate about 'Labor's mess' naming the energy and emissions minister, Chris Bowen.
'Bowen's lie of lower energy prices is wrecking Australia's economy and we've still failed to meet targets,' Kennedy said.
'The politics and policy line up for us. We can set a clear, credible framework that drives investment in the technology already being developed by the private sector.
'The Liberal future should be built on innovation: delivering cheaper, cleaner power and a stronger economy powered by Australian ingenuity, not empty promises.'
South Australian Liberal senator Andrew McLachlan the Coalition's comprehensive policy review, being led by the shadow energy minister, Dan Tehan, was warranted.
'It is also important to note that while some members have begun publicly advocating for the abandonment of our net zero by 2050 commitment, that is in no way a fait accompli in our party room,' McLachlan said.
'There are many in favour of continuing our emissions reduction targets, both for environmental and economic reasons.'
One MP present for the meeting, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said there were frustrations the policy reviews were being overshadowed by the small but vocal group opposing net zero. They said Kennedy's comments 'solidified support' behind the party process.
'It [the net zero debate] has caused frustration towards that small group, and probably lost them some support [internally].'
Another Coalition member, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said MPs should let the policy reviews run their course.
'People should respect the process. The process is important to have their [Coalition members'] opinions be heard and for us to come up with a considered position.'
Labor used its majority on Thursday to allow debate on Joyce's private member's bill in the House of Representatives next month. Joyce was the only Coalition MP to vote with the government and members of the crossbench to allow debate.
Former Liberal minister Simon Birmingham told the Australia Grains Industry Conference in Melbourne that Labor and Climate 200 were successfully weaponising Nationals' positions on climate against the Liberals.
'It is a problem. There's little point shying away from it,' the newly appointed Australian Banking Industry chief executive said on Thursday.
'If you look at the way things that are said by National party figures or leaders are then deployed in campaigns against Liberal candidates in those urban electorates, it has clearly real cut-through.
'The real debate that the Coalition can and should be having in terms of talking to voters today is about the five- to 10-year horizon: around their power prices, their fertiliser prices – the pressure points that are happening on the journey to net zero.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
Farmers consider abandoning drought-hit region in central Hungary
LADANYBENE, Hungary, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Farmers in southern Hungary's key agricultural area are grappling with increasingly severe drought as climate change cuts crop yields and reduces groundwater levels, with some considering relocating or alternative employment. The vast flatland, situated between the Tisza and the Danube rivers, produces corn, grain, and sunflower seed, but scientists warn that rising temperatures and insufficient rainfall are threatening its agricultural viability. The Hungarian meteorological service said on Thursday that soil in central Hungary remains "critically dry" despite recent rains, with summer crops severely affected. Krisztian Kisjuhasz, a beekeeper in Ladanybene would normally move his bees home to his farm at the end of the honey-producing season in July, and start preparing them for the winter. This year, however, he packed up his bees in the middle of the night, wearing a headlamp with red light to move them to a flood zone of the Tisza river, more than 80 kilometers from his home to ensure they have access to pollen. "Last year 30% of our bees died mainly because there was not enough pollen due to the drought ... they were not strong enough for the winter," he said, adding that the costs of commuting to tend to his bees will force him to raise honey prices. Kisjuhasz, whose farm has been in his family for five generations, is now contemplating selling it and moving to a less dry area. "There is no future for beekeeping in the Homokhátság," he said. In May, the government launched a project worth about 5 billion forints ($14.29 million) to clean canals and focus on water retention to combat drought. However, the government cannot completely protect the country from the drought, Prime Minister Viktor Orban said in an interview with website last month. "We are doing everything we can, but even these efforts will only be sufficient to alleviate the damage caused by drought," he said. In 2022, a droughtcaused 1000 billion forints ($2.86 billion) of losses for the agricultural sector and contributed to a rise in Hungarian inflation to two-decade highs. Csaba Toldi, a farmer in Jaszszentlaszlo, said his grasslands produced a loss this year for the first time due to the drought and he is seeking alternative work. Water needs to be returned to the Homokhatsag region, either through channels or water retention, Toldi says, otherwise "this area will completely dry out." ($1 = 350.0000 forints)
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Major update in Sydney Harbour Bridge protest battle as police reveal why they're so against pro-Palestine march
NSW Police have challenged plans for a pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge, arguing in court the rally could cause crowd crush if it goes ahead. Up to 100,000 protesters could descend on the bridge on Sunday as part of the 'March for Humanity', the court heard. NSW Police lodged a prohibition order in the Supreme Court against the planned rally organised by Palestine Action Group. Authorities argued the event posed a risk to public safety due to crowd crush and could even lead to clashes and hostility from competing protests. A previously planned counter-protest in the harbour tunnel has already been cancelled. Pro-Israel group Never Again is Now applied for permission to hold its protest at the same time as the Palestine Action Group's rally but has since withdrawn its application. The group wanted permission to block the harbour tunnel in recognition of the hostages held by Hamas in Gaza. NSW Police's barrister Lachlan Gyles, SC, said violent clashes and crowd crush were highly likely if both protests were to have gone ahead. Mr Gyles argued police could not ensure the safety of up to 100,000 protesters crossing the bridge in such a short time frame. 'This is really unprecedented … in terms of scale, level of risk, lack of time to prepare, and of course location, which is one of the main arteries in one of the largest cities in the world,' Mr Gyles told the court. Mr Gyles told Justice Belinda Rigg the court needed to be 'concerned about being seen to condone' the rally if there were violent scenes or if ambulances were blocked from reaching patients. He added the prohibition order was 'necessary' otherwise police would not have the powers that they would normally have to control such a massive crowd. Court proceedings were further stalled on Friday after 100 pro-Palestine supporters packed into the courtroom and sat on the floor. Justice Rigg said she would reserve her decision until 10am on Saturday - just one day before the rally is set to take place. The planned march would lead protesters across the Harbour Bridge from Lang Park near Wynyard towards the US consulate in North Sydney. It has been scheduled to begin at 1pm. If police succeed in barring this from happening, the protest would simply be rescheduled, activists have said. Acting Assistant Police Commissioner Adam Johnson said his concerns would not rest even if the courts allowed the march to continue. 'Fifty thousand people at Lang Park, whether authorised or unauthorised, has significant public safety risk, crowd crush,' he said under cross-examination. 'I'm personally concerned about that.' Palestine Action Group and protest organiser Joshua Lees told the court the march was 'unstoppable'. Mr Lees argued the group did not seek 'confrontation with police' but rather, wanted to work with authorities to ensure the success of the protest. 'We want to work with them to make this a successful event,' Mr Lees told the court. 'What we don't want to see but is a real, real possibility, which is that if we lose in the case here today.' 'If [the protest] is unauthorised, that opens up the ability for the police to use extra powers to make arrests against peaceful protesters … an outcome we absolutely do not want to see.' Mr Lees added the rushed planning of the event was necessary to produce a maximum effect while the Israel-Gaza war was still making global headlines. Palestine Action Group had offered to postpone the protest until August 24 - an offer Mr Lees said was still on the table and which police have yet to accept. Any prohibition order would not prevent the protest from going forward but would make it illegal for protesters to block roads. Barrister Felicity Graham represented the group and told the court that people turning up to protest was a foregone conclusion Instead of trying to frivolously prevent the march, police should instead focus on trying to make it safe, she said. 'It would create a very fluid, dangerous and unstable situation if the court grants this application,' Ms Graham said. 'It's unclear exactly what would unfold, but it's clear police wish to have powers to arrest people simply for being on a road.' Five Labor MPs have already vowed to attend the rally despite Premier Chris Minns urging them not to. Stephen Lawrence, Anthony D'Adam, Linda Voltz, Cameron Murphy and Sarah Kaine have said they will all march across the bridge. Other politicians including Greens and independent crossbenchers have also confirmed their attendance. Despite gaining momentum, Acting Deputy Commissioner Peter McKenna previously told 2GB the protest was still 'stoppable'. He also accused its organisers of sending out mixed messages to the public which has created confusion about what exactly is happening. Justice Belinda Rigg will reveal her judgment at 10am on Saturday.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Sorry America, but it's not Australia's fault that your healthcare system is failing you
If I were president of the United States, I would certainly be concerned about the cost and performance of the country's healthcare system. The grim statistics are well known. As of 2022, the US spent $12,555 per person on healthcare, almost twice as much as other wealthy countries, including Australia. That gap alone cancels out about half of the difference in income per person between the US and Australia, according to World Bank estimates. Higher expenditure on healthcare would not be a problem if it delivered a healthier population. But this is not the case. The US has one of the lowest life expectancies of any rich country. And even though more Americans die young, those who survive have worse health than elsewhere. Americans suffer from chronic diseases like diabetes, asthma and depression at around twice the (age-adjusted) rate of other rich countries. This gap is too large to be accounted for by specific causes like gun violence or drug overdoses, or even unequal income distribution. The US has worse health outcomes at every point on the income distribution scale than other rich countries, even though those at the upper end have much higher incomes. Sign up: AU Breaking News email And the problem is getting worse. The US saw declining life expectancy in the years after 2014 and, unlike other countries, saw a late, limited recovery from the increased death rate after the onset of the Covid pandemic. There's not much hope for rapid progress in US health outcomes. The destruction of US public health infrastructure through budget cuts, the gutting of key agencies such as the Center for Disease Control and the appointment of notorious anti-vaxxer RFK Jr as secretary of health and human services will only make matters worse. It's unsurprising then that President Donald Trump is looking at the cost side of the equation. As might be expected he has raised, again, the perennial grievances of US health policy. This is the fact that Americans pay far more for prescription medicines than do citizens of other countries where prices are controlled through mechanisms like Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). And, given his grievance-based approach to the world in general, it is no surprise that his latest statement on the topic describes Australia and other countries as 'freeloaders' on the US. The US government is, of course, entirely within its rights to set its own policy regarding the pricing of prescription drugs. The US Department of Veterans Affairs already has a program similar to the PBS, under which it pays about half as much of the typical US price. There is no reason this couldn't be extended to the entire US Medicare system, except that the result would be to close down 1,000 or more private plans, each with their own lobbyists. And with a bit more effort, the US could establish its own version of the PBS, covering all Americans. Quite possibly, faced with lower prices in the US, pharmaceutical companies might demand higher returns from other countries including Australia. But a systematic reform of this kind is beyond the capacity of the Trump administration. Instead we have seen the typical Trumpian claim that other countries are benefiting unfairly from medical research done in the US. This was arguably true in the second half of the 20th century when the US was the undoubted centre of global medical research, most notably through the National Institutes of Health. But funding for the NIH (adjusted for inflation) peaked in 2004, and has suffered from decades of financial stringency. Meanwhile, the US share of genuine innovations, measured by 'new molecular entities' has declined and is no longer notably larger (relative to GDP) than that of leading European innovators. The development of semaglutide (Ozempic and Wegovy) treatments for obesity and diabetes by Danish firm Novo Nordisk is a notable example of a drug of particular importance to the US being developed in Europe. More generally, if Trump wants to import ideas like the PBS into the US system, Australia has plenty to offer. Australia's Medicare system, combining a single-payer universal scheme for standard healthcare with private insurance and fee-for-service medicine as an upper tier, could provide a politically palatable way of delivering the US demand for 'Medicare for all' without destroying the private sector. But of course, this isn't the Trump way. What we will doubtless see, as in the recent tariff negotiations, is a series of bullying demands, resulting in triumphant announcements of magnificent deals, which turn out, on closer inspection, to be largely illusory. The bigger lesson for Australia in all of this is that, as with China, we need to treat the US not as an ally or friend but as a trading partner which will seek to push us around whenever possible. The correct response, again as with China, is to stand our ground until the other side sees the pointlessness of bullying and the mutual benefits of free exchange. John Quiggin is a professor at the University of Queensland's school of economics
