What Is The Mann Act? Understanding Diddy's ‘Guilty' Verdict
The sex trafficking trial against Sean 'Diddy' Combs captivated audiences for weeks. A jury ultimately rendered a verdict acquitting the disgraced mogul of the most serious charges and found him guilty on two counts of violating the Mann Act.
Diddy is an icon, but the Bad Boy Records founder has a mixed reputation. His contributions to music and the culture have earned him love and praise, but there have always been whispers of his abuse across the industry. It wasn't until video of him assaulting then-girlfriend Cassie at the Intercontinental Hotel gave credence to the rumors. His mask had been torn away, and the monster underneath unveiled through hours of harrowing testimonies.
While the jury didn't find him guilty of racketeering and conspiracy, aka RICO, Cassie's brave testimony paved the way for him to be found accountable through the Mann Act.
The United States passed The Mann Act into law in 1910. James Robert Mann authored the law. Mann was an Illinois congressman with deep concerns about what he considered immoral behavior infiltrating the fabric of the nation, especially via the corruption of White women. Legislators called it the 'White-Slave traffic Act' previously. It represented moral panics that followed the loosening of social restrictions following the Industrial Revolution.
According to archives from the U.S. Department of Justice, this law currently 'prohibits transporting any individual in interstate or foreign commerce for the purpose of engaging in prostitution or other sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, and related crimes.'
In 1910, the act had a broader definition. It stated women could not be transported across state lines 'for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose.' Citizens criticized for its broadness, prompting amendments.
Lawmakers updated the definition in the 1980s. They repealed the highly subjective phrase 'immoral purpose.'
The jury in the Diddy trial heard from several self-professed sex workers. They described traveling to engage in the 'freakoffs' that were at the center of the trial. The Mann Act carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a fine.
The government prosecuted several other Black celebrities and other high-profile figures under the Mann Act. R. Kelly received Mann Act charges. Jurors convicted him of several counts of violating the Mann Act in 2021. Kelly attempted to have his convictions overturned on appeal recently. He was denied.
The government used the law to prosecute the rock musician Chuck Berry and Jack Johnson, the first Black man to become a heavyweight boxing champion.
Johnson was convicted in 1912, shortly after the law was enacted, despite the 'prostitute' in question being his white girlfriend who would later become his wife. Berry's 1960 arrest was fictionalized in the 2008 film Cadillac Records .
Courts used the law to broadly condemn consensual interracial sex legally, in come cases. That does not explain every application. Johnson's paramour, turned spouse, wholly refused to testify against him. Witnesses testified against Combs.
Each charge of the Mann Act carries a potential maximum penalty of up to 10 years in prison.
Defense lawyers argued the Mann Act was being selectively enforced in Combs' case. They accused prosecutors of being employed to destroy a successful Black man for engaging in a common, but technically criminal, practice, the New York Times reported.
Juries convict average people under the Mann act. But it is overall rare and 'a very small percentage of prosecuted federal cases,' according to Bobby Taghavi, who spent over a decade serving at the Orange County District Attorney's office, where he dealt with well-known cases and prosecuted violent sex offenders. He explained his understanding of the frequency of the law's use in a statement to HelloBeautiful .
'It is more commonly used in high-profile, complex, or cross-jurisdictional cases, such as cases involving transportation of minors, sex trafficking rings, and celebrities, or public figures,' continued Taghavi who is currently a National Managing Partner of the personal injury firm Sweet James. 'Normally, such human trafficking and prostitution cases are prosecuted in State Court, and commonly in federal court it is a supplemental charge to RICO.'
Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and legal commentator, told PEOPLE that it's likely Combs will get 'little to no time.'
'He may even get time served and prostitution has a 10 year maximum,' he said. 'But the fact that he was acquitted of the most serious counts. The government would not have brought this case had they thought they could only get prostitution.'
The court declined to release Combs after the verdict.
DON'T MISS:
Horrifying Surveillance Footage Shows Diddy Physically Attacking Cassie In 2016
Janice Smalls Combs Breaks Her Silence Regarding Her Son, Sean 'Diddy' Combs
Misa Hylton Reacts To Diddy's Leaked Assault Hotel Video
SEE ALSO
What Is The Mann Act? Understanding Diddy's 'Guilty' Verdict was originally published on hellobeautiful.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘The View's Sunny Hostin Was 'Dismayed' By Judge's Decision To Deny Diddy Bail: 'I Think That's The Wrong Thing'
After spending a week on hiatus, The View had a lot to catch up on when it returned to ABC this morning, including the outcome of Sean 'Diddy' Combs' federal trial, which came to an end last week. Combs, who pleaded not guilty to all charges brought against him, was convicted on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution following an eight-week trial. However, he was acquitted on more serious charges of sex trafficking and racketeering, which did not surprise Sunny Hostin, who was present in the courtroom for much of the trial. Speaking of the sex trafficking charges, Hostin shared why she felt jurors chose to acquit Combs, despite hearing a testimony from his ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, who took the witness stand to speak out about the physical abuse she endured throughout their long-term relationship. 'It's hard for people [to understand] because there was a long relationship with one of the victims,' Hostin said. 'We're talking about an 11-year relationship where someone is never saying no, and actually, actively agreeing to it.' 'I think with eight men on the jury and four women, what man is going to find him guilty of [sex trafficking] and understand that no is no, yes is yes, and the blurred lines between that?' she continued. 'I don't think the government did a good enough job of explaining domestic violence and how yes can mean no. They just didn't have it.' While Hostin felt Combs' violation of the Mann Act—which prohibits the transportation of women and girls across state lines for prostitution—was a 'slam dunk,' she had doubts that he would actually serve prison time for the guilty charges, which carry up to a 20-year sentence. 'Twenty years in prison? We didn't even prosecute [former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer] for that very same thing,' she said. 'It's generally not used. That is something the prosecution threw in so that they could get a conviction.' The former federal prosecutor also felt 'a little dismayed' by the judge's decision to deny Combs bail and hold him in prison until his sentencing later this year. After Ventura's lawyers submitted a letter asking the judge to deny his bail, the judge agreed that, because of the proof of domestic violence that had been brought against the disgraced rapper, 'society couldn't be protected from him,' according to Hostin. 'I think that's the wrong thing,' Hostin said, noting that he's 'not a flight risk' since they could've figured out other ways to keep Combs in the United States by confiscating his passport, his plane, and making him wear an ankle monitor. The View airs on weekdays at 11/10c on ABC. , or text START to 88788
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Albany will slice a lifeline for New York's abused kids — unless Kathy Hochul takes a stand
Want to report a case of child abuse? Better be prepared to give your name and phone number, too. The state Legislature last month passed a bill that would outlaw anonymous reports to the state's central hotline for child abuse and neglect. The bill now awaits Gov. Kathy Hochul's signature. Advertisement But the governor should think twice before putting her stamp of approval on this one: The claims of activists pushing this legislation don't hold up to scrutiny — and discouraging reports of child maltreatment will put more kids in danger. For years, advocates have claimed that anonymous reports are nothing more than a means of facilitating harassment of innocent parents. They have insisted that embittered exes, devious landlords seeking to oust tenants, even nosy 'Karens' who don't like the way another person parents can use anonymous reports to unfairly put families in the authorities' crosshairs. Advertisement 'False reports waste time and resources that could be spent on actual cases of child abuse,' California state Assembly member Reggie Jones-Sawyer wrote of a similar law that recently passed in the Golden State. 'They compound the suffering of families that are already struggling.' 'This bill will transform people's lives,' asserted Juval Scott of The Bronx Defenders, a public-defense nonprofit, who used Juneteenth as a pretext to claim the new rules will protect 'thousands of families from the threat of family surveillance and separation.' Scott, along with many other advocates, claims that anonymous reporting perpetuates racial bias. Advertisement As the bill language itself argues, 'meritless' anonymous allegations drive 'inexcusable racial disparities that disproportionately impact Black and Brown families,' subjecting them to child-welfare investigations 'that can forever change a family.' Advocates are correct that anonymous reports are less likely to be substantiated than reports from social-service workers. They are far less likely to cause children to be taken immediately into foster care. But when you look at the long-term outcomes of anonymous calls, the picture shifts radically. A recent paper in the journal Child Abuse and Neglect found that, according to national data, children who have been reported anonymously are more likely to be re-reported to authorities than those reported by social service workers — and also more likely to end up in foster care at a later date. Advertisement In other words, anonymous reports are not frivolous reports. Only a very small percentage of kids who are reported for abuse and neglect ever wind up in foster care. Those who do must be investigated thoroughly by a child welfare agency — and a judge must sign off on any removal. The study, published in March, found that kids who are reported anonymously are ultimately more likely to be removed from their families than kids who are reported by medical personnel, law enforcement, child-care workers or education personnel. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters So who are these anonymous callers? It's hard to tell, but the data indicate that anonymous reporters most closely resemble another category of people commonly known to raise alarms in child maltreatment cases: friends and neighbors. Why would friends and neighbors want to remain anonymous? The same reason anyone reporting a crime might want to do so: They do not want to anger the perpetrators — and in some cases, they might fear for their personal safety. Proponents of New York's rule change say that the hotline's reports will remain 'confidential,' even if reporters are required to give their names to the state. But many potential reporters will rightly be nervous anyway. If you hear your violent neighbor beating his kids, would you want to leave your name with authorities? Advertisement There's no doubt that some anonymous calls to state child-abuse hotlines are fraudulent. But the same is true of any crime. The answer to such an egregious abuse of the system is to investigate and punish anyone who uses it to make false claims — not to remove a potential lifeline for children at grave risk. Suppressing calls to a child-abuse hotline only helps adults. Hochul should remember the real victims as she considers this ill-advised measure. Naomi Schaefer Riley is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Los Angeles Times
6 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Amid ongoing ICE raids, the Chicxs Rockerxs summer camp moves to protect community
Every year, nonprofit organization Chicxs Rockerxs (pronounced cheek-ex roh-kerr-ex) hosts a week-long summer camp in Southeast Los Angeles for girls and gender nonconforming youth to unleash their inner rock stars. At the camp, which took place from June 30 to July 4 this year, students learn new instruments, attend creative workshops, and perform original songs in bands with their fellow campers. Students ages 8 to 17 qualify for enrollment. Yet two weeks before camp this summer, amid the citywide uptick in raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, organizers heard some students were staying home in fear. 'As we were planning and getting ready for camp in person, that's sort of when the raids started happening in Southeast L.A., and we saw how intensified they were in the area and how violent [they were] and just really damaging to the community,' said organizer Audrey Silvestre. To safeguard campers and their families from ICE raids in the region, Chicxs Rockerxs canceled the in-person camp — but not entirely. Organizers quickly moved the program online. Staffers offered to drop off musical instruments, gift cards for food, and camp supplies to families who were not comfortable going out during the raids. They also made a formal announcement on Instagram, informing supporters about the crucial format change. 'We want to reaffirm that CRSELA stands in solidarity with our Black and Brown immigrant communities. As an organization, we formed in response to the firsthand challenges faced by girls and LGBTQ+ youth in Southeast LA, a predominantly Latinx/e immigrant region,' the post read in part. 'Thank you for thinking of the babies!!!' one person commented on the camp's post. 'Your SELA community supports you!' another person wrote. 'It didn't feel safe to be asking our communities to take the risk to leave their homes if they didn't feel safe to do so,' Silvestre said. Chicxs Rockerxs previously went virtual during the COVID-19 pandemic and facilitated their music camp by having students connect through Zoom to create bands, learn songwriting skills, and come up with an end product they could record together in the video sessions. According to Star, an organizer who asked that their full name not be disclosed for privacy reasons, the virtual model they developed for the pandemic was restructured for this year's camp, and many changes were made to enhance the experience. 'We wanted them just to have an opportunity to have a safe space to create and to express themselves, and it didn't necessarily have to result in a song at the end of the week,' Star said. 'It was just opportunities to be creative.' Students still learned new instruments this year, as staffers were able to drop off keyboards, guitars, bass guitars, drum pads and karaoke microphones to campers for daily lessons. Besides music courses, students also participated in smaller breakout rooms called 'jam rooms,' which included different themes and creative activities. For example, some jam rooms consisted of karaoke, while others focused on making TikToks and interviewing one another. 'The idea behind these rooms was to keep it fun, because it's Zoom and it's not the most exciting for many kiddos who went to school on Zoom,' said Silvestre. 'It's not the most enjoyable way to experience camp, but it's for them to have fun, bond with their bandmates and just be in community with each other.' While campers all participated online from home, some staffers operated in person at their campus to stream lunchtime performances and daily assemblies. The organizers created a 'DIY television studio,' which they described as similar to public access cable, allowing them to toggle between different cameras from their set to make sessions dynamic and improve the virtual experience for students. Students like 17-year-old Naima Ramirez, who attended camp for the past four years, said she appreciated what Chicxs Rockerxs did for her and fellow campers. 'I think it was very thoughtful and kind of them to forget all of the scheduling that they had originally done for in-person camp and scramble into doing everything on Zoom,' Ramirez said. Ramirez said she was initially disappointed to hear that camp was moving online but believed Chicxs Rockerxs did the right thing because of the current environment in Southeast L.A. 'I was bummed because it's my last year and I was really looking forward to being in person,' Ramirez said. 'But I also understood why we had to go online.' For organizers at Chicxs Rockerxs, the safety and well-being of campers and their families is their top concern. Even though camp took a different approach this year, they said they're always willing to help campers beyond the creative services they provide. 'One of the things CRSELA prides itself in is that this is meant to be a safe space,' Star said. 'I'm really proud that we [were] able to create a safe space in a different way for [camp this year]. It's a safety precaution for our community, and I think that's more important at this time.'
