Is it worth upgrading to premium economy on Emirates?
However, could I be tempted to shell out the – relatively more modest – extra cost for premium economy?
Emirates launched the new class to offer a more luxurious experience to flyers on the airline's fleet of Airbus A380 and Boeing 777 (premium economy is also available on the Emirates A350 operating to Edinburgh, which launched in January 2025). At present, 72 planes have been outfitted with premium economy; the new seats are available on 38 routes from London and Manchester, including New York JFK, San Francisco, Singapore, Dubai, Sydney, Melbourne, Mumbai, Vienna and Tokyo Haneda (Cape Town, Mexico City, Barcelona and Hong Kong and are some of the destinations to be added later this year and in early 2026).
The airline enlisted the likes of Penelope Cruz to show off the plush white leather seats with up to 40 inches of legroom and gourmet meals in a slick ad. It all looks good, but let's talk price.
For a flight to Dubai, a return in economy 12 weeks in advance is showing as £625. For premium economy it's £1,573. This is quite a steep increase, so is it worth it? In spring, I tested this route – one that I had previously flown in both economy and business class (first class we'll leave for another day).
As with any Emirates flight, booking premium economy is simple and pricing is transparent.
At the airport, you get a dedicated check-in desk on premium economy. Flying from London Heathrow Terminal 3, the process was smooth and stress-free with zero queue – although admittedly this was also the case at the economy desks. As ever, Emirates staff were helpful and efficient – we had a connecting flight and they quickly sorted combining the tickets so we wouldn't have to re-check bags.
With premium economy, you don't get access to the Emirates Lounge (at Heathrow this is just for business and first), but you can upgrade for somewhere between £100-£150. Emirates lounges aren't particularly glitzy or showy but they are comfortable and spacious. The food is great, and the wine even better.
On the plane itself, the configuration in premium economy (2-4-2 rather than 3-3-3) means that at 19.5 inches the seats are significantly wider (about 2 inches) than in economy, and you do notice the difference. The interior is a classic luxe style, with comfortable cream quilted leather seats, soft head rests and cushioned calf leg rest, which allows a very pleasant recline of 8 inches. This makes a real difference if you plan to sleep on your flight.
There is an impressive 40 inches per pitch, which allowed plenty of legroom for both me and my 6ft 2in travel companion. At my height (5ft 4in – the same as Penelope Cruz as it happens), this level of space is enough to fully stretch out – it almost feels like there would be little point paying out a few hundred more for business class.
Specs aside, it just feels luxurious. The cabin is spacious; the seats are leather; there's wood panelling similar to that in business class; drinks are served in glassware (and the wine list is pretty good; examples included Chablis 2022 from Albert Bichot, the Woodcutters Shiraz 2021 from Torbreck in Barossa, and Domaine Chandon 2017 – a sparkling wine that is an in-flight exclusive to Emirates Premium Economy); and cutlery is stainless steel and wrapped in linen napkins.
A longstanding complaint I have with Emirates (which stands in all classes) is this is not an airline that accommodates vegetarians well. On a previous business class flight, the staff struggled to find anything vegetarian for me to eat and I was left with hummus and crackers for a seven-hour stretch to Dubai. This time around in premium economy, the dinner options consisted of braised beef cheeks or fisherman's pie. As has happened previously, the staff questioned if and why I hadn't pre-ordered a vegetarian meal. Admittedly, this was my own lack of planning, but it seems surprising that a non-meat option isn't readily available.
I was brought a vegetarian meal that was described as 'rice and vegetables' but was actually a simple, but very pleasant curry. Served alongside the main was fresh bread with butter, crackers and cheese, and a pecan and cookie dessert.
I later checked with Emirates about vegan, gluten-free and other diets and they reassured me that these can easily be arranged. It's also worth noting that when I did try to change my preferences online, I found out there is no vegetarian option available, although there is an 'Indian vegetarian'. I have no problem with Indian dining, but it all seemed quite challenging to be served a simple vegetarian meal on an airline where cuisine is a top selling point.
That being said, service is flawless – slick, efficient and friendly. It's what I expect of Emirates in every class and I wasn't let down. It probably comes down to individual staff, but I was more impressed with the service on my premium economy flight than on previous business class flights.
Ultimately, the most valuable part of premium economy is the space. And yes, on a seven-hour flight this does make a real difference. Emirates has an excellent economy class so many would baulk at the prospect of paying an extra £900 for a flight – but you do get value.
With the level of comfort provided in premium economy, even if I could (and I can't) afford to constantly upgrade to business, I'm not sure I would.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
‘Costly mistake' that some holidaymakers are making when travelling abroad
Going without cash when abroad could be an expensive mistake for some holidaymakers, according to research, with more than one in three having found themselves caught out when needing physical money. Some 39% of holidaymakers have found themselves in unexpected situations where cash was required while they were abroad, according to a survey commissioned by website Be Clever With Your Cash. The most common expenses included tipping, taxi fares and shopping at local or independent retailers, according to the research. Prepaid and specialist travel cards can make it easier to rely less on physical cash while travelling overseas. But those suddenly needing that cash could end up paying extra costs, the survey carried out by Opinium, among 2,000 people across the UK who have travelled abroad, indicates. The research found some people who had to make an emergency cash machine withdrawal on their last trip overseas were charged an ATM fee. Some people also said they turned to airport exchange desks for last-minute cash, even though they may potentially be getting a worse deal than if they had shopped around for their travel money and planned ahead. The website said that stepping outside major cities can also present challenges, as rural and remote areas in some countries could be less likely to accept cards. Amelia Murray, a money expert at Be Clever With Your Cash, said: 'There's still a blind spot when it comes to cash. Many people assume that having a fee-free card is enough, but that can be a false economy if you end up using an ATM abroad that charges or get stung by poor exchange rates. 'It's not about carrying wads of cash, it's about being prepared for those moments when a card simply won't cut it.' Ms Murray suggested packing a 'cash cushion' – a small amount of local currency that could be useful for tipping, local travel, or if holidaymakers end up somewhere that does not accept cards. She also suggested that holidaymakers make sure they understand their card's policy on fees and currency conversion before they travel. People may also want to check how much they would be covered for by their travel insurer if their cash is lost or stolen while they are abroad. Research released by financial information business Defaqto in May indicated that 91% of annual and 86% of single trip policies included cash cover as standard. Just over a third (35%) of single trip travel insurance policies covered as much as £200 to £299, while a quarter (24%) covered between £300 to £399, according to Defaqto's analysis.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
The best travel accessories to make holiday packing a breeze
Faithful to the fold? A strategic roller? Or a last minute thrower-inner? Whatever your approach to packing, chic travel kit can make the process a whole lot more pleasurable. From space-maxing suitcases to stylish add-ons, your luggage has never looked better. Let's start with the absolute essential: a suitcase. Here, investment in a good one cannot be underestimated. The style set is committed to Rimowa, and while silver is the colour choice of many, we're currently coveting this aluminium version with a bronze finish. A portable charger is another modern-travel must-have. Burga's fit into the palm of your hand, plus they come in a range of stylish prints to boot. • Read more fashion advice and style inspiration from our experts As for a way to make the actual packing a breeze, say hello to modular storage solutions. Cadence is the name to seek out here, of particular note the nifty honeycomb set that features pick-your-own compartments in a range of sizes and colours (which certainly beats putting suncream in a knotted supermarket carrier bag). A hand-held clothes steamer is also a godsend if you're travelling to an event such as a destination wedding — or you simply love linen (and hate ironing). For your absolute essentials though — aka your passport and money — Aspinal's luxe leather travel wallet is just the ticket. Ready for departure? You are now. • This article contains affiliate links that can earn us revenue From leftLarge duffel bag, £65, steamer, £120, tag, £95, Reusable water bottle, £35, power bank, from £78, travel wallet, £165, AirTag key ring, £40, vanity case, £475, travel container honeycomb kit, £152, check-in suitcase, £1,340,
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Public sector reform may be the only route left for Labour
It is more than a quarter of a century since Tony Blair complained about the 'scars on my back' from two years of trying to reform the public sector. As the Cabinet Office supremo, Pat McFadden, noted in a speech on the same subject in December, Blockbuster Video and Toys R Us were still in operation at the time of Blair's comments, while Airbnb, WhatsApp and Spotify had yet to be born. Twenty-six years later, creative destruction has reshaped the private sector, in some ways unrecognisably, but the same old arguments swirl about modernising government. The case for public sector reform has become more urgent after the reversals of the past few weeks. A partial U-turn on cuts to winter fuel payments, at a cost of almost £1.3 billion, turned out to be a mere appetiser for a near-total capitulation on attempts to cut welfare by nearly £5 billion. Those surrenders, plus a possible downgrade of the independent fiscal watchdog's productivity forecasts and other revisions, could blow a £30 billion hole in the public finances. After £40 billion of tax rises in October's budget — which put the UK on course for a record postwar haul of 37.7 per cent of GDP — the drums are beating to the rhythm of more taxes this autumn. Breaking a manifesto promise not to increase the burden on 'working people' could cost the chancellor her job. Cranking up taxes even further on businesses — which have swallowed £25 billion of extra national insurance contributions — and on capital gains, carried interest and inheritances would place another drag on already sluggish growth. Labour may have been handed an ugly fiscal picture by the Conservatives last year, but it is getting worse. Much valid criticism has been made of Rachel Reeves, Sir Keir Starmer and senior colleagues for their failure to persuade a recalcitrant parliamentary party of the need for realism in spending cuts. Although the winter fuel business was handled badly politically, reducing payments was right in principle, and £5 billion should have been just the start in controlling a benefits bill that is predicted to swell to £378 billion by 2030. The simple fact is that Labour is showing itself incapable of getting the nation's costs down, and higher taxes would stifle the economy. Sharpening public sector productivity is the only plausible third way. Three articles we carry today offer a way forward. Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police commissioner, argues that the present model of 43 county-based forces has not been fit for purpose 'for at least two decades' and should be replaced by 12 to 15 regional forces. He says this would reduce back-office duplication and allow the enlarged groups to make better use of technology. Rowley also makes the point that creaking social services are frequently forcing police officers to take on the role of social workers, especially in cases of children missing from local authority care. Penny Dash, the new chairwoman of NHS England, says the health service's dysfunctional bureaucracy makes her 'just want to cry'. There are examples of brand-new scanners lying idle, unused buildings on the NHS estate, operating theatre times routinely slipping and appointment letters being sent out to patients after they were due to be seen. Dash wants to open up data on NHS performance, including on individual doctors and teams, saying the institution should go 'really big on transparency'. Today we also report on the scandal of HS2, a rail project that could end up costing more than £100 billion despite suffering repeated delays. We reveal how contracts were struck with the private sector, on behalf of the taxpayer, that contained no element of risk. This meant that there was no incentive for many of the contractors to operate efficiently, as they were safe in the knowledge that if the costs over-ran, the taxpayer would pick up the tab. The new boss of HS2 has pledged to renegotiate the contracts. His approach should be replicated across Whitehall. In truth Labour has so far taken the easy options for improving public sector performance, awarding workers above-inflation pay rises and increasing capital budgets. Sensible cabinet ministers now accept in private that those pay deals should never have been struck without some kind of union commitment to workplace reform. The next steps will now be harder, involving confronting vested interests, including Starmer's own backbenchers. Blair, with his record landslide in 1997, was prepared to sustain scars in pursuit of reform — and even he made limited progress. The big question is whether Starmer and his team are up for and up to the challenge.
