Ladakh: Statehood issue yet to be addressed, say Kargil leaders
The KDA, along with the Leh Apex Body (LAB), has been spearheading an agitation in Ladakh, seeking statehood, safeguards enshrined under the sixth schedule of the Constitution and a separate public service commission (PSC) for the strategic Himalayan region.
In 2023, the Union home ministry had formed a high-powered committee under minister of state Nityanand Rai to discuss ways to protect Ladakh's unique culture, considering its location and strategic importance.
Reacting to the Centre's notifications, KDA's senior leader and political in-charge of Jamiat ul Ulama Isna Ashariya Kargil (JUIAK), Sajjad Hussain Kargili, said, 'Though it's good, women reservation was not a part of our four-point agenda. We have been agitating for legislature. Statehood is a big issue for us.'
On domicile law, Kargili said, 'Something is better than nothing. In the past six years, not even a single gazetted post (job) has been given in Ladakh.'
'We also arrived at a consensus that domicile law of 15 years should be implemented prospectively. At the same time, we want it to be made 30 years. The government has assured us to consider it,' said Kargili.
'We hope that without further delay, the Ladkah administration will now advertise jobs,' he said.
Congress' Tsering Namgyal, leader of the Opposition in Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council of Leh, welcomed 33% reservation for women in hill councils. He lambasted the Centre for fixing 15-year residency for domicile law and described it a ploy to change the demography of Ladakh. 'The LAB and the KDA wanted 1989 as the cut-off year to grant domicile certificates. This 15-year residency rule has been rejected by 80% to 90% people of Ladakh,' he said.
Chering Dorjay Lakrook, ex-BJP minister and president of the Ladakh Buddhist Association, refused to make any comment. 'After we study them (notifications), we will address media on Wednesday. Till then, I have been asked not to talk to mediapersons,' he said.
The Ladakh Civil Services Decentralisation and Recruitment (Amendment) regulation was notified days after the ministry and Ladakhi representatives met on May 27 and agreed to the rules, an official aware of the matter said. It defines a domicile for jobs for a person who has resided in the UT for 15 years, studied for seven years, and appeared for class 10 or 12 examinations in Ladakh. A similar policy was announced for Jammu and Kashmir in May 2020.
The Union Territory of Ladakh Reservation (Amendment) Regulation, also notified on Tuesday, says the reservation shall in no case exceed 85% of the available vacancies, excluding reservation for economically weaker sections. The official cited above said 80% of vacancies are reserved for the region's majority, scheduled tribes (STs), 4% for those living along the Line of Actual Control or Line of Control, 1% for the scheduled castes and 10% for the economically weaker sections. The ministry had proposed 95% of the reservation for locals during discussions.
The third notification provides for one-third seats for women in the hill councils by rotation to different territorial constituencies. The Ladakh Official Languages Regulation recognises English, Hindi, Urdu, Bhoti, and Purgi as the official languages and says that the administrator 'shall make special efforts for the promotion and development of other native languages of Ladakh: Shina (Dardic), Brokskat (Dardic), Balti and Ladakhi'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
BJP MPs walk out of Parliamentary panel meet over Medha Patkar, Prakash Raj's presence; meeting postponed
NEW DELHI: A parliamentary panel meeting on Rural Development and Panchayati Raj had to be postponed abruptly on Tuesday as BJP MPs boycotted its meeting in protest against the presence of activist Medha Patkar and actor-turned-activist Prakash Raj who were invited to appear before the committee. The meeting saw stormy scenes as former Union minister and BJP MP Parshottam Rupala along with other ruling party MPs stormed out with some calling Patkar as "anti-national". According to sources, a BJP MP told the meeting that 'Prime Minister of Pakistan could have been invited for the meeting." The panel, headed by Congress MP Saptagiri Sankar Ulaka was called to discuss the implementation and effectiveness of the land acquisition law enacted by Parliament when the Congress-led UPA government was in power in 2013. According to sources, within 40 minutes into the meeting, the BJP MPs began protests against the panel's decision to hear activist Medha Patkar, and called her "anti-national". While a BJP MP told this paper that they were not informed about the deposition of Medha Patkar and Prakash Raj, panel head Saptagiri Sankar Ulaka said that it is a normal practice for a committee to invite civil society members and other stakeholders on various issues.
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Bihar Election 2025: 'Maulana' Tejashwi Yadav playing communal politics, says BJP – 'no place in India for those…'
Bihar Election 2025: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on July 1 launched a scathing attack on RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav over his remarks on the Waqf Act, calling him a 'Maulana – a Muslim cleric. The saffron party accused the former deputy chief sister of polarising the society on communal lines, sensing opposition Mahagathbandhan's 'imminent' defeat in the assembly polls due later this year. The BJP was responding to Yadav's earlier assertion that the opposition grand alliance in Bihar will consign the Waqf Act to the dustbin if voted to power in the upcoming assembly polls. BJP national spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia alleged that the opposition amalgamation in Bihar—part of the INDIA bloc—wants to gain the power to implement 'Sharia law' (Islamic Law) for the empowerment of one particular community only, unlike the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA), which works for the progress of all sections of society. "These 'namazwadi' do not want Babasaheb Ambedkar's Constitution. They do not respect the Constitution. They only want Sharia law…They want only one particular religion's empowerment," Bhatia said at a press conference at the BJP headquarters here. "There is no place in India for those Namazwadis who want Sharia. They can go to Pakistan," he said. Bhatia accused Yadav of indulging in "communal politics" with an eye on Muslim votes and said, "Those talking about consigning Babasheb's Constitution and law passed by Parliament to the dustbin, people of Bihar will ensure that their communal politics is consigned into the dustbin." Yadav on Sunday claimed that the ruling NDA in Bihar was "on its way out," and the new government in the state led by the opposition alliance would "consign to the dustbin" the Waqf Act brought by the Narendra Modi government at the Centre. The RJD leader was addressing a 'Save Waqf, Save Constitution' rally at Gandhi Maidan in Patna. Bhatia also questioned the RJD leader's understanding of the Constitution and the judicial process. "Tejashwi Yadav, the opposition leader and former Bihar deputy chief minister who failed in class ninth, was saying yesterday that he will throw the Waqf (Amendment) Act to the dustbin. "I ask Tejaswi Yadav, a 'Samajwadi', Mauluna, and messiah of those who do appeasement, have you ever read the Constitution? Have you ever fulfilled its basic spirit?" he said, asking if any state government can trash a law passed by Parliament. Key Takeaways The BJP is framing Tejashwi Yadav's statements as a strategy to gain Muslim votes. The Waqf Act has become a focal point of contention in Bihar politics. The exchange highlights the increasing polarization in Indian politics as elections approach.
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mizoram celebrates 39 yrs of peace accord
Aizawl: As Mizoram marked the 39th anniversary of the historic Mizo Peace Accord on Monday, Article 371G of the Constitution — seen as a pillar of the 1986 agreement — took centre stage in both political discourse and public displays. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now At an event in Saitual, opposition (MNF) president and former chief minister Zoramthanga described Article 371G, introduced through the 53rd Constitutional Amendment, as one of the most significant gains of the accord. The provision protects Mizo customary law, land ownership, and religious practices from unilateral parliamentary legislation, unless approved by the Mizoram Assembly. Zoramthanga said the accord was not simply a bilateral agreement between the MNF and the Centre, but a tripartite understanding that included the people of Mizoram. He said then chief secretary Lalkhama signed the accord on behalf of the state, including those not involved in the armed struggle, while MNF leader Laldenga represented the underground movement. "It was not an accord of the weak. Both sides were at their strongest. The moment of peace came when God — the 'Wonderful Counsellor' — deemed it ripe," he said, referencing the "Book of Isaiah". He warned that the protections granted under Article 371G must not be taken for granted. "While Nagaland received similar safeguards in 1962, ours was earned through struggle. If anyone tries to take it away, we will demand back our arms and the blood with which we earned it," he added. In Aizawl, the Mizo National Youth Front (MNYF) marked the anniversary by unveiling a hoarding spotlighting Article 371G in front of the Mizo Hnam Run (MNF party office). The hoarding was inaugurated by Lalkhama, one of the three signatories of the Peace Accord. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Speaking at the occasion, Lalkhama paid tribute to the MNF cadres and martyrs, saying their sacrifices laid the foundation for peace and constitutional safeguards. "They are the real heroes. The protections under Article 371G must be made more widely known," he said, commending MNYF for its initiative. MNYF president Robert Romawia Royte also addressed the gathering, noting that the peace accord directly led to the 53rd Constitutional Amendment. "This gives the Mizoram assembly the power to accept or reject any central law relating to our religion, customs, or land. Only Mizoram and Nagaland enjoy this privilege," he said.
