‘I've been quiet fired from my job, what should I do?': Singaporean worker asks after being put on no-pay leave
That's the situation for a local Reddit user, who sought advice from others, being somewhat at a loss about how to move forward.
In a post on Thursday (July 3), u/ Educational_Dress692 wrote that they genuinely enjoy working at the ad agency where they're employed, but the company hasn't been doing well, and people have been let go.
The post author hasn't been officially let go, but they've 'essentially been quiet-fired.'
'I have been asked to take on multiple roles from other coworkers who have been let go, and now I've been asked to go on an indefinite no-pay leave.
'I haven't officially resigned, but it feels like they're trying to avoid paying severance or making things official while pushing me out the door,' they wrote. See also Six Singapore fintechs are among the KPMG's Fintech100
They wondered if they should push back and ask for formal retrenchment with severance, accept the no-pay leave while job-hunting on the side, or resign on their own terms and start fresh.
The post author is also considering negotiating with the company to do remote freelance work during this downtime.
Commenters on the post encouraged u/Educational_Dress692 to keep looking for a new job and even do freelance or gig work if there isn't a clause in their current contract preventing them from doing so.
'If you aren't retrenched, then I am guessing the company still wants to retain you but needs to get past cash flow issues. Look for a job in the meantime,' a Reddit user advised.
However, a commenter working in the same industry had this advice to give:
'Hi. Ad person here, so I can give a perspective on industry norms here in SG (esp for the MNC [multinational corporation] networks like WPP).
'Severance is not required by law. See also Is Singlish declining? Singaporeans express concerns
'And severance is typically offered only if you're officially retrenched, have served at least three years with them, AND if the agency has liquidity.
'Most of the time, ailing agencies can't even afford to pay out someone's notice period in lieu of severance.
'You're better off officially tendering. Find a job while serving notice, and if you want, negotiate a mutual shortening of the notice period to save you pain and save the agency cash.'
'You need to have a direct and open conversation with your manager and HR and do what is best for you, if that means terminating your contract so you can seek other employment or modifying it then so be it, but they can't expect you to wait around on no pay till they're ready, chances are, they will never be,' another suggested.
''Forced' no pay leave is worse than being fired. If you resign, at least you are still entitled to being paid for your notice period. Just resign,' a commenter chimed in. /TISG
Read also: Rage applying, moonlighting, and quiet quitting lead job market trends in 2024 amid calls for better pay
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Malaysia puts anti-dumping duties on some China, South Korea, Vietnam iron, steel
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia said on Saturday (Jul 5) it has imposed provisional anti-dumping duties ranging from 3.86 per cent to 57.9 per cent on certain iron and steel imports from China, South Korea and Vietnam. The duties on imports of galvanised iron coils or sheets or galvanised steel coils or sheets were imposed based on a preliminary determination made in an anti-dumping duty investigation initiated on Feb 6, the investment, trade and industry ministry said in a statement. "The government finds that there is sufficient evidence that the importation of the subject goods ... is being dumped and that the investigation should be continued," it said. The provisional duties will be in effect from Monday for up to 120 days with a final determination to be made by Nov 3, the ministry said.
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Singapore C-suite leaders face a ‘complexity conundrum' that demands different leadership
SINGAPORE-BASED C-suite executives face a unique challenge that their global counterparts often don't – what we at AlixPartners call the 'complexity conundrum'. Our 2025 Global Risk Survey shows that while most organisations worldwide struggle with specific risk categories, Singapore business leaders must juggle a much broader range of interconnected challenges all at once. Let's be clear: This isn't just about having more risks to worry about. It's about understanding how deeply interconnected these risks are when you're running operations across multiple markets. The numbers tell an interesting story: 61 per cent of global organisations admit they're unprepared for cyber threats, but in Singapore, businesses have developed what we see as an 'all-front defence strategy', with remarkably consistent investment across all cybersecurity dimensions. This balanced approach jumps out from the data. Singapore organisations maintain extraordinarily consistent cybersecurity investments (21 to 29 points across all measures), compared to the rather erratic patterns charted among regional neighbours like China (22 to 36 points), Hong Kong (17 to 34 points), and Japan (10 to 29 points). Singapore's C-suite leaders seem to understand instinctively that you can't just shore up defences in one area when you're operating across multiple markets; that simply creates vulnerabilities elsewhere. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Climate change is perhaps the most telling example of this complexity. Singapore executives rate climate change concerns at 42 per cent – significantly higher than in Hong Kong (16 per cent) and Japan (20 per cent). This isn't just about being environmentally conscious – it reflects the hard reality that multi-market operations face climate risks that ripple across diverse geographies, regulatory environments, and supply chains. One Singapore CEO put it rather bluntly: 'When a climate event hits one of our markets, the headache spreads through our entire regional operation in ways that single-market businesses just don't experience.' The same goes for navigating regulations: 71 per cent of global organisations confess they're not ready for international regulatory changes, but in Singapore, C-suite leaders have had to develop more balanced approaches to juggling technology resilience, data privacy, cybersecurity, ESG (environmental, social and governance) and AI regulations across multiple jurisdictions – all at the same time. This complexity conundrum demands a different sort of leadership. Singapore executives simply can't afford to become experts in one risk area while neglecting others. They need balanced competency across cybersecurity, climate adaptation, regulatory compliance and geopolitical navigation. Their leadership teams must be good at spotting connections between seemingly unrelated risks – understanding how a climate event might trigger supply-chain problems while simultaneously creating regulatory headaches and cybersecurity vulnerabilities. For C-suite leaders navigating Singapore's complex business environment, our research points to three essential strategies: First, resist the temptation to prioritise risks narrowly based on global trends. Second, approach risk management holistically, recognising that Singapore's position creates uniquely interconnected challenges. Finally, build leadership teams with diverse risk management capabilities rather than isolated specialists. The Singapore complexity conundrum certainly makes life more difficult, but our data suggests it's also creating a hidden advantage. By mastering this balanced approach to risk, Singapore-based executives are developing skills that will become increasingly valuable as all global businesses face the interconnected challenges of tomorrow's business landscape. The writer is partner, managing director and Singapore country leader at AlixPartners.
Straits Times
5 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump signs signature tax-cut and spending bill into law
U.S. President Donald Trump presents a sweeping spending and tax legislation, known as the \"One Big Beautiful Bill Act,\" after he signed it, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 4, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis WASHINGTON - U.S. President Donald Trump signed into law a massive package of tax and spending cuts in a ceremony at the White House on Friday, one day after the Republican-controlled House of Representatives narrowly approved the signature legislation of Trump's second term. The bill, which will fund Trump's immigration crackdown, make his 2017 tax cuts permanent, and is expected to knock millions of Americans off health insurance, was passed with a 218-214 vote after an emotional debate on the House floor. "I've never seen people so happy in our country because of that, because so many different groups of people are being taken care of: the military, civilians of all types, jobs of all types," Trump said at the ceremony, thanking House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune for leading the bill through the two houses of Congress. "So you have the biggest tax cut, the biggest spending cut, the largest border security investment in American history," Trump said. Trump scheduled the ceremony on the South Lawn of the White House for the July 4 Independence Day holiday, replete with a flyover by stealth bombers and fighter jets like those that took part in the recent U.S. strikes on nuclear facilities in Iran. Hundreds of Trump supporters attended, including White House aides, members of Congress, and military families. The bill's passage amounts to a big win for Trump and his Republican allies, who have argued it will boost economic growth, while largely dismissing a nonpartisan analysis predicting it will add more than $3 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion debt. While some lawmakers in Trump's party expressed concerns over the bill's price tag and its hit to healthcare programs, in the end just two of the House's 220 Republicans voted against it, joining all 212 Democrats in opposition. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore PAP has begun search for new candidates; PM Wong hopes to deploy them earlier ahead of next GE Singapore 20 retired MPs spoke up on many issues in Parliament, helped successors prepare for new role: PM Wong Singapore $3b money laundering case: 9 financial institutions handed $27.45m in MAS penalties over breaches Singapore Banks tighten vigilance and processes following $3b money laundering case Asia JB petrol station shooting: Dead man with bullet wounds dumped at hospital Singapore Trilateral work group formed to address allegations of foreigners illegally taking on platform work Singapore Power distribution system in renewal project may be linked to Bukit Panjang LRT disruption: SMRT Singapore Rise in number of scam e-mails claiming to be from Cardinal William Goh: Catholic Church The tense standoff over the bill included a record-long floor speech by House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who spoke for eight hours and 46 minutes, blasting the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy that would strip low-income Americans of federally-backed health insurance and food aid benefits. REUTERS
