‘Repeatedly outbid': readers share stories of housing despair as Australia's prices reach record highs again
After a short reprieve, property prices have surged to record highs across large parts of Australia, making a family home even more unaffordable for prospective buyers.
One Melbourne reader, a nurse, said she felt like cattle herded from one home open to the next.
'Multiple times I went to inspections of properties I liked, only to be told on the way out that there was already an offer of $30-50k over asking and if I was interested I needed to submit a better offer within a few hours,' said the reader, who eventually secured a property.
'The market was so competitive I felt really rushed into making a decision a lot of the time.'
Auctions are heating up across the country, with six straight weeks of preliminary clearance rates holding above 70%, according to Cotality data, in a clear sign sellers are in control.
Clearance rates refer to the percentage of properties sold at auction compared with the total number of properties listed to go under the hammer, with results above 70% viewed as an indicator of strong buying demand.
Bidding is expected to become even more fierce amid expectations of further interest rate cuts and an enduring lack of supply of homes.
Property prices in Sydney, Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth are at peak levels, while Melbourne, Canberra and Hobart are also rising.
A reader in Western Australia's south-west said she and her partner bought far from their family and friends in Perth 'not because we were seeking a lifestyle change but because we simply couldn't compete in the city or suburbs any more.
'We went to countless inspections and put in offer after offer, but were repeatedly outbid, ignored by real estate agents or told homes were under offer before we'd even had a chance,' the reader said.
'At the same time, we were grappling with housing instability, facing no-ground evictions and repeated rent increases.'
The couple aged in their early 30s are now so financially stretched with their new mortgage they've made the decision not to have children.
'We simply can't afford to raise a family,' the reader said.
'That's not something we ever imagined we'd have to sacrifice, but this housing crisis has forced people like us to choose between stability and the future we once hoped for.'
Many readers commented on the presence of investors bidding up prices at auctions.
Over the past five years, investors have increased their share of new home loans from 28% to 37%, according to Australian Bureau of Statistics data.
One Canberra resident said she wanted to buy a home to provide stability for her family after moving between rentals eight times in nine years.
The public servant went to two auctions where the same investor bid up prices, with his teenage son filming.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'I saw the same guy at an open house for the house we purchased and gave him a filthy look of recognition,' said the reader, who was pleased the investor didn't lodge a bid for her eventual home.
A Melbourne reader said while it wasn't always possible to identify who he was bidding against, 'it was always obvious at auctions who were the first home buyers as they bowed out first'.
Most market watchers attribute the growing influence of investors to favourable tax settings, including the Howard-era decision to halve the rate of capital gains tax.
Those settings are particularly helpful to investors when many prospective first home buyers are being priced out of the market.
Australia's intense housing problem, whereby Sydney, Adelaide, Melbourne and Brisbane are all in the top 10 least affordable global cities, has a knock-on effect across society, with foster care agencies reporting a fall in the number of applicants given many people can't afford the time and don't have the spare room to be a carer.
Some readers have turned to 'rent-vesting', a strategy of renting a home to live in while buying a more affordable property elsewhere, in the hope that capital growth will pay for a future deposit.
A Sydney reader said he and his wife tried to buy a home for 15 years.
'The most frustrating thing was watching our rent, continuously being raised, go to pay someone else's mortgage,' he said.
'We had to become part of the problem to beat the system. We had to rentvest for five years to accumulate enough equity to pay for our own home.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
Woodside beats Q2 revenue estimates, exits hydrogen project as costs bite
July 23 (Reuters) - Australia's Woodside Energy ( opens new tab reported a stronger-than-expected 8% rise in second-quarter revenue on Wednesday due to robust output from Senegal's Sangomar project, but took hefty writedowns on a failed hydrogen venture and aging offshore facilities. The revenue beat underscores the strong performance of the Sangomar project, which has contributed $510 million in revenue for the quarter. The company's overall production jumped 13% to 50.1 million barrels of oil equivalent (boe) during the quarter, up from 44.4 million boe in the same period last year. The country's top gas producer posted revenue of $3.28 billion for the three months ended June 30, surging 8% from $3.04 billion a year earlier and exceeding the Visible Alpha consensus estimate of $3.09 billion. Woodside also reduced annual unit production costs to $8-$8.50 per boe from $8.50-$9 per boe. Shares rose as much as 2.4% to a one-month high of A$25.44 by 0057 GMT, outpacing gains of over 1% in the broader energy sub-index (.AXEJ), opens new tab. However, the company said it was abandoning its H2OK hydrogen project in Oklahoma, citing cost escalation and weaker-than-expected demand in the low-carbon hydrogen sector. The exit will result in an impairment loss of about $140 million on a pre-tax basis. "We have made the decision to exit the H2OK Project, demonstrating our disciplined approach to portfolio management," the company said. Woodside also faces mounting decommissioning costs for its aging Minerva, Stybarrow and Griffin offshore facilities, with technical challenges at closed sites driving up expenses. The company expects to book $400-$500 million in pre-tax charges related to the decommissioning work. On the positive side, Woodside completed the sale of a 40% stake in its Louisiana LNG project to Stonepeak for $5.7 billion in June, with the buyer agreeing to fund 75% of the project's capital expenditures in 2025 and 2026. The company said it continues to attract interest from potential partners for further stakes. Woodside in late March agreed to sell offshore oil and gas assets in Trinidad and Tobago to London-based Perenco, which included production facilities and interests in shallow water fields. As a result of the asset sale, Woodside marginally adjusted its 2025 production forecast to between 188 million and 195 million boe, compared with its previous guidance range of 186 million to 196 million boe.
The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Australian taxpayers on the hook to pay Chevron more than $500m to clean up oil wells
The Australian government faces having to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to the American oil and gas company Chevron to help it clean up oil wells on Barrow Island, in Western Australia, under a deal made in the 1980s. The Western Australian government also faces a hefty bill – estimated to be $129m – to help repair an offshore nature reserve where about 900 wells have been drilled over the past six decades. Chevron says it has paid more than $1bn in royalties – about $3 a barrel – for oil and gas extracted from beneath the island, which is about 70km off the state's north-west coast. Under state legislation written especially for the project, federal and state taxpayers will have to pay them back about nearly half that amount to help cover remediation costs. A WA government minute obtained by independent news site Boiling Cold under freedom-of-information laws suggests it will cost Chevron and its venture partners more than $2.3bn to fix the site, which has produced 335m barrels of oil. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The legislation stipulates that the company would pay 40% of the difference between Chevron's sales revenue and operational costs, with 75% of the payment going to the federal government and 25% to WA. The legislation stated that once production ended at the site the calculation would operate in reverse. Chevron and its partners, ExxonMobil and Santos, would be refunded 40% of what they spent on decommissioning the oilfield infrastructure for the following three years, with the federal and state governments again splitting what they paid back 75%-25%. Oil production at the site stopped in May. According to the newly released documents, the WA Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety did not have an estimate of the expected cost until Nine's WA Today reported on the issue in 2022. That report suggested Chevron could spend $1.3bn on the clean-up in the covered timeframe, triggering a cost to the state of about $129m. Officials said they intended to 'approach Chevron directly to request cost estimates'. The documents do not show what those discussions yielded. Under the terms of the deal, the commonwealth would be required to pay three times as much as the state government, implying it could face a bill of $387m. It suggests a total payment to Chevron and its partners of $516m. The final sum could be higher if Chevron spends more on the clean-up before 2028 to maximise its royalty refund. In response to questions about the expected cost, a WA department spokesman said the refund cost was not included in the state budget forward estimates – covering the next four years – but the potential liability was recognised as 'a non-quantifiable contingent liability' in an annual report on state finances. The finances report acknowledged that 'a significant amount of royalties will need to be refunded' after Chevron paid the costs and the state verified and audited them. The federal Department of Industry, Science and Resources declined to comment. It is waiting on a WA government assessment of what refund is required under state law. The clean-up cost may include dealing with a gas leak near old Barrow Island oil wells that Chevron reported to the state regulator in May. The company said an unknown amount of gas was seeping to the surface near its old Barrow Island oil wells. A Chevron spokesman said data analysis had indicated 'an environmental risk from the subsurface migration of hydrocarbons, primarily gas, to groundwater and the surface'. They said the company had informed regulators and would work with them to 'develop and implement a comprehensive investigation program'. Sign up to Afternoon Update Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion The spokesperson said the company took its stewardship of Barrow Island seriously and was 'committed to the responsible management of environmental impacts and risks at our sites in accordance with relevant laws and regulations'. Mark Ogge, from the Australia Institute, said the revelation showed the 'extraordinary scale of the mismanagement of Australia's gas resources by our governments'. 'Not only have our governments been giving our resources away for free and failing to tax these foreign-owned corporations properly but they are also handing back much of the meagre royalties they have collected,' he said. 'This is entirely the responsibility of the Australian and WA governments. They had 40 years to fix this terrible deal but they have chosen not to. They need to be held to account.' A WA government database sets out the scale of the required clean-up. About 700 of the wells on the island are more than 40 years old. Up to four drilling rigs will be used to plug the wells before they are abandoned. The procedure is designed to permanently seal the oil and gas underground, usually using cement. Remediation will be needed at 16 sites contaminated with hydrocarbons. The Gorgon liquefied natural gas plant, also operated by Chevron, will remain on the island after the wells are decommissioned.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
VIEW Reaction to U.S. trade deal with Japan
July 23 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump on Tuesday said the U.S. and Japan had struck a trade deal that includes a 15% tariff that will be levied on U.S. imports from the country. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said the deal would include $550 billion of Japanese investments in the United States. KRISTINA CLIFTON, SENIOR ECONOMIST, COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA, SYDNEY: "We don't know all the details yet, apart from just that he will place a 15% tariff on imports from Japan. "It's a lower rate than what President Trump announced on Liberation Day, so to that end, it's a better outcome than potentially they could've seen. Steel, aluminium, and also cars are important exports for Japan, so it'll be interesting to see if there's any specific carve-outs for those." HIROFUMI SUZUKI, CHIEF CURRENCY STRATEGIST, SMBC, TOKYO: "This is good news for the Japanese economy. However, it alone will not prompt the Bank of Japan to raise interest rates, and the pressure to buy yen will likely be limited. If anything, political instability is having more of an impact on the market, and the pressure for yen depreciation is likely to continue."
